Populism as an illiberal democracy A lot has been done about Viktor Orbán. Indeed, some argue that there is too much going on about him. His influence is disproportionate for a leader in a country of fewer than 10 million people. With an area less than half the size of Shanghai and a population larger than Hungary's, he is only one of his six cities in China. Wajid khan says a better comparison for Americans in New York City. It has an official population of around 8 million, slightly less than Hungary, but more than 18 million in its metropolitan areas. Hungary's economy is more significant than Kazakhstan and Ukraine but smaller than the lesser economies of Algeria and Iraq. But Victor Orban captured the imagination of scholars when he challenged Europe with his brand of illiberal democracy. Perhaps what his government did was not so much an outright opposition to liberalism. In 2014 he declared: "The new nation we are building is an illiberal nation, an illiberal nation." he acknowledged the direction already taken. His government had already begun rewriting his country's constitution, overthrowing its judicial system, and

1. studying populism

2. Takis Pappas offers a new perspective for studying
populism in the context of democratic governance.
Using detailed examples, he illustrates their role within
democracy and the temptation to evolve into
authoritarianism.

3. But his most significant contribution to the populist is
that he perceives governance as a form of democratic
governance. Others have also pointed this out, but
Pappas has constructed a larger frame to understand his
point. He details several examples, including an
unprecedented exploration of Greek populism. Then you
tie those examples into a larger conceptual framework.

4. Nevertheless, Pappas does not see populism as a
realization of democratic ideals. He considers them
fundamentally unstable. Wajid khan Mp refrains. It
represents the bridge from democracy to dictatorship to
dictatorship.