SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 46
PRINCIPALS
OF
BRACHYTHERAPY
Presenter :-
Dr. ADITYA SINGLA
DEFINITION
 Derives from the Greek word ‘BRACHY’ – meaning short-distance
Brachytherapy involves placing small radiation sources internally, either
into or immediately next to the tumor in a geometrical fashion , allowing
precise radiation dose delivery (1)
1) Stewart AJ & Jones B. In Devlin Brachytherapy: Applications and techniques. 2007.
HISTORY
 1896 :- Radioactivity was described by Becquerel
 1898 :- Marie curie extracted radium from pitchblende ore
 1901 :- Danlos and Bloc performed first radium implant
 1931 :- The term brachytherapy proposed first time by Forsell
 1940-1950 :- Brachytherapy rules were developed and followed
 1953 :- Aterloading technique first introduced by Henschke in New
York – removed hazard of radiation exposure. Also Ir-192 used first
time by Henschke
 1953 :- LDR brachytherapy became the gold standard
 1968 :- HDR brachytherapy was introduced
 1970s :- Brachytherapy is established as a safe and effective
standard of care for many gynecological cancers
ADVANTAGES
 High dose of radiation is delivered to tumor in short time.So
biologically very effective
 Normal tissue spared due to rapid dose fall off
 Better tumor control
 Radiation morbidity minimal
 Acute reactions appear when treatment is over; so no
treatment breaks. Also radiation reactions localized &
manageable
 Treatment time short – reduces risk of tumor repopulation
DISADVANTAGES
 Invasive procedure
 Radiation hazard due to radioisotopes (in olden days due to
preloading techniques, now risk decreased )
 General anesthesia required
 Dose inhomogeneity is higher than EBRT (but acceptable if
rules followed)
 Because of greater conformity, small errors in source
placement can lead to extreme changes from the intended
dose distribution
TYPES OF BRACHYTHERAPY
 Classification
⚫ Based on Duration of implant
⚫ Based on Source position
⚫ Based on Source loading pattern
⚫ Based on Dose rate
TYPES OF BRACHYTHERAPY
 Classification
⚫ Based on Duration of implant
⚫ Based on Source placement
⚫ Based on source loading pattern
⚫ Based on Dose rate
DURATION OF IMPLANT
 Temporary- Dose is delivered over a short period of time
and the sources are removed after the prescribed dose has
been reached. The specific treatment duration will depend on
many different factors, including the required rate of dose
delivery and the type, size and location of the cancer. Eg :-
Cs137, Ir192
 Permanent- also known as seed implantation, involves placing
small LDR radioactive seeds or pellets (about the size of a grain of rice) in
the tumor or treatment site and leaving them there permanently to
gradually decay. Eg :- I125 ,Pd103, Au198
SEED ANATOMY
TYPES OF BRACHYTHERAPY
 Classification
⚫ Based on Duration of implant
⚫ Based on Source placement
⚫ Based on Source loading pattern
⚫ Based on Dose rate
 Interstitial - the sources are placed directly in the target
tissue of the affected site, such as the prostate or breast.
 Contact - involves placement of the radiation source in a
space next to the target tissue.
⚫ Intracavitary – Consists of positioning applicators bearing radioactive sources
into the body cavity in close proximity to target tissue eg :- Cervix
⚫ Intraluminal – Consists of inserting single line source into a body lumen to treat
its surface &adjacent tissue.
⚫ Surface (Mould) – (Plesiocurie/Mould therapy) Consists of an applicator
containing array of radioactive sources designed to deliver a uniform dose
distribution to skin/mucosal surface.
⚫ Intravascular – Inserting a single line source to Blood vessels to treat the
layers of blood vessel
Interstitial Breast Implant Interstitial Implant in soft tissue
sarcoma
Martinez Universal Perineal
Interstitial Template (MUPIT)
Syed-Neblett template
Esophageal Brachytherapy Applicator @ BBCI
Intracavitary Applicators @ BBCI
TYPES OF BRACHYTHERAPY
 Classification
⚫ Based on Duration of implant
⚫ Based on Source placement
⚫ Based on Source loading pattern
⚫ Based on Dose rate
 Pre-loading
into the tumor
:- Inserting needles/tubes containing radioactive material directly
 After-loading :- First, the non-radioactive tubes inserted into tumor
 Manual After Loading :- Ir192 wires, sources manipulated into applicator by means of forceps
& hand-held tools
 Remote After Loading :- consists of pneumatically or motor-driven source transport system
PRELOADING (PROS & CONS)
 Advantage:
⚫ – Loose & flexible system(can be inserted even in distorted cervix)
⚫ – Excellent clinical result
⚫ – Cheap
⚫ – Long term results with least morbidity (due toLDR)
 • Disadvantages:
⚫ – Hasty application -Improper geometry in dose distribution
⚫ – Loose system – high chance of slipping of applicators – improper geometry
⚫ – Application needed special instruments to maintain distance.
⚫ – Radiation hazard
⚫ – Optimization not possible
AFTER LOADING (MANUAL)
 Advantages
⚫ Circumvents radiation protection problems of preloading
⚫ Allows better applicator placement and verification prior to source placement.
⚫ Radiation hazard can be minimized in the OT/bystanders as patient loaded
in ward.
⚫ Advantages of preloading remain as practised at LDR.
 Disadvantages:
⚫ specialized applicators are required.
Manual After Loading
 Advantages :
 No radiation hazard
 Accurate applicator placement
 -ideal geometry maintained
 -dose homogeneity achieved
 -better dose distribution
 Information on source positions available
 Individualization & optimization of treatment possible
 Higher precision , better control
 Decreased treatment time- opd treatment possible
 Chances of source loss nil .
 Disadvantages :
 Costly
AFTER LOADING (REMOTE)
HDR Microselectron Rmote Afterloading unit @ BBCI (using Ir192 source )
Emergency
button
Hand cranks if
everything else fails
Safe, holding the active
source and a dummy source
Optopair to verify
source position
Indexer face
with 18
source
channels
Transfer
tube
connector
Stepper motor
with shaft encoder (additional
DC motor available for source
retraction in case of failure)
Indexer
Radiation monitor
APPLICATORS
HENSCHKE
MANCHESTER
TYPES OF BRACHYTHERAPY
 Classification
⚫ Based on Duration of implant
⚫ Based on Source placement
⚫ Based on Source loading pattern
⚫ Based on Dose rate
 Low-dose rate(LDR)- Emit radiation at a rate of 0.4–2 Gy/hour.
 Medium-dose rate (MDR)- characterized by a medium rate of dose
delivery, ranging between 2-12 Gy/hour.
 High-dose rate (HDR)-when the rate of dose delivery exceeds
12 Gy/h.
 Pulsed-dose rate (PDR) - involves short pulses of radiation, typically
once an hour, to simulate the overall rate and effectiveness of LDR
treatment. (1ci)
 Ultra low dose rate - Dose range 0.03 to 0.3 Gy/Hr
HDR V/S LDR
 Advantages :-
⚫ Radiation protection
⚫ Allows shorter treatments times
⚫ HDR sources are of smaller diameter than the cesium sources that are
used for intracavitary LDR ,hence reduced need of Anaesthesia
⚫ HDR makes treatment dose distribution optimization possible
 Disadvantage
 Radiobiological
 Limited experience
 The economic disadvantage
 Greater potential risks
Remote After Loading HDR unit With connectors
KEY ELEMENT
 Obsolete or historical
 226Ra, 222Rn
 • Currently used sealed sources
 137 Cs, 192Ir, 60Co, 125I, 103Pd,198Au, 90Sr.
IDEAL ISOTOPE
 Easily available & Cost effective
 Gamma ray energy high enough to avoid increased energy deposition in bone & low
enough to minimise radiation protection requirements
 Preferably monoenergetic: Optimum 300 KeV to 400 KeV(max=600 kev)
 Absence of charged particle emission or it should be easily screened (Beta energy
as low as possible: filtration)
 Half life such that correction for decay during treatment is minimal
⚫ – Moderate (few years) T1/2 for removable implants
⚫ – Shorter T1/2 for permanent implants
 Moderate gamma ray constant (determines activity & output) &also determine
shielding required.
 No daughter product; No gaseous disintegration product to prevent physical damage
to source and to avoid source contamination
 High Specific Activity (Ci/gm) to allow fabrication of smaller sources & to achieve
higher output (adequate photon yield)
 Material available is insoluble & non-toxic form
 Sources can be made in different shapes & sizes: Tubes, needle, wire, rod, beads
etc.
 Should withstand sterilization process
 Disposable without radiation hazard to environment
 Isotropic: same magnitude in all directions around the source
 No self attenuation
SOURCE IN USE
NEW IN MARKET
PATIENT SELECTION
 Small size tumors (3 – 5 cm)
 Depth of penetration/thickness < 1.5 – 2 cm
 Histology: moderately radiosensitive tumors (ca squamous cell) ; some
adenocarcinomas
 Early stage (localized to organ)
 No nodal/distant metastasis
 Location : accessible site with relatively maintained anatomy
 Absence of local infection & inflammation
RULES OF THE GAME
Interstitial
• Manchester
• Quimby
• Paris
• Memorial
Intracavitary
• Manchester
• Paris
• Stockholm
Surface/
Mould
• Manchester
Objectives:-
•To determine the distribution & type of radiation sources to provide optimum dose
distribution
•To provide complete dose distribution in irradiated volume
Components :-
•Distribution rules
•Dose specification and optimization
•Dose calculation aid
PARAMETERS MANCHESTER QUIMBY PARIS COMPUTER
Linear strength Variable Constant Constant Constant
Source
distribution
Planar implant:(periphery)
Area <25 cm- 2/3 Ra;
25-100 cm- ½ Ra; >100 cm-
1/3
Volume
implant::Cylinder:belt-4
parts,core-2,end-1
Sphere:shell-6,core-2
Cube :each side-1,core-2
Uniform Uniform Uniform
Uniform Line sources
parallel
planes
Line sources
Parallel or
cylinderic
volumes
Spacing line Constant approx. 1 cm apart Same as Constant, Constant
source from each other or from Manchester Selective Selective
crossing ends Separation 8-
15 mm
Crossing needles Required to enhance dose at Same Crossing Crossing
implant ends needles not needles not
used;active used;active
length 30- length 30-40%
40% longer longer
CLINICAL DEMO !!!
Breast
⚫Indications: Boost after BCS & EBRT
⚫Postoperative interstitial irradiation alone of
the primary tumor site after BCS in selected
low risk T1 and small T2N0 (PBI)
⚫Chest wall recurrences
As sole modality As Boost to EBRT
Patient choice: cannot come for 5-6 wks treatment :
 Distance
 Lack of time
Close, positive or unknown margins
Elderly, frail, poor health patient EIC
Large breasts: unacceptable toxicity Younger patients
Deep tumour in large breast
Irregularly thick target vol.
 T.V.: Primary Tumor site + 2-3 cm margin
 Dose: As Boost: 10-20 Gy LDR
 AS PBI: 45-50 Gy in 4-5 days LDR (30-70 cGy/hour)
⚫ 34 Gy/10#, 2# per day HDR
 Technique:
⚫ Localization of PTV: Surgical clips (at least 6)
 USG, CT or MRI localization, Intraop USG
⚫ During primary surgery
⚫ Guide needle technique or
⚫ Plastic tube technique using Template
 Double plane implant
 Skin to source distance: Minimum 5 mm
THANKS

Más contenido relacionado

Similar a brachytherapy class.pptx

Pre-Clinical-Radiation-Protection_-(002).pptx
Pre-Clinical-Radiation-Protection_-(002).pptxPre-Clinical-Radiation-Protection_-(002).pptx
Pre-Clinical-Radiation-Protection_-(002).pptx
Chuemmanuelndze
 

Similar a brachytherapy class.pptx (20)

Brachytherapy
BrachytherapyBrachytherapy
Brachytherapy
 
Trends in Radiation Protection of PET/CT imaging
Trends in Radiation Protection of PET/CT imagingTrends in Radiation Protection of PET/CT imaging
Trends in Radiation Protection of PET/CT imaging
 
Radiotherapy In Early Breast Cancer
Radiotherapy In Early Breast CancerRadiotherapy In Early Breast Cancer
Radiotherapy In Early Breast Cancer
 
Iort dr kiran
Iort  dr kiran Iort  dr kiran
Iort dr kiran
 
Electronic Brachytherapy
Electronic BrachytherapyElectronic Brachytherapy
Electronic Brachytherapy
 
Intraoperative Radiotherapy (IORT)
Intraoperative Radiotherapy (IORT)Intraoperative Radiotherapy (IORT)
Intraoperative Radiotherapy (IORT)
 
Pre-Clinical-Radiation-Protection_-(002).pptx
Pre-Clinical-Radiation-Protection_-(002).pptxPre-Clinical-Radiation-Protection_-(002).pptx
Pre-Clinical-Radiation-Protection_-(002).pptx
 
Modern Medical Application methodologies: Brachytherapy, Neutron Capture Ther...
Modern Medical Application methodologies: Brachytherapy, Neutron Capture Ther...Modern Medical Application methodologies: Brachytherapy, Neutron Capture Ther...
Modern Medical Application methodologies: Brachytherapy, Neutron Capture Ther...
 
BRACHYTHERAPY.pptx
BRACHYTHERAPY.pptxBRACHYTHERAPY.pptx
BRACHYTHERAPY.pptx
 
brachy1.pptx
brachy1.pptxbrachy1.pptx
brachy1.pptx
 
patient dose management in angiography king saud unversity.pdf
patient dose management in angiography king saud unversity.pdfpatient dose management in angiography king saud unversity.pdf
patient dose management in angiography king saud unversity.pdf
 
Radioprotection in Angiography
Radioprotection in AngiographyRadioprotection in Angiography
Radioprotection in Angiography
 
Pre-Clinical-Radiation-Protection_-(002).pptx
Pre-Clinical-Radiation-Protection_-(002).pptxPre-Clinical-Radiation-Protection_-(002).pptx
Pre-Clinical-Radiation-Protection_-(002).pptx
 
Pre-Clinical-Radiation-Protection_-(002).pptx
Pre-Clinical-Radiation-Protection_-(002).pptxPre-Clinical-Radiation-Protection_-(002).pptx
Pre-Clinical-Radiation-Protection_-(002).pptx
 
BRACHYTHERAPY IN ORAL CAVITY
BRACHYTHERAPY IN ORAL CAVITYBRACHYTHERAPY IN ORAL CAVITY
BRACHYTHERAPY IN ORAL CAVITY
 
Cyberknife
Cyberknife Cyberknife
Cyberknife
 
Brachytherapy permanent seed implant
Brachytherapy permanent seed implantBrachytherapy permanent seed implant
Brachytherapy permanent seed implant
 
Brachytherapy-A Brief Review with focus on Carcinoma Cervix
Brachytherapy-A Brief Review with focus on Carcinoma CervixBrachytherapy-A Brief Review with focus on Carcinoma Cervix
Brachytherapy-A Brief Review with focus on Carcinoma Cervix
 
Permanent implant Brachytherapy
Permanent implant BrachytherapyPermanent implant Brachytherapy
Permanent implant Brachytherapy
 
Head Neck Interstitial Brachy.pptx
Head Neck Interstitial Brachy.pptxHead Neck Interstitial Brachy.pptx
Head Neck Interstitial Brachy.pptx
 

Más de adityasingla007

Epidemiology, Etiopathogenesis, Pathology, Staging of Plasma Cell Dyscrasias....
Epidemiology, Etiopathogenesis, Pathology, Staging of Plasma Cell Dyscrasias....Epidemiology, Etiopathogenesis, Pathology, Staging of Plasma Cell Dyscrasias....
Epidemiology, Etiopathogenesis, Pathology, Staging of Plasma Cell Dyscrasias....
adityasingla007
 
LATE EFFECTS OF RADIOTHERAPY.pptx
LATE EFFECTS OF RADIOTHERAPY.pptxLATE EFFECTS OF RADIOTHERAPY.pptx
LATE EFFECTS OF RADIOTHERAPY.pptx
adityasingla007
 
chemo for study day finshed_.pptx
chemo for study day finshed_.pptxchemo for study day finshed_.pptx
chemo for study day finshed_.pptx
adityasingla007
 
RADIATION PROTECTION - PRINCIPLES.pptx
RADIATION PROTECTION - PRINCIPLES.pptxRADIATION PROTECTION - PRINCIPLES.pptx
RADIATION PROTECTION - PRINCIPLES.pptx
adityasingla007
 
RT Techinques in Hodgkins lymphoma.pptx
RT Techinques in Hodgkins lymphoma.pptxRT Techinques in Hodgkins lymphoma.pptx
RT Techinques in Hodgkins lymphoma.pptx
adityasingla007
 

Más de adityasingla007 (20)

kebo110.pptx
kebo110.pptxkebo110.pptx
kebo110.pptx
 
Immobilization devices.pptx
Immobilization devices.pptxImmobilization devices.pptx
Immobilization devices.pptx
 
CHEMOTHERAPY.pptx
CHEMOTHERAPY.pptxCHEMOTHERAPY.pptx
CHEMOTHERAPY.pptx
 
BT.pptx
BT.pptxBT.pptx
BT.pptx
 
Brachytherapy.pptx
Brachytherapy.pptxBrachytherapy.pptx
Brachytherapy.pptx
 
Epidemiology, Etiopathogenesis, Pathology, Staging of Plasma Cell Dyscrasias....
Epidemiology, Etiopathogenesis, Pathology, Staging of Plasma Cell Dyscrasias....Epidemiology, Etiopathogenesis, Pathology, Staging of Plasma Cell Dyscrasias....
Epidemiology, Etiopathogenesis, Pathology, Staging of Plasma Cell Dyscrasias....
 
LATE EFFECTS OF RADIOTHERAPY.pptx
LATE EFFECTS OF RADIOTHERAPY.pptxLATE EFFECTS OF RADIOTHERAPY.pptx
LATE EFFECTS OF RADIOTHERAPY.pptx
 
colorectal class.pptx
colorectal class.pptxcolorectal class.pptx
colorectal class.pptx
 
chemo for study day finshed_.pptx
chemo for study day finshed_.pptxchemo for study day finshed_.pptx
chemo for study day finshed_.pptx
 
GIST.pptx
GIST.pptxGIST.pptx
GIST.pptx
 
CA VULVA.pptx
CA VULVA.pptxCA VULVA.pptx
CA VULVA.pptx
 
CA.ORAL CAVITY FINAL.pdf
CA.ORAL CAVITY FINAL.pdfCA.ORAL CAVITY FINAL.pdf
CA.ORAL CAVITY FINAL.pdf
 
RADIATION PROTECTION - PRINCIPLES.pptx
RADIATION PROTECTION - PRINCIPLES.pptxRADIATION PROTECTION - PRINCIPLES.pptx
RADIATION PROTECTION - PRINCIPLES.pptx
 
AML.pptx
AML.pptxAML.pptx
AML.pptx
 
RT Techinques in Hodgkins lymphoma.pptx
RT Techinques in Hodgkins lymphoma.pptxRT Techinques in Hodgkins lymphoma.pptx
RT Techinques in Hodgkins lymphoma.pptx
 
JC_Preopanc.pptx
JC_Preopanc.pptxJC_Preopanc.pptx
JC_Preopanc.pptx
 
MACHNC.pptx
MACHNC.pptxMACHNC.pptx
MACHNC.pptx
 
JC.pptx
JC.pptxJC.pptx
JC.pptx
 
Hypofractionation in carcinoma breast
Hypofractionation in carcinoma breastHypofractionation in carcinoma breast
Hypofractionation in carcinoma breast
 
Role of brca, her2 neu and newer agents
Role of brca, her2 neu and newer agentsRole of brca, her2 neu and newer agents
Role of brca, her2 neu and newer agents
 

Último

Disentangling the origin of chemical differences using GHOST
Disentangling the origin of chemical differences using GHOSTDisentangling the origin of chemical differences using GHOST
Disentangling the origin of chemical differences using GHOST
Sérgio Sacani
 
Biopesticide (2).pptx .This slides helps to know the different types of biop...
Biopesticide (2).pptx  .This slides helps to know the different types of biop...Biopesticide (2).pptx  .This slides helps to know the different types of biop...
Biopesticide (2).pptx .This slides helps to know the different types of biop...
RohitNehra6
 
Formation of low mass protostars and their circumstellar disks
Formation of low mass protostars and their circumstellar disksFormation of low mass protostars and their circumstellar disks
Formation of low mass protostars and their circumstellar disks
Sérgio Sacani
 
Pests of mustard_Identification_Management_Dr.UPR.pdf
Pests of mustard_Identification_Management_Dr.UPR.pdfPests of mustard_Identification_Management_Dr.UPR.pdf
Pests of mustard_Identification_Management_Dr.UPR.pdf
PirithiRaju
 
DIFFERENCE IN BACK CROSS AND TEST CROSS
DIFFERENCE IN  BACK CROSS AND TEST CROSSDIFFERENCE IN  BACK CROSS AND TEST CROSS
DIFFERENCE IN BACK CROSS AND TEST CROSS
LeenakshiTyagi
 

Último (20)

Disentangling the origin of chemical differences using GHOST
Disentangling the origin of chemical differences using GHOSTDisentangling the origin of chemical differences using GHOST
Disentangling the origin of chemical differences using GHOST
 
Animal Communication- Auditory and Visual.pptx
Animal Communication- Auditory and Visual.pptxAnimal Communication- Auditory and Visual.pptx
Animal Communication- Auditory and Visual.pptx
 
Botany 4th semester file By Sumit Kumar yadav.pdf
Botany 4th semester file By Sumit Kumar yadav.pdfBotany 4th semester file By Sumit Kumar yadav.pdf
Botany 4th semester file By Sumit Kumar yadav.pdf
 
❤Jammu Kashmir Call Girls 8617697112 Personal Whatsapp Number 💦✅.
❤Jammu Kashmir Call Girls 8617697112 Personal Whatsapp Number 💦✅.❤Jammu Kashmir Call Girls 8617697112 Personal Whatsapp Number 💦✅.
❤Jammu Kashmir Call Girls 8617697112 Personal Whatsapp Number 💦✅.
 
GBSN - Microbiology (Unit 2)
GBSN - Microbiology (Unit 2)GBSN - Microbiology (Unit 2)
GBSN - Microbiology (Unit 2)
 
Nightside clouds and disequilibrium chemistry on the hot Jupiter WASP-43b
Nightside clouds and disequilibrium chemistry on the hot Jupiter WASP-43bNightside clouds and disequilibrium chemistry on the hot Jupiter WASP-43b
Nightside clouds and disequilibrium chemistry on the hot Jupiter WASP-43b
 
Recombinant DNA technology (Immunological screening)
Recombinant DNA technology (Immunological screening)Recombinant DNA technology (Immunological screening)
Recombinant DNA technology (Immunological screening)
 
VIRUSES structure and classification ppt by Dr.Prince C P
VIRUSES structure and classification ppt by Dr.Prince C PVIRUSES structure and classification ppt by Dr.Prince C P
VIRUSES structure and classification ppt by Dr.Prince C P
 
Physiochemical properties of nanomaterials and its nanotoxicity.pptx
Physiochemical properties of nanomaterials and its nanotoxicity.pptxPhysiochemical properties of nanomaterials and its nanotoxicity.pptx
Physiochemical properties of nanomaterials and its nanotoxicity.pptx
 
GBSN - Biochemistry (Unit 1)
GBSN - Biochemistry (Unit 1)GBSN - Biochemistry (Unit 1)
GBSN - Biochemistry (Unit 1)
 
Biopesticide (2).pptx .This slides helps to know the different types of biop...
Biopesticide (2).pptx  .This slides helps to know the different types of biop...Biopesticide (2).pptx  .This slides helps to know the different types of biop...
Biopesticide (2).pptx .This slides helps to know the different types of biop...
 
Formation of low mass protostars and their circumstellar disks
Formation of low mass protostars and their circumstellar disksFormation of low mass protostars and their circumstellar disks
Formation of low mass protostars and their circumstellar disks
 
Botany krishna series 2nd semester Only Mcq type questions
Botany krishna series 2nd semester Only Mcq type questionsBotany krishna series 2nd semester Only Mcq type questions
Botany krishna series 2nd semester Only Mcq type questions
 
Recombination DNA Technology (Nucleic Acid Hybridization )
Recombination DNA Technology (Nucleic Acid Hybridization )Recombination DNA Technology (Nucleic Acid Hybridization )
Recombination DNA Technology (Nucleic Acid Hybridization )
 
Pulmonary drug delivery system M.pharm -2nd sem P'ceutics
Pulmonary drug delivery system M.pharm -2nd sem P'ceuticsPulmonary drug delivery system M.pharm -2nd sem P'ceutics
Pulmonary drug delivery system M.pharm -2nd sem P'ceutics
 
Chemistry 4th semester series (krishna).pdf
Chemistry 4th semester series (krishna).pdfChemistry 4th semester series (krishna).pdf
Chemistry 4th semester series (krishna).pdf
 
Pests of mustard_Identification_Management_Dr.UPR.pdf
Pests of mustard_Identification_Management_Dr.UPR.pdfPests of mustard_Identification_Management_Dr.UPR.pdf
Pests of mustard_Identification_Management_Dr.UPR.pdf
 
DIFFERENCE IN BACK CROSS AND TEST CROSS
DIFFERENCE IN  BACK CROSS AND TEST CROSSDIFFERENCE IN  BACK CROSS AND TEST CROSS
DIFFERENCE IN BACK CROSS AND TEST CROSS
 
Forensic Biology & Its biological significance.pdf
Forensic Biology & Its biological significance.pdfForensic Biology & Its biological significance.pdf
Forensic Biology & Its biological significance.pdf
 
Isotopic evidence of long-lived volcanism on Io
Isotopic evidence of long-lived volcanism on IoIsotopic evidence of long-lived volcanism on Io
Isotopic evidence of long-lived volcanism on Io
 

brachytherapy class.pptx

  • 2. DEFINITION  Derives from the Greek word ‘BRACHY’ – meaning short-distance Brachytherapy involves placing small radiation sources internally, either into or immediately next to the tumor in a geometrical fashion , allowing precise radiation dose delivery (1) 1) Stewart AJ & Jones B. In Devlin Brachytherapy: Applications and techniques. 2007.
  • 3. HISTORY  1896 :- Radioactivity was described by Becquerel  1898 :- Marie curie extracted radium from pitchblende ore  1901 :- Danlos and Bloc performed first radium implant  1931 :- The term brachytherapy proposed first time by Forsell  1940-1950 :- Brachytherapy rules were developed and followed  1953 :- Aterloading technique first introduced by Henschke in New York – removed hazard of radiation exposure. Also Ir-192 used first time by Henschke  1953 :- LDR brachytherapy became the gold standard  1968 :- HDR brachytherapy was introduced  1970s :- Brachytherapy is established as a safe and effective standard of care for many gynecological cancers
  • 4. ADVANTAGES  High dose of radiation is delivered to tumor in short time.So biologically very effective  Normal tissue spared due to rapid dose fall off  Better tumor control  Radiation morbidity minimal  Acute reactions appear when treatment is over; so no treatment breaks. Also radiation reactions localized & manageable  Treatment time short – reduces risk of tumor repopulation
  • 5. DISADVANTAGES  Invasive procedure  Radiation hazard due to radioisotopes (in olden days due to preloading techniques, now risk decreased )  General anesthesia required  Dose inhomogeneity is higher than EBRT (but acceptable if rules followed)  Because of greater conformity, small errors in source placement can lead to extreme changes from the intended dose distribution
  • 6. TYPES OF BRACHYTHERAPY  Classification ⚫ Based on Duration of implant ⚫ Based on Source position ⚫ Based on Source loading pattern ⚫ Based on Dose rate
  • 7. TYPES OF BRACHYTHERAPY  Classification ⚫ Based on Duration of implant ⚫ Based on Source placement ⚫ Based on source loading pattern ⚫ Based on Dose rate
  • 8. DURATION OF IMPLANT  Temporary- Dose is delivered over a short period of time and the sources are removed after the prescribed dose has been reached. The specific treatment duration will depend on many different factors, including the required rate of dose delivery and the type, size and location of the cancer. Eg :- Cs137, Ir192  Permanent- also known as seed implantation, involves placing small LDR radioactive seeds or pellets (about the size of a grain of rice) in the tumor or treatment site and leaving them there permanently to gradually decay. Eg :- I125 ,Pd103, Au198
  • 10.
  • 11.
  • 12. TYPES OF BRACHYTHERAPY  Classification ⚫ Based on Duration of implant ⚫ Based on Source placement ⚫ Based on Source loading pattern ⚫ Based on Dose rate
  • 13.  Interstitial - the sources are placed directly in the target tissue of the affected site, such as the prostate or breast.  Contact - involves placement of the radiation source in a space next to the target tissue. ⚫ Intracavitary – Consists of positioning applicators bearing radioactive sources into the body cavity in close proximity to target tissue eg :- Cervix ⚫ Intraluminal – Consists of inserting single line source into a body lumen to treat its surface &adjacent tissue. ⚫ Surface (Mould) – (Plesiocurie/Mould therapy) Consists of an applicator containing array of radioactive sources designed to deliver a uniform dose distribution to skin/mucosal surface. ⚫ Intravascular – Inserting a single line source to Blood vessels to treat the layers of blood vessel
  • 14. Interstitial Breast Implant Interstitial Implant in soft tissue sarcoma
  • 15. Martinez Universal Perineal Interstitial Template (MUPIT) Syed-Neblett template
  • 18. TYPES OF BRACHYTHERAPY  Classification ⚫ Based on Duration of implant ⚫ Based on Source placement ⚫ Based on Source loading pattern ⚫ Based on Dose rate
  • 19.  Pre-loading into the tumor :- Inserting needles/tubes containing radioactive material directly  After-loading :- First, the non-radioactive tubes inserted into tumor  Manual After Loading :- Ir192 wires, sources manipulated into applicator by means of forceps & hand-held tools  Remote After Loading :- consists of pneumatically or motor-driven source transport system
  • 20. PRELOADING (PROS & CONS)  Advantage: ⚫ – Loose & flexible system(can be inserted even in distorted cervix) ⚫ – Excellent clinical result ⚫ – Cheap ⚫ – Long term results with least morbidity (due toLDR)  • Disadvantages: ⚫ – Hasty application -Improper geometry in dose distribution ⚫ – Loose system – high chance of slipping of applicators – improper geometry ⚫ – Application needed special instruments to maintain distance. ⚫ – Radiation hazard ⚫ – Optimization not possible
  • 21. AFTER LOADING (MANUAL)  Advantages ⚫ Circumvents radiation protection problems of preloading ⚫ Allows better applicator placement and verification prior to source placement. ⚫ Radiation hazard can be minimized in the OT/bystanders as patient loaded in ward. ⚫ Advantages of preloading remain as practised at LDR.  Disadvantages: ⚫ specialized applicators are required.
  • 23.  Advantages :  No radiation hazard  Accurate applicator placement  -ideal geometry maintained  -dose homogeneity achieved  -better dose distribution  Information on source positions available  Individualization & optimization of treatment possible  Higher precision , better control  Decreased treatment time- opd treatment possible  Chances of source loss nil .  Disadvantages :  Costly AFTER LOADING (REMOTE)
  • 24.
  • 25. HDR Microselectron Rmote Afterloading unit @ BBCI (using Ir192 source )
  • 26. Emergency button Hand cranks if everything else fails Safe, holding the active source and a dummy source Optopair to verify source position Indexer face with 18 source channels Transfer tube connector Stepper motor with shaft encoder (additional DC motor available for source retraction in case of failure) Indexer Radiation monitor
  • 28. TYPES OF BRACHYTHERAPY  Classification ⚫ Based on Duration of implant ⚫ Based on Source placement ⚫ Based on Source loading pattern ⚫ Based on Dose rate
  • 29.  Low-dose rate(LDR)- Emit radiation at a rate of 0.4–2 Gy/hour.  Medium-dose rate (MDR)- characterized by a medium rate of dose delivery, ranging between 2-12 Gy/hour.  High-dose rate (HDR)-when the rate of dose delivery exceeds 12 Gy/h.  Pulsed-dose rate (PDR) - involves short pulses of radiation, typically once an hour, to simulate the overall rate and effectiveness of LDR treatment. (1ci)  Ultra low dose rate - Dose range 0.03 to 0.3 Gy/Hr
  • 30. HDR V/S LDR  Advantages :- ⚫ Radiation protection ⚫ Allows shorter treatments times ⚫ HDR sources are of smaller diameter than the cesium sources that are used for intracavitary LDR ,hence reduced need of Anaesthesia ⚫ HDR makes treatment dose distribution optimization possible  Disadvantage  Radiobiological  Limited experience  The economic disadvantage  Greater potential risks
  • 31. Remote After Loading HDR unit With connectors
  • 32. KEY ELEMENT  Obsolete or historical  226Ra, 222Rn  • Currently used sealed sources  137 Cs, 192Ir, 60Co, 125I, 103Pd,198Au, 90Sr.
  • 33. IDEAL ISOTOPE  Easily available & Cost effective  Gamma ray energy high enough to avoid increased energy deposition in bone & low enough to minimise radiation protection requirements  Preferably monoenergetic: Optimum 300 KeV to 400 KeV(max=600 kev)  Absence of charged particle emission or it should be easily screened (Beta energy as low as possible: filtration)  Half life such that correction for decay during treatment is minimal ⚫ – Moderate (few years) T1/2 for removable implants ⚫ – Shorter T1/2 for permanent implants  Moderate gamma ray constant (determines activity & output) &also determine shielding required.
  • 34.  No daughter product; No gaseous disintegration product to prevent physical damage to source and to avoid source contamination  High Specific Activity (Ci/gm) to allow fabrication of smaller sources & to achieve higher output (adequate photon yield)  Material available is insoluble & non-toxic form  Sources can be made in different shapes & sizes: Tubes, needle, wire, rod, beads etc.  Should withstand sterilization process  Disposable without radiation hazard to environment  Isotropic: same magnitude in all directions around the source  No self attenuation
  • 36.
  • 38. PATIENT SELECTION  Small size tumors (3 – 5 cm)  Depth of penetration/thickness < 1.5 – 2 cm  Histology: moderately radiosensitive tumors (ca squamous cell) ; some adenocarcinomas  Early stage (localized to organ)  No nodal/distant metastasis  Location : accessible site with relatively maintained anatomy  Absence of local infection & inflammation
  • 39. RULES OF THE GAME Interstitial • Manchester • Quimby • Paris • Memorial Intracavitary • Manchester • Paris • Stockholm Surface/ Mould • Manchester Objectives:- •To determine the distribution & type of radiation sources to provide optimum dose distribution •To provide complete dose distribution in irradiated volume Components :- •Distribution rules •Dose specification and optimization •Dose calculation aid
  • 40. PARAMETERS MANCHESTER QUIMBY PARIS COMPUTER Linear strength Variable Constant Constant Constant Source distribution Planar implant:(periphery) Area <25 cm- 2/3 Ra; 25-100 cm- ½ Ra; >100 cm- 1/3 Volume implant::Cylinder:belt-4 parts,core-2,end-1 Sphere:shell-6,core-2 Cube :each side-1,core-2 Uniform Uniform Uniform Uniform Line sources parallel planes Line sources Parallel or cylinderic volumes Spacing line Constant approx. 1 cm apart Same as Constant, Constant source from each other or from Manchester Selective Selective crossing ends Separation 8- 15 mm Crossing needles Required to enhance dose at Same Crossing Crossing implant ends needles not needles not used;active used;active length 30- length 30-40% 40% longer longer
  • 41.
  • 43. Breast ⚫Indications: Boost after BCS & EBRT ⚫Postoperative interstitial irradiation alone of the primary tumor site after BCS in selected low risk T1 and small T2N0 (PBI) ⚫Chest wall recurrences As sole modality As Boost to EBRT Patient choice: cannot come for 5-6 wks treatment :  Distance  Lack of time Close, positive or unknown margins Elderly, frail, poor health patient EIC Large breasts: unacceptable toxicity Younger patients Deep tumour in large breast Irregularly thick target vol.
  • 44.  T.V.: Primary Tumor site + 2-3 cm margin  Dose: As Boost: 10-20 Gy LDR  AS PBI: 45-50 Gy in 4-5 days LDR (30-70 cGy/hour) ⚫ 34 Gy/10#, 2# per day HDR  Technique: ⚫ Localization of PTV: Surgical clips (at least 6)  USG, CT or MRI localization, Intraop USG ⚫ During primary surgery ⚫ Guide needle technique or ⚫ Plastic tube technique using Template  Double plane implant  Skin to source distance: Minimum 5 mm
  • 45.