Call Girls Talegaon Dabhade Call Me 7737669865 Budget Friendly No Advance Boo...
Managing ecosystems using low cost protected cultivation with agroforestry leaf biomass transfer
1. Simon Mng'omba
World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), Lilongwe
8th November 2016
Chitedze, Lilongwe
Managing Ecosystems using Low-cost Protected
Cultivation with Agroforestry Leaf Biomass Transfer:
Fruit and Vegetable Production in Malawi
2. PRESENTATION OUTLINE
Introduction
• global fruit & vegetable production
• open vs protected cultivation
• negative impacts of open cultivation
Production technologies
• Keyhole gardens
• Hydroponics
Evidence of fertiliser tree biomass on fruit yield
• Effect of organic fertilizer on paprika yield
• Protected cutivation of tomato yield
Conclusions
3. World Fruit and Vegetable Production
Fruit production
• 640 million tons of fruits produced in 2011
• High increases have been tropical fruits (e.g. banana, mango etc. )
Vegetable production
• 1.811 billion tons of vegetables (2009)
Production
• fruit & vegetable production: >2.4 billion tons (FAO, 2009)
• Global export trade exceeds US$ 17 billion annually*
• Subsistence micro-gardens (villages) to huge commercial
enterprises (greenhouses & field crops/orchard)
• Involves application of fertilizer, water, pesticides etc.
FAOSTAT, 2009; *Scripta Horticulturae 14 (2012)
4. Benefits of Fruits and Vegetables
Food, Nutrition and Health
• rich in micronutrients, vitamins, water etc. (about 1.7 million deaths
worldwide are due to low fruit & vegetable consumption)
Income generation
Vegetables/fruits have high returns per
unit of land
Employment opportunities
• rural & urban areas: more consumption of vegetables/fruits creates
a market
Mind provoking thoughts (Scripta Horticulturae No. 14)
• Production shift: from countries with high energy inputs and labour costs to those
with lower energy and labour costs (tropical countries, southern Africa???)
• Population growth by 2045 is estimated at 9 billion hence increase in fruit &
vegetables to 3.1 billion tons. Where will this increased production come from?
source: www.fao.org/giews/english/fo/index.htm
5. Vegetable production: A case in Malawi
Cultivation is on open field & fragile
lands e.g.
• riverbanks
• wetlands (damboland)
• water catchment areas
• flood plains (fertile soils &water)
>80% of total vegetable
production is by smallholder
farmers in rural /peri-urban
areas (Mwandira 2003)
Ecosystems heavily disturbed
• high soil erosion: siltation
• floods rampart
• water shortage
• water body pollution due to
• pesticide residues
• fertilizer drift
• high weed growth
consequently, in Malawi
By Simon Mng’omba
By Chris Katema
6. Effects of unsustainable land cultivation
By Simon Mng’omba
Total cost of :
• weed management at Liwonde Barrage:
US$ 366,328.57 per year (revenue lost)
• Remedial costs (dredging & diving) incurred
by ESCOM (Nkula, Tedzani & Kapichira
power stations) is about US$ 959, 615
each year
Source: UNDP, PIMS 2085, (2010) PPP in SLM in the SRB in Malawi; GoM 2014
Between 1967 – 2003
18 floods occurred in Malawi affecting 1.8 million people resulting in:
• loss of life
• infrastructure destruction (roads, rail, homes etc.)
• crop loss and food insecurity
• health impacts (diarrhoea, cholera and malaria).
7. Crops grown in wetlands
Crop type HHs who
cultivated
(%) *
All
Male Female
Vegetables 56 42 52
Maize 53 38 49
Rice 21 9 17
S. potato 10 11 10
Beans 9 7 8
Cassava 6 0 4
Others 14 16 15
Source: Tracy et al. 2009
• *Multiple responses
• Dominance of vegetables
Solutions suggested
Respondent
s (%) *
Plant trees along river
banks 74
Avoid cultivating crops
along river banks 25
Avoid cutting trees/reeds
along river bank 18
Close barrages
11
Promote irrigation
11
Why are farmers still cultivating fragile lands?
agriculture accounts for > 80 % of employment
8. Knowledge, practices & challenges in the SRB
Technology
Households (%) who Constraints using
the technologyKnows the
technology
Currently use
the technology
Used it before
but stopped
Inorganic
fertilizer
100 73 11 no extension services
fertilizer trees 72 15 6 lack of seed & training
fruit trees 95 71 6
pest & diseases; lack of
seed & training
woodlot 86 31 2
lack of seed & training,
small land area
soil/water
conservation
85 70 0
lack of information &
training
farmyard
manure &
compost
89 47 0
lack of training & too
much labour
Source: Ajayi et al. 2010
9. Unsustainable cultivation in the Shire River Basin
Investing in enterprises (e.g. bee-keeping,
juice & livestock production, tree planting &
agroforestry technologies) can
• provide incentives to adoptions of
SLM approaches (soil & water
conservation) as IGAs
• discourage growing vegetables
along the river banks for income
• investing in juice making & AF
means many trees will be planted
and hence protecting soil loss
Source: GoM, Ministry of Water Development & Irrigation (2011)
10. Production methods with limited Ecosystem disturbance
1. Protected cultivation - uses structures such as:
- shade houses
- row covers
- net tunnels
- plastic tunnels (plasticulture)
2. Micro-gardens – e.g.
- sack farms (recycled sacks)
3. Key hole gardens
4. Hydroponics - gardening without soil & uses 70-90% less water.
Aeroponics are a form of hydroponic
by Simon Mng’omba
11.
12. Low-cost protected cultivation structures
Bamboo & plastic
Plastic rolled up & down
Ideal for:-
• smallholder farmers- simple & affordable
• hotspot areas (protection) e.g. flood plains
• profitable
• low water utilization
• high quality vegetables produced
• no blemishes due to limited pest &
disease attack hence higher prices
Low-cost protected cultivation structures:-
• an alternative & sustainable fruit &
vegetable production
• Fertilizer tree biomass incorporation
improves crop yield
13. Evidence of improved yield due to biomass application
Treatment Fruit yield (mg/ 9 m2)
2007
Fruit yield (mg/ 9m2)
2008
Control 89.7 202.2
Inorganic fertilizer 97.4 221.7
Gliricidia (8 t/ha) 124.7 289.7
Gliricidia + fertilizer 96.3 372.1
Source: Sileshi et al. 2007
Recommendations:
• Gliricidia biomass integrated with half recommended dose of
inorganic fertilizer improved paprika fruit yield
• Gliricidia biomass alone also improved paprika fruit yield
Table 1: Effect of organic/inorganic fertilizer on Paprika fruit yield
14. Table 2: cabbage yield kg/ha (with inorganic fertilizer: 0, 75 & 150 CAN kg/ha)
Treatment Yield range (kg/ha) Mean yield (kg/ha)
Control 9.02 – 21.96 15.54
Gliricidia (8 t DM/ha) 16.5 – 33.95 25.62
Tephrosia (6 t DM/ha) 21.62 – 35.7 28.94
Source: Makumba and Phiri, 2008
Conclusions:
• Application of AF leaf biomass improved yield
• AF leaf biomass integrated with half recommended dose of
inorganic fertilizer improved yield
Treatment Yield range (kg/ha) Mean yield (kg/ha)
Control 5.25 – 13.87 9.57
Gliricidia (8 t DM/ha) 6.86 – 15.76 11.04
Tephrosia (6 t DM/ha) 9.82 – 17.87 13.81
Table 3: tomato yield t/ha (with inorganic fertilizer: 0, 75 & 150 CAN kg/ha)
15. Evidence for increased production and quality
Production
under
Marketable /40 m2
Number Kg
Non-market./40 m2
Number Kg
Total yield
(t/ha)
Protected 10,769 401 79 1.9 100.79
Open field 4,145 133 371 6.8 34.88
Conclusions
• Higher yields from low-cost protected structures than from open
field
• Higher quality fruit & vegetables low-cost protected structures than
from open field
Table 4: tomato yield under open & protected structure
Source: Gonzaga et al. 2012
16. Protected cultivation structures
• High-cost - permanent structures such as greenhouse / glasshouse
covered with UV treated plastic. Can be house type: ideal for
tall/climbing vegetables (melons)
• Low-cost structures
e.g. low tunnels:
Low tunnel covered (top) & uncovered (bottom)
Source: Gonzaga et al. 2012
17. Benefits of Protected Cultivation
• Vegetables & fruits mature faster (30%) than field-grown crops
• Carrots – when grown under greenhouse they are sweeter & tender
than grown outdoors (phenols)
• Cucumbers - when grown under greenhouse they are less bitter
than when grown outdoors (phenols)
• Better pest & disease management - reduces pesticide usage
• Reduction in water use: plastic sheets reduce evapotranspiration
• All year-round production & predictable yields and quality
Source: Gonzaga et al. 2012; Mangmang 2002
18. Why low-cost protected cultivation structure?
• low investments in structures
• easy construction (local artisans can construct)
• materials are available
• simple maintenance
• crop yields are not different from high cost-protected cultivation
Selection protected cultivation structure
depends on:
• crops to be grown (a g/house may not be
needed)
• A simple structure can economically
extend growing season. E.g. low tunnels
19. Low-cost protected cultivation with biomass transfer
We need
• Expertise in protected cultivation (to train artisans)
• Focus on Hotspot areas (flood plains, river banks, wetland etc.) need to:
• assess level of horticultural crop production
• assess impact on environment (soil erosion)
• assess market for vegetables considering different seasons
• Design of protected cultivation structures consider:
• site (hot areas may require rolling up sheet)
• crop management under g/house conditions
Low-cost protected cultivation structures and AF leaf biomass
transfer have a great potential to sustainably produce fruits and
vegetables in hotspot areas
20. Conclusions
Low-cost protected cultivation with AF tree biomass transfer can:
• Improve income levels – poverty reduction
• Reduced heavy fertilizer & pesticide application
• Protect ecosystems
• High crop yield and good quality crop
• Increase urban supply of high quality fresh produce
• All year round supply
• Enables early production