9. A Pedagogical Road Map
Connecting Interests & Passions to
Academic Content
FutureCasting®
10. TYPE III
INDEPENDENT OR SMALL GROUP INVESTIGATIONS
PRODUCTS AND/OR PERFORMANCES
TYPE I
GENERAL
EXPLORATORY
ACTIVITIES
TYPE II
METHODOLOGICAL
TRAINING /
HOW-TO ACTIVITIES
(Renzulli, 1977)
29. Who am I?
A light rainfall,
A soft word,
The sweet, melodic
Song of a bird.
Fragile and easily
overlooked, unheard
A little sad
A little unsure
A symphony of
quiet sounds…
kindness when it seems
It cannot be found
A gentle Grace
That slowly changes
The way the world works
Who am I?
41. write stories
design graphics
paint pictures
program softwaretake photographs
make movies
start a business
perform music
invent sculpt
build
serve the community
advocate
create computer games
conduct an experiment
present research
raise funds
70. S
TO
W
Helpful
to achieving the
objective
Harmful
to achieving the
objective
Internal Origin
Attributes of the
Individual
Strengths Weaknesses
External Origin
Attributes of the
Environment
Opportunities Threats
SWOT
Analysis
79. S
TO
W
Helpful
to achieving the
objective
Harmful
to achieving the
objective
Internal Origin
Attributes of the
Individual
Strengths Weaknesses
External Origin
Attributes of the
Environment
Opportunities Threats
SWOT
Analysis
93. How have I grown?
I have always been called a crybaby
for as long as I can remember. I have
to admit that I always did cry a lot.
94. How have I grown?
I have always been called a crybaby
for as long as I can remember. I have
to admit that I always did cry a lot.
…now the nature of my
sensitivity has changed.
95. How have I grown?
I used to cry mostly out of self-pity
because someone hurt my feelings.
96. How have I grown?
I used to cry mostly out of self-pity
because someone hurt my feelings.
Now I have begun
to cry for others.
109. S
TO
W
Helpful
to achieving the
objective
Harmful
to achieving the
objective
Internal Origin
Attributes of the
Individual
Strengths Weaknesses
External Origin
Attributes of the
Environment
Opportunities Threats
SWOT
Analysis
114. High achieving students
demonstrated greater
autonomy and
competence than low
achieving students in
computer-based learning
tasks.
(Otta & Tavella, 2010)