1. Lessons learned from OSU’s first service learning alternative spring break by Wendy Alemán, Mark Belson, & Kristin Price

5. Accommodator Adapts to circumstances if necessary, will discard theory to address problem. Learns best from “hands-on” experience. Relies on people more than analysis. Diverger Imaginative ability. Can view problem from a variety of personal perspectives. Data gatherer interested in people. Sensitive to feelings. Creator of models. Easily uses inductive reasoning. More interested in logic of ideas and theory and their application. Assimilator Searches for practical uses of ideas and theories. Deductive reasoner, single response to issue/concern. Interested in things. Converger Reflective Observation (observing) Concrete Experience (feeling) Abstract Conceptualization (Thinking) Active Experimentation (doing) PHASE 1 Exploration Comparison of the Experiential Learning Cycle* with the Service Learning Model** *Kolb(1984),**Delve et. al, (1990) Delve’s, Mintz’s, & Stewart’s (1990) Service Learning Model Phase 5 Internalization Transition to PHASE 5 PHASE 3 REALIZATION Transition to Phase 2 Transition to PHASE 4 PHASE 4 Activation PHASE 2 Clarification Transition to PHASE 3

10. Video

15. Q & A