Paper Presentation: "The Honda Effect Revisited" by Mintzberg, Pascale, Goold & Rumelt, 1996
1. presentation of scientific papers
seminar: strategy-as-pratice
»the Honda effect revisited«
University of Zurich
23rd of September, 2010
A. Schwarzinger
Boris Morgounovski
Mintzberg, Pascale, Goold & Rumelt, 1996.
Page 1
Presentation and Discussion
of scientific papers in the field of
Strategy-as-Pratice
University of Zurich
Seminar in Strategy-as-Pratice
23rd of September, 2010
Andreas Schwarzinger
Boris Morgounovski
2. »What it‘s all about?«
presentation of scientific papers
seminar: strategy-as-pratice
University of Zurich
23rd of September, 2010
Agenda.
A. Schwarzinger
Boris Morgounovski
Page 2
» main message of the paper
» research question(s) & purpose
» what is Honda?
» the Honda effect
» summary
» discussion
3. »What it‘s all about?«
presentation of scientific papers
seminar: strategy-as-pratice
University of Zurich
23rd of September, 2010
Agenda.
A. Schwarzinger
Boris Morgounovski
Page 3
» main message of the paper
» research question(s) & purpose
» what is Honda?
» the Honda effect
» summary
» discussion
4. »what they want to tell us«
presentation of scientific papers
seminar: strategy-as-pratice
University of Zurich
23rd of September, 2010
main message of the paper
A. Schwarzinger
Boris Morgounovski
Page 4
main
message » Honda became one of the motorcycle market leaders
in Japan and the US in basically just 5 years
»
research
questions
& purpose
» Strategy is ”all things necessary for the successful
»
functioning of an organization as an adaptive
what is
Honda? mechanism”
»
the Honda
» Strategy is not something that always happens or is
intended or planned intentionally
effect
»
summary » The Honda case is a perfect example of how
complicated it is for outsiders to judge what the
»
discussion
strategy of successful companies were or are
5. »What it‘s all about?«
presentation of scientific papers
seminar: strategy-as-pratice
University of Zurich
23rd of September, 2010
Agenda.
A. Schwarzinger
Boris Morgounovski
Page 5
» main message of the paper
» research question(s) & purpose
» what is Honda?
» the Honda effect
» summary
» discussion
6. »any questions?«
presentation of scientific papers
seminar: strategy-as-pratice
University of Zurich
23rd of September, 2010
research questions of the paper
A. Schwarzinger
Boris Morgounovski
Page 6
main
message » Understand the success factors of Honda’s
motorcycle division in Japan and the US market
»
research
questions
& purpose
» Understand how Honda was dealing with
»
what is
Honda?
problems and challenges they had during the
penetration of the US motorcycle market
»
the Honda
effect
» Debate: Did Honda use any strategy to become
»
successful? If so, which one?
summary
»
discussion
7. »what is it for?«
presentation of scientific papers
seminar: strategy-as-pratice
University of Zurich
23rd of September, 2010
purpose of the paper
A. Schwarzinger
Boris Morgounovski
Page 7
» Major shift in the 1960s: US motorcycle registrations
main increased from 0,575 to 1,38 Mio in 1965
message
» 1960: Harley Davidson was the main market player in
»
research
questions
the US motorcycle industry
& purpose
» US motorcycle industry attracted only few people (the
»
what is
“leather jacket stereotype”)
Honda?
»
the Honda
effect
»
» 1965: Market share loss and profitability declines
summary (market share of British motorcycles in the US dropped
from 49% to 9%)
»
» Scale disadvantages in technology, distribution and
discussion
manufacturing in comparison to the competitors in the
US market
8. »what is it for?«
presentation of scientific papers
seminar: strategy-as-pratice
University of Zurich
23rd of September, 2010
purpose of the paper
A. Schwarzinger
Boris Morgounovski
Page 8
» Major shift in the 1960s: US motorcycle registrations
main increased from 0,575 to 1,38 Mio in 1965
message
» 1960: Harley Davidson was the main market player in
»
research
questions
the US motorcycle industry
& purpose
» US motorcycle industry attracted only few people (the
»
what is
“leather jacket stereotype”)
Honda?
»
Market Entry of Honda to the US Market
the Honda
effect
»
» 1965: Market share loss and profitability declines
summary (market share of British motorcycles in the US dropped
from 49% to 9%)
»
» Scale disadvantages in technology, distribution and
discussion
manufacturing in comparison to the competitors in the
US market
9. »What it‘s all about?«
presentation of scientific papers
seminar: strategy-as-pratice
University of Zurich
23rd of September, 2010
Agenda.
A. Schwarzinger
Boris Morgounovski
Page 9
» main message of the paper
» research question(s) & purpose
» what is Honda?
» the Honda effect
» summary
» discussion
10. »tell us more about it«
presentation of scientific papers
seminar: strategy-as-pratice
University of Zurich
23rd of September, 2010
Honda as a company
A. Schwarzinger
Boris Morgounovski
Page 10
» The Honda Motor Company, Ltd.
main
message » Manufacturer of automobiles and
motorcycles
»
research
questions » World’s largest manufacturer for
& purpose
internal combustion engines
»
(e. g. used in boats, lawn-mowers, …):
what is >14 Mio. each year
Honda?
» World’s largest manufacturer of
»
motorcycles
the Honda
effect
» Second-largest Japanese automotive manufacturer,
»
fourth-largest in the US, sixth-largest in the world
summary
» Revenue: 120 billion USD in 2009
»
» Net income: 1.4 billion USD in 2009
discussion
» Employees: 182’000
» Motorcycle sales: 2 Mio. units in 2009 (peak: 3 Mio. in 1982)
11. »What it‘s all about?«
presentation of scientific papers
seminar: strategy-as-pratice
University of Zurich
23rd of September, 2010
Agenda.
A. Schwarzinger
Boris Morgounovski
Page 11
» main message of the paper
» research question(s) & purpose
» what is Honda?
» the Honda effect
» summary
» discussion
12. »the way of success«
presentation of scientific papers
seminar: strategy-as-pratice
University of Zurich
23rd of September, 2010
Honda‘s success factors in Japan
A. Schwarzinger
Boris Morgounovski
Page 12
» Honda in the late 40s one of many producer of clipon engines
main
message
» 1949: Honda meets Fujasawa
»
research
questions
» 1950: Introduction of D-type motorcycle, which was not successful
& purpose
» Combination of two people: technological ability and wish to express
»
what is
himself through invention together with marketing and financial
Honda? strengths
»
» 1951: Honda invents a new design that has double of horsepower of
the Honda
effect the competitors’ four-stroke engine
»
» Market demand required new organization, plant, production
summary facilities
»
» By 1954 Honda has a market share of 15% of the Japanese motorcycle
discussion market
» DESIGN AND PRODUCTION METHODS
13. »the way of success«
presentation of scientific papers
seminar: strategy-as-pratice
University of Zurich
23rd of September, 2010
Honda‘s success factors in Japan
A. Schwarzinger
Boris Morgounovski
Page 13
main
message
»
research
questions
& purpose
»
what is
Honda?
»
the Honda
effect
»
summary
»
discussion
14. »the way of success«
presentation of scientific papers
seminar: strategy-as-pratice
University of Zurich
23rd of September, 2010
challenges in penetrating the US market
A. Schwarzinger
Boris Morgounovski
Page 14
» “Success against all odds” culture, Honda implemented
main
message
» Focus on competition with European firms
»
research
questions
» Started in Los Angeles, with the inventory of 25% each of the
& purpose
Supercub CC model
»
» Distribution channel: direct through retailers (1960: 40 dealers)
what is
Honda?
» 1960: machines were leaking oil and encountering clutch failure
»
the Honda
effect
» Different market conditions: motorcycles are driven much faster,
much farther and the motorcycles are much bigger and luxurious
»
(testing lab trying replicate the failure)
summary
» Self-marketing led to first success
»
discussion
» While it was harming the image in the “heavily macho market”, it
was a big success in sporting goods stores (customers: Every-day
Americans)
15. »the way of success«
presentation of scientific papers
seminar: strategy-as-pratice
University of Zurich
23rd of September, 2010
Honda‘s success story in the US
A. Schwarzinger
Boris Morgounovski
Page 15
main
message
»
research
questions
& purpose
»
what is
Honda?
»
the Honda
effect
»
summary
»
discussion
16. »let the fight begin«
presentation of scientific papers
seminar: strategy-as-pratice
University of Zurich
23rd of September, 2010
Mintzberg vs. Goold – the Honda paper debate
A. Schwarzinger
Boris Morgounovski
Page 16
main
message
»
research
questions
& purpose
• Reply to Goold report. Left
Critics on BCG • Managerial perspective of
»
• What is managerial report?
out main points the case
what is
Honda? • • Random experiments vs.
No rational planning • Incremental learning and
process byto the chance to
exposing Honda deliberate planning don’t
»
• More incremental/
be surprised by the “intetrwine”
the Honda
effect emergent learninglearn
marketplace and and • Mintzberg would say “try
• Honda people came with
deliberate planing are something, see if it works
»
needed
their experience to US and learn from your
summary
• You can’t work all out in
prepared to learn experience”
• Argues with Goold: future,
»
advance , predict the • Learning 1, Planning 1
identify non-starters in
“danger to go too far
discussion
• Learning 1, Planning 0
other direction”
17. »more of the same?«
presentation of scientific papers
seminar: strategy-as-pratice
University of Zurich
23rd of September, 2010
BCG report on the Honda case
A. Schwarzinger
Boris Morgounovski
Page 17
main
message
» BCG: recognize importance of relative cost/experience/
market share and aim to build sufficient share in targeted
»
research segments of the market
questions
& purpose
» Report was not able to come up with a strategy to save the
»
British motorcycle industry
what is
Honda?
» Strategy proposed by Mintzberg/Pascal is problematic,
»
because the British motorcycle industry was already in
the Honda
effect decline and needed practical advices
»
» Rumelt: success comes from innovative products
summary
»
discussion
18. »the way of success«
presentation of scientific papers
seminar: strategy-as-pratice
University of Zurich
23rd of September, 2010
competence, intent and strech
A. Schwarzinger
Boris Morgounovski
Page 18
main
message
» Creation of new resources and strengths in the pursuit of
long-term intent
»
research
questions
& purpose
» Usage of innovating approaches is important
»
» According to the view of Prahalad and Hamel, company’s
what is
Honda? direction is deliberate and managed, but at the same time
they reject BCG’s view
»
the Honda
effect » Honda with long-term vision of global leadership, building
competences in design and manufacturing and competing
»
through innovations
summary
»
discussion
19. »What it‘s all about?«
presentation of scientific papers
seminar: strategy-as-pratice
University of Zurich
23rd of September, 2010
Agenda.
A. Schwarzinger
Boris Morgounovski
Page 19
» main message of the paper
» research question(s) & purpose
» what is Honda?
» the Honda effect
» summary
» discussion
20. »the last debate«
presentation of scientific papers
seminar: strategy-as-pratice
University of Zurich
23rd of September, 2010
summary
A. Schwarzinger
Boris Morgounovski
Page 20
main » All views agree to a number of key points:
message
»
» Honda had a superior competence at engine design
research
questions
& purpose » Honda had success in Japan before entering the US market
»
» Honda was successful with smaller bikes in the US market and extended
deliberate
& emergent
that success to larger bikes
strategies
» But which strategy if any did Honda use? Different views, different
»
8 types
opinions, not possible to prove or disprove writers’ assumptions
of strategy
» Rumelt’s view: “process/ emergent” school is right to be non-linear:
»
Generate new knowldege, quickly reactions Vision and swift
summary
adaptation
»
» “Design” school is right about the reality of forces
discussion
» Strategic thinking is overrated
21. »What it‘s all about?«
presentation of scientific papers
seminar: strategy-as-pratice
University of Zurich
23rd of September, 2010
Agenda.
A. Schwarzinger
Boris Morgounovski
Page 21
» main message of the paper
» research question(s) & purpose
» what is Honda?
» the Honda effect
» summary
» discussion
22. »any questions?«
presentation of scientific papers
seminar: strategy-as-pratice
University of Zurich
23rd of September, 2010
discussion
A. Schwarzinger
Boris Morgounovski
Page 22
main
message » Which approach of strategic planning did Honda
use according to your opinion?
»
research
questions
» In your opinion, which of the introduced 8 types
& purpose
»
deliberate
& emergent
of strategy was Honda following when entering
strategies
the US market?
»
8 types
of strategy » Was it more of an induced or more of an
»
autonomous strategy process Honda was
summary following when entering the US market?
»
discussion
Notas del editor
Last point: many opinions in the debate; Mintzberg, Pascal, Rumelt, Goold. Everybody has different view. Somebody argues, that Honda used a coherent strategy, another it was a deliberate process. So, what?? Everybody should think about it and in the end we will discuss, how companies should deal with such situation, Honda could also easily fail.
Also: short-term orientation over the last 15 years, only short-term view!! As we will see, one of the success factors in Japan was long-term orientation, that means i.e investments in low-cost production methods British withdraw from the smaller bike, only large bikes, where the Japanese were not represented (p.104 down)
Also: short-term orientation over the last 15 years, only short-term view!! As we will see, one of the success factors in Japan was long-term orientation, that means i.e investments in low-cost production methods British withdraw from the smaller bike, only large bikes, where the Japanese were not represented (p.104 down)
Japan was in need for transformation Lots of motorcycle manufacturers doing the same type of motorcycle: clipon engines, which were used to redesign a byke to a moped Fujasawa provided financial support and markeiting strenghts 247 manufacturers, Honda: not finanicial motivation, there was no end to his pursuit of technology Fujasawa presses Honda There was no organization at this moment
They saw the competitors not the motorbykes, but normal byke drivers the japanese wife resisted to buy heavy and dangerous motorcycle; trains and buses were inconvenient Afer introduction of honda 50cc Supercub: new plant with a capacity of 30 000 units per monthM plant was built in 1965, till this point: subcontractors 168 000 of 285 000 were Supercubs Distribution system: Honda was a late entry and had been carried as secondary line by distributors
Poor English, bad treatment in the shops; poor after.sales service,… Impression: everybody drives a car But the registration numbers were ok: 450,000 motorcycles, 60 000 of them are from Europe, 10% is ours Currency allocation from a ministery of finances-> Toyota failed; only 11 000 cash of 250 000 Dollars Los Angeles: second and thord generation of japanese cimmunity, climate suitable for motorcycle use and growing population potential market Appartment fpr 80 $ a month, 2 of 3 slept on the floor, New model after testing: redesigned head gasket and clutch spring To see who is your competitor and which products do u take for the comparison?!
Region by region: started in LA, West coast moved eastward over a period of 4 years Advertisement: Young families, “You meet the nicest people in Honda” Target group: members of general public, everyday Americans; who had never before though of buying a motorcycle Product Launch: Easy to handle, motorcycle as an attraction, fun! R&D: Experience from Japan; technology and production methods; 700 designers and engineers; competitors in average: 100; 1962: production per man was 159 units, Harley Davidson reached this number in 1974 high volumens per model, potential for high productivity, highly automotive techniques; impact on price Price is attractive, distributors want it so stronger bargaining position of Honda! Ditribution: direct through retailers, later pattern for the industry British: 14 mot/ worker and year, honda: 200, costs 1/10 of british manufacturers, honda paid 45% higher wage, costs ¼ of Uk manufacturer Scale effect: as not a decision, it’s a learning process
Strategy: “all the things necessary for the successful functioning of org. as an adaptive mechanism” Debate between Mintzberg and Goold: Mintzberg: non-strarter, believed to be small motorcycle; Creative process, no formal techniques BCG left out: main period how emergent learning impacted the deliberate planning and vice versa Goold tries to defend his position, he argues that BCG report didn’t come up with a strategy which defends the market share Goold as a co-author of the report, explains the goal of the report: report was written for a commission and it was not the aim to explain how the company developed their strategy Such advice would not help for the manager, either the time nor the money to experiment with non-starters BCG report helps to understand which strategies made Honda successful, focus not on HOW but which strategies led to success… What is managerial? Does it abstract from history? Implication lock in the office and do an competetietve analysis?different ton of the report. We didn’t have choice, events took a suprising turn Honda people avoided being too rational; BCG: skipts necessary period of learning
Main point: how could british motorcycle industry be saved if we look on the approaches, authors suggest Rumelt. Best alternative, but a lot of risks, and lack of ideas for new models; strategy is good only if u have the products which are needed on the market But alltogher situation was bad, and very weak position in the market, so finding a new strategy which could save the situation would be difficult; Mintzberg/pascal needs time, how to choose what to try….errors and trial: money and time
Strategic intent: “Companies that have risen to global leadership over the past 20 years invariably began with ambitions that were out of all proportion to their resources and capabilities” Usage that territory and use the base to launch new products; Many oversee that honda while selling motorcycles was already selling larger bikes in europe, strategic intent and its growing competence in engines and power trains BCGs view: scale, cost advantage, market share are in the center of the story
Success in Japan: better product, design skills Success in US. Ability to experiment, to learn quickly from mistakes, rapidly revise design problems and discover opportunities Reality of forces: scale economy, accumulated experience, cumulative development You can have a Phd but don’t have know how about design!