SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 42
Identifying the target environments
in breeding for rainfed ecosystems



        B.P. Mallikarjuna Swamy
            August 3, 2012


      Rice Breeding Course 2011
Outline
• The concept of the target population of environments(TPE)

• Complexity of rainfed ecosystem

• Factors to be considered in delineating the TPE

• Methods of grouping locations into TPE

• Relationship between selection environments and TPE

• Setting goals and prioritizing traits

• Appropriate breeding strategy for a TPE

• A case study
Target population of environments(TPE)

Comstock (1977) defined the concept of a target
population of environments (TPE) associated with a
breeding program as the complete set of "types" of
environments in which cultivars can be grown within the
geographical area targeted by a breeding program.
Concept of the TPE

• TPE is the set of all environments, fields and seasons in which
  an improved variety is targeted to perform well.
• TPE consists of – Not a single environment but a set of present
  and future production environments.
• Environmental variability changes the performance of varieties.
• Breeders wish to develop cultivars that are superior to currently
  used varieties in most years and on most farms within the TPE.
Concept of the TPE

• Seasonal variation can result in very different conditions
  in the same field in different years

• Weather records for a certain location shows-

  Favorable years -        10
  Years with drought at seedling stage   -        4
  Years with drought at flowering -       6
  Years with submergence          -       0
  Blast      -     10
  BPH        -      0
  BLB                                     -       3
Concept of the TPE
• Development of appropriate research strategy and
  prioritization of rice research activities requires -

       1.     In depth understanding of TPE
              (More relevant with the Global climate
               change scenario)

       2.     Farmers traditional knowledge and
              farming practices

       3.     Socio-economic environments

       4.     Farmers perception of the new
              technologies being introduced
Rianfed Ecosystems
Rainfed Upland
   Drought
Rainfed shallow Lowland
        Drought
 Rainfed shallow Lowland
                 Favorable
             Rainfed shallow Lowland
                  Drought, submergence
                      Rainfed shallow Lowland
                                   Submergence
                                 Rainfed medium Lowland
                                           Submergence
                                                          Rainfed Lowland




Deficit                        Water                           Surplus
Complexity of rainfed environments

• Large variations in rain fed ecosystems – rainfed upland,
  rainfed lowland
• rainfall
• soil type
• topography
• occurrence of abiotic stresses- drought, submergence
• prevalent-insect-pests
• low input use
• quality preference
• socio-economic conditions of the farmers
Factors in delineating the TPE

• Environmental factors
  Rainfall, topography, Soil type, Insect-pest
  Many breeding programs considers this and have
  separate breeding program
• Socioeconomic factors
  Resource capacity, Input use availability
  Very few breeding programs takes this into account
Methods of Grouping sites in TPE
• Crop Models
• Environmental parameters
• Currently used varieties
• Statistical analysis of multi environment data
  - Principal component analysis
  -Tests of fixed environmental effects
  - Examination of correlations of cultivar means across sites
• Geographical information system (GIS)
Crop modeling
• The need to manage and predict crop's behavior over a
  wide range of planting dates, geographies and situations
  has become increasingly important.


• Use of crop simulation models incorporating local climatic
  conditions with management operations increases our
  ability to make more timely and educated decisions.


• The time has finally arrived in which crop modeling tools
  are increasingly being deployed to help address questions
  and problems on a larger, farm scale size. The full
  potential and value of crop models have not yet been
  realized in production agriculture.
Grouping sites in TPE: Crop Models
• Use of crop models to identify environments in terms of
  water stress has been suggested

• Historical weather data required

• Information can be obtained from farmers if environmental
  information is not available:
       -Rapid rural appraisal
       -Agro system analysis
Grouping sites in TPE: Environmental
                  parameters


• Sites with similar rainfall
  pattern, soil types and
  depths of standing
  water accumulation
  within each region may
  be grouped together for
  breeding purposes
Sites                  Target environment       Soil type                   Field topography    Drought                 Presently grown
                                                                                                                        varieties
Indira Gandhi Krishi   Rainfed low land         Clay, clay loam, low        Bunded shallow      Reproductive, early     MTU 1010, IR 64,
Vishwavidyalaya        ecosystem                organic carbon              lowland to mid      stage                   Swarna, Mahamaya
(IGKV),                                                                     lowland
NDUAT, Faizabad        Rainfed shallow low      Clay, clay loam, low        Bunded              Early season drought    Sarjoo 52, Swarna,
                       land drought prone       organic carbon                                  and reproductive        NDR 97, NDR 359,
                       and submergence                                                          stage                   Baranideep
                       prone
CRURRS, Hazaribag      Rainfed shallow low      acidic in nature, very      Highly undulating   Drought at all stages   IR 36, IR 64, MTU
                       land and bunded          poor in fertility, low in                       of growth               1010, Hazaridhan,
                       uplands                  available N and                                                         Sadabahar, Birsa 201,
                                                organic carbon                                                          Some other land races
CRRI, Cuttack          Costal region, rainfed   sandy loam and clay         Bunded low lands    seedling stage, and     Lalat, Swarna,
                       upland and lowland       loam soil                                       vegetative stage        Varshadhan Naveen,
                                                                                                                        MTU 1010,
                                                                                                                        Khandagiri, Vandana,
TNAU, Coimbatore       Irrigated Lowland        Clay                        Bunded lowland      Reproductive stage      IR 64, Co-47
TNAU, Paramakudi       Rainfed Upland           Clay loam                   Bunded              Reproductive stage      PMK-3, ADT 38, Local
                                                                                                                        races
UAS, Bangalore         Eastern Dry Zone         red, loamy and light        Unbunded            Reproductive stage      MTU 1001, IR 64,
                                                                                                drought                 Jyoti, MTU 1010, BPT
                                                                                                                        5204, Rasi,
BF, Hydrabad           Low land                 Clay loam                   Bunded              Reproductive stage      Samba Masuri,
                                                                                                                        Swarna, MTU 1010
BAU, Ranchi            Rainfed shallow low      acidic in nature, very      Highly undulating   Drought at all stages   Lalat, IR 36, IR 64,
                       land and bunded          poor in fertility, low in                       of growth               MTU 1010, Birsa 201,
                       uplands                  available N and                                                         Some other land races
                                                organic carbon
Grouping sites in TPE: Currently used varieties

• Predominant farmers variety can also be used to
  characterize the target environment
• Variety Brown Gora grown in Chhotonagpur plateau region
  of eastern India can be classified as upland TPE
• Variety Swarna grown in much of south Asia can be
  classified as shallow rainfed lowland
• Most reliable and simplest way to define TPE
• Adverse situations that these cultivars face in these
  ecosystems, and performance under such situation has to
  be taken into account
Sites categorization into favorable (F) or unfavorable
(U) environments based on the ranking of mean yield
                   in different years

  SITE       Site mean yield (t/ha)     Mean    Ranking             Category
            2003      2004       2005          2003   2004   2005
Santhapur             2.35       2.39   2.37           1      1       F
Semiligud
      a      2        2.24        1.2   1.82    1      2      5       F
Faizabad              1.75        1.4   1.58           3      4       F
Jagdalpur   1.86      1.02       1.76   1.54    2      4      3       F
Ambikapur   1.36      0.62       1.77   1.25    6      7      2       F
 Ranchi     1.59      0.54       0.79   0.97    5      8      7       U
 Almora     0.94      0.76        0.9   0.86    7      6      6       U
Hazaribag   1.65      0.36       0.39   0.8     3     10      9       U
  Rewa      1.64      0.46       0.26   0.78    4      9     10       U
  Derol     0.59      0.77              0.68    8      5              U
Banswara    0.54      0.23       0.74   0.5     9     11      8       U
Genotypes under favorable and unfavorable
               environment: India
Genotypes       Favorable environment       Genotypes      Unfavorable emvironment
  Designation    Low Input     High Input    Designation    Low Input     High Input
VR 379-5           2.07           2.36      Ashoka 228        0.92           1.03
VL 3288            1.57           2.62      DDR 13            0.89             1
RR385-249          1.53           2.31      DDR 97            0.87           1.19
RR 433-2           1.49           2.66      Richa 6           0.84           1.05
RR 363-5           1.49           2.51      Richa 5           0.83           1.04
RR 356-74          1.48           2.16      Ashoka 200F       0.82           1.02
Anjali             1.48           2.58      IC 267974         0.78           1.07
DDR 106            1.42           2.13      VL 6309           0.76           0.95
VL 6394            1.41           2.07      DDR 105           0.74           1.22
DDR 117             1.4           2.31      RR 434-3          0.74            1.1
RR 383-21          1.39           2.34      DDR 102           0.74           0.97
BAU 249-92         1.36            2.3      VL 6747           0.72           0.82
Vandana            1.22           1.86      Vandana           0.59           0.94
Kalinga III        1.17           1.66      Kalinga III       0.66            0.6
Brown Gora         1.15            1.9      Brown Gora        0.71            0.6
Ashoka 228         0.93           2.19      Anjali            0.59           1.05
Mean               1.21             2       Mean              0.61            0.9
SED0.05           0.2298         0.3658     SED0.05          0.1698         0.2176
Grouping sites in TPE: Principal component analysis

• Pattern analysis to group sites on the basis of minimum G
  x E within groups and maximum G x E among groups

• Used when TPE is very large and diverse

• Used when researchers do not have a good hypothesis
  about the causes of G x E

• Use of probe and reference genotypes (known for their
  adaptation in each environment) is very helpful
IRRI-India Drought Breeding Network
                                                                      % grain yield of control
                            Entry   Name                  Barwale Faizabad Hazaribag      Raipur   Ranchi
  40 medium duration            1   IR55419-04              3.5     64.3       79.4        44.4     43.7
                                2   IR74371-3-1-1           2.2     93.1       81.0        38.6    100.0
advanced breeding lines         3   IR74371-54-1-1          1.9     82.1        7.5        34.2     71.4
                                4   IR77298-14-1-2          1.1     85.7       71.2        35.0     27.7
 selected with different        5   IR78875-131-B-1-1       3.9     78.0       70.8        42.5     35.0
                                6   IR78875-131-B-1-4       2.2     59.1       74.5        26.5     75.0
  performance across            7   IR78877-181-B-1-1-2     8.1     50.0       68.8        55.3     85.7
                                8   IR78877-208-B-1-4       6.4     42.9       94.0        50.4     45.0
     environments               9   IR78878-53-2-2-2        4.6     71.4       58.9        29.1     66.7
                              10    IR78878-53-2-2-4        5.1     92.3       76.9        19.6     88.9
                              11    IR79899-B-179-2-3       2.5     69.2       74.2        16.8     70.0
                              12    IR79906-B-192-2-1       2.4     60.5       65.6         4.5     37.0
                              13    IR697515-72-1-3         1.7     54.6       87.5        34.4     44.5
                              14    IR80431-B-44-4         11.6     75.0       56.4        18.6     40.0
                              15    IR82870-58              0.6     65.5       84.2        21.1     62.5



Source                     d.f.        Sum of squares        Mean squares         % of total sum of
                                                                                      squares
Genotype                    39             29446.3                755.0                 11.4
Environment                 4             103737.0               25934.0                40.0
GxE                        151            126104.0                835.1                 48.6
   GxE regression           39             1220.3                 313.3                  9.7
   Stability deviations    112             11388.4                1016.8                90.3
   AMMI component 1         42             73300.4                1745.3                58.1
   AMMI component 2         40             27333.1                683.3                 21.7
   AMMI component 3         38             18698.5                492.1                 14.8
   AMMI component 4         36             6772.0                 188.1                  5.4
Total                      194            259287.3
Genotype x environment interactions-1
     AMMI1 BIPLOT OF MAIN EFFECTS AND INTERACTIONS
                12                                           5
                                                                 Ranchi


                7.2                                                         28

                          Barwale                 26  22 23
                                            34
                                             27
                2.4                                     10 2
                                    20           11 25
                                                 15 18
                                                  6
                                     16    17 14 9
                                          12 3
                                          29          7     3     Hazaribag
        IPCA1




                      1                         13139
                                             33 248
                                                45        2
                                        40 19 38
                                             37 36                31
            -2.4                         30          21
                                                            Faizabad

                                                       35
            -7.2                                                       32


                                       Raipur      4
                -12
                 2.295        18.695     35.095   51.495      67.895      84.295
                                              MEANS
   VARIATE: RGY DATA FILE: AMMI                 MODEL FIT: 79.6% OF TABLE SS"
Grouping the sites in TPE: Correlation of cultivar means

 • An easy and effective way of assessing the G x E across
   environments within target region

 • If correlations are above 0.3 for a single 3 replicate trial, G x E
   is unlikely to be large

 • If lower than 0.3:
   - either G x E is large
               or
   - trial have high error and little genetic variations among
    cultivars – F value for cultivars is not significant
Correlations among line means in
          Eastern Indian OYT -URSBN
         Pusa    Patna    Gerua    Bhaw    Chin    Cutt    Mott    Nlak    Tita

Maso      0.36     0.51     0.31    0.21   -0.08   -0.10    0.24    0.64    0.35

Pusa               0.41     0.19    0.21    0.01    0.18    0.29    0.26    0.46

Patna                       0.24    0.06    0.10    0.14    0.41    0.34    0.37

Gerua                               0.15   -0.31   -0.05    0.12    0.33    0.18

Bhaw                                        0.01    0.06   -0.01    0.27    0.17

Chin                                                0.42    0.18   -0.25    0.32

Cutt                                                        0.29   -0.14    0.35

Nlak                                                                0.12    0.38
Results of correlations


• Shallow sites tend to be correlated


• Deeper sites (Cuttack and Chinsurah are correlated)


• Correlation between shallow and deep sites is poor
Grouping sites in TPE: GIS

• Geographical information system (GIS) and crop
  modeling is used to predict the performance of a variety
  for a range of environmental conditions.

• These performance ranges can be combined with known
  spatial variation of key environmental variables
  contained in GIS to generate performance domain over
  space.

• These tools also help to identify areas that are relatively
  homogeneous in terms of key constraints to productivity
Grouping sites in TPE: GIS
Relationship between the selection
      environment (SE) and the TPE

• SE is the nursery in which breeder makes selections

• The chosen SE should predict performance in the TPE

• May need more than one SE if TPE is highly variable

• SE is not the same as TPE, so the relationship must be
  monitored
Requirements for the SE

•   The SE must predict performance in seasons and
    locations within the TPE - genetic correlation (rG)
    between TPE and SE must be high

•   The SE must clearly and repeatably differentiate among
    genotypes under evaluation.

•   Heritability (H) for screening in the SE must be high

•   The SE must permit relatively large numbers of
    genotypes to be screened at low cost.

•   SE must permit a high selection intensity (i) to be
    achieved.
Examples of SE for specific requirements

  • In addition to the yield potential, local quality
    preferences, SE may require to screen for

     –   Insect-disease (Bacterial blight) resistance
     –   Submergence tolerance
     –   Drought tolerance
     –   Salinity tolerance
How to make SE more close to TPE


• Multi location testing under diverse set of
  environments – Many national programs follow this
  approach



• Testing under managed screens- Identify few
  promising lines and carry multi location testing with
  them
Setting goals and prioritizing traits

• Determining farmers preferences:

- Focus group discussions. Farmers are asked about
  positive and negative features of present cultivars

 - Preference analysis. Farmers are asked to rate
  experimental lines in a trial

 - In some cases, future farmer preferences must be
   predicted (i.e., they may not be aware of new
   options/technologies)
Main objectives of a breeding program

• Generally, to develop a cultivar that is superior to
  farmers’ varieties in a particular target population of
  environments

• Specific objectives

   – Replace a specific cultivar
   – Develop a new product
   – Change a single trait
Breeding goals: specific traits and strategies

  • Deficiencies of currently grown varieties

  • List of required traits with parents that are sources of
    these traits

  • Strategy for generating populations and selection for
    the desired traits
Breeding goals: specific traits and strategies
  • A high-quality locally-preferred variety should be used as
    a parent in most crosses. Because it can be difficult to
    recover quality characteristics in a single cross, the high-
    quality parent may be used as the recurrent parent in
    generating a BC-derived population

  • Quality parameters should be the focus of early-
    generation selection, because they are highly heritable,
    whereas yield is not.

  • The program should be structured to generate a large
    population of breeding lines with acceptable quality,
    which can then be evaluated for yield under farmer
    management.
Appropriate breeding strategy: Broad
    adaptations vs. specific adaptation
• Irrigated ecosystem is more uniform as compared to
  the rainfed ecosystem

• Broad adaptation has been very successful

• Rainfed ecosystem is highly diverse

• Broad adaptation through reduced G x E interaction
  effect not clearly visible in rainfed ecosystem?
Appropriate breeding strategy
• Among G, G x E and E variance – G is comparatively high
  in irrigated situation but G x E is high in rainfed ecosystem.

• G x E interactions have been earlier considered a
  hindrance to the crop improvement.

• Nevertheless, G x E offer opportunity in selection and
  adoption of genotypes showing positive interactions with
  the location*.

• However, if G x E is small, possible advantage of breeding
  for specific adaptation is reduced.
TPE classification: A case study from Thailand

• A water balance model was used to estimate the level of
  standing water in paddy using weekly rainfall data from 1987
  to 2001 for Nong Khai and Nakhon Ratchasima provinces of
  Thailand

• Time and duration of standing water in the paddy

                                          (Boonrat et al. 2006)
A successful breeder must:

• Be in close touch with the farmers
• Know the constraints in the target environment
• Know the market requirements
• Know the plant traits considered important by the
  farmers
• Imply all these information in his breeding program
A case study from Thailand

Parameter              Nong Khai             Nakhon Ratchasima

Total Rainfall         2000 mm               1000 mm

Growing season         Earlier               Later (High chance of
beginning                                    early drought)
Rainfall withdrawl     8-14 Oct.             8-14 Oct.

Chances of late        High                  High
drought
Varietal requirement   Late season drought   Cultivars with tolerance
                       tolerant cultivars    to drought at early as
                                             well as at late season
A superior cultivar is one that:

• Will be grown by the farmer because it performs
  better (or obtains a better price) than the existing
  cultivar
• Under management practices currently used or
  available to the farmer


                    Economic benefit
A Case study from Thailand: Village level
                surveys


• Earlier, the target domain was classified using G x E
  interaction and cluster analysis of multi location trials

• Because of year to year variation, the TPE changed
  from year to year.
A Case study from Thailand: Village level
                surveys

• Surveys at village and house hold level have
  been used to define the TPE
• Hydrology of rice paddies even at local level
  in farmers fields is utilized.

• Four terrace paddy levels are identified-
     Upper             –     drought prone
     Middle            -     drought prone
     Middle            -     Favorable
     Lower             -     Flooded
Identifying target environments drought rbc 2012

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente

Alan GRAINGER "Is zero net land degradation in dry areas a feasible operation...
Alan GRAINGER "Is zero net land degradation in dry areas a feasible operation...Alan GRAINGER "Is zero net land degradation in dry areas a feasible operation...
Alan GRAINGER "Is zero net land degradation in dry areas a feasible operation...
Global Risk Forum GRFDavos
 
Nisha VARGHESE "Linkages between desertification and human development in the...
Nisha VARGHESE "Linkages between desertification and human development in the...Nisha VARGHESE "Linkages between desertification and human development in the...
Nisha VARGHESE "Linkages between desertification and human development in the...
Global Risk Forum GRFDavos
 
Wolfgang_Voegler_Tillage_Prague_June11
Wolfgang_Voegler_Tillage_Prague_June11Wolfgang_Voegler_Tillage_Prague_June11
Wolfgang_Voegler_Tillage_Prague_June11
TacTac-RAS
 
WolfgangVoegler_Tillage_PragueJune11
WolfgangVoegler_Tillage_PragueJune11WolfgangVoegler_Tillage_PragueJune11
WolfgangVoegler_Tillage_PragueJune11
TacTac-RAS
 
Native warm season grasses 3
Native warm season grasses 3Native warm season grasses 3
Native warm season grasses 3
nacaa
 
Magnificant Manzanitas - Notes
Magnificant Manzanitas - NotesMagnificant Manzanitas - Notes
Magnificant Manzanitas - Notes
cvadheim
 
Abundance and diversity of azotobacter and po4 solubilizing microorganisms i...
Abundance and diversity of azotobacter and po4  solubilizing microorganisms i...Abundance and diversity of azotobacter and po4  solubilizing microorganisms i...
Abundance and diversity of azotobacter and po4 solubilizing microorganisms i...
CSM _BGBD biodiversity
 

La actualidad más candente (20)

Landscape Aproaches: The place of Agroforestry, afforestation and reforestati...
Landscape Aproaches: The place of Agroforestry, afforestation and reforestati...Landscape Aproaches: The place of Agroforestry, afforestation and reforestati...
Landscape Aproaches: The place of Agroforestry, afforestation and reforestati...
 
Poster12A: Farmers' adaptive management: key factor in wider adoption of clim...
Poster12A: Farmers' adaptive management: key factor in wider adoption of clim...Poster12A: Farmers' adaptive management: key factor in wider adoption of clim...
Poster12A: Farmers' adaptive management: key factor in wider adoption of clim...
 
Alan GRAINGER "Is zero net land degradation in dry areas a feasible operation...
Alan GRAINGER "Is zero net land degradation in dry areas a feasible operation...Alan GRAINGER "Is zero net land degradation in dry areas a feasible operation...
Alan GRAINGER "Is zero net land degradation in dry areas a feasible operation...
 
Nisha VARGHESE "Linkages between desertification and human development in the...
Nisha VARGHESE "Linkages between desertification and human development in the...Nisha VARGHESE "Linkages between desertification and human development in the...
Nisha VARGHESE "Linkages between desertification and human development in the...
 
Wolfgang_Voegler_Tillage_Prague_June11
Wolfgang_Voegler_Tillage_Prague_June11Wolfgang_Voegler_Tillage_Prague_June11
Wolfgang_Voegler_Tillage_Prague_June11
 
WolfgangVoegler_Tillage_PragueJune11
WolfgangVoegler_Tillage_PragueJune11WolfgangVoegler_Tillage_PragueJune11
WolfgangVoegler_Tillage_PragueJune11
 
Pulleman - Biodiversity and climate resilience
Pulleman - Biodiversity and climate resiliencePulleman - Biodiversity and climate resilience
Pulleman - Biodiversity and climate resilience
 
SC: Rain Garden Brochure
SC: Rain Garden BrochureSC: Rain Garden Brochure
SC: Rain Garden Brochure
 
Native warm season grasses 3
Native warm season grasses 3Native warm season grasses 3
Native warm season grasses 3
 
Magnificant Manzanitas - Notes
Magnificant Manzanitas - NotesMagnificant Manzanitas - Notes
Magnificant Manzanitas - Notes
 
Habitat Enhancements
Habitat EnhancementsHabitat Enhancements
Habitat Enhancements
 
Yield Prophet and precision agriculture - a suitable tool for risk management...
Yield Prophet and precision agriculture - a suitable tool for risk management...Yield Prophet and precision agriculture - a suitable tool for risk management...
Yield Prophet and precision agriculture - a suitable tool for risk management...
 
Abundance and diversity of azotobacter and po4 solubilizing microorganisms i...
Abundance and diversity of azotobacter and po4  solubilizing microorganisms i...Abundance and diversity of azotobacter and po4  solubilizing microorganisms i...
Abundance and diversity of azotobacter and po4 solubilizing microorganisms i...
 
Strip Till Systems Info Session
Strip Till Systems Info SessionStrip Till Systems Info Session
Strip Till Systems Info Session
 
3 Kengiller N2africa
3 Kengiller N2africa3 Kengiller N2africa
3 Kengiller N2africa
 
3 Kengiller N2africa
3 Kengiller N2africa3 Kengiller N2africa
3 Kengiller N2africa
 
9. soil conservation tillage By Allah Dad Khan
9. soil conservation tillage By Allah Dad Khan 9. soil conservation tillage By Allah Dad Khan
9. soil conservation tillage By Allah Dad Khan
 
Trabajo yunque + guanica
Trabajo yunque + guanicaTrabajo yunque + guanica
Trabajo yunque + guanica
 
tillage
tillagetillage
tillage
 
CGMDC CICL IFFCO_Tara Coal Block presentation_09.03.2011
CGMDC CICL IFFCO_Tara Coal Block presentation_09.03.2011CGMDC CICL IFFCO_Tara Coal Block presentation_09.03.2011
CGMDC CICL IFFCO_Tara Coal Block presentation_09.03.2011
 

Similar a Identifying target environments drought rbc 2012

Similar a Identifying target environments drought rbc 2012 (20)

DESERT PLANNING
DESERT PLANNINGDESERT PLANNING
DESERT PLANNING
 
Agro Ecoregion 4
Agro Ecoregion 4Agro Ecoregion 4
Agro Ecoregion 4
 
Ramkishan b.ed major types of soils
Ramkishan b.ed major types of soils Ramkishan b.ed major types of soils
Ramkishan b.ed major types of soils
 
Soil types of india
Soil types of indiaSoil types of india
Soil types of india
 
Sri lanka - Paddy field adaptation - practical action
Sri lanka -  Paddy field adaptation - practical actionSri lanka -  Paddy field adaptation - practical action
Sri lanka - Paddy field adaptation - practical action
 
Sri lanka - Paddy field adaptation - practical action
Sri lanka -  Paddy field adaptation - practical actionSri lanka -  Paddy field adaptation - practical action
Sri lanka - Paddy field adaptation - practical action
 
Soil health an overview
Soil health an overviewSoil health an overview
Soil health an overview
 
Resource & development ppt
Resource & development pptResource & development ppt
Resource & development ppt
 
Resource & Development
Resource & Development Resource & Development
Resource & Development
 
ICAR - National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning
 ICAR - National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning ICAR - National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning
ICAR - National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planning
 
Horticulture zones of india and the crops grown .pptx
Horticulture zones of india and the crops grown .pptxHorticulture zones of india and the crops grown .pptx
Horticulture zones of india and the crops grown .pptx
 
Lateritic Soils and Constraints in crop production
Lateritic Soils and Constraints in crop productionLateritic Soils and Constraints in crop production
Lateritic Soils and Constraints in crop production
 
Boudh_Chapter_4.pdf
Boudh_Chapter_4.pdfBoudh_Chapter_4.pdf
Boudh_Chapter_4.pdf
 
Soil in Chhattisgarh (IGKV RAIPUR. C.G)
Soil in Chhattisgarh (IGKV RAIPUR. C.G)Soil in Chhattisgarh (IGKV RAIPUR. C.G)
Soil in Chhattisgarh (IGKV RAIPUR. C.G)
 
Soils of telangana and water management
Soils  of telangana and water managementSoils  of telangana and water management
Soils of telangana and water management
 
Agro ecological region and sub rgions of India
Agro ecological region and sub rgions of IndiaAgro ecological region and sub rgions of India
Agro ecological region and sub rgions of India
 
Jonathan Davies: Priorities for Research in the Wetland Forests of Brunei
Jonathan Davies: Priorities for Research in the Wetland Forests of BruneiJonathan Davies: Priorities for Research in the Wetland Forests of Brunei
Jonathan Davies: Priorities for Research in the Wetland Forests of Brunei
 
Local community perceptions of change and climate variability in tropical for...
Local community perceptions of change and climate variability in tropical for...Local community perceptions of change and climate variability in tropical for...
Local community perceptions of change and climate variability in tropical for...
 
Rahul Bajpai M.tech Remote sensing & GIS RSACUP
Rahul Bajpai M.tech Remote sensing & GIS RSACUPRahul Bajpai M.tech Remote sensing & GIS RSACUP
Rahul Bajpai M.tech Remote sensing & GIS RSACUP
 
Various media for propagating nursery plants
Various media for propagating nursery plantsVarious media for propagating nursery plants
Various media for propagating nursery plants
 

Identifying target environments drought rbc 2012

  • 1. Identifying the target environments in breeding for rainfed ecosystems B.P. Mallikarjuna Swamy August 3, 2012 Rice Breeding Course 2011
  • 2. Outline • The concept of the target population of environments(TPE) • Complexity of rainfed ecosystem • Factors to be considered in delineating the TPE • Methods of grouping locations into TPE • Relationship between selection environments and TPE • Setting goals and prioritizing traits • Appropriate breeding strategy for a TPE • A case study
  • 3. Target population of environments(TPE) Comstock (1977) defined the concept of a target population of environments (TPE) associated with a breeding program as the complete set of "types" of environments in which cultivars can be grown within the geographical area targeted by a breeding program.
  • 4. Concept of the TPE • TPE is the set of all environments, fields and seasons in which an improved variety is targeted to perform well. • TPE consists of – Not a single environment but a set of present and future production environments. • Environmental variability changes the performance of varieties. • Breeders wish to develop cultivars that are superior to currently used varieties in most years and on most farms within the TPE.
  • 5. Concept of the TPE • Seasonal variation can result in very different conditions in the same field in different years • Weather records for a certain location shows- Favorable years - 10 Years with drought at seedling stage - 4 Years with drought at flowering - 6 Years with submergence - 0 Blast - 10 BPH - 0 BLB - 3
  • 6. Concept of the TPE • Development of appropriate research strategy and prioritization of rice research activities requires - 1. In depth understanding of TPE (More relevant with the Global climate change scenario) 2. Farmers traditional knowledge and farming practices 3. Socio-economic environments 4. Farmers perception of the new technologies being introduced
  • 7. Rianfed Ecosystems Rainfed Upland Drought Rainfed shallow Lowland Drought Rainfed shallow Lowland Favorable Rainfed shallow Lowland Drought, submergence Rainfed shallow Lowland Submergence Rainfed medium Lowland Submergence Rainfed Lowland Deficit Water Surplus
  • 8. Complexity of rainfed environments • Large variations in rain fed ecosystems – rainfed upland, rainfed lowland • rainfall • soil type • topography • occurrence of abiotic stresses- drought, submergence • prevalent-insect-pests • low input use • quality preference • socio-economic conditions of the farmers
  • 9. Factors in delineating the TPE • Environmental factors Rainfall, topography, Soil type, Insect-pest Many breeding programs considers this and have separate breeding program • Socioeconomic factors Resource capacity, Input use availability Very few breeding programs takes this into account
  • 10. Methods of Grouping sites in TPE • Crop Models • Environmental parameters • Currently used varieties • Statistical analysis of multi environment data - Principal component analysis -Tests of fixed environmental effects - Examination of correlations of cultivar means across sites • Geographical information system (GIS)
  • 11. Crop modeling • The need to manage and predict crop's behavior over a wide range of planting dates, geographies and situations has become increasingly important. • Use of crop simulation models incorporating local climatic conditions with management operations increases our ability to make more timely and educated decisions. • The time has finally arrived in which crop modeling tools are increasingly being deployed to help address questions and problems on a larger, farm scale size. The full potential and value of crop models have not yet been realized in production agriculture.
  • 12. Grouping sites in TPE: Crop Models • Use of crop models to identify environments in terms of water stress has been suggested • Historical weather data required • Information can be obtained from farmers if environmental information is not available: -Rapid rural appraisal -Agro system analysis
  • 13. Grouping sites in TPE: Environmental parameters • Sites with similar rainfall pattern, soil types and depths of standing water accumulation within each region may be grouped together for breeding purposes
  • 14. Sites Target environment Soil type Field topography Drought Presently grown varieties Indira Gandhi Krishi Rainfed low land Clay, clay loam, low Bunded shallow Reproductive, early MTU 1010, IR 64, Vishwavidyalaya ecosystem organic carbon lowland to mid stage Swarna, Mahamaya (IGKV), lowland NDUAT, Faizabad Rainfed shallow low Clay, clay loam, low Bunded Early season drought Sarjoo 52, Swarna, land drought prone organic carbon and reproductive NDR 97, NDR 359, and submergence stage Baranideep prone CRURRS, Hazaribag Rainfed shallow low acidic in nature, very Highly undulating Drought at all stages IR 36, IR 64, MTU land and bunded poor in fertility, low in of growth 1010, Hazaridhan, uplands available N and Sadabahar, Birsa 201, organic carbon Some other land races CRRI, Cuttack Costal region, rainfed sandy loam and clay Bunded low lands seedling stage, and Lalat, Swarna, upland and lowland loam soil vegetative stage Varshadhan Naveen, MTU 1010, Khandagiri, Vandana, TNAU, Coimbatore Irrigated Lowland Clay Bunded lowland Reproductive stage IR 64, Co-47 TNAU, Paramakudi Rainfed Upland Clay loam Bunded Reproductive stage PMK-3, ADT 38, Local races UAS, Bangalore Eastern Dry Zone red, loamy and light Unbunded Reproductive stage MTU 1001, IR 64, drought Jyoti, MTU 1010, BPT 5204, Rasi, BF, Hydrabad Low land Clay loam Bunded Reproductive stage Samba Masuri, Swarna, MTU 1010 BAU, Ranchi Rainfed shallow low acidic in nature, very Highly undulating Drought at all stages Lalat, IR 36, IR 64, land and bunded poor in fertility, low in of growth MTU 1010, Birsa 201, uplands available N and Some other land races organic carbon
  • 15. Grouping sites in TPE: Currently used varieties • Predominant farmers variety can also be used to characterize the target environment • Variety Brown Gora grown in Chhotonagpur plateau region of eastern India can be classified as upland TPE • Variety Swarna grown in much of south Asia can be classified as shallow rainfed lowland • Most reliable and simplest way to define TPE • Adverse situations that these cultivars face in these ecosystems, and performance under such situation has to be taken into account
  • 16. Sites categorization into favorable (F) or unfavorable (U) environments based on the ranking of mean yield in different years SITE Site mean yield (t/ha) Mean Ranking Category 2003 2004 2005 2003 2004 2005 Santhapur 2.35 2.39 2.37 1 1 F Semiligud a 2 2.24 1.2 1.82 1 2 5 F Faizabad 1.75 1.4 1.58 3 4 F Jagdalpur 1.86 1.02 1.76 1.54 2 4 3 F Ambikapur 1.36 0.62 1.77 1.25 6 7 2 F Ranchi 1.59 0.54 0.79 0.97 5 8 7 U Almora 0.94 0.76 0.9 0.86 7 6 6 U Hazaribag 1.65 0.36 0.39 0.8 3 10 9 U Rewa 1.64 0.46 0.26 0.78 4 9 10 U Derol 0.59 0.77 0.68 8 5 U Banswara 0.54 0.23 0.74 0.5 9 11 8 U
  • 17. Genotypes under favorable and unfavorable environment: India Genotypes Favorable environment Genotypes Unfavorable emvironment  Designation Low Input High Input Designation Low Input High Input VR 379-5 2.07 2.36 Ashoka 228 0.92 1.03 VL 3288 1.57 2.62 DDR 13 0.89 1 RR385-249 1.53 2.31 DDR 97 0.87 1.19 RR 433-2 1.49 2.66 Richa 6 0.84 1.05 RR 363-5 1.49 2.51 Richa 5 0.83 1.04 RR 356-74 1.48 2.16 Ashoka 200F 0.82 1.02 Anjali 1.48 2.58 IC 267974 0.78 1.07 DDR 106 1.42 2.13 VL 6309 0.76 0.95 VL 6394 1.41 2.07 DDR 105 0.74 1.22 DDR 117 1.4 2.31 RR 434-3 0.74 1.1 RR 383-21 1.39 2.34 DDR 102 0.74 0.97 BAU 249-92 1.36 2.3 VL 6747 0.72 0.82 Vandana 1.22 1.86 Vandana 0.59 0.94 Kalinga III 1.17 1.66 Kalinga III 0.66 0.6 Brown Gora 1.15 1.9 Brown Gora 0.71 0.6 Ashoka 228 0.93 2.19 Anjali 0.59 1.05 Mean 1.21 2 Mean 0.61 0.9 SED0.05 0.2298 0.3658 SED0.05 0.1698 0.2176
  • 18. Grouping sites in TPE: Principal component analysis • Pattern analysis to group sites on the basis of minimum G x E within groups and maximum G x E among groups • Used when TPE is very large and diverse • Used when researchers do not have a good hypothesis about the causes of G x E • Use of probe and reference genotypes (known for their adaptation in each environment) is very helpful
  • 19. IRRI-India Drought Breeding Network % grain yield of control Entry Name Barwale Faizabad Hazaribag Raipur Ranchi 40 medium duration 1 IR55419-04 3.5 64.3 79.4 44.4 43.7 2 IR74371-3-1-1 2.2 93.1 81.0 38.6 100.0 advanced breeding lines 3 IR74371-54-1-1 1.9 82.1 7.5 34.2 71.4 4 IR77298-14-1-2 1.1 85.7 71.2 35.0 27.7 selected with different 5 IR78875-131-B-1-1 3.9 78.0 70.8 42.5 35.0 6 IR78875-131-B-1-4 2.2 59.1 74.5 26.5 75.0 performance across 7 IR78877-181-B-1-1-2 8.1 50.0 68.8 55.3 85.7 8 IR78877-208-B-1-4 6.4 42.9 94.0 50.4 45.0 environments 9 IR78878-53-2-2-2 4.6 71.4 58.9 29.1 66.7 10 IR78878-53-2-2-4 5.1 92.3 76.9 19.6 88.9 11 IR79899-B-179-2-3 2.5 69.2 74.2 16.8 70.0 12 IR79906-B-192-2-1 2.4 60.5 65.6 4.5 37.0 13 IR697515-72-1-3 1.7 54.6 87.5 34.4 44.5 14 IR80431-B-44-4 11.6 75.0 56.4 18.6 40.0 15 IR82870-58 0.6 65.5 84.2 21.1 62.5 Source d.f. Sum of squares Mean squares % of total sum of squares Genotype 39 29446.3 755.0 11.4 Environment 4 103737.0 25934.0 40.0 GxE 151 126104.0 835.1 48.6 GxE regression 39 1220.3 313.3 9.7 Stability deviations 112 11388.4 1016.8 90.3 AMMI component 1 42 73300.4 1745.3 58.1 AMMI component 2 40 27333.1 683.3 21.7 AMMI component 3 38 18698.5 492.1 14.8 AMMI component 4 36 6772.0 188.1 5.4 Total 194 259287.3
  • 20. Genotype x environment interactions-1 AMMI1 BIPLOT OF MAIN EFFECTS AND INTERACTIONS 12 5 Ranchi 7.2 28 Barwale 26 22 23 34 27 2.4 10 2 20 11 25 15 18 6 16 17 14 9 12 3 29 7 3 Hazaribag IPCA1 1 13139 33 248 45 2 40 19 38 37 36 31 -2.4 30 21 Faizabad 35 -7.2 32 Raipur 4 -12 2.295 18.695 35.095 51.495 67.895 84.295 MEANS VARIATE: RGY DATA FILE: AMMI MODEL FIT: 79.6% OF TABLE SS"
  • 21. Grouping the sites in TPE: Correlation of cultivar means • An easy and effective way of assessing the G x E across environments within target region • If correlations are above 0.3 for a single 3 replicate trial, G x E is unlikely to be large • If lower than 0.3: - either G x E is large or - trial have high error and little genetic variations among cultivars – F value for cultivars is not significant
  • 22. Correlations among line means in Eastern Indian OYT -URSBN Pusa Patna Gerua Bhaw Chin Cutt Mott Nlak Tita Maso 0.36 0.51 0.31 0.21 -0.08 -0.10 0.24 0.64 0.35 Pusa 0.41 0.19 0.21 0.01 0.18 0.29 0.26 0.46 Patna 0.24 0.06 0.10 0.14 0.41 0.34 0.37 Gerua 0.15 -0.31 -0.05 0.12 0.33 0.18 Bhaw 0.01 0.06 -0.01 0.27 0.17 Chin 0.42 0.18 -0.25 0.32 Cutt 0.29 -0.14 0.35 Nlak 0.12 0.38
  • 23. Results of correlations • Shallow sites tend to be correlated • Deeper sites (Cuttack and Chinsurah are correlated) • Correlation between shallow and deep sites is poor
  • 24. Grouping sites in TPE: GIS • Geographical information system (GIS) and crop modeling is used to predict the performance of a variety for a range of environmental conditions. • These performance ranges can be combined with known spatial variation of key environmental variables contained in GIS to generate performance domain over space. • These tools also help to identify areas that are relatively homogeneous in terms of key constraints to productivity
  • 25. Grouping sites in TPE: GIS
  • 26. Relationship between the selection environment (SE) and the TPE • SE is the nursery in which breeder makes selections • The chosen SE should predict performance in the TPE • May need more than one SE if TPE is highly variable • SE is not the same as TPE, so the relationship must be monitored
  • 27. Requirements for the SE • The SE must predict performance in seasons and locations within the TPE - genetic correlation (rG) between TPE and SE must be high • The SE must clearly and repeatably differentiate among genotypes under evaluation. • Heritability (H) for screening in the SE must be high • The SE must permit relatively large numbers of genotypes to be screened at low cost. • SE must permit a high selection intensity (i) to be achieved.
  • 28. Examples of SE for specific requirements • In addition to the yield potential, local quality preferences, SE may require to screen for – Insect-disease (Bacterial blight) resistance – Submergence tolerance – Drought tolerance – Salinity tolerance
  • 29. How to make SE more close to TPE • Multi location testing under diverse set of environments – Many national programs follow this approach • Testing under managed screens- Identify few promising lines and carry multi location testing with them
  • 30. Setting goals and prioritizing traits • Determining farmers preferences: - Focus group discussions. Farmers are asked about positive and negative features of present cultivars - Preference analysis. Farmers are asked to rate experimental lines in a trial - In some cases, future farmer preferences must be predicted (i.e., they may not be aware of new options/technologies)
  • 31. Main objectives of a breeding program • Generally, to develop a cultivar that is superior to farmers’ varieties in a particular target population of environments • Specific objectives – Replace a specific cultivar – Develop a new product – Change a single trait
  • 32. Breeding goals: specific traits and strategies • Deficiencies of currently grown varieties • List of required traits with parents that are sources of these traits • Strategy for generating populations and selection for the desired traits
  • 33. Breeding goals: specific traits and strategies • A high-quality locally-preferred variety should be used as a parent in most crosses. Because it can be difficult to recover quality characteristics in a single cross, the high- quality parent may be used as the recurrent parent in generating a BC-derived population • Quality parameters should be the focus of early- generation selection, because they are highly heritable, whereas yield is not. • The program should be structured to generate a large population of breeding lines with acceptable quality, which can then be evaluated for yield under farmer management.
  • 34. Appropriate breeding strategy: Broad adaptations vs. specific adaptation • Irrigated ecosystem is more uniform as compared to the rainfed ecosystem • Broad adaptation has been very successful • Rainfed ecosystem is highly diverse • Broad adaptation through reduced G x E interaction effect not clearly visible in rainfed ecosystem?
  • 35. Appropriate breeding strategy • Among G, G x E and E variance – G is comparatively high in irrigated situation but G x E is high in rainfed ecosystem. • G x E interactions have been earlier considered a hindrance to the crop improvement. • Nevertheless, G x E offer opportunity in selection and adoption of genotypes showing positive interactions with the location*. • However, if G x E is small, possible advantage of breeding for specific adaptation is reduced.
  • 36. TPE classification: A case study from Thailand • A water balance model was used to estimate the level of standing water in paddy using weekly rainfall data from 1987 to 2001 for Nong Khai and Nakhon Ratchasima provinces of Thailand • Time and duration of standing water in the paddy (Boonrat et al. 2006)
  • 37. A successful breeder must: • Be in close touch with the farmers • Know the constraints in the target environment • Know the market requirements • Know the plant traits considered important by the farmers • Imply all these information in his breeding program
  • 38. A case study from Thailand Parameter Nong Khai Nakhon Ratchasima Total Rainfall 2000 mm 1000 mm Growing season Earlier Later (High chance of beginning early drought) Rainfall withdrawl 8-14 Oct. 8-14 Oct. Chances of late High High drought Varietal requirement Late season drought Cultivars with tolerance tolerant cultivars to drought at early as well as at late season
  • 39. A superior cultivar is one that: • Will be grown by the farmer because it performs better (or obtains a better price) than the existing cultivar • Under management practices currently used or available to the farmer Economic benefit
  • 40. A Case study from Thailand: Village level surveys • Earlier, the target domain was classified using G x E interaction and cluster analysis of multi location trials • Because of year to year variation, the TPE changed from year to year.
  • 41. A Case study from Thailand: Village level surveys • Surveys at village and house hold level have been used to define the TPE • Hydrology of rice paddies even at local level in farmers fields is utilized. • Four terrace paddy levels are identified- Upper – drought prone Middle - drought prone Middle - Favorable Lower - Flooded