4. Motivation
The performance is influenced by mobility and saturation velocity!
(Low field current=charge*density*mobility*field)!
Mobility is ~50 % down due to very short channels !
Higher mobility => Higher drive current!
(Saturation current=charge*density*saturation velocity)
Saturation velocity will differ in very short channels
Higher saturation velocity => Higher drive current!
Higher drive current enables lower operating voltages!
Material Si Ge GaAs In0.53Ga0.47As InAs InSb
Mobility [cm2/Vs] 1500 3900 8500 14000 25000 78000
vS [cm/s] 1!107 6 106 2 107 2.5 107 3.5 107 5 107
Manufacturability Co-Integration
III-V MOSFETs ? Low DOS Gate Dielectric
The p-channel Doping activation
CDE-2009 Santiago de Compostela, Spain 4
5. Motivation
GGO is a good
dielectric for III-Vs
M. Passlack et al., IEEE EDL 23(9), 2002.
CDE-2009 Santiago de Compostela, Spain Z. Yu et al., APL 82(18), 2003. 5
6. Implant-Free (IF) MOSFET
VT controlled by workfunction
Carriers confined in the channel
Volume inversion
UTB-like electrostatic integrity
Low resistance access regions
High injection velocity
High ballisticity
No thermal budget constraints
M. Passlack, Hartin, Ray, Medendorp, U.S. Patent 6 963 090, Nov. 8, 2005.
M. Passlack et al., IEEE TED 53(10), 2006.
CDE-2009 Santiago de Compostela, Spain 6
7. (Real) 1µm gate IF MOSFET
CDE-2009 Santiago de Compostela, Spain 7
R. Hill et al., IEEE EDL 28 1080 (2007)
8. Monte Carlo Device Simulator
Quantum confinement effects:
• Effective quantum potential
D. K. Ferry, Superlatt. Microstruct. 28(5-6) (2000).
Included scattering mechanisms:
• polar optical phonons
• inter/intra-valley optical phonons
• acoustic phonons
• ionized impurities
• alloy scattering
CDE-2009 Santiago de Compostela, Spain 8
10. Simulation Results Id-Vg
1760 μA/μm
1600 μA/μm
1360 μA/μm
CDE-2009 Santiago de Compostela, Spain 10
11. Simulation Results Id-Vg
5690 µS/µm
5100 µS/µm
3840 µS/µm
CDE-2009 Santiago de Compostela, Spain 11
12. Simulation Results
5.1×107 cm/s
4.9×107 cm/s
3.9×107 cm/s
CDE-2009 Santiago de Compostela, Spain 12
13. Simulation Results
2000
Lg = 15 nm
1800 y2
y1
Cutoff Frequency fT (GHz)
1600 0.25
Lg = 20 nm
Delay Time !T (ps)
0.2
1400
0.15
1200 0.1
avg
! y2 $ ! y2 $
Lg = 30 nm 0.05 1
10
2
10
v x = # ( nvx dy & # ( n dy &
1000
Gate Length Lg (nm) #y & #y &
" 1 % " 1 %
800 Leff
gate
100 150 200 250 300 350 400 1 dx'
DC Power Dissipation ( !W/!m) tT = = (
2p fT
π 0
v x ( x' )
CDE-2009 Santiago de Compostela, Spain 13
14. Conclusions
A fair comparison of different channel materials
requires careful consideration of all relevant effects.
IF InGaAs channel MOSFETs with high-Indium
content offers ~2x performance improvement down
to 15 nm channel length.
The IF MOSFET attractive for low-power, high-
performance CMOS circuits and applications.
CDE-2009 Santiago de Compostela, Spain 14