Technology is integral to the academic experience today. As the role of technology increases, demand for help desk resources and support increases as well. If resources are not growing to meet demand, student adoption and satisfaction can suffer. Blackboard’s IT Help Desk services make sure the technologies powering your campus accelerate learning rather than inhibit it. We can provide a unified and scalable solution that extends your IT support affordably, while offering personalized service that helps keep all of your users satisfied.
More than 500 institutions currently use Blackboard Help Desk as an extension of their helpdesk support to: Improve end user satisfaction and adoption; Focus limited staff on complex support issues; and Off-load routine inquiries to self-service technologies or Blackboard advisors.
The Widening Student Service Gap - Michael Zastudil, Blackboard
1. How to Meet Increasing Student Expectations
The Widening Student Service Gap
2. Higher Education Today
Tremendous competition for students
Shifting student demographics
Significant decreases in funding
Focus on career outcomes and ROI
3. Budget Pressure
3
(Institutions) that can’t maintain quality will lose market share
and relevance.
Universities will be compelled to create new, leaner business
models as competition increases for staff, students, funding and
partners.
“The traditional university model is the analogue
of the print newspaper… 15 years max, you’ve got
the transformation.” University Vice-Chancellor
The university administration will need to be
significantly leaner than it is today. Most
universities at present have significantly more
support staff than academic staff — this ratio will
have to change.Outsources some back-office functions to realise lower operating
costs, and/or drives efficiencies through shared services
arrangements with likeminded institutions.
Streamlined back office, including using outsourcing
and/or shared services models to drive efficiency and
economies of scale
4. Need to Streamline
4
Organisations in other knowledge-based
industries, such as professional services
firms, typically operate with ratios of
support staff to front-line staff of 0.3 to 0.5.
That is, 2-3 times as many front-line staff as
support staff. Universities may not reach
these ratios in 10-15 years, but given the
‘hot breath’ of market forces and declining
government funding, education institutions
are unlikely to survive with ratios of 1.3, 1.4,
1.5 and beyond.
6. Traditional University Model
6
• Inconsistent Student
Experience
• Inefficient and costly silos
• Little to no satisfaction
measurement
• Duplicate efforts
• Multiple software solutions -
Overlap
7. Future University Model
7
• Allows staff to focus on core
functions
• Consistent message
• Accurate information (single
version of the truth)
• Better insight to student
experience
• Scalable and cost effective
8. 8
One Stop Service Desk
Transcripts
Admissions
Student Accounts
Advising Career Services
Records
Financial Aid
Registration
9. Improving the Student Experience
9
Typically, there are two options…
Do It Yourself Partner
11. Staffing Challenges
11
Limited ability to increase advisor pay
and retain top talent
Salary expenses vs. outsourced
operating expenses
Hiring ramp and decline during peak
periods
Recruiting and retention difficult to
manage due to lower wage labor force
Hiring & Retaining
of Staff
Budget Pressure
Cost Controls
Seasonality
12. Seasonality
12
22
18
19 19
18
20 20 20 20
18
14
22
0
5
10
15
20
25
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
10000
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Volume Agents
Monthly staffing needs range vary
from 14 to 22 advisors
13. Technology Considerations
13
Integrating multiple systems to ensure
a full view of student information
Need to manage updates and content
High cost of configuration and
installation and risk
Completing the due diligence required
to select and procure the right
technology solutions
Selection
Exercises
Technology
Compatibility
Administration
Implementation
14. Total Cost of Ownership Analysis
14
Accompanying detailed excel model
with custom inputs and assumptions
Apples-to-apples comparison of
outsourcing vs. central management
Customised assumptions based on
preferences
Examines help desk calls annually
with region specific salary
assumptions
16. Benefits of Working with a Partner
16
Included in Blackboard’s Solution
Added
Value of
Outsourcing
• Trusted partner with
experience in call center
operations and
management for 13+
years
• Cost control with ability
to dial back on services
vs. fixed staffing expense
• Rigorous quality
assurance, plus industry
benchmarking against
performance
metrics/trends
Telecom &
License Fees
Management &
Training
Hardware &
Maintenance
Continuous
Improvement
Vendor / Tech
Selection &
Management
Seasonality &
Ongoing
Recruiting
17. 17
Blackboard Student Lifecycle Services
Millions
of students served
500+
clients
1,000+
advisors
7 million
interactions per year
90+%
satisfaction rate
18. 18
Simplified Student Experience
Streamlined self-
help tools to
empower users
Proactive resolution
through predictive
data and insights
Mobile-friendly
solutions that
students prefer
Disparate questions
resolved in one place:
“one version of the truth”
19. 24/7 Help Desk Services International Reach
19
Multi-Language Support
Size, scale, and business health to
quickly react to your needs
Data security to protect
proprietary information
Complete visibility into
performance and metrics
20. SmartView Technology
20
Self-HelpTicketing
system
Advisor
Desktop
Data Integration Data Portal
Advisors or Staff Users
LMS SIS CRM
Institutional Data Systems
Scalable 24/7/365
solution
Integrated 360o view of
student data
Enables physical &
virtual Support
Multi-channel services
delivery
Improved problem
resolution
Effective Self-Service
Faster, more
accurate service
Built-in Case
Management
Customised knowledge
base Powerful analytics
22. Organizational Effectiveness
22
Question 1:
“Was the advisor able to solve your issue or
provide the appropriate next steps?”
92% 91%
95% 95% 95% 94% 95%
97%
81% 81%
86% 87%
84% 84% 85%
88%
70%
75%
80%
85%
90%
95%
100%
Jul-15 Aug-15 Sep-15 Oct-15 Nov-15 Dec-15 Jan-16 Feb-16
Student Satisfaction Surveys
Question 1 Question 2
Question 2:
“Using a satisfaction scale of 1 to 5, where 5 is
most satisfied and 1 is least satisfied rate your
satisfaction received from today’s call.”
Performance Metrics
00:30
Service delivery
wait-time
89%
Satisfaction
91%
First-call
resolution
rates
24. 2424
Enrollment Management Solutions
Inquiry
Management
Increase application
conversion rates
Nurture prospective students
with proactive outreach and
customized communications
Application
Management
Grow enrollments and
application yield rates
Optimize yield with personalized
support through admissions and
onboarding
25. 2525
Enrollment Management Capabilities
A dedicated extension of your team to proactively
guide candidates through the admissions process
Outreach strategies and technologies that
maximize contact and engagement with prospects
Customized promotional content to highlight
unique value propositions via phone, email & text
Integrated marketing support ensures higher
engagement rates to reinforce your brand message.
Data and reporting on key performance metrics,
application forecasts, and candidate feedback
26. 2626
Tracking Candidate Progress
Ensure candidates complete critical steps
Coaches guide and encourage progress
Track critical milestones and deadlines
Configurable Process Maps
Inquiry > Application
Program
Overview
Tour Campus
Campus Overview
FA Planning
Session
Visit Open House
Visit FA Office
Application > Enrollment
Program
Selection
Assessment
FA Completion
Technology
Session
Advising
Orientation
27. 2727
Reporting and Feedback
QuarterlyMonthlyWeekly
Activity Reports
• Volume of new
inquiries, applications
and/or enrollments
• Contact rates, contact
speed, and engagement
rates
• Candidate progress
through application
and enrollment steps
Conversion Report
• Compare running
conversion rates to
benchmarks and goals
Forecast
• Predict application or
enrollment volume per
start date based on
progress through
funnel
Business Review
• Assess goal attainment
for KPIs
• Strategy review and
updates
Market Reports
• Feedback from
candidates who chose
not to progress
28. 2828
An Extension of Your Team
Partner
Outreach
Marketing Lead
Workforce
Management
TECHNOLOGY
Support
Quality
& Compliance
Training
COLLEGE
Schools
& Programs
ACCOUNT
Management
Enrollment
Manager
ENROLLMENT
Coaches
With the rise of competition for students and increases in costs, today’s traditional student expects that they will be provided service similar to what they experience in their personal life. 24x7, easy and quick. They expect technology to just “work” and if it doesn’t they expect to find quick answers online via their mobile phone…they might even chat with someone, but they certainly don’t want to call someone on their phone. This goes for just about any situation where they may need help, technology or otherwise.
Alternatively, non-traditional students, faculty and staff are more apt to want to talk to someone as they want a personal approach.
Both support methods need to be provided in an environment with decreasing budgets and increasing competition.
Government looks to cut university funding by $1.4 billion over the next 4 years. This forces higher education to consider how they compete in their own markets and internationally with a leaner budget while maintaining quality and service. Institutions realize that they must adapt to the new reality. Cost savings must be found in order to invest and increase their “product and service” offerings to their “customers”. Leadership of forward thinking institutions realize they have roughly 10 years to transform their operations to remain relevant.
Additionally the market forces of competition and reduced funding require institutions to streamline their support staffing. As you can see from the representative sample while most professional services operate with 1 support staff supporting 2-3 front line staff providing service to customers Most universities are operating with over a 1 to 1 ratio. While Universities won’t likely every have the ratio of support staff to front line staff as the private sector, efficiencies will need to be gained.
All this leads to the “widening service gap” as the student demand rises resources are reduced and over time the gap gets wider and wider. Thus far, most institutions are making up the difference by stretching the staff to meet the increasing need leading to turnover and loss of institutional knowledge that further weakens the ability of the University to provide the level of service to satisfy demand.
The traditional university structure that we all recognize operates in a less than optimized environment that is not conducive to delivering a single service desk, but rather a fractured student experience. With back off and student services delivered by different departments and technologies it is difficult to bring all of that into one single solution which results in customer service being provided by each area with little consistency or full understanding or measurement of the service delivery to students. Additionally recruiting is not always streamlined or supported consistency.
A potential future model that can operate in the new reality streamlines the delivery of their “education products and services” through outsourcing non-core activities. In order to attract and deliver to new customers with a wider suite of offerings investments are made in delivering programs and strategic marketing and developing traction in new customer areas, such as international and corporate education.
In this model student services and back office functions are outsourced or delivered in a shared service model and technology is utilized to ensure a consistent service experience and insight into the user experience. Additionally some enrollment and student acquisition functions are also provided outside of the institution.
Most institutions are either considering or currently attempting to deliver a one stop experience for their students, but at varying degrees of sophistication. Many are putting all these departments into one building so that students don’t need to go all over campus to get answers to all of their questions. However, without a single service desk this is still a fractured service delivery. This also doesn’t support remote distance or non-traditional students who cannot visit these offices during business hours, nor does it provide a single application to track service request and it is not-practical to staff these types of one stop service centers 24/7
In order to provide a true singular 24/7 virtual and physical one stop environment you can either develop in-house or work with a partner.
There are quite of bit of factors that need to be considered if an institution wants to deliver these services internally.
Perhaps the most costly is the method of staffing and selecting the advisors/agents who will provide the tier1 services directly to students faculty and staff. This staff is dedicated to providing support vs. delivering service as a part of their core responsibilities.
In order to be effective service desks need to have an application that can provide self-service tools and tracking of service requests. There are many different service management applications to choose from and they are frequently a large investment.
There are infrastructure costs that need to be accounted for such as telecom, hardware and maintenance.
You need to account for management staff that can ensure efficiency of the staff through monitoring and quality reviews. You’ll also need content management to keep knowledge base content relevant as well as training resources available when staff turns over or new hires for peak periods.
There is also a hiring cost that needs to be accounted for and in the contact center business turnover can be very high
In order to measure success the service management system will need to be configured to capture user satisfaction, customer effort scores, cost per contact, self-help usage, service desk efficiency and measurement of request patterns, particularly during peak periods activity.
The largest portion of cost comes from staffing and there are some unique characteristics of staffing a service desk. As I mentioned earlier, turnover can be high and recruiting can become a full-time job. You may not be able to keep your best performers very long as there usually little flexibility to increase pay. The seasonal aspect of higher education can either lead to unnecessary costs with advisors sitting idle for months at a time or a pattern of hiring and releasing advisors at the appropriate times.
To highlight the point regarding seasonal hiring, here is a forecast of activity based on a US traditional semester schedule with start dates in Jan and August. This example is based on 77,000 service requests per year with a 60 second average response time. As you can see the staffing fluctuates fairly drastically throughout the year.
In thinking about the technology costs and implementation, you’ll need to select the right technology solutions that will meet your needs across the organizations and depending on the complexity of the tool configuration and implementation can be costly, typically requiring working with a third party consultant. Critical to the process…the quality of the implementation of the service management tool can determine the success or failure of the service desk.
We’ve developed a total cost of ownership analysis workbook that will help to identify and quantify the components and cost that would be required to build our your own service desk taking into considerations all of the items I just spoke about as well as others that most people don’t typically consider. This allows those considering setting up a service desk the internal vs. outsourcing costs via an apples to apples comparison customized to their preference of service levels, service request volume as well as regional costs. We are happy to go through this exercise with you and review the results to adjust to your unique situation. If you are interested, please contact your account executive.
Here is a high level comparison cost for a university in the US that expected 77,000 incidents per year for IT technical support. The results take three categories into consideration. The first year investment in infrastructure and technology, annual staffing costs and the ongoing management and maintenance needed year over year. When you consider all the real cost to build your own service desk you can see the vast difference in the cost per contact.
When you work with a partner you take advantage of the investments that have been made in service management technology, hardware, and management resources and an infrastructure that is designed to handle seasonality and continuous recruiting. There is already a framework in place to measure success and identify areas of improvement. You don’t need to worry about training or additional management staff or working with telecom vendors and monthly carrier charges.
There are quality assurance processes and staffing already in place, as well as industry experience and benchmarking of your support program against like institutions. Cost is passed on to you through economies of scale and the ability to dial up and down staff for full utilization and maximizing the investment.\s.
Blackboard has been providing service management solutions for over 13 years and we are the leader in higher education support for students, faculty and staff.
Utilizing Black board Student Services for One-stop services provides several benefits, specifically, a centralized repository of knowledge that all departments can refer to and provide consistent information to students. Effective self-service to deflect live requests and provide support in a mode that students prefer. The ability to enhance support through analysis to provide more effective and targeted information on student behavior and needs…and all of this can be delivered in a mobile environment which is the method preferred by students.
We deliver our live support services from 5 contact centers….3 in the US and 2 centers in Manilla that we invested in so that we can provide follow the sun support and have greater flexibility to support emerging markets in Asia pacific. We are expanding the Manilla operations to include support for multiple languages such as mandarin and Korean. This reach allows us to have an incredible amount of flexibility to support our customer’s needs wherever they are.
Our platform is built on our proprietary system SmartView that we developed to support the unique needs of higher education. SmartView consists of 4 modules that our clients can utilize. We have a robust and customized support portal, branded to be an extension of your web pages. A robust ticketing and case management system that is role based and configurable to support any business processes and workflows. The service desk also contains the knowledge base that is easy to use to add content, modify articles and publish internally and externally. In addition, SmartView uses an advisor desktop that can pull data from multiple sources to display information relevant to supporting the student, faculty of staff. This information can come from the SIS, LMS or another CRM currently utilized so that all the information needed is in once place easy to find without having to log in to multiple systems to search. And finally, SmartView provides powerful analytics through our data portal so that you can see exactly what is happening with support. We provide an executive dashboard that reports on case activity and SLA management. That is backed by detailed reporting and analysis tools to customize the data that you’re interested in. You can even access and listen to call recordings through the portal.
Here are some screenshots of SmartView. The self – help pages are responsive design so they render for use on mobile devices. Users can access the knowledge base though keyword search or browsing. We can also configure frequently asked questions. The SmartView service desk ticket management system has robust configuration options to customize the workflows and data that are collected during the support experience. This is also where the knowledge base module is and those users who have permission can modify or add content on the fly. There is also a screenshot of the executive dashboard showing the SLA management along with a high level view of case activity.
One of the most critical pieces of a successful service desk that is frequently forgotten is the ability to gather performance data. We offer two methods of survey. There is an after call survey that is provided to each caller that asks if their issue was resolved and also asks for a satisfaction rating of the interaction on a 1-5 scale. Additionally, through case surveys we can gather free text comments that allow us to understand why a particular user was not pleased or their issue was not resolved. We also have the ability to track these results back to a case and phone call so that we can research the root cause of the issue. Was it that the student was provided incorrect information, were they frustrated with a particular process that they had to go through in order to get their issue resolved. This root cause analysis is the key to ensuring a continuous improvement process to get ahead of trends and improve service.
We offer several levels of support to our clients. Whether you just need immediate help and someone to pick up the phone or you have some of the pieces already available and need us to augment support such as after-hours. And we can provide the full suite of services and products which essentially provides all the tools and support needed to provide a robust service desk.
I also want to take a few minutes to talk about our enrollment services. We found that lots of institutions just don’t have the staff to be able to guide students through the application and registration process. So we have developed enrollment teams that learn the custom process at each client in order to better convert interested individuals to applicants and applicants to students.
As a representative of the client we use a very custom approach that is based on each client’s value proposition to develop a communication plan that uses outreach strategies and engagement to drive results. Additionally, we provide extremely useful metrics to learn why students may decide not to attend, where else they may be going as well as better forecasting on enrollments.
We develop in partnership with each client a custom process map that follows the institution messaging and value proposition. Gathering key information and milestones that can help guide students and provide the information needed for them to make an informed decision. We can then also take that applicant through the enrollment and registration process providing them key information to resources they have access to as well as key dates to deliver a cohesive personalized approach.
Just like with the service desk, the one most critical component of the enrollment service is gather activity information and results to leadership to better plan and strategize to drive higher enrollments. Operational reports are delivered weekly, performance reports monthly and strategic reports for review with leadership are provided quarterly.
With everything we do to support our partners we serve as an extension of your team. Our goal is to provide a better service experience to your students, faculty and staff while providing insight on how to improve as we move forward. We do this through the components that we’ve invested in…training, workforce management, quality assurances, operation management and technology. We also assign a dedicated account manager to be your evangelist within the organization and measure performance to goals.
Here are some of the key partners that we’ve worked with for both service desk support as well as enrollment services.