Enhancing and Restoring Safety & Quality Cultures - Dave Litwiller - May 2024...
EAP Response to Bank Robberies: A Comprehensive Approach
1. Presenters: Bernie McCann & Keith Crochiere
MA/RI Chapter of EAPA Annual Symposium
Waltham, MA May 10, 2012
2. Presenter Bios
Bernie McCann, Ph.D., CEAP is an experienced Employee Assistance consultant,
workplace trainer, university instructor and behavioral health researcher. His prior
work experience includes Research Associate at Brandeis University, Policy Analyst at
the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy, Member Assistance
Specialist for the Laborers' Health & Safety Fund of North America; Employee
Assistance Counselor at Baltimore Gas & Electric, and Project Manager on workplace
wellness programs funded by NIH, CDC, SAMHSA and the Robert Woods Johnson
Foundation.
Keith Crochiere, CEO of Employee Assistance Network, is a psychologist with 20+
years of EAP experience. A published expert on employee performance and
behavior issues and is frequently asked to speak on a variety of human resource
topics such as: Working with Difficult People, Conflict Negotiation, The Art of Giving
and Receiving Criticism, and Listening Skills, Keith has held graduate faculty
positions at University of Massachusetts, Bridgewater State College, and Western
New England College, lecturing on Chemical Dependency, Organizational
Management and Organizational Behavior. EAP Network provides counseling and
consultation services to 100 New England organizations.
3. Presentation Agenda
Background/Introduction to the issue
Responding to initial notification of the traumatic event
Assessing the nature & extent of the incident
Addressing concerns of employer representatives regarding affected
employees
Providing EA services to affected employees
On-site response, psychoeducation, triage for acute stress
Follow-up support & referrals to higher levels of care
Training curriculum for bank branch managers
Request for assistance in reducing post-robbery stress & resignations
Development & implementation of presentation in providing
psychological first aid to bank line employees.
4. Critical Incidents by Industry
Incident Type
Workplace Accidental Downsizing/
Industry Type Death Injury Layoffs Robbery Suicide
Manufacturing 51.5% 12.1% 25.8% 2.0% 8.6%
Transportation/
Communication
s/ 70.6% 15.8% 4.5% 3.2% 5.9%
Utilities
Services 66.7% 16.7% 3.7% 0% 13.0%
Financial 26.9% 3.8% 7.7% 61.5% 0%
5. Bank Crimes & Worker Impact
Surveyed employees in one large banking company who
experienced one or more robbery provided these reactions:
80% reported concentration/productivity negatively affected
67% reported experiencing anger or stress
63% reported experiencing hypervigilance
60% reported feeling not safe
60% reported feeling suspicious of those resembling the
perpetrator
1/3 reported other symptoms (insomnia, headaches,
stomachaches, nightmares, etc.)
Source: Burke et al. (1999)
6. CSID, PFA, or CISM?
Definitions
Critical Incident Stress Debriefing (CISD) – A technique, originally
developed for use in one-on-one interventions with first responders (the Mitchell
Model) and later expanded to wider application for virtually any type of group post-
trauma response.
Psychological First Aid (PFA) – A more recent technique, primarily a public
health approach to disaster response employing a holistic view of victim safety,
attention to basic needs, and psychological triage.
Critical Incident Stress Management (CISM) – A comprehensive,
integrated, systematic and multicomponent crisis intervention approach. Components
may include pre-incident preparedness, acute crisis support & defusing, referral
mechanisms, post-incident follow up, etc.
*For all the above, the existing research on effectiveness and outcomes can
be characterized as having both gaps and contradictory findings.
7. Critical Incident Stress Research
Most individuals who received critical incident stress debriefings endorsed
it as helpful (Carlier et al, 2000; Small et al., 2000)
Rose et al., (2001) concluded “there is no current evidence that
psychological debriefing is useful for prevention of PTSD after traumatic
events and compulsory debriefings should cease.”
Boscarino (2005) followed 1681 NY adults after 9/11 in a 2 year follow up,
PFA/crisis intervention resulted in lowered binge drinking, alcohol
dependence, PTSD symptoms, major depression and anxiety.
Comparing two groups of employees who received a single group
intervention (CISD) and an integrated approach (CISM); the CISM group
had significantly less post-trauma morbidity at 3-12 mo. follow-ups
compared to CISD alone (Richards, 2001).
8. A Comprehensive Approach
1. Professional Competency (Knowledge of current best practice)
2. Worksite Needs Assessment (Organizational/Client Knowledge)
3. Capacity for Crisis Response (Adequate Infrastructure & Staffing)
4. Clinical Resources (On-site response & Referral network)
5. Psychoeducation (Employees, Supervisors & Management)
9. Initial Response to Critical Incidents
Timing is important - A key element is when to do the
debriefing. Too soon and people are still in shock/denial and too
preoccupied with providing information to police and following
internal security protocols.
Proper coordination with management and onsite leadership is
essential. Having a protocol to follow, a code word to share the
information with others, who is to contact whom, scheduling the
on-site session -- and not leaving the decision to the onsite contact
(who may be emotionally unable to make a good decision regarding
staff needs), are all crucial considerations.
Obtain as much information as possible (from all contacts) before
arriving to conduct an on-site session.
10. Onsite Critical Incident Response
Following notice of a workplace critical incident and after receiving a
request for onsite EAP response, some logistical suggestions are:
Bring sufficient educational materials, EAP brochures, etc.
Arrive early, introduce yourself to and talk casually with staff if
possible
Provide each employee with an EAP brochure & any handouts used
Provide managers additional materials & extra copies of brochures
Notify participants that you will remain after session to speak
individually/privately to anyone who desires, be visible during this
time period
11. Conducting Onsite Critical
Incident Sessions
When conducting the onsite session:
Personally invite all employees to join session to encourage
attendance, even those who may not have been present during the
incident – the goal is to create a sense of shared support for the
work group and those affected, that “we are all in this together”
During the session, provide information to participants on:
Purpose of the session, why EAP is responding
Typical responses to traumatic events
Any additional psychoeducational details
How the EAP works, confidentiality, etc.
Take this opportunity to describe the many other types of
support/assistance available from the EAP (i.e., normalizing the idea
of contacting the EAP)
12. Post-Session Follow up
After providing an on-site session, EAP critical incident
follow up services may include:
1. Employees identified as suffering particularly severe acute
stress symptoms - for these individuals it may be appropriate
to recommend continuing EAP involvement via phone or in-
person counseling, individually or in group sessions.
2. Management/HR/on-site supervisors – to ascertain staff
recovery from the incident; their satisfaction with on-site
sessions; additional training or organizational development
needs
13. Psychoeducation & Stress Response
Psychoeducation can provide important information for individuals with
psychological concerns. A primary goal is to assist individuals to better
understand conditions and to better deal with symptoms. The individual's own
strengths, resources and coping skills are reinforced, in order to encourage
improved functioning/wellness, feel less helpless and avoid relapse.
As an element of Psychological First Aid and Critical Incident Response to bank
crimes, psychoeducation content may include:
Common symptoms & duration of stress reactions
Self-care following traumatic incidents
The benefit of support from co-workers, supervisors, families, etc.
Data on the likelihood of injuries or fatalities during bank crimes
Additionally, psychoeducation also has the function of contributing to the de-
stigmatization of psychological concerns and diminish resistance to treatment.
14. Presenting OD Issue & EA Response
Situation: Multiple requests to provide post-robbery EA
services to a number of local banks in the Boston area
Additional data: Subsequent discussion with HR Manager at
one of the largest credit unions in Massachusetts revealed that
often after robberies, a percentage of line employees
(particularly novice staff members) would resign/miss work
From exit interviews and other discussions, HR Manager
ascertained these resignations and absences were due to:
Novice employees being frightened of “unsafe work environment”
Family pressure on employees to resign or stay home
15. Branch Manager Training
Based on the HR Manager’s concerns about bank line
employee absences and retention following robberies; we
suggested and developed a 90 minute training presentation
for a quarterly bank branch managers meeting.
This training focused on the following:
• Data about bank crimes & likely employee responses to
robberies
• An orientation to Psychological First Aid
• Encouraging use of services
• Helping families/friends cope to reduce employee stress
16. The Critical Incident Stress Response
When a robbery occurs, employees are likely to
feel a variety of emotions; these include shock,
fear, anxiety, disconnectedness, and even anger.
The time span of these emotions may continue for
days, weeks, months -- although typically these
feelings become less intense in frequency, duration
and intensity.
Given that bank employees typically return to the same
environment where the robbery occurred, some may
experience a ‘triggering effect’ when they encounter
certain stimuli.
17. ‘Psychological First Aid’
Psychological first aid is an application of early
critical incident/crisis response suitable for use
by non-mental health professionals.
Relying on a strengths-based perspective, it
involves providing a basic level of support and
information to victims immediately following a
critical incident/emergency/disaster.
It is designed to reduce the initial distress of
traumatic events and foster coping abilities.
18. Providing ‘Psychological First Aid’
When victims want to talk, be prepared to listen.
When listening, focus on patiently hearing what
speakers are trying to say.
Respond in ways that address immediate goals
and how you can be of assistance. Speak slowly,
clearly and calmly. Clarify answers repeatedly as
necessary.
Update victims and others as new information
becomes available. Inform them of available
resources and how they can access them easily.
19. Encouraging the use of services
Inform employees that a EAP representative/mental
health professional will be conducting an initial
debriefing session (and provide date and time if
available).
Strongly encourage all employees (not just those
present during the incident) to attend.
For those unable or unwilling to attend the initial
debriefing service, make certain they understand that
additional counseling services are available now and
will continue to be provided through the EAP.
Furnish EAP contact information to employees (and
family members as appropriate).
20. Ways to help employees cope
First priority: Make sure everyone is safe – visual
staff inspections are just part of a complete picture.
Expressing your concern by engaging/inquiring
directly of each employee as to how they are doing
will help gauge their state of mind and the level of
their stress reaction.
Keep in mind the potential variety of individual
responses and range of emotions in such events –
avoid judgmental language or labeling of anyone’s
particular responses, the initial focus should be on
checking in with each individual and reassurance.
21. Branch Manager Training Results
Comments from branch managers during the training were
remarkably similar to those often heard from supervisors and
managers during workplace substance abuse and EAP
orientations – they expressed an uneasiness when entering
into areas considered “psychological” or commenting on
employee’s family life, etc.
Post-training feedback from HR Manager was positive, she
felt the training had given branch managers an understanding
of the principles of PFA and how they might apply them with
employees after a robbery.
Additionally, a slight increase in requests for post-robbery
EAP response did occur following the training.
22. Concluding Remarks
While not all EAPs will be confronted with the task of
responding to bank crimes, we believe this aspect of EA
services provides a good illustration of how to develop and
apply a comprehensive approach to workplace critical
incident stress management.
Research on the evolving best practices for supporting
employees (and others) during crises/traumatic events
indicates that an approach which fosters resistance to stress
and resilience through appropriate levels of support,
psychoeducation, and referral to higher levels of care when
indicated, can be an effective EAP approach.
Notas del editor
Critical Incident - An event that is sudden, unexpected, and of a magnitude that is beyond the norm of what usually happens to people at work, potentially overwhelming normal coping abilities. Sudden deaths (suicides, homicides, natural), natural disasters that damage the workplace, shootings, robberies. Source: Blum, Dorothy & Paul, Jan. Workplace Disaster Preparedness and Response: The Employee Assistance Program Continuum of Services. The International Journal of Emergency Mental Health. Volume 7, Number 3. Summer 2005. pp. 169-178The source of this chart is from Greenwood, et al. (2006) Responding in Times of Crisis-An Exploratory Study of Employer Requests for Critical Incident Response Services. Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health . 21(3/4):171-189.Two interesting observations from this slide The financial industry has by far the largest percent of robberies; and The financial industry has the lowest percent of deaths.
CISD - The intention of CISD is to provide some sort of psychological “closure” upon the traumatic, or critical, incident – when closure is not possible, the CISD may service as a useful mechanism for psychological triage so as to identify those who will need more advanced care.Psychological first aid is an application of early critical incident/crisis response suitable for use by non-mental health professionals. Relying on a strengths-based perspective, it involves providing a basic level of support and information to victims immediately following a critical incident/emergency/disaster. It is designed to reduce the initial distress of traumatic events and foster coping abilities. A CISM program is comprehensive, it promotes pre-event stress and crisis management education; planning and policy development; as well as training and preparation for management of traumatic stress. It also contains a set of interventions which are helpful for when a traumatic event is in progress and interventions that are useful in the aftermath of a traumatic event. It is integrated --the components of a CISM program are linked and blended together into a cohesive approach for use in crisis intervention. It is systematic,the elements of a CISM program are applied in a logical, step-by-step manner. It is multi-component, having many parts that are interlocked, encouraging a strategic, multi-faceted and interlinked approach to crisis management.
A large part of the debate over debriefings is whether they are a treatment or a preventative exercise. Is the goal of debriefings to improve resiliency rather than to prevent or alleviate illness?Several findings suggest that there are positive effects from short term CISD interventions, but it should be understood that regardless of early intervention, there is a significant percentage of victims who may develop symptoms and receive a diagnosis of PTSD, depression and/or generalized anxietySince debriefings are voluntary, perhaps only those employees who are truly upset about the incident may choose to attend the session. Some may be upset about the incident but don’t choose to attend. This may skew the numbers when research on the effectiveness and efficacy of CISDs is being performedIf a single intervention is all that is offered, perhaps the sessions do more harm than good. It’s been suggested that a debriefing should be considered as “one component of a comprehensive multi-component crisis intervention program.”
Professional Competency (Knowledge of current best practice)Worksite Needs Assessment (Organizational/Client Knowledge)Capacity for Crisis Response (Adequate Infrastructure & Staffing)Clinical Resources (On-site response & Referral network)Psychoeducation (Employees, Supervisors & Management)
Recommendations about when to conduct a sessionAsk questions about gender of de-briefing staff
Goals of PFA are similar to First Aid:Stabilize individual’s psychological functioning through meeting basic physical needs, then by addressing the most basic of psychological needsMitigate psychological dysfunction/distressAssist with attainment of acute adaptive psychological/behavioral functioning, and/orFacilitate referral/access to next level of care
Psychoeducation can take place in one-on-one discussion or in groups and by any qualified health professional.In the group setting, participants are informed about the condition simultaneously, which can encourage a shared experience. Additionally, exchanges of common experiences between participants and mutual support can contribute to the healing process.
The range of emotions and reactions that individuals experience is neither a list nor a continuum -- some may feel one, others two in succession, or perhaps even all of them over the course of days, weeks, or months.Some researchers of the robbery/critical incident phenomena have speculated that continuing to return to in the previously-safe workplace environment may account for a persistence of stress-related trauma symptoms in some individuals, and thus contribute to a longer, more severe recovery process.
The term Psychological First Aid does have a number of different meanings. In today’s short training we are focusing on using the term merely as an approach for managers and supervisors to provide support and information in the direct aftermath of a critical incident, particularly a robbery – rather than a formal training whereby non-mental health professionals receive a more extensive training leading to a certification, which does actually exist.The Psychological First Aid paradigm does not assume all victims will develop severe mental health problems following a traumatic event. Rather, it is based on the understanding that victims will experience a broad range of early reactions: physical, psychological, and behavioral seen in victims of trauma. What we have learned is that there is a definite space and time between the event and, for example the time of any formal defusing or debriefing that management, supervisors and even co-workers can provide a basis level of support and information – and that providing this is very beneficial to those impacted by the event.Now, clearly some of these reactions may cause enough distress to an individual to interfere with the normal adaptive coping and recovery process – that is the secondary purpose of PFA -- to help identify those individuals that may benefit from further assessment and assistance by mental health professionals.
The Goal: Provide a sense of safety, calm, connectedness, hope and optimism in a manner that is non-intrusive, yet supportive and educational by demonstrating competence and concern for the organization’s human capital with the aim of encouraging both individuals and the work group to return to normal functioning.
Current best practices in providing post workplace critical incident response include the following principles: 1) Administer an initial “dose” of support & education, or debriefing within 48-72 hours, or as soon as practical thereafter. 2) Attendance for work group members is strongly suggested, however active (verbal) participation is absolutely voluntary. 3) The primary focus of an initial de-briefing should be educational and use a strengths-based approach; information about critical incident stress and common responses; psychological self-care recommendations for post-acute recovery; encouragement of self-monitoring of mental health symptoms; details of various sources of counseling - professional, community, faith-based.4) During any group debriefings and individual crisis counseling sessions, EAPs and other mental health professionals are guided by their observations of individuals and use of routine mental status assessments which provide may evidence of possible recommendations for further services.5) The voluntary nature of service use is critical, mandates for counseling sessions are not recommended, however suggestions from trusted managers, supportive co-workers or concerned family members are often instrumental in a victim’s decision to seek help.
In my pre-training discussion with HR Representatives, this was an area we might discuss further – the idea of using non-judgmental language and avoiding labels.To clarify, what I am suggesting is that its helpful to remember that not every individual’s response to an incident is likely to be identical.From a strictly gender perspective, it may be that any males present will react in one fashion, while females in another. Males in our society are socialized to be stoic, to shrug off trauma and “apply a task oriented” approach to difficult situations, whereas women may be more likely to verbalize their reactions. Which is better? The short answer is neither – the danger lies in taking a position which assumes one is more appropriate for all those involved.My experience in providing CISDs and recent research tells me that a cookie cutter approach is not the way to go. Purposefully checking in with individuals, then would be my suggestion in how to ascertain their level of stress
Would like to emphasize these findings are anecdotal – they represent only one training and ongoing discussions with one organization.