3. Since 1997, the RLMS averaged 33 000 completed question-
naires each month (28% response rate). To ensure that all geo-
graphical areas are represented and to adjust for difference re-
sponse rates, regions of the country where the response rates were
low were oversampled.
To maintain consistency, the question included in the RLMS,
with respect to milk feeding, has not changed markedly over time.
From a list of all commercial infant formulas, human milk, and
cow’s milk (whole, 2%, etc) mothers were asked to indicate the
type of milk fed to their infant “in the hospital,” “at 1 week of
age,” “in the last 30 days.” and “most often in the last week.” The
“in the hospital” category was used to determine infant feeding
practices initiated at birth. The “most often in the last week”
category was used to determine the types(s) of milk fed to a
6-month-old infant. The list of infant formulas is updated as new
formulas are introduced or removed from the marketplace. Each
mother was also asked to answer questions describing her socio-
demographic status.
Following the approach taken in previous publications,1– 8 the
rates of breastfeeding in the hospital and at 6 months of age were
evaluated. The present study provides breastfeeding data for 1996
and 2001, with some additional information on trends since 1965. Fig 1. In-hospital breastfeeding and exclusive breastfeeding
We chose 1996 as the starting point, because our previous pub- rates: 1965–2001 (see Appendix for data by year).
lished data described breastfeeding trends up to 1995.8 In 1996,
approximately 744 000 questionnaires were mailed. In 2001, 1.4
million questionnaires were mailed. ing, however, increased slightly from 43.5% in 1990
Two categories of breastfeeding practices were considered: to 46.3% in 2001. From 1997–2001, exclusive breast-
breastfeeding and exclusive breastfeeding. The breastfeeding cat- feeding in the hospital held steady at around 46% to
egory included all infants fed human milk or a combination of
human milk and formula or cow’s milk (ie, any breastfeeding) in 47%.
the hospital or at 6 months of age. This category was used in our Trends in breastfeeding and exclusive breastfeed-
previous publications. Exclusive breastfeeding included the sub- ing at 6 months of age were similar to those seen in
set of infants who were fed only human milk in the hospital or at the hospital. As shown in Fig. 2, breastfeeding and
6 months of age; no supplemental formula and/or cow’s milk
were used. Information about the introduction and types of solid
exclusive breastfeeding at 6 months of age increased
foods fed to infants was not collected. from 1971 to a high point in 1982 (27.1% and 19.8%,
The employment variable considered in this study represented respectively). The prevalence of continued breast-
postpartum employment outside the home at the time mothers feeding and exclusive breastfeeding to 6 months of
received the questionnaire. To evaluate WIC participation status, age declined from 1984 –1989. Since 1990, the preva-
mothers were asked, “Since the birth of your youngest infant, have
you or your youngest infant participated in the government Sup- lence of breastfeeding at 6 months of age nearly
plemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children doubled from 17.6% in 1990 to 32.5% in 2001, sur-
(WIC)?” The WIC variable, therefore, represented whether the passing its previous high level in 1982. Since 1990,
mother and/or her child received WIC benefits. exclusive breastfeeding at 6 months of age increased
The responses to the survey were weighted to account for the
varying geographical coverage and response rates and to more
steadily from 10.4% 1990 to 17.2% in 2001.
precisely reflect the sociodemographic profile of births in the
United States. The weights were based on proportions of mothers Prevalence of Breastfeeding by Sociodemographic
within specific sociodemographic subgroups in the United States: Characteristics: 1996 Versus 2001
maternal region of residence (within 9 census regions), ethnic Increases in the rates of initiation of breastfeeding
background (either black or non-black), maternal age ( 24, 25–29,
30 –34, and 35 years of age), and education (either college or no between 1996 and 2001 were statistically significant
college). The weights that were used corresponded to the socio-
demographic variables that have historically been associated with
breastfeeding. The weights for these variables were derived from
the National Center for Health Statistics.9,10
A z statistic was produced to test for significant increases in
rates of breastfeeding between 1996 and 2001 in each sociodemo-
graphic subgroup. An absolute value of z 1.65 for a 1-tailed test
(P .05) was considered to be unlikely to have occurred by
chance.11
RESULTS
Trends in Breastfeeding and Exclusive Breastfeeding
From 1965–2001
As shown in Fig. 1, initiation of breastfeeding and
exclusive breastfeeding increased from 1971 to a high
point in 1982 (61.9% and 55.0%, respectively). The
prevalence of the initiation of breastfeeding and ex-
clusive breastfeeding declined from 1983 to 1989.
Since 1990, the prevalence of the initiation of breast-
feeding dramatically increased 35%, from 51.5% in
1990 to 69.5% in 2001, reaching the highest level Fig 2. Breastfeeding and exclusive breastfeeding rates at 6
recorded to date. Initiation of exclusive breastfeed- months of age: 1971–2001 (see Appendix for data by year).
1104 BREASTFEEDING CONTINUES TO INCREASE INTO THE NEW MILLENNIUM
Downloaded from www.pediatrics.org by on June 2, 2009
4. (P .05) across each demographic subgroup (Table groups increases in breastfeeding at 6 months of age
1). The largest increases in the initiation of breast- between 1996 and 2001 were statistically significant
feeding between 1996 and 2001 occurred among (P .05). There was approximately a twofold in-
women who were black, younger ( 20 years of age), crease in the prevalence of breastfeeding at 6 months
no more than high school-educated, primiparous, of age among women who were black, younger ( 20
living in the West South Central region of the United years of age), employed full-time, and women with
States; women who were not employed at the time low birth weight infants. Continued breastfeeding at
they received the survey; and women who partici- 6 months of age was most common in the Western
pated in the WIC program (Table 1). It is noteworthy states and among women who were white or His-
that, in 2001 for the first time, Hispanic women had panic, college-educated, older and multiparous, and
a higher rate of in-hospital breastfeeding than did did not participate in WIC. Breastfeeding at 6 months
white women (73% vs 69.5%). The increase in the rate of age was also more common among women who
for initiation of breastfeeding of low birth weight were employed part-time or not working outside
infants was 30.6%. their home than among women employed full-time.
Not surprising, the smallest increases occurred
among women who have been traditionally more Prevalence of Exclusive Breastfeeding by
likely to initiate breastfeeding: women who were Sociodemographic Characteristics: 2001
white, older ( 25 years of age), college-educated, Table 2 provides the rates for initiation of exclusive
multiparous, not in WIC, and living in the Mountain breastfeeding and continued exclusive breastfeeding
and Pacific regions of the United States. The rates of to 6 months of age in 2001. As in the initiation of
in-hospital breastfeeding in these groups were al- breastfeeding, exclusive breastfeeding initiated in
ready at relatively high levels. the hospital was most common among mothers who
Increases in rates of breastfeeding at 6 months of were white, older in age, employed part-time, pri-
age were much larger than those for the initiation of miparous, did not participate in the WIC program,
breastfeeding (Table 1). Except for mothers in the and living in the Mountain and Pacific states. In
grade and high school subgroups, for the other sub- contrast to in-hospital breastfeeding, the rate for ex-
TABLE 1. Breastfeeding in the Hospital and at 6 Months of Age by Selected Demographic Characteristics, 1996 and 2001
Characteristic In-Hospital At 6 Months
1996, % 2001, % Change, %* 1996, % 2001, % Change, %*
All infants 59.2 69.5 17.4 21.7 32.5 49.8
White 63.8 72.2 13.2 24.3 34.2 40.7
Black 37.1 52.9 42.6 11.3 21.9 93.8
Hispanic 60.5 73.0 20.7 19.5 32.8 68.2
Maternal age, y
20 43.3 57.2 32.1 9.6 19.5 103.1
20–24 52.7 65.6 24.5 15.0 25.5 70.0
25–29 62.2 72.8 17.0 23.1 35.1 51.9
30–34 67.5 75.8 12.3 28.5 41.8 46.7
35 69.3 76.1 9.8 33.9 43.7 28.9
Maternal education
Grade school 46.8 55.1 17.7 17.6 18.9† 7.4
High school 49.2 61.1 24.2 15.1 23.9† 58.3
College 73.8 82.1 11.2 31.1 45.8 47.3
Maternal employment
Employed full-time 60.2 67.6 12.3 14.8 25.1 69.6
Employed part-time 63.3 71.5 13.0 23.4 34.0 45.3
Not employed 57.5 69.0 20.0 24.9 35.8 43.8
Birth weight
Low ( 2500 g) 48.0 62.7 30.6 13.1 22.1 68.7
Parity
Primiparous 61.0 72.0 18.0 19.7 31.9 61.9
Multiparous 57.4 66.5 15.9 23.6 33.3 41.1
WIC participant
Participant 46.6 58.2 24.9 12.9 20.8 61.2
Nonparticipant 70.8 78.9 11.4 29.5 43.2 46.4
US census region
New England 60.9 70.8 16.3 23.1 37.1 60.6
Middle Atlantic 53.5 64.0 19.6 19.8 30.3 53.0
East North Central 54.3 64.6 19.0 19.0 27.7 45.8
West North Central 60.8 72.0 18.4 20.8 31.7 52.4
South Atlantic 54.7 65.7 20.1 18.5 29.3 58.4
East South Central 45.1 54.4 20.6 14.0 20.3 45.0
West South Central 53.8 65.9 22.5 16.6 26.8 61.4
Mountain 73.8 82.8 12.2 30.9 44.3 43.4
Pacific 73.9 82.9 12.2 30.7 44.2 44.0
* The percent change % breastfed in 2001 % breastfed in 1996/% breastfed in 1996.
† No significant difference between 1996 and 2001.
ARTICLES 1105
Downloaded from www.pediatrics.org by on June 2, 2009
5. TABLE 2. Exclusive Breastfeeding in the Hospital and at 6 feeding their infants at 6 months of age; 17.2% were
Months of Age by Selected Demographic Characteristics, 2001 exclusively breastfeeding.
Characteristic In-Hospital At 6 Months Some studies have considered the strengths and
% % weaknesses of the RLMS.12,13 The RLMS breast-
All infants 46.3 17.2 feeding rates have been compared with those from
White 52.8 18.7 other national surveys including the 1988 National
Black 26.6 10.7 Surveys of Family Growth,6 the 1988 National
Hispanic 36.2 16.2
Maternal age, y
Maternal and Infant Health Survey,12 and the third
20 34.4 10.3 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey,
20–24 43.3 13.9 1988 –1994.14 Rates for exclusive breastfeeding from
25–29 49.9 19.1 Phase II (1991–1994) of the third National Health and
30–34 51.9 21.3
35 50.4 21.8
Nutrition Examination Survey were also compared
Maternal education with those from the RLMS.15 Results of all these
Grade school 29.9 13.3 comparisons demonstrate that despite differences in
High school 39.0 12.7 survey methods and design, these surveys report
College 57.3 24.0
Maternal employment
similar trends and rates of breastfeeding across sev-
Employed full-time 44.7 10.4 eral sociodemographic characteristics. The advan-
Employed part-time 50.2 16.5 tage of the RLMS is its ability to provide breastfeed-
Not employed 46.1 21.2 ing trends on a continuous basis over a long period
Birth weight of time.12 The RLMS will be the main instrument
Low ( 2500 g) 27.1 8.4
Parity used to monitor progress toward meeting the Healthy
Primiparous 47.3 17.0 People 2010 goals.13
Multiparous 45.1 17.3 Between 1996 and 2001, the largest increases in the
WIC participant initiation of breastfeeding and continued breastfeed-
Participant 33.9 10.0
Nonparticipant 56.5 23.5 ing to at least 6 months occurred among groups of
Census region women who have been historically less likely to
New England 53.6 20.6 breastfeed: women who were black, younger in age,
Middle Atlantic 38.2 15.7 less educated, receiving WIC benefits, and living in
East North Central 44.6 14.0
West North Central 56.0 15.8 regions of the country where mothers are less in-
South Atlantic 42.8 15.6 clined to breastfeed. Increases in the prevalence of
East South Central 36.9 10.8 breastfeeding at 6 months among mothers in these
West South Central 41.4 13.9 groups were particularly large.
Mountain 56.4 23.4
Pacific 54.2 24.1 Breastfeeding and exclusive breastfeeding in the
hospital and at 6 months of age were more common
among privileged mothers and those living in the
Mountain and Pacific states. Increases in the rates of
clusive in-hospital breastfeeding was higher among breastfeeding were less dramatic in these subgroups
white women than Hispanic women. because rates of breastfeeding were initially very
In 2001, at 6 months of age, as in the hospital, high.
exclusive breastfeeding was most common among The gap between breastfeeding and exclusive
women who were white, older, college-educated, did breastfeeding in the hospital and at 6 months of age
not participate in WIC, and living in the Western has increased through time. In 1971, the gap between
regions of the country. Exclusive breastfeeding at 6 breastfeeding and exclusive breastfeeding in the hos-
months of age was also more common among pital was only 3%. By 2001, the gap widened to 23%.
women who were more experienced (multiparous), At 6 months of age, the gap between breastfeeding
or were not working outside their home than among and exclusive breastfeeding increased from 2% in
first-time mothers, and mothers who were working 1971 to 15% in 2001. Considering that rates of exclu-
part-time or full-time. sive breastfeeding initiation have not increased as
rapidly as those for breastfeeding, it is clear that
DISCUSSION many more mothers than ever before used supple-
Since the RLMS began tracking breastfeeding in mental feedings in the hospital and at 6 months of
the United States in 1954, the percentage of mothers age.
who nursed their infants has fluctuated widely. After The effect that early introduction of formula has
dropping steadily throughout the late 1950s and on breastfeeding initiation and duration is equivocal.
1960s, initiation of breastfeeding reached its lowest A recent meta-analysis of 9 randomized, controlled
level in 1971, with only 24.7% of mothers breastfeed- trials involving 3730 women found that when hospi-
ing. By 1982, initiation of breastfeeding had in- tal discharge packages (with or without formula)
creased dramatically, to 61.9%, but by 1990 it had were distributed to new mothers, the number of
dropped again, to 51.5%. Now, the RLMS indicates women exclusively breastfeeding was slightly re-
that breastfeeding is more popular than ever. In 2001, duced, but there was no effect on early termination
69.5% of mothers breastfed their infants in the hos- of any breastfeeding (women who were using sup-
pital; 46.3% of mothers exclusively breastfed their plements).16 Howard et al17 compared the effect that
infants. In 2001, 32.5% of mothers were still breast- prenatal distribution of formula company materials,
1106 BREASTFEEDING CONTINUES TO INCREASE INTO THE NEW MILLENNIUM
Downloaded from www.pediatrics.org by on June 2, 2009
6. advertising, and samples had on breastfeeding pat- ployed women began breastfeeding, but at 6 months
terns. They found that these materials did not signif- postpartum, only 10% of full-time working mothers
icantly effect breastfeeding initiation and duration, were still breastfeeding, compared with 24% of those
but women who received formula promotion mate- not employed.5 In 2001, maternal employment still
rials were more likely to cease breastfeeding before had little effect on the initiation of breastfeeding or
hospital discharge or before 2 weeks postpartum. exclusive breastfeeding. However, full-time employ-
Using data from the RLMS, Ryan18 considered the ment was associated with early weaning, but to a
effects that infant formula discharge packages, socio- much smaller degree than seen in the 1980s.5,23,24
demographic characteristics, and breastfeeding in- In 2001, mothers working part-time were more
structions had on exclusive and any breastfeeding at likely to initiate and continue breastfeeding or exclu-
1 and 4 months of age. Stepwise regression analysis sive breastfeeding relative to those working full-
indicated that discharge kits did not exert as large an time; rates for breastfeeding among part-time work-
effect on breastfeeding as other factors such as ma- ing mothers exceeded those observed at the national
ternal employment, family income, maternal educa- level. At 6 months of age, part-time working mothers
tion, parity, and breastfeeding instructions. Women were also more likely to use supplemental feedings
who received a formula discharge kit compared with than mothers who worked full-time or were not em-
those who did not had a slightly higher probability ployed. Fein and Roe25 found that part-time work
of initiating any breastfeeding in the first (10% vs 7%) was an effective strategy to help new mothers com-
and fourth month (27% vs. 25%.). In addition, rela- bine breastfeeding and employment by providing
tive to other sociodemographic factors that influence mothers more access to their infant. The likelihood
breastfeeding initiation and duration, 2 randomized that mothers will continue to breastfeed after return-
clinical studies reported that the inclusion of formula ing to work may also depend on the mother’s occu-
in discharge packages did not decrease the duration pation. Women employed as professionals may have
of exclusive or any breastfeeding19 or had at best a more control over their environment and may have
very modest effect on breastfeeding feeding method more flexibility to met both the needs of their job and
and breastfeeding duration.20 their infant.23
The Healthy People 2010 goal for the initiation of The recent increase in breastfeeding among low-
breastfeeding was identical to that established for income women may be attributable to program
2000: 75% breastfeeding in the early postpartum pe- changes within WIC and the targeting of breastfeed-
riod.21,22 In 2001, this goal was exceeded by mothers ing promotion materials to meet the specific needs of
who were older ( 35 years of age), college-educated, these women,26,27 Programs such as peer counseling
not participating in WIC, and living in the Mountain (provided by those who have previously breastfed
and Pacific states. In the Mountain and Pacific re- and have been on WIC),28 intensive breastfeeding
gions of the United States, 8 of 10 infants were informational and support campaigns for inner-city
breastfed in the hospital. mothers,29 the development of the Best Start Pro-
The Healthy People 2000 and Healthy People 2010 gram30 and the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initia-
goal for continued breastfeeding to 5 to 6 months tive,31,32,33 have had a positive, significant impact on
postpartum was earmarked to be at least 50%.21,22 In breastfeeding rates even in high-risk populations.
2001, this goal was not achieved by any sociodemo- Recently, the Department of Health and Human
graphic subgroup and disparities still existed across Services (DHHS) Blueprint for Action on Breastfeeding
many subgroups. Moreover, despite the relative high introduced a plan for breastfeeding that involves
increases in the rates of in-hospital breastfeeding and education, training, awareness, support and re-
continued breastfeeding to 6 months of age, rates for search.34 This plan provides detailed recommenda-
breastfeeding among low birth weight infants fell tions for the promotion of breastfeeding. Certain
short of the national averages. populations such as adolescents and ethnic minori-
From 1996 –2001, the RLMS rates of in-hospital ties need to be targeted. Black adolescents are typi-
breastfeeding increased approximately 2% per year cally less likely to be encouraged to breastfeed by
nationally and 3% per year in some sociodemo- their health care providers, mothers, partner, or
graphic subgroups (eg, 3.2% per year among blacks). peers.35 The primary reason given by black women
Assuming the 2% per year rate of increase, in-hospi- for not breastfeeding was that they preferred bottle-
tal breastfeeding rates at the national level and in feeding.36 This suggests that black women bottle-
every sociodemographic group of women should feed their infants not because of employment or
meet or exceed the Healthy People 2010 goal. Contin- physical difficulties but because of preference.36,37
ued breastfeeding at 6 months of age also increased Although black and Latino adolescents recognized
about 2% per year nationally and across many sub- that breastfeeding offers many health benefits to
groups. At this rate, the Healthy People 2010 goal may both the mother and infant, fear or pain, embarrass-
not be reached by several subgroups including ment with public exposure and unease with the act
women who are black, less educated, and participat- of breastfeeding acted as significant barriers.38
ing in WIC. Among low-income mothers, barriers to breastfeed-
In the 1980s, full-time work had no effect on the ing were also associated with their perceptions of
initiation of breastfeeding but had a profound effect social disapproval of breastfeeding in public, reports
on the duration of breastfeeding.5,23 For example, in of ridicule by friends, lack of support from some
1988, an equal number of employed and nonem- health providers, and difficulties associated with em-
ARTICLES 1107
Downloaded from www.pediatrics.org by on June 2, 2009
7. ployment.39 Thus, mothers must be equipped with APPENDIX. Breastfeeding and Exclusive Breastfeeding in the
strategies designed to deal with perceptions of dis- Hospital and at 6 Months of Age by Year, 1965–2001
approval.39 A culturally sensitive approach that re- Year In-Hospital At 6 Months
flects the woman’s familial social network, including % %
encouragement from the infant’s father or the wom- Breastfeeding Exclusive Breastfeeding Exclusive
an’s mother40,41,42 is also needed. Because decisions Breastfeeding Breastfeeding
on whether to breastfeed are made early, positive 1965 28.2 24.5
attitudes and education concerning breastfeeding 1966 27.6 22.9
need to be developed before pregnancy and must be 1967 27.6 24.1
1968 28.7 25.3
provided throughout the pregnancy, perinatal, and 1969 28.4 25.3
postpartum period.43,44 1970 26.5 23.2
The workplace can be a barrier for the mother who 1971 24.7 21.7 5.4 3.2
decides to breastfeed. Legislative efforts have been 1972 28.1 24.8 5.0 3.1
1973 28.9 25.2 7.5 4.7
put into place to protect women’s rights to breastfeed 1974 32.2 27.8 6.5 5.2
after returning to work and to encourage employees 1975 35.5 31.1 14.1 10.3
to provide a safe, private environment for women to 1976 41.6 36.2 17.0 12.7
express (or pump) breast milk.45 Continued efforts in 1977 44.7 39.4 19.6 14.1
1978 46.6 41.7 18.9 13.7
the areas of improving attitudes, workplace policies, 1979 51.0 45.8 21.3 16.1
and a positive media portrayal of breastfeeding as 1980 55.3 49.5 23.2 17.0
the normal and preferred method of feeding infants 1981 57.6 51.5 25.1 17.8
will help promote and support breastfeeding in the 1982 61.9 55.0 27.1 19.8
1983 58.4 51.2 23.3 16.5
workplace. 1984 59.7 52.1 23.8 16.7
The health care system has an important role to 1985 58.0 50.6 22.1 14.5
play in the promotion and support of breastfeeding. 1986 56.9 49.3 21.6 14.0
Lu et al46 indicated that in populations less likely to 1987 55.5 47.6 20.2 13.1
1988 54.3 46.1 19.5 12.5
breastfeed, encouragement by nurses and physicians 1989 52.2 44.3 18.1 11.0
significantly increased breastfeeding initiation. 1990 51.5 43.5 17.6 10.4
Women who were encouraged by their physicians 1991 53.3 44.2 18.2 10.9
1992 54.2 44.5 18.9 11.1
and nurses to breastfeed were 4 times as likely to 1993 55.9 45.2 19.0 10.7
initiate breastfeeding than women who did not re- 1994 57.4 46.8 19.7 11.2
ceive such encouragement.46 1995 58.9 47.6 20.8 11.9
In a national survey of pediatric residents and 1996 59.2 47.3 21.7 12.2
1997 62.4 46.1 26.0 12.7
practicing physicians, 70% of practitioners indi- 1998 64.3 46.2 28.6 13.8
cated that more time needs to be devoted to direct 1999 67.2 46.3 30.7 15.8
patient interaction and practice of counseling and 2000 68.4 46.0 31.4 16.0
problems solving skills related to assist breastfeeding 2001 69.5 46.3 32.5 17.2
mothers.47 Breastfeeding knowledge, attitudes, train-
ing, and experience among residents and practicing
physicians in family medicine, obstetrics/gynecol- REFERENCES
ogy, and pediatrics also demonstrate that more 1. Martinez GA, Nalezienski JP. The recent trend in breast-feeding. Pedi-
knowledge regarding breastfeeding management is atrics. 1979;64:686 – 692
2. Martinez GA, Nalezienski JP. 1980 update: the recent trend in breast-
needed.48 The desire for breastfeeding education feeding. Pediatrics. 1981;67:260 –263
among pediatricians is strong.49 To address this is- 3. Martinez GA, Dodd DA. 1981 milk feeding patterns in the United States
sue, the American Academy of Pediatrics has pub- during the first 12 months of life. Pediatrics. 1983;71:166 –170
4. Martinez GA, Krieger FW. 1984 milk-feeding patterns in the United
lished a policy statement concerning breastfeeding
States [special article]. Pediatrics. 1985;76:1004 –1008
promotion and goals and offers suggestions to help 5. Ryan AS, Martinez GA. Breast-feeding and the working mother: a
pediatricians influence and improve breastfeeding profile. Pediatrics. 1989;83:524 –531
rates.50 6. Ryan AS, Pratt WF, Wysong JL, Lewandowski G, McNally JW, Krieger
FW. A comparison of breast-feeding data from the National Surveys of
Increasing the rates of breastfeeding is a compel- Family Growth and the Ross Laboratories Mothers Surveys. Am J Public
ling public health goal, especially among groups Health. 1991;81:1049 –1052
who are less likely to initiate and sustain breastfeed- 7. Ryan AS, Rush D, Krieger FW, Lewandowski GE. Recent declines in
ing.21 Successful breastfeeding requires the support breast-feeding in the United States, 1984 through 1989. Pediatrics. 1991;
88:719 –727
from family, friends, and health care professionals. 8. Ryan AS. The resurgence of breastfeeding in the United States. Pediat-
Education and information are critical to continue rics. 1997;99(4). Available at: http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/
the positive trends in breastfeeding seen over the last full/99/4/e12
decade and into the new millennium. 9. National Center for Health Statistics. Advance report of the final natal-
ity statistics. Monthly Vital Health Stat. 1989;38(suppl 3):1– 47
10. Ventura SJ, Martin JA, Mathews TJ, Clarke SC. Advance report of the
final natality statistics, 1994. Monthly Vital Health Stat. 1996;44(suppl
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 11):1– 88
This article is dedicated to the memory of Linda Goode, who 11. Dietrich II FH, Kearns TJ. Basic Statistics: An Inferential Approach. 3rd ed.
helped supervise the day-to-day activities of the Ross Laboratories San Francisco, CA: Dellan Publishing Co; 1989
Mothers Survey for 30 years. Her attention to detail and appre- 12. Kennedy KI, Visness CM. A comparison of two U. S. surveys of infant
ciation for historical documentation will not be forgotten. feeding. J Hum Lact. 1997;13:39 – 43
1108 BREASTFEEDING CONTINUES TO INCREASE INTO THE NEW MILLENNIUM
Downloaded from www.pediatrics.org by on June 2, 2009
8. 13. Grummer-Strawn LM, Ruowei L. US national surveillance of breast- friendly in an inner city hospital. Birth. 2001;28:1, 36 – 40
feeding behavior. J Hum Lact. 2000;16:283–290 32. Naylor AJ. Baby-friendly hospital initiative: protecting, promoting, and
14. Hediger ML, Overpeck MD, Ruan WJ, Troendle JF. Early infant feeding supporting breastfeeding in the twenty-first century. Pediatr Clin North
and growth status of US-born infants and children aged 4 –71 mo: Am. 2001;48:475– 483
analyses from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination 33. Kyenka-Isabrrye M. UNICEF launches the Baby-Friendly Hospital Ini-
Survey, 1988 –1994. Am J Clin Nutr. 2000;72:159 –167 tiative. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 1992;17:177–179
15. Ruowei L, Ogden C, Ballew C, Gillespie C, Grummer-Strawn L. Prev- 34. US Department of Health and Human Services. HHS Blueprint for Action
alence of exclusive breastfeeding among US infants: the Third National on Breastfeeding. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human
Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (Phase II, 1991–1994). Am J Services, Office on Women’s Health; 2000
Public Health. 2002;92:1107–1110 35. Wiemann CM, DuBois JC, Berenson AB. Racial/ethnic differences in the
16. Donnelly A, Snowden HM, Renfrew MJ, Woolridge MW. Commercial decision to breastfeed among adolescent mothers. Pediatrics. 1998;101(6).
hospital discharge packs for breastfeeding women (Cochrane Review). Available at: http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/101/6/ell
In: The Cochrane Library. Oxford, United Kingdom: Update Software; 36. Forste R, Weiss J, Lippincott E. The decision to breastfeed in the United
2002 States: does race matter? Pediatrics. 2001;108:291–296
17. Howard C, Howard F, Lawrence R, Andresen E, DeBlieck E, Weitzman 37. Leffler D. U. S. high school age girls may be receptive to breastfeeding
M. Office prenatal formula advertising and its effect on breast-feeding promotion. J Hum Lact. 2000;16:36 – 40
patterns. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95:296 –303 38. Hannon PR, Willis SK, Bishop-Townsend V, Martinez IM, Scrimshaw
18. Ryan AS, Wysong JL, Martinez GA, Simon SD. Duration of breast- SC. African-American and Latina adolescent mothers’ infant feeding
feeding patterns established in the hospital. Clin Pediatr. 1990;29:99 –107 decisions and breastfeeding practices: a qualitative study. J Adolesc
19. Dungy CI, Losch ME, Russell D, Romitti P, Dusdieker LB. Hospital Health. 2000;26:399 – 407
infant formula discharge packages: do they affect the duration of breast- 39. Guttman N, Zimmerman DR. Low-income mothers’ views on breast-
feeding? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1997;151:724 –729 feeding. Soc Sci Med. 2000;50:1457–1473
20. Bliss MC, Wilkie J, Acredolo C, Berman S, Tebb KP. The effect of 40. Meyerink RO, Marquis GS. Breastfeeding initiation and duration
discharge pack formula and breast pumps on breastfeeding duration among low-income women in Alabama: the importance of personal and
and choice of infant feeding method. Birth. 1997;24:2, 90 –97 familial experiences in making infant-feeding choices. J Hum Lact. 2002;
21. US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2010, 18:38 – 45
Volumes I and II. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Hu- 41. Mahoney MC, James DM. Predictors of anticipated breastfeeding in an
man Services, Public Health Service, Office of the Assistant Secretary for urban, low-income setting. J Fam Pract. 2000;49:529 –533
Health; 2000 42. Riordan J, Gill-Hopple K. Breastfeeding care in multicultural popula-
22. US Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2000: tions. JOGNN. 2000;30:216 –223
National Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Objectives. Washington, 43. Losch M, Dungy CI, Russell D, Dusdieker LB. Impact of attitudes on
DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the maternal decisions regarding infant feeding. J Pediatr. 1995;126:
Assistant Secretary for Health; 1990. DHHS Publ. No. PHS 91-50212 507–514
23. Visness CM, Kennedy KI. Maternal employment and breastfeeding: 44. Grossman LK, Fitzsimmons SM, Larsen-Alexander JB, Sachs L, Harter
Findings from the 1988 National Maternal and Infant Health Survey. C. The infant feeding decision in low and upper income women. Clin
Am J Public Health. 1997;87:945–950 Pediatr. 1990;29:30 –37
24. Roe B, Whittington LA, Fein SB, Teisl MF. Is there competition between 45. Meek JY. Breastfeeding in the workplace. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2001;
breastfeeding and maternal employment? Demography. 1999;36:157–171 48:461– 473
25. Fein SB, Roe B. The effect of work status on initiation and duration of 46. Lu MC, Lange L, Slusser W, Hamilton J, Halfon N. Provider encour-
breastfeeding. Am J Public Health. 1998;88:1042–1046 agement of breast-feeding: evidence from a national survey. Obstet
26. Wright AL. The rise of breastfeeding in the United States. Pediatr Clin Gynecol. 2001;97:290 –295
North Am. 2001;48:11–12 47. Freed GL, Clark SJ, Lohr JA, Sorenson JR. Pediatrician involvement in
27. Ahluwalia IB, Tessaro I, Grummer-Strawn, LM, MacGowan C, Benton- breast-feeding promotion: a national survey of residents and practitio-
Davis S. Georgia’s breastfeeding promotion program for low-income ners. Pediatrics. 1995;96:490 – 494
women. Pediatrics. 2000;105(6). Available at: http://www.pediatrics.org/ 48. Freed GL, Clark SJ, Lohr JA, et al. National assessment of physicians’
cgi/content/full/105/6/e85 breastfeeding knowledge, attitudes, training, and experience. JAMA.
28. Shaw E, Kaczorowski J. The effect of a peer counseling program on 1995;273:472– 476
breastfeeding initiation and longevity in a low-income rural population. 49. Schanler RJ, O’Connor KG, Lawrence RA. Pediatricians’ practices and
J Hum Lact. 1999;15:19 –25 attitudes regarding breastfeeding promotion. Pediatrics. 1999;103(3).
29. Zimmerman DR. You can make a difference: increasing breastfeeding Available at: http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/103/103/
rates in an inner-city clinic. J Human Lact. 1999;15:217–220 e135
30. Hartley BM, O’Connor ME. Evaluation of the ‘Best Start’ breast-feeding 50. Phillip BL, Merewood A, O’Brien S. Physicians and breastfeeding pro-
education program. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1996;150:868 – 871 motion in the United States: a call for action [commentary]. Pediatrics.
31. Merewood A, Phillip BL. Implementing change: becoming baby- 2001;107:584 –587
END-OF-THE-WORLD SCENARIO
“Since 1970, the population of the United States had grown by 40%, while the
number of registered vehicles has increased by nearly 100%. In other words, cars
have proliferated twice as fast as people have. During this same period, road
capacity increased by 6%. . . the world [will] end not with a bang, but a traffic jam.”
Seabrook J. The slow lane. New Yorker Magazine. September 2, 2002
Submitted by Student
ARTICLES 1109
Downloaded from www.pediatrics.org by on June 2, 2009
9. Breastfeeding Continues to Increase Into the New Millennium
Alan S. Ryan, Zhou Wenjun and Andrew Acosta
Pediatrics 2002;110;1103-1109
DOI: 10.1542/peds.110.6.1103
Updated Information including high-resolution figures, can be found at:
& Services http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/110/6/1103
References This article cites 37 articles, 21 of which you can access for free
at:
http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/110/6/1103#BIBL
Citations This article has been cited by 66 HighWire-hosted articles:
http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/110/6/1103#otherartic
les
Subspecialty Collections This article, along with others on similar topics, appears in the
following collection(s):
Nutrition & Metabolism
http://www.pediatrics.org/cgi/collection/nutrition_and_metabolis
m
Permissions & Licensing Information about reproducing this article in parts (figures,
tables) or in its entirety can be found online at:
http://www.pediatrics.org/misc/Permissions.shtml
Reprints Information about ordering reprints can be found online:
http://www.pediatrics.org/misc/reprints.shtml
Downloaded from www.pediatrics.org by on June 2, 2009