3 Reasons to Swap Your Next Pen Test With a Bug Bounty Program
•Descargar como PPTX, PDF•
0 recomendaciones•1,498 vistas
This webcast will analyze the key differences between the penetration testing and bug bounty models and explore why one company replaced their pen tests over the last three years.
Recomendados
Recomendados
Más contenido relacionado
La actualidad más candente
La actualidad más candente (20)
Similar a 3 Reasons to Swap Your Next Pen Test With a Bug Bounty Program
Similar a 3 Reasons to Swap Your Next Pen Test With a Bug Bounty Program (20)
Más de bugcrowd
Más de bugcrowd (10)
Último
Último (20)
3 Reasons to Swap Your Next Pen Test With a Bug Bounty Program
- 1. 3 REASONS TO SWAP YOUR NEXT PEN TEST WITH A BUG BOUNTY PROGRAM
- 2. Jason Haddix, Head of Trust and Security Wade Billings, VP of Technology Services 2 YOUR SPEAKERS
- 3. AGENDA • Key differences between bug bounties and penetration testing • Definitions • Testers • Coverage • Model • Canvas by Instructure Case Study • Q&A 3 DOWNLOAD OUR REPORT ‘HEAD TO HEAD: BUG BOUNTIES VS. PENETRATION TESTING” https://bugcrowd.com/penetration-testing
- 4. WHAT IS PENETRATION TESTING? A penetration is… • A time-boxed, fixed-cost assessment • External consultants try to find as many vulnerabilities and config issues as possible and exploiting those vulnerabilities to determine the risks A penetration is NOT… • A red team assessment 4
- 5. | CONFINDENTIAL INFORMATION WHAT IS A BUG BOUNTY? 3/14/175 Independent security researchers from all over the world are recruited Vulnerabilities are found and reported Rewards are exchanged for reporting vulnerabilities in company applications
- 6. PENETRATION TESTING VS. BUG BOUNTIES: KEY DIFFERENCES 6
- 7. TESTERS: MANY VS. FEW Not only is the testing pool much larger, but it is also more diverse, providing organizations with a broad set of skills and expertise. 7
- 8. COVERAGE: ONGOING VS. POINT-IN-TIME Security assessment should be continuous, especially as development processes become more agile. Penetration testing can’t offer that coverage. Bug bounties can. 8
- 9. MANY WAYS TO USE BUG BOUNTY PROGRAMS 9 Start with invite only private program to gain experience Deliver ongoing security assurance with continuous private and/or public program Project or app specific On-Demand Start with invite only private program to gain experience Expand scope to increase value & researcher engagement
- 10. MODEL: PAY-FOR-RESULTS VS. CONTRACT- BASED Bug bounties utilize a pay-for-results model that encourages deeper and more focused testing. Higher severity bugs carry a bigger incentive. 10
- 11. 11 CASE STUDY
- 12. SECURITY AT CANVAS • Published security notices • Extensive security testing • Open security audits since 2011 • Working with independent researchers
- 13. RESULTS: SIX YEARS OF PUBLIC SECURITY AUDITS 13 0 10 20 30 40 Average pen test findings 2011 - 2013 Average bug bounty findings 2014 - 2016 Non-critical vulnerabilities High-critical vulnerabilities
- 14. KEY LEARNINGS: MORE THAN JUST THE RESULTS 14
- 15. FUTURE OF BUG BOUNTIES…
- 16. | CONFINDENTIAL INFORMATION WIDE ADOPTION OF CROWDSOURCED SECURITY 3/14/1716 FINANCIAL SERVICES CONSUMER TECH RETAIL & ECOMMERE AUTOMOTIVE INFRASTRUCTURE TECH SECURITY TECHNOLOGY OTHER 2/3rd of Programs are Private
- 17. Q&A
Notas del editor
- SC Mag folks will introduce concept, take care of housekeeping and hand it over
- Spend a couple of minutes introducing yourselves and backgrounds
- Haddix to quickly outline agenda Plug = download accompanying report that is attached within the webinar screen or at the url listed
- Set framework for what we’re discussing–differentiate between red teaming and penetration testing Make sure to communicate the fact that we understand there are uses for penetration testing (and outline what those uses are) Also make sure to communicate that we’re not saying testers themselves are flawed, but the model
- Haddix
- Brief overview of next slides (acts as a summary/table of contents)
- Main message: this is why Canvas chose the crowdsourced model – more testers Stat: On average, public and private, 138 unique researchers submit on bounty programs Address: Trust Follow-up questions: How can you trust bug hunters? Wade, did you run into any internal questions about this? Do they have the necessary skills/specialized skill sets?
- Main message: continuous testing is the key to the improvement over pen testing Mention Methodology issue Follow-up questions: How did you ensure coverage of bug hunters?
- Note: I moved this slide up one for a better flow. Use this slide to talk about the different uses and talk about how Canvas is utilizing the crowdsourced model
- Don’t spend as much time on this slide… use this slide as a segue into the case study
- Wade to set framework for the Canvas story
- NOTE: Graph shows averages of 3 annual pen tests vs. 3 annual bug bounties Can also talk about each year individually–8x the first year, dip in results the second year, back up the third year Talk about QUALITY
- Wade to expand on learnings
- Wade to talk about the future of bug bounties at Canvas Haddix to talk about the future of the space…segue into logos slide (adoption)
- Haddix to expand upon the adoption, talk about private, talk about expanding testing capabilities
- Do you think every organization is ready for a bug bounty program? Can bug bounties replace all pen testing? What is the signal vs. noise in bug bounties? Is it worth it? What is the future of penetration testing? What top tier companies have switched to this model? Seems risky, how do you control rogue researchers?