1. Surfaces
and
Interfaces
Microscopic
mechanisms
and
macroscopic
consequences
Dr.
Keith
T.
Butler
Department
of
Chemistry
k.t.butler@bath.ac.uk
“God
made
the
bulk;
surfaces
were
invented
by
the
devil”
Wolfgang
Pauli
2. Content
• Background
and
history
of
surfaces
– History
– Importance
• Important
concepts
for
surface
definiEons
– Energy-‐band-‐alignment
diagram
– Miller
indices
– Tasker
notaEon
– Polar
surfaces
• Surface
energeEcs
and
electronic
structure
– Bond
breaking
approximaEon
– Surface
Tamm
states
• Surfaces
in
PV
– Trapping
– PassivaEon
• Interface
classificaEons
and
formaEon
• Strain
and
supercells
• WeKng
angle
and
cohesion
• Coherent/Semi-‐coherent/Incoherent
• Interfaces
in
PV
• SchoMky
barrier
/
Ohmic
contacts
• Charge
neutrality
level
• Band
Alignment
in
PV
• Work
funcEons
and
electron
energies
• Measuring
work
funcEons
• CalculaEng
work
funcEons
• Bulk/surface
contribuEons
• Work
funcEon
engineering
• PracEcal
examples
• CalculaEon
of
surface/interface
energy
in
DFT
• Band
alignment
from
DFT
SURFACES
INTERFACES
5. Benjamin
Franklin
and
the
old
wives
tale
“[T]he oil, though not more than a teaspoonful, produced an
instant calm over a space several yards square which spread
amazingly and extended itself gradually till it reached the lee side,
making all that quarter of the pond, perhaps half an acre, as
smooth as a looking glass.”
6. The
study
of
surfaces
• Mostly
atoms
are
not
at
the
surface
BULK
Surface
7. The
study
of
surfaces
&
interfaces
“The interface is the device”
Herbert
Kroemer
Nobel
prize
in
Physics
2000
“For
developing
semiconductor
heterostructures
used
in
high-‐speed-‐
and
opto-‐electronics"
8. Surfaces
in
PV
Charge
separa?on
Extrac?on
of
carriers
Recombina?on
Contact
resistance
hMp://www.pveducaEon.org
9. Content
• Background
and
history
of
surfaces
– History
– Importance
• Important
concepts
for
surface
definiEons
– Energy-‐band-‐alignment
diagram
– Miller
indices
– Tasker
notaEon
– Polar
surfaces
• Surface
energeEcs
and
electronic
structure
– Bond
breaking
approximaEon
– Surface
Tamm
states
• Surfaces
in
PV
– Trapping
– PassivaEon
• Interface
classificaEons
and
formaEon
• Strain
and
supercells
• WeKng
angle
and
cohesion
• Coherent/Semi-‐coherent/Incoherent
• Interfaces
in
PV
• SchoMky
barrier
/
Ohmic
contacts
• Charge
neutrality
level
• Band
Alignment
in
PV
• Work
funcEons
and
electron
energies
• Measuring
work
funcEons
• CalculaEng
work
funcEons
• Bulk/surface
contribuEons
• Work
funcEon
engineering
• PracEcal
examples
• CalculaEon
of
surface/interface
energy
in
DFT
• Band
alignment
from
DFT
SURFACES
INTERFACES
10. Energy-‐band-‐diagrams
Valence
Band
(Occupied
states)
ConducEon
Band
(Unoccupied
states)
Vacuum
level
Band-‐gap
Electron
Affinity
IonisaEon
potenEal
12. Energy-‐band-‐diagrams
“If, in discussing a semiconductor
problem, you cannot draw an
Energy-Band-Diagram, this shows
that you don’t know what you are
talking about”
“If you can draw one, but don’t, then
your audience won’t know what you
are talking about.”
21. ClassificaEon
IdenEfy
intercepts
FracEonal
coordinates
of
intercepts
If
fracEons
result
in
step
(ii)
then
round
up
all
indices
by
mulEplicaEon;
e.g.
(1/3,0,1)
-‐>
(1,0,3)
NegaEve
numbers
are
indicated
by
an
over-‐bar
23. The
Polar
Catastrophe
Type
III
PotenEal
Energy
P
W
Tasker
1979
J.
Phys.
C:
Solid
State
Phys.
12
4977
24. Examples
of
Polar
Surfaces
• A
polar
surface
can
exist
–
with
modificaEons.
• Zincblende
(100)
• Mechanisms
for
stabilisaEon:
– Change
in
stoiciometry
in
surface
layers
– AdsorpEon
of
ions
on
the
surfaces
– Electron
redistribuEon
2D
electron
gas
C.
Noguera
,
J.
Phys.:
Condens.
MaMer
12
R367
σ j
j=1
m
∑ = −
σm+1
2
(−1)m
−
R2 − R1
R2 + R1
#
$
%
&
'
(
25. Content
• Background
and
history
of
surfaces
– History
– Importance
• Important
concepts
for
surface
definiEons
– Energy-‐band-‐alignment
diagram
– Miller
indices
– Tasker
notaEon
– Polar
surfaces
• Surface
energeEcs
and
electronic
structure
– Bond
breaking
approximaEon
– Surface
Tamm
states
• Surfaces
in
PV
– Trapping
– PassivaEon
• Interface
classificaEons
and
formaEon
• Strain
and
supercells
• WeKng
angle
and
cohesion
• Coherent/Semi-‐coherent/Incoherent
• Interfaces
in
PV
• SchoMky
barrier
/
Ohmic
contacts
• Charge
neutrality
level
• Band
Alignment
in
PV
• Work
funcEons
and
electron
energies
• Measuring
work
funcEons
• CalculaEng
work
funcEons
• Bulk/surface
contribuEons
• Work
funcEon
engineering
• PracEcal
examples
• CalculaEon
of
surface/interface
energy
in
DFT
• Band
alignment
from
DFT
SURFACES
INTERFACES
29. Content
• Background
and
history
of
surfaces
– History
– Importance
• Important
concepts
for
surface
definiEons
– Energy-‐band-‐alignment
diagram
– Miller
indices
– Tasker
notaEon
– Polar
surfaces
• Surface
energeEcs
and
electronic
structure
– Bond
breaking
approximaEon
– Surface
Tamm
states
• Surfaces
in
PV
– Trapping
– PassivaEon
• Interface
classificaEons
and
formaEon
• Strain
and
supercells
• WeKng
angle
and
cohesion
• Coherent/Semi-‐coherent/Incoherent
• Interfaces
in
PV
• SchoMky
barrier
/
Ohmic
contacts
• Charge
neutrality
level
• Band
Alignment
in
PV
• Work
funcEons
and
electron
energies
• Measuring
work
funcEons
• CalculaEng
work
funcEons
• Bulk/surface
contribuEons
• Work
funcEon
engineering
• PracEcal
examples
• CalculaEon
of
surface/interface
energy
in
DFT
• Band
alignment
from
DFT
SURFACES
INTERFACES
30. Surface
recombinaEon
• Characterised
by
capture
and
release
rates
of
carriers
and
energy
of
state
RSE
RSH
RSE
RSH
34. Content
• Background
and
history
of
surfaces
– History
– Importance
• Important
concepts
for
surface
definiEons
– Energy-‐band-‐alignment
diagram
– Miller
indices
– Tasker
notaEon
– Polar
surfaces
• Surface
energeEcs
and
electronic
structure
– Bond
breaking
approximaEon
– Surface
Tamm
states
• Surfaces
in
PV
– Trapping
– PassivaEon
• Interface
classificaEons
and
formaEon
• Strain
and
supercells
• WeKng
angle
and
cohesion
• Coherent/Semi-‐coherent/Incoherent
• Interfaces
in
PV
• SchoMky
barrier
/
Ohmic
contacts
• Charge
neutrality
level
• Band
Alignment
in
PV
• Work
funcEons
and
electron
energies
• Measuring
work
funcEons
• CalculaEng
work
funcEons
• Bulk/surface
contribuEons
• Work
funcEon
engineering
• PracEcal
examples
• CalculaEon
of
surface/interface
energy
in
DFT
• Band
alignment
from
DFT
SURFACES
INTERFACES
36. Interface
thermodynamics
• Interface
energy
related
to
weKng
angle.
σ1v
σ2v
σ12
MW
Finnis
1996
J.
Phys:
Condens.
Ma4er.
8
5811
37. LaKce
matching
• Depends
on
laKce
parameters
of
the
two
phases
• Determines
interface
strain;
large
contribuEon
to
interface
energy
a
b
38. Coherent
Interface
Interface
laKce
planes
must
match.
The
same
atomic
configuraEon
across
the
interface.
Examples:
CuSi
alloys
GaAs/AlAs
InAs/GaAs
Ge/Si
PbTe/CdTe
The
energy
of
coherent
interfaces:
Mismatching
bond
energy
Strain
energy
is
negligible
Energy
0
–
200
mJ/m^2
39. Semi-‐coherent
Interface
When
strains
are
sufficiently
large.
EnergeEcally
favorable
to
to
form
misfit
dislocaEons
at
interfaces.
Examples:
InAs/GaAs
The
energy
of
semi-‐coherent
interfaces:
Strain
plus
chemical
bonding
Energy
200
–
500
mJ/m^2
40. Incoherent
interface
Very
different
configuraEons
on
either
side
of
the
interface.
OR
laKce
constants
>
25%
difference.
Examples:
High
angle
grain
boundaries
Inclusions
in
alloys
The
energy
of
incoherent
interfaces:
Very
large
structural
contribuEon.
Energy
500
-‐1000
mJ/m^2
41. Content
• Background
and
history
of
surfaces
– History
– Importance
• Important
concepts
for
surface
definiEons
– Energy-‐band-‐alignment
diagram
– Miller
indices
– Tasker
notaEon
– Polar
surfaces
• Surface
energeEcs
and
electronic
structure
– Bond
breaking
approximaEon
– Surface
Tamm
states
• Surfaces
in
PV
– Trapping
– PassivaEon
• Interface
classificaEons
and
formaEon
• Strain
and
supercells
• WeKng
angle
and
cohesion
• Coherent/Semi-‐coherent/Incoherent
• Interfaces
in
PV
• SchoMky
barrier
/
Ohmic
contacts
• Charge
neutrality
level
• Band
Alignment
in
PV
• Work
funcEons
and
electron
energies
• Measuring
work
funcEons
• CalculaEng
work
funcEons
• Bulk/surface
contribuEons
• Work
funcEon
engineering
• PracEcal
examples
• CalculaEon
of
surface/interface
energy
in
DFT
• Band
alignment
from
DFT
SURFACES
INTERFACES
42. Ohmic
Contacts
in
PV
• Minimising
losses
in
PV
• V
∝
I
• Ideal
Ohmic
contacts
will
not
produce
potenEal
barriers
• Ideal
contact
all
Fermi
levels
align
44. Band
Bending
The
SchoMky
limit.
SchoMky
barrier
–
limits
charge
transport
across
the
interface.
Contact
resistance
depends
exponenEally
on
the
SchoMky
barrier.
46. ConsideraEons
for
devices
n-‐type
p-‐type
Space
charge
PosiEve
NegaEve
Metal
work
funcEon
Small
/
shallow
Large
/
deep
Examples
Li,
Na,
Ca,
K,
Au,
Ag,
Fe
47. Charge
Neutrality
Level/Surface
States
States
in
the
gap
of
the
semiconductor.
Can
result
in
addiEonal
charge
transfer.
New
local
charge
region.
Region
~
0.2
–
0.3
nm
49. Content
• Background
and
history
of
surfaces
– History
– Importance
• Important
concepts
for
surface
definiEons
– Energy-‐band-‐alignment
diagram
– Miller
indices
– Tasker
notaEon
– Polar
surfaces
• Surface
energeEcs
and
electronic
structure
– Bond
breaking
approximaEon
– Surface
Tamm
states
• Surfaces
in
PV
– Trapping
– PassivaEon
• Interface
classificaEons
and
formaEon
• Strain
and
supercells
• WeKng
angle
and
cohesion
• Coherent/Semi-‐coherent/Incoherent
• Interfaces
in
PV
• SchoMky
barrier
/
Ohmic
contacts
• Charge
neutrality
level
• Band
Alignment
in
PV
• Work
funcEons
and
electron
energies
• Measuring
work
funcEons
• CalculaEng
work
funcEons
• Bulk/surface
contribuEons
• Work
funcEon
engineering
• PracEcal
examples
• CalculaEon
of
surface/interface
energy
in
DFT
• Band
alignment
from
DFT
SURFACES
INTERFACES
50. Work
funcEons
“The
minimum
energy
required
to
remove
an
electron
from
deep
within
the
bulk,
to
a
point
a
macroscopic
distance
outside
the
surface.
”
51. Measuring
work
funcEons
(I)
Ultraviolet
Photoemission
Spectroscopy
(UPS/PES)
hMps://www.tu-‐chemnitz.de/physik/HLPH/elec_spec.htmlhMps://www.tu-‐chemnitz.de/physik/HLPH/elec_spec.html
53. Measuring
Work
funcEons
Just
look
it
up…right?
§
“A single group often obtains different values on
different crystals, different cleaves, or different days”
Surface Science of Metal Oxides: Henrich & Cox
59. Mott-Littleton (1938)
Harwell Labs, UK
A. B. Lidiard, JCSFT 85, 341 (1989)
Daresbury Labs, UK
A. A. Sokol et al, IJCQ 99, 695 (2004)
Limitation: Convergence in region sizes and accurate
analytical MM potentials
Current Implementation:
ChemShell (QM/MM driver)
Bulk Values: An Embedded Crystal
62. Real
capping
layers
PbO2 SiO2 TiO2
Capping
layer
IP
Φ
ΔΦ
(wrt
ITO)
SiO2
11.07
6.87
+0.77
TiO2
10.19
5.99
-‐0.11
PbO2
10.25
6.05
-‐0.05
Phys. Rev. B 89, 115320 (2014)
ITO
replacement
CIGS,
Si
High
Φ
OPV!
63. Content
• Background
and
history
of
surfaces
– History
– Importance
• Important
concepts
for
surface
definiEons
– Energy-‐band-‐alignment
diagram
– Miller
indices
– Tasker
notaEon
– Polar
surfaces
• Surface
energeEcs
and
electronic
structure
– Bond
breaking
approximaEon
– Surface
Tamm
states
• Surfaces
in
PV
– Trapping
– PassivaEon
• Interface
classificaEons
and
formaEon
• Strain
and
supercells
• WeKng
angle
and
cohesion
• Coherent/Semi-‐coherent/Incoherent
• Interfaces
in
PV
• SchoMky
barrier
/
Ohmic
contacts
• Charge
neutrality
level
• Band
Alignment
in
PV
• Work
funcEons
and
electron
energies
• Measuring
work
funcEons
• CalculaEng
work
funcEons
• Bulk/surface
contribuEons
• Work
funcEon
engineering
• PracEcal
examples
• CalculaEon
of
surface/interface
energy
in
DFT
• Band
alignment
from
DFT
SURFACES
INTERFACES
64. PracEcal
Session
• Building
a
good
surface/interface
• CalculaEng
a
surface
energy
• CalculaEng
a
workfuncEon
from
DFT
65. Cut
the
surface
:
METADISE
• Input
unit
cell
and
miller
index
• SystemaEcally
generates
all
cuts
• Checks
for
dipolar
surfaces
66. CalculaEng
a
surface
energy
Calculate
the
energy
of
the
pure
system.
Calculate
the
energy
of
a
2D
slab.
69. Pro-‐Eps
for
surfaces
in
VASP
• k-‐point
sampling
in
the
surface
normal
direcEon
can
be
drasEcally
reduced.
• Vacuums
of
~
15
Angstrom
are
usually
large
enough…check
this
for
convergence
though.
• Slab
thickness
required
varies
–
depends
on
the
system
type.
Generally
–
more
broken
bonds
@
surface
means
more
surface
states
requires
a
thicker
slab
…
eg
layered
systems
are
easy!!
70. Interface
energy
caveat
• SomeEmes
interface
energies
calculated
as
above
converge
very
slowly.
• Calculate
energies
for
several
layer
thicknesses.
71. Pro-‐Eps:
CalculaEng
a
band
alignment
diagram
from
DFT
ICORELEVEL = 1
NEDOS = 1000
NBANDS = 468
1:
Get
the
energy
levels
of
the
bulk
structure
DFT
band
structure
(usually
with
a
hybrid
funcEonal)
Get
energy
difference
between
core
state
and
VBM
hMps://github.com/keeeto/VASPBands
Core
level,
serves
as
a
reference
state
Increase
NEDOS
–
nicer
DOS
plots
Increase
#
bands
quicker
convergence
-‐
NBANDS
=
#
electrons
(spin
unpolarised)
-‐
NBAMDS
=
2x
#electrons
(spin
polarised)
72. Pro-‐Eps:
CalculaEng
a
band
alignment
diagram
from
DFT
ICORELEVEL = 1
LVHAR = .TRUE.
2:
Calculate
the
electrostaEc
potenEal
of
the
slab
structure
Core
level,
serves
as
a
reference
state
Hartree
potenEal
–
converges
more
quickly
than
total
potenEal.
Get
the
VBM
from
core
level
plus
energy
difference
from
the
bulk
calculaEon.
Avoids
surface
state
influence.
73. Pro-‐Eps:
CalculaEng
a
band
alignment
diagram
from
DFT
2:
Calculate
the
electrostaEc
potenEal
of
the
slab
structure
ExtracEng
the
electrostaEc
potenEal
from
LOCPOT
file.
Our
code
MacroDensity
does
this
for
a
range
of
systems
and
electronic
structure
codes.
hMps://github.com/WMD-‐Bath/MacroDensity
input_file = 'LOCPOT.slab'
lattice_vector = 4.75
output_file = 'planar.dat'
# No need to alter anything after
here
#------------------------------------------------------
PlanarAvergae.py
> python PlanarAverage.py
74. Pro-‐Eps:
CalculaEng
a
band
alignment
diagram
from
DFT
2:
Calculate
the
electrostaEc
potenEal
of
the
slab
structure
ExtracEng
the
electrostaEc
potenEal
from
LOCPOT
file.
Our
code
MacroDensity
does
this
for
a
range
of
systems
and
electronic
structure
codes.
hMps://github.com/WMD-‐Bath/MacroDensity
input_file = 'LOCPOT.slab'
lattice_vector = 4.75
output_file = 'planar.dat'
# No need to alter anything after
here
#------------------------------------------------------
PlanarAvergae.py
> python PlanarAverage.py
75. ElectrostaticPotentialPro-‐Eps:
CalculaEng
a
band
alignment
diagram
from
DFT
Bulk
calculaEon
the core state eigenenergies are
1- 1s -87.8177 2s -87.9364 2p -87.9364
2- 1s -87.9771 2s -88.1009 2p -88.1009
76. Important
Points
• Surfaces
consEtute
a
small
part
of
a
system,
but
have
a
huge
influence
on
properEes.
• Energy-‐band-‐diagrams
are
criEcal
for
designing
devices.
• Single
material
calculaEons
can
be
used
to
predict
offsets
in
hetero-‐juncEon
systems…but
cauEon
is
always
advised.
• Both
experimental
and
theoreEcal
characterisaEon
of
surfaces
are
difficult
and
should
be
used
to
compliment
one
another
wherever
possible.