This document contains an evaluation of local activities and outputs from the LLP – Grundtvig Learning Partnership TrEE “Teaching recycling and Environmental Education” project conducted by Scoala Gimnaziala Nicolae Velea in Romania. It includes a 13 question survey about how participants heard about the project, which activities/outputs they participated in, their level of interest in topics, clarity of objectives/content, usefulness of teaching materials and activities, and an overall assessment. Respondents provided positive feedback and enjoyed dissemination activities, meetings with partners, and activities conducted by organizers.

1. LLP – Grundtvig Learning Partnership
TrEE “Teaching recycling and Environmental Education”
EVALUATION OF THE LOCAL ACTIVITIES AND OUTPUTS
Scoala Gimnaziala Nicolae Velea Roamania
1. How did you hear about the project?
 Internet / Web / Media
 Conference
 Brochures / information material
 Personal / Professional Contact
 Participation in dissemination events organized by Scoala Gimnaziala Nicolae Velea
 Participation in programs / activities / workshops organized by the Scoala Gimnaziala
Nicolae Velea
 Other _____________________

2. 2. Which activity/output did you test?
______________________________________________________________________
(please describe)
diseminare, deplasare Bulgaria
333
materiale informationale, brosuri,conferinte
brosura, diseminare,
brosura, diseminare
diseminare, site-ul proiectului
brosura, diseminare, mobilitate Bulgaria
diseminare, brosura
diseminare, brosura, site-ul proiectului
diseminare,brosura,
diseminare, mobilitate Bulgaria
diseminare,brosura,
diseminarea,
broşură, diseminare, workshopuri
diseminare
brosura, diseminare,
site-ul, brosura
Conferinte,brosuri,participarea in programe organizate de scoala gimnaziala Nicolae Velea Cepari
3. I'm interested in the topics of this project
 1  2  3  4  5
Comments/Suggestions:

3. 4. Objectives, content and tools were clearly defined
 1  2  3  4  5
Comments/Suggestions:
5. The preliminary knowledge owned by me, were sufficient for an understanding of
the topics
 1  2  3  4  5
Comments/Suggestions:

4. 6. The involved staff stimulated / motivated my personal interest in the subject
 1  2  3  4  5
Comments/Suggestions:
7. The teaching material (designated or provided) is adequate for the study of topic
 1  2  3  4  5
Comments/Suggestions:

5. 8. The teaching material (indicated or supplied) is easily available
 1  2  3  4  5
Comments/Suggestions:
9. The teaching material (indicated or supplied) is easily usable/transferable
 1  2  3  4  5
Comments/Suggestions:

6. 10.The integrative didactic activities (tutorials, workshops, seminars, etc ...) are
useful for learning purposes
 1  2  3  4  5
Comments/Suggestions:
11.The project offers supplementary material available on-line
 1  2  3  4  5
Comments/Suggestions:

7. 12.Overall assessment of the activity / output
 1  2  3  4  5
Comments/Suggestions:
13.What did you like best/like to change?
diseminare, intalnirile cu partenerii din proiect
diseminarea, activitatile sustinute de participantii la proiect
intalnirile cu ceilalti parteneri din proiect
activitatile din proiect
participarea la activităţile realizate de organizatori,
Subiectul proiectului si modul cum a reusit sa antreneze un numar mare de participanti
intalnirile cu partenerii din celelalte tari
diseminarea, activitatile din proiect
intalnirea cu partenerii din proiect
diseminarea, activitatile partenerilor din proiect
diseminarea
nimic
diseminarea,
diseminarea, relationarea cu alti parteneri din diferite tari
diseminarea,
diseminarea, activitaţile realizate de organizatori
activitatile din proiect, diseminarea
activitatile