Euclid Community Survey final presentation

1. CITY OF EUCLID MASTER PLAN COMMUNITY SURVEY RESULTS

2. County Planning Team • James Sonnhalter, Manager, Planning Services • Patrick Hewitt, Senior Planner

3. The Euclid Master Plan: Six Steps CommunitySurvey CommunityVision Policies Implementation Current Conditions Demographic, land use, housing, and other data to develop a community profile Includes a review of existing plans and surveys DraftMasterPlan CommunitySurvey CommunityVision Policies Implementation Current Conditions Demographic, land use, housing, and other data to develop a community profile Includes a review of existing plans and surveys

4. The Euclid Master Plan: Six Steps CommunityVision Policies Implementation DraftMasterPlan Community Survey Community input on Master Plan topics and City services CurrentConditions

5. The Euclid Master Plan: Six Steps Policies Implementation DraftMasterPlan Community Vision Broad goals for how the community wants to grow and develop in the future CurrentConditions CommunitySurvey

6. Policies Action steps to achieve the community’s desired future The Euclid Master Plan: Six Steps Implementation DraftMasterPlan CurrentConditions CommunitySurvey CommunityVision

7. The Euclid Master Plan: Six Steps Implementation Timelines, priorities, responsibilities, and potential funding sources for undertaking action steps DraftMasterPlan CurrentConditions CommunitySurvey CommunityVision Policies

8. The Euclid Master Plan: Six Steps Draft Master Plan Combined and completed Master Plan document CurrentConditions CommunitySurvey CommunityVision Policies Implementation

9. • Methodology + Process • Detailed Findings • Demographics • Major Themes

14. METHODOLOGY + PROCESS

15. Formulated Questions Mailed Surveys Follow-Up Postcard Tabulated Results Produced Report

16. Euclid Survey Total Households 22,191 Households

17. Euclid Survey Total Households 22,191 Households Mailed Surveys 1,400 Surveys

18. Euclid Survey Total Households 22,191 Households Mailed Surveys 1,400 Surveys Returned Surveys 265 Surveys Response Rate 18.9%

19. Euclid Survey Total Households 22,191 Households Mailed Surveys 1,400 Surveys Returned Surveys 265 Surveys Response Rate 18.9% Confidence Level 95% Statistical Error Rate +/- 5.98

20. DETAILED FINDINGS

21. SURVEY TOPICS • Reasons for Residing in Euclid • Parks and Recreation • Quality of Life • Economic Development • City Image and Communication • Housing • Transportation • Development • Community Amenities • City Services

22. Strongly Agree Very High Agree High Neither Agree nor Disagree Average Disagree Low Strongly Disagree Very Low LEGEND The graphs in this presentation have been sorted by most popular answer.

23. REASONS FOR RESIDING IN EUCLID

24. 42.0% 40.0% 34.8% 33.6% 30.0% 18.8% 18.8% 18.4% 16.8% 15.6% 14.0% 11.2% 11.2% 8.4% 6.4% 5.2% 3.6% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Access to highways Close to family and/or friends Close to Lake Erie Housing costs fit my budget Easy access to Downtown Cleveland Close to shopping Well-maintained neighborhood Close to my work Feel safe in the City/my neighborhood For a diverse community For the suburban environment Offers the type of housing I want High quality of municipal services Easy access to University Circle Easy access to the City's parks Property is a good investment Quality of the school system REASONS FOR RESIDING IN EUCLID

25. 42.0% 40.0% 34.8% 33.6% 30.0% 18.8% 18.8% 18.4% 16.8% 15.6% 14.0% 11.2% 11.2% 8.4% 6.4% 5.2% 3.6% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Access to highways Close to family and/or friends Close to Lake Erie Housing costs fit my budget Easy access to Downtown Cleveland Close to shopping Well-maintained neighborhood Close to my work Feel safe in the City/my neighborhood For a diverse community For the suburban environment Offers the type of housing I want High quality of municipal services Easy access to University Circle Easy access to the City's parks Property is a good investment Quality of the school system REASONS FOR RESIDING IN EUCLID Morethan10%Lessthan10%TopAnswers

29. CONSIDERATIONS FOR MOVING FROM EUCLID 18.6% 38.0% 35.3% 18.2% 15.1% 14.7% 14.0% 12.0% 11.2% 10.9% 10.9% 9.7% 9.7% 8.5% 7.4% 6.6% 6.6% 5.8% 4.7% 4.7% 3.1% 1.6% 1.6% 0.4% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% I would not consider moving out For a safer community For lower taxes For a better school district For a retirement friendly community For a different climate To be closer to family and/or friends For a newer house For better community facilities For more home for my money For a more rural environment For a higher quality of municipal services For better access to shopping For more property To be closer to work/job related For a smaller house For a larger house To be able to walk more places For a rental unit For attached condos/clustered homes For less traffic congestion To be closer to Downtown Cleveland To be closer to University Circle To have better access to highways

30. CONSIDERATIONS FOR MOVING FROM EUCLID 18.6% 38.0% 35.3% 18.2% 15.1% 14.7% 14.0% 12.0% 11.2% 10.9% 10.9% 9.7% 9.7% 8.5% 7.4% 6.6% 6.6% 5.8% 4.7% 4.7% 3.1% 1.6% 1.6% 0.4% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% I would not consider moving out For a safer community For lower taxes For a better school district For a retirement friendly community For a different climate To be closer to family and/or friends For a newer house For better community facilities For more home for my money For a more rural environment For a higher quality of municipal services For better access to shopping For more property To be closer to work/job related For a smaller house For a larger house To be able to walk more places For a rental unit For attached condos/clustered homes For less traffic congestion To be closer to Downtown Cleveland To be closer to University Circle To have better access to highways Morethan10%Lessthan10% Top Answers

31. CONSIDERATIONS FOR MOVING FROM EUCLID 18.6% 38.0% 35.3% 18.2% 15.1% 14.7% 14.0% 12.0% 11.2% 10.9% 10.9% 9.7% 9.7% 8.5% 7.4% 6.6% 6.6% 5.8% 4.7% 4.7% 3.1% 1.6% 1.6% 0.4% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% I would not consider moving out For a safer community For lower taxes For a better school district For a retirement friendly community For a different climate To be closer to family and/or friends For a newer house For better community facilities For more home for my money For a more rural environment For a higher quality of municipal services For better access to shopping For more property To be closer to work/job related For a smaller house For a larger house To be able to walk more places For a rental unit For attached condos/clustered homes For less traffic congestion To be closer to Downtown Cleveland To be closer to University Circle To have better access to highways

32. 18.6% 38.0% 35.3% 18.2% 15.1% 14.7% 14.0% 12.0% 11.2% 10.9% 10.9% 9.7% 9.7% 8.5% 7.4% 6.6% 6.6% 5.8% 4.7% 4.7% 3.1% 1.6% 1.6% 0.4% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% I would not consider moving out For a safer community For lower taxes For a better school district For a retirement friendly community For a different climate To be closer to family and/or friends For a newer house For better community facilities For more home for my money For a more rural environment For a higher quality of municipal services For better access to shopping For more property To be closer to work/job related For a smaller house For a larger house To be able to walk more places For a rental unit For attached condos/clustered homes For less traffic congestion To be closer to Downtown Cleveland To be closer to University Circle To have better access to highways CONSIDERATIONS FOR MOVING FROM EUCLID

36. PARKS AND RECREATION

37. EASE OF PUBLIC ACCESS TO LAKE ERIE Excellent 24.9% Good 43.4% Average 23.3% Poor 6.0% Very Poor 2.4%

38. QUALITY OF FACILITIES 44.2% 28.2% 28.6% 19.3% 12.7% 9.7% 12.4% 16.7% 8.6% 6.4% 10.7% 11.6% 11.1% 35.1% 48.3% 40.8% 48.8% 48.1% 48.5% 43.8% 38.1% 44.3% 44.7% 39.3% 34.9% 28.9% 15.6% 21.3% 28.6% 27.1% 29.1% 33.6% 38.2% 28.6% 42.9% 38.3% 33.3% 39.5% 35.6% 7.6% 6.7% 11.9% 7.8% 10.7% 7.0% 11.1% 7.0% 13.3% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Joseph Farrell Memorial Fishing Pier Cleveland Metroparks Euclid Creek… Sims Park Disc Golf Course Sims Park (overall) Briardale Golf Course Memorial Park (overall) Memorial Park Pool Indian Hills Splash Park C.E. Orr Ice Arena Neighborhood Parks and Playgrounds Neighborhood Pools (Willow,… Skate Park Dog Park

39. 44.2% 28.2% 28.6% 19.3% 12.7% 9.7% 12.4% 16.7% 8.6% 6.4% 10.7% 11.6% 11.1% 35.1% 48.3% 40.8% 48.8% 48.1% 48.5% 43.8% 38.1% 44.3% 44.7% 39.3% 34.9% 28.9% 15.6% 21.3% 28.6% 27.1% 29.1% 33.6% 38.2% 28.6% 42.9% 38.3% 33.3% 39.5% 35.6% 7.6% 6.7% 11.9% 7.8% 10.7% 7.0% 11.1% 7.0% 13.3% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Joseph Farrell Memorial Fishing Pier Cleveland Metroparks Euclid Creek… Sims Park Disc Golf Course Sims Park (overall) Briardale Golf Course Memorial Park (overall) Memorial Park Pool Indian Hills Splash Park C.E. Orr Ice Arena Neighborhood Parks and Playgrounds Neighborhood Pools (Willow,… Skate Park Dog Park Morethan50%Lessthan50% QUALITY OF FACILITIES

40. 44.2% 28.2% 28.6% 19.3% 12.7% 9.7% 12.4% 16.7% 8.6% 6.4% 10.7% 11.6% 11.1% 35.1% 48.3% 40.8% 48.8% 48.1% 48.5% 43.8% 38.1% 44.3% 44.7% 39.3% 34.9% 28.9% 15.6% 21.3% 28.6% 27.1% 29.1% 33.6% 38.2% 28.6% 42.9% 38.3% 33.3% 39.5% 35.6% 7.6% 6.7% 11.9% 7.8% 10.7% 7.0% 11.1% 7.0% 13.3% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Joseph Farrell Memorial Fishing Pier Cleveland Metroparks Euclid Creek… Sims Park Disc Golf Course Sims Park (overall) Briardale Golf Course Memorial Park (overall) Memorial Park Pool Indian Hills Splash Park C.E. Orr Ice Arena Neighborhood Parks and Playgrounds Neighborhood Pools (Willow,… Skate Park Dog Park QUALITY OF FACILITIES

43. OVERALL QUALITY OF FACILITIES Excellent 10.9% Good 45.6% Average 38.9% Poor 2.9% Very Poor 1.7%

44. QUALITY OF LIFE

45. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT Yes, I feel engaged, 46.4% No, I do not feel engaged, 53.6%

46. METHODS OF INVOLVEMENT 47.1% 39.2% 20.3% 15.7% 8.5% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Place of worship or faith community Street, civic, beach, or block clubs School Recreation/athletic organizations Community service groups (e.g., Kiwanis Club)

47. 47.1% 39.2% 20.3% 15.7% 8.5% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Place of worship or faith community Street, civic, beach, or block clubs School Recreation/athletic organizations Community service groups (e.g., Kiwanis Club) METHODS OF INVOLVEMENT

48. FREQUENCY OF INVOLVEMENT Very Often 4.3% Often 11.2% Somewhat Often 26.2% Not Often 58.4%

49. OVERALL QUALITY OF LIFE Excellent 4.3% Good 37.4% Average 39.3% Poor 14.4% Very Poor 4.7%

50. ENGAGEMENT BY QUALITY OF LIFE 69.9% 38.1% 10.6% 30.1% 61.9% 89.4% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Above Average Average Below Average Yes, I feel engaged No, I do not feel engaged

51. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

52. 38.3% 36.1% 27.8% 25.2% 25.0% 19.4% 11.1% 11.2% 45.6% 42.6% 42.7% 44.6% 34.4% 32.4% 36.9% 32.3% 13.7% 16.0% 24.9% 27.3% 30.3% 36.8% 42.6% 17.5% 7.8% 8.9% 7.8% 29.9% 9.2% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Maintain and attract different types of retail/service stores Attract manufacturing and industrial jobs Promote workforce training programs in Euclid Attract office jobs Grow as a regional retail and shopping destination Support development near freeways (gas stations, hotels, fast food) Develop more arts and cultural attractions Most of my shopping needs can be met by local retailers OPINION ON POLICY STATEMENTS

53. 38.3% 36.1% 27.8% 25.2% 25.0% 19.4% 11.1% 11.2% 45.6% 42.6% 42.7% 44.6% 34.4% 32.4% 36.9% 32.3% 13.7% 16.0% 24.9% 27.3% 30.3% 36.8% 42.6% 17.5% 7.8% 8.9% 7.8% 29.9% 9.2% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Maintain and attract different types of retail/service stores Attract manufacturing and industrial jobs Promote workforce training programs in Euclid Attract office jobs Grow as a regional retail and shopping destination Support development near freeways (gas stations, hotels, fast food) Develop more arts and cultural attractions Most of my shopping needs can be met by local retailers OPINION ON POLICY STATEMENTS Morethan50%Lessthan50%

58. OPINION ON POLICY STATEMENTS 31.7% 42.5% 50.6% 58.5% 46.7% 44.6% 80.5% 73.3% 60.0% 70.7% 80.5% 80.0% Most of my shopping needs can be met by local retailers Working age adults Young adults Seniors The City should develop more arts and cultural attractions The City should focus on attracting office jobs The City should focus on attracting manufacturing and industrial jobs

59. CITY IMAGE AND COMMUNICATION

60. OPINION ON POLICY STATEMENTS 29.4% 19.2% 13.1% 10.0% 18.0% 44.1% 47.5% 45.9% 42.8% 33.9% 20.8% 28.8% 19.2% 22.8% 41.8% 15.7% 18.0% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Streets should have decorative elements Focus on preserving its cultural heritage and history The City does a good job of making information accessible I feel well informed about community programs and events Focus on creating a unique City identity and brand

61. OPINION ON POLICY STATEMENTS 29.4% 19.2% 13.1% 10.0% 18.0% 44.1% 47.5% 45.9% 42.8% 33.9% 20.8% 28.8% 19.2% 22.8% 41.8% 15.7% 18.0% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Streets should have decorative elements Focus on preserving its cultural heritage and history The City does a good job of making information accessible I feel well informed about community programs and events Focus on creating a unique City identity and brand Morethan50%

64. 29.4% 19.2% 13.1% 10.0% 18.0% 44.1% 47.5% 45.9% 42.8% 33.9% 20.8% 28.8% 19.2% 22.8% 41.8% 15.7% 18.0% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Streets should have decorative elements Focus on preserving its cultural heritage and history The City does a good job of making information accessible I feel well informed about community programs and events Focus on creating a unique City identity and brand OPINION ON POLICY STATEMENTS

65. OPINION ON POLICY STATEMENTS Streets should have decorative elements Working age adults Young adults Seniors The City does a good job of making information accessible I feel well informed about community programs and events 81.6% 79.2% 62.4% 44.7% 54.1% 72.5% 45.0% 45.8% 65.6%

66. 48.4% 27.8% 24.6% 22.2% 20.6% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Phone Calls City Website Community Television (ECTV) Other Social Media METHODS FOR RECEIVING INFORMATION

69. HOUSING

70. 51.5% 32.8% 25.6% 24.7% 19.6% 15.1% 25.0% 14.4% 8.2% 29.7% 30.2% 37.0% 30.8% 29.3% 32.3% 22.4% 28.4% 23.8% 11.5% 13.8% 25.5% 29.3% 30.0% 30.2% 37.9% 29.7% 33.8% 40.3% 26.1% 7.7% 8.4% 13.8% 11.2% 11.6% 14.4% 16.5% 22.6% 7.1% 11.2% 9.0% 11.3% 36.8% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Maintaining existing housing and neighborhoods More sustainable and energy- efficient housing More housing options for seniors More infill development on vacant land More single-family, detached homes More walkable housing options More new affordable housing More housing types for young people More townhouses/condos in appropriate locations More apartments in appropriate locations PRIORITY HOUSING NEEDS

71. 51.5% 32.8% 25.6% 24.7% 19.6% 15.1% 25.0% 14.4% 8.2% 29.7% 30.2% 37.0% 30.8% 29.3% 32.3% 22.4% 28.4% 23.8% 11.5% 13.8% 25.5% 29.3% 30.0% 30.2% 37.9% 29.7% 33.8% 40.3% 26.1% 7.7% 8.4% 13.8% 11.2% 11.6% 14.4% 16.5% 22.6% 7.1% 11.2% 9.0% 11.3% 36.8% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Maintaining existing housing and neighborhoods More sustainable and energy- efficient housing More housing options for seniors More infill development on vacant land More single-family, detached homes More walkable housing options More new affordable housing More housing types for young people More townhouses/condos in appropriate locations More apartments in appropriate locations PRIORITY HOUSING NEEDS Morethan 50% Lessthan50% Top Answer

77. 55.9% 37.0% 36.9% 39.9% 37.4% 28.3% 25.3% 39.1% 32.4% 27.8% 28.9% 30.3% 15.1% 19.3% 23.7% 22.6% 28.5% 24.2% 7.8% 9.4% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Demolition of vacant/blighted housing Assistance for home improvements First-time homeowner education Rental property management education Stronger or more consistent code enforcement First-time homebuyer down payment assistance PRIORITY HOUSING SERVICES

78. 55.9% 37.0% 36.9% 39.9% 37.4% 28.3% 25.3% 39.1% 32.4% 27.8% 28.9% 30.3% 15.1% 19.3% 23.7% 22.6% 28.5% 24.2% 7.8% 9.4% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Demolition of vacant/blighted housing Assistance for home improvements First-time homeowner education Rental property management education Stronger or more consistent code enforcement First-time homebuyer down payment assistance PRIORITY HOUSING SERVICES Morethan50%

81. TRANSPORTATION

82. 42.6% 36.2% 25.3% 20.8% 21.3% 29.9% 32.1% 27.1% 29.0% 26.7% 19.1% 25.0% 34.4% 32.9% 31.2% 7.7% 9.2% 11.9% 8.2% 8.9% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Senior Transportation Walking Car Public Transit Bike PRIORITY FOR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS

83. 42.6% 36.2% 25.3% 20.8% 21.3% 29.9% 32.1% 27.1% 29.0% 26.7% 19.1% 25.0% 34.4% 32.9% 31.2% 7.7% 9.2% 11.9% 8.2% 8.9% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Senior Transportation Walking Car Public Transit Bike PRIORITY FOR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS Morethan50%Lessthan50%

86. PRIORITY FOR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS BY AGE 41.0% 38.9% 47.5% 65.0% 44.8% 55.0% 51.0% 52.9% 69.6% 74.3% 55.6% 53.0% 39.7% 68.1% 80.8% Young Adults Working Age Adults Seniors Biking Walking Walking Walking SeniorTransportation SeniorTransportation Public Transit Car Bike Senior Transportation Walking

87. PRIORITY FOR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS ON MAJOR ROADS 38.6% 34.0%31.5%30.4% 43.6%44.5% 38.1%39.2% 16.3%17.5% 21.4% 18.2% 47.5% 58.5% 45.2% 51.9% 14.4%15.0% 11.3% 14.4% 0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0% Lakeshore BoulevardEuclid AvenueEast 250th StreetEast 260th Street 30.3%30.3%28.8%28.5% 45.2% 41.0%38.4% 42.0% 13.9% 17.9%20.2% 16.0% 52.9% 46.7% 52.5%55.0% 21.6%23.1%20.7%21.0% 0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0% East 185th StreetEast 222nd StreetBabbitt RoadEast 200th Street Moving cars more quickly More attractive streets Easier access to transit Safer for walking Safer for bikes

88. PRIORITY FOR TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS ON MAJOR ROADS 38.6% 34.0%31.5%30.4% 43.6%44.5% 38.1%39.2% 16.3%17.5% 21.4% 18.2% 47.5% 58.5% 45.2% 51.9% 14.4%15.0% 11.3% 14.4% 0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0% Lakeshore BoulevardEuclid AvenueEast 250th StreetEast 260th Street 30.3%30.3%28.8%28.5% 45.2% 41.0%38.4% 42.0% 13.9% 17.9%20.2% 16.0% 52.9% 46.7% 52.5%55.0% 21.6%23.1%20.7%21.0% 0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0% East 185th StreetEast 222nd StreetBabbitt RoadEast 200th Street Moving cars more quickly More attractive streets Easier access to transit Safer for walking Safer for bikes

89. DEVELOPMENT

90. 49.7%51.2% 15.1% 44.4%46.3% 6.8% 26.9% 20.7% 32.2% 16.4% 28.7% 2.9% 14.6% 18.9% 76.6% 0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0% East 260th and Euclid AvenueEuclid Avenue CorridorLakefront 79.9%77.3% 65.8% 28.4%30.4%31.2% 14.2% 17.7%14.7% 5.9%6.6% 35.5% 28.9% 16.0% 20.8% 0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0% Downtown Euclid (Lakeshore Blvd and East 222nd St) East 185th StreetEuclid Square Mall DESIRED USES FOR CERTAIN AREAS Parks Industrial Housing Office Retail

95. 57.1% 33.6% 32.2% 34.6% 27.3% 24.2% 24.8% 15.0% 31.0% 49.3% 43.0% 39.7% 42.9% 37.7% 33.8% 25.2% 9.8% 14.4% 20.4% 19.8% 17.2% 26.4% 27.4% 30.1% 8.4% 8.7% 11.1% 21.7% 8.0% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Focus on demolishing abandoned or foreclosed homes Focus on walkable, mixed-use development Encourage more environmentally sustainable development Vacant lots should be offered for yard expansion Vacant properties should be used for new housing Vacant properties should be used as green space New homes should match the scale and design of existing homes Vacant properties should be developed for commerical use OPINION ON POLICY STATEMENTS

96. 57.1% 33.6% 32.2% 34.6% 27.3% 24.2% 24.8% 15.0% 31.0% 49.3% 43.0% 39.7% 42.9% 37.7% 33.8% 25.2% 9.8% 14.4% 20.4% 19.8% 17.2% 26.4% 27.4% 30.1% 8.4% 8.7% 11.1% 21.7% 8.0% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Focus on demolishing abandoned or foreclosed homes Focus on walkable, mixed-use development Encourage more environmentally sustainable development Vacant lots should be offered for yard expansion Vacant properties should be used for new housing Vacant properties should be used as green space New homes should match the scale and design of existing homes Vacant properties should be developed for commerical use OPINION ON POLICY STATEMENTS Morethan50% Lessthan 50%

102. COMMUNITY AMENITIES

103. 58.6% 40.2% 33.8% 35.0% 23.9% 19.0% 17.6% 15.2% 13.8% 11.4% 8.2% 30.4% 34.6% 40.5% 34.2% 45.3% 44.4% 38.5% 39.2% 35.5% 32.9% 24.7% 7.6% 19.6% 21.6% 22.6% 24.8% 30.2% 31.9% 43.0% 31.6% 34.7% 27.6% 13.8% 21.2% 18.2% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Euclid Public Library Joseph Farrell Memorial Fishing Pier Henn Mansion Euclid Hospital Senior Community Center Private or Parochial Schools Euclid Historical Society and Museum Polka and Softball Hall of Fame Euclid YMCA Shore Cultural Centre Euclid City Schools QUALITY OF COMMUNITY AMENITIES

104. 58.6% 40.2% 33.8% 35.0% 23.9% 19.0% 17.6% 15.2% 13.8% 11.4% 8.2% 30.4% 34.6% 40.5% 34.2% 45.3% 44.4% 38.5% 39.2% 35.5% 32.9% 24.7% 7.6% 19.6% 21.6% 22.6% 24.8% 30.2% 31.9% 43.0% 31.6% 34.7% 27.6% 13.8% 21.2% 18.2% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Euclid Public Library Joseph Farrell Memorial Fishing Pier Henn Mansion Euclid Hospital Senior Community Center Private or Parochial Schools Euclid Historical Society and Museum Polka and Softball Hall of Fame Euclid YMCA Shore Cultural Centre Euclid City Schools QUALITY OF COMMUNITY AMENITIES Morethan50%Lessthan50%

105. 58.6% 40.2% 33.8% 35.0% 23.9% 19.0% 17.6% 15.2% 13.8% 11.4% 8.2% 30.4% 34.6% 40.5% 34.2% 45.3% 44.4% 38.5% 39.2% 35.5% 32.9% 24.7% 7.6% 19.6% 21.6% 22.6% 24.8% 30.2% 31.9% 43.0% 31.6% 34.7% 27.6% 13.8% 21.2% 18.2% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Euclid Public Library Joseph Farrell Memorial Fishing Pier Henn Mansion Euclid Hospital Senior Community Center Private or Parochial Schools Euclid Historical Society and Museum Polka and Softball Hall of Fame Euclid YMCA Shore Cultural Centre Euclid City Schools QUALITY OF COMMUNITY AMENITIES AboveAverageBelowAverage

106. 80.7% 77.4% 69.0% 55.2% 50.0% 41.4% 32.8% 27.4% 27.8% 19.6% 15.1% 16.9% 17.5% 20.8% 31.3% 33.8% 35.7% 39.1% 35.8% 34.8% 35.2% 24.9% 8.3% 9.2% 16.5% 21.8% 27.9% 26.9% 37.0% 41.3% 8.8% 10.6% 8.3% 18.7% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Euclid Public Library Euclid Hospital Euclid City Schools Senior Community Center Private or Parochial Schools Euclid YMCA Shore Cultural Centre Henn Mansion Joseph Farrell Memorial Fishing Pier Euclid Historical Society and Museum Polka and Softball Hall of Fame IMPORTANCE OF COMMUNITY AMENITIES

107. 80.7% 77.4% 69.0% 55.2% 50.0% 41.4% 32.8% 27.4% 27.8% 19.6% 15.1% 16.9% 17.5% 20.8% 31.3% 33.8% 35.7% 39.1% 35.8% 34.8% 35.2% 24.9% 8.3% 9.2% 16.5% 21.8% 27.9% 26.9% 37.0% 41.3% 8.8% 10.6% 8.3% 18.7% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Euclid Public Library Euclid Hospital Euclid City Schools Senior Community Center Private or Parochial Schools Euclid YMCA Shore Cultural Centre Henn Mansion Joseph Farrell Memorial Fishing Pier Euclid Historical Society and Museum Polka and Softball Hall of Fame IMPORTANCE OF COMMUNITY AMENITIES Morethan50%Lessthan 50%

108. 80.7% 77.4% 69.0% 55.2% 50.0% 41.4% 32.8% 27.4% 27.8% 19.6% 15.1% 16.9% 17.5% 20.8% 31.3% 33.8% 35.7% 39.1% 35.8% 34.8% 35.2% 24.9% 8.3% 9.2% 16.5% 21.8% 27.9% 26.9% 37.0% 41.3% 8.8% 10.6% 8.3% 18.7% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Euclid Public Library Euclid Hospital Euclid City Schools Senior Community Center Private or Parochial Schools Euclid YMCA Shore Cultural Centre Henn Mansion Joseph Farrell Memorial Fishing Pier Euclid Historical Society and Museum Polka and Softball Hall of Fame IMPORTANCE OF COMMUNITY AMENITIES AboveAverageBelowAverage

109. IMPORTANCE-QUALITY MATRIXIncreasingimportance Increasing quality

110. IMPORTANCE-QUALITY MATRIX Average importance

111. IMPORTANCE-QUALITY MATRIX Averagequality

112. IMPORTANCE-QUALITY MATRIX Above average quality, above average importance

113. IMPORTANCE-QUALITY MATRIX

114. IMPORTANCE-QUALITY MATRIX Below average importance, above average quality

116. IMPORTANCE-QUALITY MATRIX Below average quality, below average importance

118. IMPORTANCE-QUALITY MATRIX Above average importance, below average quality

120. CITY SERVICES

121. QUALITY OF CITY SERVICES 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Fire protection/EMS Police protection Trash collection & curbside recycling Blackboard Connect (Telephone… Senior services Healthcare access Park maintenance Leaf collection Traffic enforcement Recreational programs Euclid Community Television City of Euclid website Street tree planting program Snow removal Water back up/sewer infrastructure Commercial maintenance… Building department Housing maintenance enforcement Street maintenance/repair

122. QUALITY OF CITY SERVICES 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Fire protection/EMS Police protection Trash collection & curbside recycling Blackboard Connect (Telephone… Senior services Healthcare access Park maintenance Leaf collection Traffic enforcement Recreational programs Euclid Community Television City of Euclid website Street tree planting program Snow removal Water back up/sewer infrastructure Commercial maintenance… Building department Housing maintenance enforcement Street maintenance/repair Morethan50%Lessthan50%

123. QUALITY OF CITY SERVICES 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Fire protection/EMS Police protection Trash collection & curbside recycling Blackboard Connect (Telephone… Senior services Healthcare access Park maintenance Leaf collection Traffic enforcement Recreational programs Euclid Community Television City of Euclid website Street tree planting program Snow removal Water back up/sewer infrastructure Commercial maintenance… Building department Housing maintenance enforcement Street maintenance/repair AboveAverageBelowAverage

124. 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Fire protection/EMS Street maintenance/repair Police protection Snow removal Trash collection & curbside recycling Water back up/sewer infrastructure Traffic enforcement Healthcare access Housing maintenance enforcement Senior services Leaf collection Park maintenance Commercial maintenance… Building department Recreational programs Blackboard Connect (Telephone… City of Euclid website Street tree planting program Euclid Community Television IMPORTANCE OF CITY SERVICES

125. 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Fire protection/EMS Street maintenance/repair Police protection Snow removal Trash collection & curbside recycling Water back up/sewer infrastructure Traffic enforcement Healthcare access Housing maintenance enforcement Senior services Leaf collection Park maintenance Commercial maintenance… Building department Recreational programs Blackboard Connect (Telephone… City of Euclid website Street tree planting program Euclid Community Television IMPORTANCE OF CITY SERVICES Morethan50%

126. 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Fire protection/EMS Street maintenance/repair Police protection Snow removal Trash collection & curbside recycling Water back up/sewer infrastructure Traffic enforcement Healthcare access Housing maintenance enforcement Senior services Leaf collection Park maintenance Commercial maintenance… Building department Recreational programs Blackboard Connect (Telephone… City of Euclid website Street tree planting program Euclid Community Television IMPORTANCE OF CITY SERVICES AboveAverageBelowAverage

127. IMPORTANCE-QUALITY MATRIXIncreasingimportance Increasing quality

128. IMPORTANCE-QUALITY MATRIX Average importance

129. IMPORTANCE-QUALITY MATRIX Averagequality

130. IMPORTANCE-QUALITY MATRIX Above average quality, above average importance

132. IMPORTANCE-QUALITY MATRIX Below average importance, above average quality

134. IMPORTANCE-QUALITY MATRIX Below average quality, below average importance

136. IMPORTANCE-QUALITY MATRIX Above average importance, below average quality

138. OVERALL QUALITY OF CITY SERVICES Excellent 13.1% Good 51.0% Average 27.4% Poor 5.8% Very Poor 2.7%

139. STRENGTHS & WEAKNESSES

140. GREATEST STRENGTHS OF EUCLID 20.9% 19.6% 12.3% 11.5% 7.2% 5.5% 3.8% 3.4% 2.1% 7.7% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Access to Lake Erie Emergency Services Location People, Diversity, and Community Services Housing, Neighborhoods, and Affordability Parks Retail and Restaurants Walkability and Downtown Euclid All Others

141. 16.0% 13.4% 9.1% 8.7% 6.5% 6.5% 4.3% 4.3% 3.9% 3.5% 2.6% 2.6% 2.6% 16.0% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% Home Maintenance and Vacancy Improve Services Improve Schools Add Business or Renovate Vacant Businesses Improve Safety and Police Relations Lower Taxes Develop the Lakefront Increase Homeownership Improve Neighbor-to-Neighbor Relations Add Jobs/Industry Improve Euclid Square Mall Area Improve Section 8 Housing Improve Community Image All Others LEADING ITEMS TO CHANGE

142. VISION FOR THE FUTURE 21.5% 16.6% 8.3% 7.2% 3.9% 3.9% 3.9% 3.9% 3.9% 3.9% 3.3% 3.3% 16.6% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Has positive community image and pride Thrives Is safer Has well-maintained properties Reduces taxes Grows Has new retail and restaurants Develops its lakefront Attracts children, young people, and young families Attracts industry and jobs Has better parks and recreation events Improves schools Other EuclidshouldbecomeaCitythat…

143. DEMOGRAPHICS

144. AGE OF RESPONDENTS 4.2% 11.5% 16.8% 30.2% 22.9% 14.5% 17.0% 16.8% 22.8% 20.8% 10.3% 12.3% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% Under 34 35 to 44 45 to 54 55 to 64 65 to 74 75+ years 2016 Euclid Survey

145. AGE OF RESPONDENTS 4.2% 11.5% 16.8% 30.2% 22.9% 14.5% 17.0% 16.8% 22.8% 20.8% 10.3% 12.3% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% Under 34 35 to 44 45 to 54 55 to 64 65 to 74 75+ years 2016 Euclid Survey 2014 American Community Survey, US Census

146. LENGTH OF RESIDENCY 4.2% 8.0% 13.3% 23.6% 15.6% 35.4% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Under 2 years 2-5 years 6-10 years 11-20 years 21-30 years More than 30 years

147. 12.7% 20.8% 13.5% 6.1% 2.0% 1.6% 43.3% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Under 2 years 2-5 years 6-10 years 11-20 years 21-30 years More than 30 years I do not intend to move out PLANNED LENGTH OF RESIDENCY

148. Homeowner 74.5% Renter 25.5% TENURE

149. Owning 77.6% Renting, 22.4% PLANNED TENURE

150. 16.5% 6.2% 6.6% 11.3% 14.4% 16.5% 17.7% 10.7% 23.4% 7.7% 11.6% 12.4% 16.6% 13.8% 6.9% 7.7% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 0 to 17 18 to 24 25 to 34 35 to 44 45 to 54 55 to 64 65 to 74 75+ years AGE OF RESPONDENT HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS 2016 Euclid Survey

151. 16.5% 6.2% 6.6% 11.3% 14.4% 16.5% 17.7% 10.7% 23.4% 7.7% 11.6% 12.4% 16.6% 13.8% 6.9% 7.7% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 0 to 17 18 to 24 25 to 34 35 to 44 45 to 54 55 to 64 65 to 74 75+ years AGE OF RESPONDENT HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS 2016 Euclid Survey 2014 American Community Survey, US Census

152. MAJOR THEMES

153. • Access to highways, Lake Erie, and Downtown Cleveland are top reasons people choose to live in Euclid • Proximity to family and housing affordability are also top reasons

154. • The perception of safety and taxes are major concerns and reasons residents may choose to move away

155. • Residents have a wide variety of preferred housing types. Small percentages of residents would move for: • More property • A smaller house • A larger house • For a rental unit • For attached condos/clustered homes • However, 12% of residents would move for a newer house

156. • The quality of larger parks is rated higher than neighborhood parks, playgrounds, or pools • The Skate Park and Dog Park are the lowest rated facilities

157. • Residents would like to see parks by the Lake—this is followed by housing and retail

158. • Less than half of respondents feel engaged in their community or neighborhood • Those that are engaged are involved in the faith community or street, civic, beach, or block club

159. • Residents would like to see new and different retail and service stores • Manufacturing and workforce development programs are the highest priority economic development initiatives

160. • Maintaining existing housing and neighborhoods is residents’ primary housing priority… • …however, demolition of vacant and blighted housing is a key housing service • More apartments are not desired by residents

161. • Residents did not universally agree that new homes should match the scale and design of existing homes

162. • Improving the walking environment is more important than improving transportation by car • More attractive streets are the highest priority for all individual streets in Euclid • Walkable, mixed-use development is strongly desired

163. • Residents would like to see vacant lots used for yard expansion before new housing and green space • Residents would not like to see vacant properties for commercial use

164. • Residents would most like to see improvements to City Schools and the YMCA • The Shore Cultural Centre, Euclid Historical Society and Museum, and Polka and Softball Hall of Fame are lower priorities and lower quality amenities

165. • Residents see Euclid Hospital, Library, private and parochial schools, and the senior community center as strong and important community amenities

166. • The repair of streets and sewer infrastructure is important and perceived as low quality • The enforcement of maintenance codes is also important and perceived as low quality

167. • Overall quality of City services is rated highly

169. Thank you!

Euclid Community Survey final presentation

Recomendados

Recomendados

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente

La actualidad más candente (20)

Similar a Euclid Community Survey final presentation

Similar a Euclid Community Survey final presentation (20)

Más de Cuyahoga County Planning Commission

Más de Cuyahoga County Planning Commission (20)

Último

Último (20)

Euclid Community Survey final presentation