Euthanasia Discursive Essay

The Euthanasia Debate Essay
Humans, like all animals, attempt to evade death. Though death is usually seen as an unwanted end,
some see it as an alternative to suffering. Most people cringe at the thought of suicide, but is
euthanasia the same thing? Do human beings have the right to choose death?"Americans have
developed a paradoxical relationship with death–we know more about the causes and conditions
surrounding death, but we have not equipped ourselves emotionally to cope with dying and death
(Bender and B. Leone)." Death is a scary subject for all humans. And death caused by oneself, or
suicide, is even scarier. Suicide on a medical terms, or euthanasia, confuses many people. It poses
many moral questions to humans: should it be allowed? How is this...show more content...
This has three subgroups: Nonvoluntary euthanasia, which is done when the patient is incapable of
deciding, involuntary euthanasia, which is done to end the suffering of a capable patient, and
voluntary euthanasia, which is done at the patients request (Yount). A broader term many people
assign these two acts to is suicide. The Merriam–Webster dictionary defines suicide as "the act of
killing yourself because you do not want to continue living." Euthanasia is a form of suicide, but
the two differ in their motives for death. People have taken their lives for a vase array of reasons,
for protest, revenge, to end despair, madness, pain, honor, illness, social situations, and many others.
(Williams–Boyd) Are all or any of these reasons justified? Perhaps in the minds of those who
attempted the taboo they are. To the "average," life loving human they are most likely not. A
common proverb to prevent suicide is "Suicide is a permanent solution to a temporary problem."
Some find meaning in this; others see its logical flaws. What if the problem isn't temporary? To
many suicidal people, the problem is life. Most people, who have problems with life, most likely
have deeper, psychological issues. And those issues are truly the problem, but "ignorance is bliss,"
and people overlook their small problems and blame life. Most suicidal people can find help, if they
choose to put in the effort to change. I have witnessed someone go from a suicidal, emotional
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Speech on Euthanasia Essay
Speech on Euthanasia
I stand before you today in confrontation. I stand before you today equal to any man. I stand before
you today with a challenge!
I challenge any man who deems, their morals, their ethics, their beliefs, their conscience enough to
find themselves fit to judge others. I challenge any man who deems himself fit to pass judgement
upon another's life. I challenge any man who believes they can play god. I challenge any man who
believes in euthanasia.
How can you believe in something you cannot justify? There is no justification in euthanasia so
how can it even be considered to be preformed, how could anyone ever justify the taking of
another's life. A mercy killing is the...show more content...
What does one do with such an old machine? It is thrown on the scrap heap. What does one do with
a lame horse, with such an unproductive cow?
No, I do not want to continue the comparison to the end––however fearful the justification for it and
the symbolic force of it are. We are not dealing with machines, horses and cows whose only function
is to serve mankind, to produce goods for man. One may smash them; one may slaughter them as
soon as they no longer fulfil this function.
No, we are dealing with human beings, our fellow human beings, our brothers and sisters. With poor
people, sick people, if you like unproductive people.
When does a life become worthless, the happiest man in the world is not necessarily the most
productive, happiness and joy and love of life can remain when the ability to be productive has
gone, true happiness lies within. Yet the manic depressants who have a perfect body, who are filled
with hate, those who make life a desolate landscape of dejected feelings, those who turn the gift of
life into a hell of misery, do they deserve life more than the terminally ill.
True is it not that it is the people themselves that wish to die, that wish to be aided in suicide, to
escape life to the sweet release of death. True it is those with the terminal illness that that make the
sole decision upon there life, but what

Euthanasia Essay
Euthanasia – Response to Anti Euthanasia Essay
Euthanasia is a topic that provokes as much controversy as capital punishment, primarily because it
is irreversible. The question of euthanasia being right or wrong is one that most would prefer left
alone. However, recent publicity on changes to existing laws has ignited considerable discussion and
has forced open the door to a much wider audience. The issues related to direct euthanasia have
raised many questions in my mind, to which I am still searching for answers. I believe it is
necessary to consider arguments, both, for and against, in order to come to any conclusion. In this
paper I will address Brian Clowes' article in the "Pro–Life Activist's Encyclopedia",
located on the...show more content...
Yet, his persistent use of medical cases where patients were classified as irreversibly comatose
and where all decisions regarding their continual treatment were made by others, neglects to
recognize the numerous cases of terminally ill patients, who simply ask for the right to control
their own destiny and to die with dignity. His use of extreme cases, all of which were found in
'National Right to Life News', gives the reader a distorted picture and neglects the many types of
cases where the prolonging of life would be cruel, inhumane and immoral. (Johnstone, 1994:353)
EUTHANASIA SETS A BAD EXAMPLE? I would ask what kind of example are we giving our
young by prolonging life at whatever cost to the person? Is quantity of life always the best option? Is
the taking of human life always wrong? In the 18th century William Mitford, an English historian
stated "Men fear death, as if unquestionably the greatess evil, and yet no man knows that it
may not be the greatest good." (Bradley, Daniels & Jones, 1969:194) Here the author
compares the act of suicide among the young with the act of euthanasia with the terminally ill. He
believes, in making euthanasia an acceptable social practice, it will inevitably have negative
repercussions on the rest of society. The writer argues that by condoning euthanasia, we condone

Euthanasia Persuasive Essay
Do you know anybody that has illness or disease where they just wished they wouldn't have to live
through it because they were so miserable from pain or just because they couldn't function by
themselves? Euthanasia is a type of lethal injection that allows a patient who has an illness or
disease to get rid of the pain and suffering by ending their life. This injection is administered by
their primary physician. There are only four countries in the world where euthanasia is legal and
there are six states in the United States where physician assisted suicide is legal. Laws based on
Euthanasia should not be enacted in Alabama because it is unlawful, a patient can be incompetent to
make such a decision, and the evolution of medicine could change someone's life if they choose not
to use physician assisted suicide. In our country we have laws that are set in place mainly to protect
our rights as citizens. Many of our laws have a resemblance to the Ten Commandments. The 9th
commandment says that you should not lie about anyone or anything. When a person goes to court
and they present any type of evidence or they give a testimony, they take an oath that states "I swear
that the evidence that I shall give, shall be the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so
help me God." That statement not only states that you are not going to lie but it is also an oath that
you take under God. Although that has absolutely nothing to do with euthanasia, the 6th
commandment does it says that we should not murder. In the state of Alabama, the law says that you
have committed murder if you have killed someone "With intent to cause the death of another person,
he or she causes the death of that person or of another person." (Reuters) When a doctor or
Physician gives their patient, who has requested to end their life by euthanasia, they have the
intent to cause the death of another person. If someone is suffering from a type of illness or
disease, that is god's plan for their life. God gives the hardest battles to his strongest warriors. His
intent might not be for you to survive but for you to strive through the hard times. Make out your
remaining days like they're some of the best days you have ever had. There are many

Euthanasia Speech Essay
Speech
Imagine if a close relative of yours was dying of lung cancer. Each breath they took was agonizing.
No medicine or drug could lessen their pain. Their life had become a torture. They ask you to end
their torment. What would you do? If you helped to hasten their death, you would most likely go to
prison for murder. What this relative has asked you to do is to commit Euthanasia. Webster's
Encyclopedia describes Euthanasia as the practice of hastening or causing the death of a person
suffering from an incurable disease . Simply put, Euthanasia is mercy killing. Euthanasia is one of
the most controversial topics in modern society, and every human being has a different view on it
according to their culture, their nation's...show more content...
Belgium is another place where Euthanasia has been made legal and its pro–Euthanasia health
system is abused to the same extent as is the Dutch one. If Euthanasia was legalized in Canada,
abuse would occur in the same manner. On top of the statistics, there are many other
disadvantages of legalizing Euthanasia. For one, how would one go about committing
Euthanasia? Most likely, drugs whose sole purpose is to end a human life would have to be
legalized as well. It is quite possible that these drugs could fall into the hands of someone who
would use them in illegal acts such as murder. Another flaw in legalizing Euthanasia would be that
it would become possible for relatives of a dying patient to take advantage of life insurance policies
or wills. Family may encourage a patient to choose Euthanasia so that they can receive money from
the patients will or life insurance.
After stating all the flaws of Euthanasia, I must describe all the benefits of it. The essential goal of
someone committing Euthanasia would be in order to end a dying human being's suffering. In
order to fully comprehend what it is like to have a family member asking for you to take their lives,
one must refer to the situation stated earlier. If the relative whose every breath was a torment wanted
you to help them kill themselves, what would you say to them? Would you deny them an escape

Persuasive Essay On Euthanasia
Around 7 million people are diagnosed with a terminal illness each year. Fifty–five percent of
terminally ill patients die in pain. Some are forced to be bed ridden for months knowing a slow
death is coming. Would you want to live, knowing you are completely dependent on nurses and
family to take care of your every need? Patients should be given the option to end their life early
with a painless death, instead of waiting for the inevitable to happen.
Euthanasia the painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease or in an
irreversible coma. Many people believe euthanasia is wrong and cruel. Euthanasia is not inhuman
because the patience asks or wants the doctor to do the process. Patients that are bed ridden and in
constant pain can choose to die on their own terms.
Every single patient deserves to be given an honest opinion by the doctor. "In Britain, a 2012
study discovered as many as 57,000 patients each year die without being told that efforts to keep
them alive have been stopped, instead being shoved onto a "death pathway" designed to alleviate
suffering by never being told" (Morris par 5). Doctors could mention euthanasia as a last resort
instead of the patient being on life support. If euthanasia is legal, doctors may not be as scared to
bring up the sad truth, knowing there is one last option, so the patient and the family must suffer no
more.
Before euthanasia was legal some families were put into situations that were very uncomfortable.

Persuasive Essay On Euthanasia
Euthanasia: Right to Die v. Right to Life
"I'm not afraid of being dead. I'm just afraid of what one might have to go through to get there." вЂ•
Pamela Bone
Every human being hopes to live and enjoy the fruits of life until death arrives. But at times he is
compelled to end his own life through unnatural means. When a person ends his life by his own act,
it is called "suicide" but to end the life of a person by others though on the request of the deceased, is
called "euthanasia" or "mercy killing".
Euthanasia is derived from a Greek words "eu" and "thanatos" meaning "good death". According to
Black's Law Dictionary (8th edition) euthanasia means the act or practice of killing or bringing
about the death of a person who suffers from an incurable disease or condition, for reasons of
mercy. It is the practice of killing a person for giving relief from incurable pain or suffering or
allowing or causing painless death when life has become meaningless and disagreeable. Euthanasia
can be voluntary, that is according to the choice of the patient or can be a result of the decision of
the patient's family member, in cases where the patient is mentally incompetent or physically
incapable of making a decision. It can be classified into following categories:
1)Active Euthanasia: It involves painlessly putting individuals to death for merciful reasons.
2)

Euthanasia Discourse
Euthanasia Discourse
Introduction
The discourse of euthanasia in a contemporary setting is highly relevant within various institutional
systems, working as a means of invoking change and establishing discussion surrounding the
legalisation of assisted suicide in a medical setting. The discourse provokes the debate surrounding
this medical process whilst allowing for the establishment of considerations from various standpoints
such as; legally, medically, culturally and religiously. The introduction of legalisedeuthanasia
practice in various western countries in recent times has further enhanced the relevance of this
discourse.
Constructs the topic
Discourse as providing the means of shaping topic is evidently relevant to Foucault's analysis...show
more content...
The discourse can organise a subject, such as that of a medical professional of whom enacts the
procedure of euthanisation in a different light to that of other medical professionals, being
associated by the public from various views both in the negative as the professional being seen as a
murderer (Emmanuel 1994) or through the discourse as a positive enactor of new capacities to help
end the suffering of the patients (Dowbiggin 2007).
Conclusion
The discourse of euthanasia is both highly relevant and controversial within contemporary society
(Gorsuch 2006), embodying the characteristics of discourse as defined by Foucault in Hall (1997).
Euthanasia encompasses a range of institutions present within society, allowing for a variety of
implications and factors to attribute to the discourse as a whole, in doing so producing a deepened
means of discourse which in turn establishes the topic of assisted suicide in itself.

Ethics of Euthanasia Essay
As patients come closer to the end of their lives, certain organs stop performing as well as they use
to. People are unable to do simple tasks like putting on clothes, going to the restroom without
assistance, eat on our own, and sometimes even breathe without the help of a machine. Needing to
depend on someone for everything suddenly brings feelings of helplessness much like an infant
feels. It is easy to see why some patients with terminal illnesses would seek any type of relief from
this hardship, even if that relief is suicide. Euthanasia or assisted suicide is where a physician would
give a patient an aid in dying. "Assisted suicide is a controversial medical and ethical issue based on
the question of whether, in certain situations,...show more content...
Whether murder is done in a peaceful, non painful way or in a very gruesome, unimaginable way,
it is still considered murder. Physicians have no way of knowing 'what is best for the patient'
especially if that patient's terminal illness prevents them from speaking. Not only is assisted
suicide considered murder, it also goes against Physicians' Hippocratic Oath. "Hippocratic Oath:
An oath (or promise) all physicians must swear to uphold, regarding the ethical practices of the
medical profession" (Lee). By allowing doctors to stray from this oath, it will be easier for them to
aid in or carry out assisted suicides when it will never be entirely necessary for them to consider the
option. "In 2005, Texas doctors removed two patients from life support without advanced directions
and against the wishes of the patient's family" (Pawlick). By not legalizing assisted suicides, families
will be able to decide when their family member is physically unable to continue with the provided
treatments, but only when the patient themselves can no longer communicate their wishes and no
document stating how they should go about the situation has been left in their families possession.
Ethical issues are not the only problem. Some argue that euthanasia also creates issues from a legal
perspective. "One legal question is whether assisted suicide violates the Controlled Substances Act, a
federal law governing the distribution of drugs" (Lee). Such

Euthanasia Essay examples
Euthanasia is often called "mercy killing". It is intentionally making someone die, rather than
allowing that person to die naturally. It is sometimes the act of ending someone's life, who is
terminally ill, or is suffering in severe pain. Euthanasia is mostly illegal in the world today.
Euthanasia can be considered a form of suicide, if the person afflicted with the problem actively
does it. The person volunteering to commit the act to that person can also consider it a form of
murder.
The positive side of Euthanasia is that it ends a person's suffering in this world. Many physicians and
psychiatrists believe that it may a humane act. From a virtue ethics point of view, it may be
appropriate. What we seek in human existence is to be...show more content...
The benefits are numerous in that the person euthanized would cease suffering, and the families
would begin the healing process from grief and/or depression from the situation.
From Mill's perspective, the person volunteering for euthanasia has a liberty to do what he/she
wants. Mill has written that if the person does not cause harm to others, it is the person's right, or
liberty, to do what they please. If a person wants euthanasia, then that person has the sole liberties to
choose such an act, and depart society and life. Nobody is being other than the person wishing it,
and it is a volunteered act.
Brandt argues for approval of euthanasia, but killing human beings is wrong, because it injures that
person and goes against the preferences of self–preservation. However, Brandt says that the above is
not present in the issue of euthanasia, so it may be permissible. Brandt says that not all killing is
injury, so not all killing is wrong. One should pay attention to one's expressed wishes he says.
Euthanasia could be considered doing a person a favor, because you cannot injure something if you
are relieving it of pain.
The negative side of euthanasia is that it goes against natural law ethics, because we do not let
nature take its course. We are disturbing what is occurring or happening naturally to the person.
Every person has a natural inclination to continue living. It is also said

Persuasive Essay Against Euthanasia
Euthanasia
"You only get one life. It's actually your duty to live it as fully as possible." (Moyes, Jojo. Me
before you. Penguin Books, 2016). Life is a celestial object, and we are obliged to handle our lives
with prudence. Abdicating your life is vile and dissolute. Assisting in the termination of one's own
life is even more absurd; therefore, it should be hindered. Euthanasia should be stated illegal and
prohibited throughout the whole world, for it leads to disadvantageous long–term consciences
including distrusting the medical field and giving more power to doctors than what they deserve.
Usually, those who demand euthanasia are pressured by those around them including doctors, and
they are deceived by their depression.
Euthanasia devastate patients' trust in the medical field. If your teacher gave you the choice
whether to do your homework or not, what will you choose? Of course, you won't do your
homework because it is the easier choice. Human beings are inevitable to pick the obstacle–free
route; therefore, if doctors were given the choice to simply kill people whose cases seem
unpromising, they will select this choice. Doctors will be discouraged to research and create new
medicines. "What is the point? I can just painlessly and effortlessly kill them". Cures that could
extenuate pain will not be discovered anymore, and scientists would not even try to invent
cotemporary medicines. Moreover, accepting euthanasia is a breach of The International Code of
Medical

Essay Pro Euthanasia
When someone is inevitably dying and in inexplicable pain is it really a crime to grant their wishes
and end their suffering? As of right now euthanasia is illegal in many countries and is a very
controversial topic. Is it compassion for the patient helping them in ending their life or murder? The
doctor is not giving death as an option, it is the patients choice and even where it is legal there are
many rules. Euthanasia should not be considered a crime because the patient is not being murdered;
they are having their suffering end in a painless, humane way out of compassion for the patient and
their family.
Euthanasia is defined by the World Book Millennium 2000 encyclopaedia as, "the practise of
painlessly ending the lives of people...show more content...
The reason to legalize euthanasia is clear, these people need to have the choice to die with dignity.
Dr. Jack Kevorkian more commonly known as Dr. Death is greatly known for his opinion that
euthanasia should be legalized and his work with patients seeking help. He was very important in
showing euthanasia and voicing his opinion on the subject so the public could not ignore the
importance of the matter. Dr. Kevorkian was said to have been involved with 130 suicides by
patients who wanted to end their own lives (Nicol and Wylie 17). He had two machines he used to
help the patients, one an injection and the other a mask, however both machines were operated by
the patient and although Dr. Kevorkian was taken to court many times for these he was not
convicted because the patient was in control. He was very careful as to not actually commit the act
himself until he was contacted by Thomas Youk, a young with Lou Gheric's disease; Lou Gheric's
disease is when the muscle stop working and eventually the patient chokes to death. Tom's condition
prevented him from actually operating the machines and therefore Dr. Kevorkian decided that he
would operate the machine himself because he cared greatly about all his patients and could not let
Tom live in his constant fear (Nicol and Wylie 11). Dr. Kevorkian taped Tom's wishes and then
himself hooking up the machine and pushing the button to inject the drugs. He then proceed to

Persuasive Speech On Euthanasia
Do you know what euthanasia is ? Have you ever heard of it ? Well if you have not heard of it or
have not heard people talking about it , I'm about to tell you what it is. Euthanasia is assisted
suicide. Which means a physician or someone in the medical field helps you die by prescribing a
lethal dose of medicine which can either be injected or the patient can drink it. It is morally wrong
, the reason I say this is because you are helping someone kill their self. As a physician or anyone in
the medical it is against the Hippocratic oath.
Euthanasia is legalized in Netherlands , Belgium , Switzerland , Luxembourg , and Montana is
currently unclear. Oregon and Washington PAS and euthanasia was legalized between 1997 to
1999 , but as of right now it is illegal in both place . There are safeguards and laws regarding
euthanasia. The laws are a patient must give explicit consent , all cases must be reported , any
and all lethal substance administered to a patient must be given by a physician , all and any
cases must have a second consultation by another physician according to this article "Legalizing
euthanasia or assisted suicide: the illusion of safeguards and controls". The reason you would
need another consultation is because 63% of physicians feel that a single consultation is
insufficient and does not fully evaluate why the patient is requesting the need for PAS
/ euthanasia. All assessments must be objective in all cases of euthanasia according to"Legalizing
euthanasia or assisted suicide: the illusion of safeguards and controls". At first between the years
of 1970's to the 1980's advocates for PAS/ euthanasia was on ment for a small group of people
which were terminally ill. In 2002 also it was only allowed to perform the procedure to terminally
ill patients. It later then extended to patient that are adults , anyone who has a terminal illness
/ disease such as dementia , anyone who is " tired of living " that is seventy or over the age of
seventy. In 2001 the jurisdiction extended to children between the ages of twelve to sixteen with
parental consent , four years later in 2005 the Groningen protocol allows euthanasia to newborns
that are expected not to have " a good quality of life" when they

Persuasive Essay on Euthanasia
Euthanasia – The Right to Decide
The definition of euthanasia from the Oxford Dictionary is: "The painless killing of a patient
suffering from an incurable and painful disease or is in an incurable coma." Consider the words
"suffering," "painful," "irreversible" and "incurable." These words describe a patients terrible
conditions and prospects. Euthanasia is known as "mercy killing" for a reason, it is the most,
humane, moral and logical form of treatment available to patients that have no hope in fully
recovering. If you had to choose between lying in bed dying a slow and painful death, or dying a
quick painless death at the time you choose so that you can be surrounded by all your loved ones,
which would you choose? With euthanasia,...show more content...
Be that as it may, take into consideration that when someone is euthanized nothing is being taken
away from them against their will, it is physician–assisted suicide not physician–assisted murder. It
is by the patients free will that they can choose to end their suffering, and isn't free will a
fundamental right? Shouldn't we have the entitlement to choose how we live, and by default
how we die? Being able to make this choice is what defines us. Euthanasia is simply the liberty to
choose, to not be forced into a situation that causes you pain and suffering. In the famous words of
Bob Marley, "Love the life you live. Live the life you love." In essence, without the free will to make
these kinds of choices regarding the value of our life, how can we be expected to love life and truly
treat it as a gift.
"Euthanasia is known as mercy killing [or assisted suicide] in order to painlessly terminate one's life
with the humane motive of ending his or her suffering," states Dr. M. Maisie. Even though it can be
argued that euthanasia is no different from a homicide, euthanasia is no the chance to alleviate
agony of terminally ill patient. It is unfair and inhuman to force suffering upon any living thing, and
we see animals being shown the compassion that many patients wish they had. Euthanasia saves
money that could be used to cure patients. Furthermore, death is inevitable for everyone; it is one of
the few things promised in life. But isn't

Persuasive Speech Against Euthanasia
Host: Good evening and welcome to The View. For tonight's issue, arguments for and against
Euthanasia being made legal in Australia will be presented to you. Taking the affirmative side I
would like to introduce to you the professor in faculties of Law and Medicine from the University of
Adelaide, Alexander Wyatt. On the negative side tonight, we have Director of the Centre for
Professional and Applied Ethics at University of South Australia, Kate Mansell. We invite Alexander
Wyatt to present his affirmative view first.
Wyatt: Imagine yourself coming to the end of your life, and finding yourself terminally ill and in
extreme, unbearable pain. If you wanted to die with dignity isn't it your right to do so? If you
were denied your right, you would feel as though your body is being trespassed. Ladies and
gentlemen, I believe physicians who are trained to have knowledge of the human body should be
free to assist people to end their lives painlessly. Suicide should be a painless passage away from the
pain, or anticipated pain, of a person's life.
Think of it this way, allowing someone to die if they wish to has no negatives and does not affect
anyone in the process. If someone feels as though it is time for them to go due to their illness, they
should not be kept alive artificially in a way that makes them feel as though it is unnatural and
uncomfortable. In fact, scarce health resources could be freed up due to someone dying. It's a win
win situation as they get what they want

Persuasive Speech: Euthanasia
SPEECH OUTLINE
(Persuasive Speech)
Title : Euthanasia: To live and let die.
Specific purpose : To persuade my audience that euthanasia should be legalized in Malaysia.
Central idea : Euthanasia is about giving people the right to choose how they want to live and die,
saves money in medical bills, and it also stops the person from having a bad quality of life.
INTRODUCTION
Attention getter :
Imagine yourself being unable to walk, unable to see, and can barely breathe let alone speak. Your
life was well lived all those years before. You are now in such unbearable pain that you can't even
cry. You can no longer complete simple tasks on your own and there is no way that you
...show more
content...
Why should they not give us the right to decide if we want to live or not? That should be the first
right before all the ones I have mentioned. It is not logical that we can choose in all those other
decisions if we cannot first choose to live or die.
ii.Supporting details:
It has been argued that for people on life support systems and people with long standing diseases
causing much pain and distress, euthanasia is a better choice. It helps in relieving them from pain
and misery. In cases like terminal cancers when the patient is in much pain and when people
associated with them also are put through a lot of pain and misery, it is much more practical and
humane to grant the person his/her wish to end his/her own life in a relatively painless and merciful
way.
– Here, I would show a picture.
iii. Supporting details:
Everyone has the right to choose how they want to live and die. Their decisions lie with them and
people hold their own key to life. No one else can decide for you how you live, therefore choices are
also made by one, and hence, if one wants to go for euthanasia, it should be granted. He definitely
has reasons why he wants to leave the world.

Transition to Main Point 2 :
B. Main–point 2 : Assisted suicide saves money in medical bills
Another reason to support assisted suicide is that medical costs are very high. Today the cost of a
hospital room can be as much

Thesis Statement On Euthanasia
ROOTS MILLENIUM SCHOOLS
Euthanasia: Interfering with life and death?
Amal Sikandar Ranjha
Table of Contents
1.Introduction.................................................................... 3
2.Thesis............................................................................... 4
3.Types of euthanasia....................................................... 4
4.Literature........................................................................ 5
5.Conclusion....................................................................... 7
6.Acknowledgements........................................................ 7 Introduction
From cloning to genetically modified food to designer babies, humans have long been known to
interfere with the way nature does things; humans have been modifying genes and improving the
outlook in the pretext that it improves the quality of our lives. Humans also have a long history of
interfering with and trying to control the more divine...show more content...
The prevalent human ethics have made this topic enormous and highly controversial to its core.
People around the globe have opposing views as to what Euthanasia is, and whether it should be
allowed or should the practitioners of euthanasia be punished. The National Health Service in the
UK has declared it illegal to help someone take their life whatever the circumstances may be.
The one name that comes up most frequently when talking about Euthanasia is Dr. Jack Kevorkian,
also sometimes referred to as Dr. Death. He made it his mission to travel across the United States
of America, at his own expense, to help the people who considered that their lives were not worth
living anymore and assist them in committing suicide. Most of the times, due to extensive suffering,
most patients simply give up; with no hope left, they start to believe that the only way out of
interminable pain and discomfort is to give up on their lives. Utter hopelessness makes them highly
vulnerable and at the same time impulsive too. So, they easily fall victim to the temptation of ending
up their own lives with just little assistance from people like Dr.

Euthanasia Essay : Euthanasia And Euthanasia
This is why Euthanasia is important and summarizing the research that I found on Euthanasia.
Euthanasia is important because there is a lot of arguments about Euthanasia. Some people support it
and some people do not support Euthanasia (Euthanasia and assisted suicide– Arguments).
Euthanasia allows people to be free from physical pain. It is the hastening of death of a patient to
prevent further sufferings (Euthanasia Revisited). The religious argument states God chooses when
human life ends. Euthanasia also causes mental suffering because they are in physical pain or they
are experiencing with terminal illness. It is a debatable issue. There are many different opinions on
Euthanasia. The topic that I am researching is Euthanasia. There are many different arguments for
and against Euthanasia. The four main types of arguments used by people who are against
Euthanasia are the religious argument, the 'slippery slope' argument, the medical ethics argument,
and the alternative argument (Euthanasia and assisted suicide–Argument. The pragmatic argument
and the ethical argument are the two main types of arguments used to support the practice of
Euthanasia and assisted suicide (Euthanasia and assisted suicide– Argument. The ethical argument is
that people should have the freedom of choice to say if they want euthanasia or not. The pragmatic
argument is for euthanasia. . In addition, that is the definition of the topic. This is what makes the
topic interesting. What makes this topic

Christian Teaching and Discussion About Euthanasia
The word euthanasia comes from two Greek words "eu" meaning good and "thanatos" meaning
death. Literally it means a "good death".
Euthanasia is arranging for someone who has an incurable terminal illness to die as quickly and as
painlessly as possible. It is the act of purposely aiding someone to die, instead of letting nature take
its course. There are four main types of euthanasia these are: Voluntary, Involuntary, Active and
Passive.
Euthanasia is currently illegal in the UK, but is legal in the Netherlands and the state of Oregon
however; it is still a widely discussed topic, which raises many moral questions. In this essay I will be
...show more content...
Also the Roman Catholic Church opposes euthanasia because of the strongly taught commandment:
"Thou shall not kill." To add to that: the Roman Catholic Church regards the sanctity of life as an
extremely important teaching and places the highest value on human life and suffering and pain do
not stop life being valuable and is not a reason for ending life, therefore the Church believes that
people should leave the dying process to God, not to humans who by allowing euthanasia are, for
Roman Catholics, devaluing human life and making it seem disposable. Instead people should die
with dignity and let them be loved unconditionally by God until the end of earthly life. Therefore
Roman Catholics oppose euthanasia, this is an absolute view.
The Church of England's report in 1975 on "dying well" and the Methodist Church's statement in
1974 both oppose euthanasia. They emphasise the fact that human life is sacred.
However Christian views today vary with most Christians not accepting euthanasia.
A Christian teaching that can be used for euthanasia is the sanctity of life. Christians believe that all
life is given as a gift from God:
" God made man in his own image, male and female he created them." Gen
Therefore because God gave life, it is a gift and it is valuable because humans are made in God's
image:
"God made man in his own image." Gen.
Because God created humans

Essay on Moral and Ethical Issues of Euthanasia
Moral and Ethical Issues of Euthanasia
As we all know, medical treatment can help save lives. But is there a medical treatment that would
actually help end life? Although it's often debated upon, the procedure is still used to help the aid of
a patient's death. Usually dubbed as mercy killing, euthanasia is the "practice of ending a life so as to
release an individual from an incurable disease or intolerable suffering" (Encarta). My argument over
this topic is that euthanasia should have strict criteria over the use of it. There are different cases of
euthanasia that should be looked at and different point of views that should be considered. I will be
looking into VE (Voluntary Euthanasia), which involves a request by the dying...show more content...
In the past, a person is considered dead if the signs of pulse or breathing is absent. But in the 1960s,
advance life–supporting technologies have re–defined the meaning of death. The invention of the
mechanical ventilator or respirator and the heart–lung machine allowed physicians to revive or
artificially maintain function in hearts and lung. This made bigger chances for the survival of
patients. Then later in the 1980s, brain activity is added to the criteria of death. The brain acts as
the center headquarters of all functioning parts of the body. The brain sends impulses through the
nerve to muscles and organs. The brain also controls memory and the ability for a person to learn
and react to his or her environment. The brain is divided into different parts for different functions.
The front part of the brain is called the Cerebrum, which is referred to as the "higher brain." This
part of the brain controls the memory and thinking abilities of a person. The brainstem, composed of
the midbrain, the pons, and the medulla oblangata is called the "lower brain" because "it controls
spontaneous and vegetative functions such as swallowing, yawning and sleep–wake cycles"
(President's Commission).
Since respiration and circulation can be restored, therefore defining brain death or the loss of brain
function is a "certification of death" (Encarta). The higher brain is considered to be the most
important part in determining the death of a person

Euthanasia Discursive Essay

Recomendados

Recomendados

Más contenido relacionado

Más de Cheap Paper Writing Services

Más de Cheap Paper Writing Services (20)

Último

Último (20)

Euthanasia Discursive Essay