5. Acute UGI Bleeding unit
Patient Group
(n=900)
SMR 95% conf
interval
All 0.63 0.48-0.78
Low risk
(Rockall 0-3)
0.35 0.00-1.04
Medium risk
(Rockall 4-6)
0.56 0.34-0.78
High risk
(Rockall >7)
0.7 0.49-0.91
Sanders et al. Eur J Gast Hep 2004, 16(5) 487-94
6. Is the patient shocked?
Class I Class II Class III Class IV
Vol loss
(ml)
<750 750-1500 1500-2000 >2000
Vol loss
(%)
0-15 15-30 30-40 >40
Systolic Normal Normal Low V Low
Diastolic Normal Raised Low V Low
Pulse Slight
tachy
100-120 120 thready >120, v
thready
Resp rate Normal Normal >20 >20
Mental
state
Alert Anxious /
aggressive
Drowsy Confused /
unconsciou
s
14. Could it be varices?
Any upper GI bleed with:
Previous history of varices / variceal bleed
Clinical evidence of chronic liver disease or
portal hypertension
NB: most ‘alcoholics’ with GI bleeds do not
have chronic liver disease (or varices)
15. Could it be varices?
Yes……….
Consider airway protection
High risk of aspiration with high mortality
16. Could it be varices?
Yes……….
Reconsider CVP line (if not already)
Avoid over-transfusion
17. Could it be varices?
Yes……….
Correct clotting and platelets
18. Could it be varices?
Yes……….
Commence Terlipressin 2mg 6 hourly
Superior to endoscopic sclerotherapy in
Bleeding control (Cochrane 2002)
20% reduction in 5 day bleeding control
When combined with endoscopic therapy
19. Could it be varices?
Yes……….
Endoscopy at earliest opportunity
It’s not always varices
20.
21. Could it be varices?
Yes……….
Endoscopy at earliest opportunity
Enables endoscopic therapy
22.
23.
24. Could it be varices?
Yes……….
Consider Sengstaken-Blakemore tube
Reconsider airway protection
May be safer to transfuse and await endoscopist
25. What’s the diagnosis?
An 80 year-old woman is brought to
hospital having collapsed in her home.
On arrival of the ambulance she was
hypotensive, grey and sweaty.
The ambulance crew reported ‘coffee
ground vomit’ while en-route.
30. Think….
Is the degree of haemodynamic
compromise consistent with volume of
reported blood loss?
Beware a shocked patient with ‘dark’
vomit
look for an alternative explanation for
hypotension.
42. When to endoscope?
Too soon?
Inadequate resuscitation: higher risk
Poor views (blood in the way)
Aspiration (stomach full of blood)
43. When to endoscope?
Too late?
Ongoing bleeding
Rebleeding
Delay to surgery
44. When to endoscope?
ASAP if:
Evidence of ongoing bleeding
Suspected varices
Suspected early rebleed
Otherwise within 12 hrs is usually OK
45. What about IV PPI?
Clots more stable when pH >4
Clot lysis occurs when pH <4
46. What about IV PPI?
Omeprazole 80mg IV bolus followed by 8mg/hour
infusion for 72 hours reduced early rebleed rate (5 vs
24 rebleeds with placebo, p<0.001)
In patients with endoscopically proven
peptic ulcer with stigmata of haemorrhage
Lau et al. NEJM 2000;343:310-6
47. What about IV PPI?
Limited evidence for
‘empirical’ use of IV PPI
prior to endoscopic
diagnosis in unselected patients
48. What if the patient rebleeds?
Repeat endoscopy
Radiological embolisation
Surgery
49. Repeat Endoscopy
No difference in bleeding control between
surgery and second endoscopic treatment
30 day mortality and transfusion requirements
similar
More complications in group randomised to
surgery
Lau et al N Engl J Med 1999;340:751-756
50. Radiological Embolisation
Equally effective to surgery as
measured by:
Rates of re-bleeding
Rates of mortality
Ripoll et al J Vasc Interv Radiol 2004; 15:447-450
51. What about surgery?
>65 with one ‘rebleed’ or > 4 units blood
required for fluid resuscitation
<65 with 2 rebleeds or >8 units blood
required for fluid resuscitation
52. What about Surgery?
Dependent on:
Type of lesion
Site of lesion
Co-morbidities
Likelihood of continued bleeding
53. Summary
Resuscitate adequately
Exclude varices (and non-GI source of
shock)
Endoscopy within 12 hours if non-
variceal
Intravenous PPI infusion if peptic ulcer
bleed with stigmata of haemorrhage