11. Method
• Repeated measures
– Three portfolio entries
First Entry Second Entry Third Entry
8 months 1 week
before before During
intervention intervention intervention
12. Method
• Measure:
– Writing Quality Rubric
• Adapted from AACU VALUE rubrics
• .82 inter-rater reliability
13. t-test
First Entry Second Entry Third Entry
8 months
1 week During
before before
intervention intervention
intervention
5
25. References
Yao, Y., Aldrich, J., Foster, K., & Pecina, U. (2009). Preservice teachers’ perceptions of an electronic portfolio as a tool for
reflection and teacher certification. Journal of Educational Research & Policy Studies, 9, 25-43.
Yao, Y., Thomas, M., Nickens, N., Downing, J., Burkett, R. S., & Lamson, S. (2008). Validity evidence of an electronic portfolio
for preservice teachers. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 27, 10-24.
Mislevy, R. J., Almond, R. G., Lukas, & J. F. (2004). A brief introduction to evidence-centered design. CSE Report 632. U.S.
Department of Education. Los Angeles, CA: National Center for Research on Evaluation
Ayan, D., & Seferoglu, G. (2011). Using electronic portfolios to promote reflective thinking in language teacher education.
Educational Studies, 37(5), 513-521.