SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 23
Case Study: Installation
        of New Powder Coat
        Paint Line
        Everbrite, LLC
        Pardeeville,WI
By
Derek Gates
Everbrite, LLC

 A leading producer in indoor/outdoor
  electronic and neon advertising signs,
  menu boards, and scoreboards, etc.
     Customers include McDonalds, Pizza Hut,
      Mobil gas station, DLK, and many more
 Founded in 1927 in Milwaukee
 Grown to about 1,200 employees in 11
  different locations (5 in WI)
Project Description

 Project focus: paint line process in the
  sheet metal section of the facility
 Concerns
      Quality of paint job
      Environmental emissions
      Employee exposure to chemicals/fumes
Current Sheet Metal Paint
Process
 Parts are prepared (manually sanded
  and wiped down) to help paint adhere to
  surface better
 Parts are hung on a conveyor system
 Parts go into paint booth via conveyor
  and are painted
 Go into curing oven to bake and dry
Problem ID: Current Paint
Process
 Open-Ended Wet Spray Paint Booth
 System was grandfathered in; old equipment,
  ventilation, etc.
      Leads to inadequate paint jobs and poor air purity
 Many parts are “defective”- need to be re-
  prepped and re-painted
 Employees handle and are exposed to amounts
  of solvents, paint thinners, etc. which are
  hazardous
 Majority of Haz. Waste of facility produced here
Picture of Spray Booth
Problem ID: Current Process
(Production)
 Shipping
     Some parts need to be powder coated, so
      they are shipped out; leads to issues with
      quality and hinders productivity
     Lost time on labor-handling, inspecting,
      and inventory on shipped parts
 WIP Materials
Solution

 Implement a new
  powder coating paint
  line
     Will greatly reduce
      environmental safety
      concerns
     Will increase quality
      of product,
      productivity, and
      lead to more
      business
Solution:
Proposed New Powder Paint Line
 Preparation-5-Stage Wash system
     Parts treated with chemicals to enhance
      ability of paint to adhere to surface
 Powder Paint Booth
 Bake Oven


 Parts moved via conveyor system
What is Powder Coating?

               Applying dry paint to
                a surface
                    Paint powder is
                     applied to the
                     surface and put in an
                     oven to bake
                    Results in a durable,
                     even-coated finish
                    Preparation and
                     baking are key to a
                     good finish
Advantages of Powder
Coating
 Releases little to no VOCs and HAPs into
    environment (solvents, thinners)
   Reduces employee exposure to these harmful
    chemicals
   Reduces burden of EPA compliance for
    facilities
   Overspray of powder is easily recyclable
   Better paint quality
       No drips, runs, or other imperfections
       Reduces defected parts; less preparation time
 Durable, Non-Corrosive Finish
Problem Solution: Air Emission
Permit
 Obtain a new air
  emission permit
 Everbrite is currently
  under a Part 70 permit
      Requires extensive
       reporting and not many
       advantages
 Everbrite should obtain a
  Registration Operating
  Permit (ROP)
ROP Permit

 Allows facilities to change processes/do
  construction without obtaining other
  expensive construction permits
      Saves time and money
      Must stay within limits of ROP during construction
 Less extensive and less frequent reporting and
  recordkeeping than Part 70
 Easy application process; short waiting time
      Don’t need to hire consultant to handle permit
 Costs less than Part 70
 Doesn’t Expire
Emission Citations

 Under Part 70- Automatically considered a High
  Priority Violation (HPV)
      Forwarded to the EPA
      Possibly referred to the Department of Justice
Emission Citations

 Under ROP- not automatically HPV
     Facility is sent a Letter of Notification
      (LON)
     Facility replies on how to make sure the
      violation doesn’t re-occur
     Follow up visit

*Depends on violation for both Part 70 and
  ROP
     ROP most likely less serious than Part 70
Expected Results/Benefits

 VOC/HAP emissions will decrease
     Less employee exposure
 Less Hazardous waste produced
 Less recording/reporting to EPA
     Not as much administrative burden to keep
      records
Benefits

 Reduction in:
      Shipping costs
      Labor Costs
      Paint/Chemical Costs
 Better employee morale due to working
  with new equipment
 Better quality of product
Cost/Benefit Analysis for a New Dry Powder Coat Paint Line at Everbrite, LLC
Annual costs with current paint system in place
     Shipping out parts to be powder coated                           $717,886
     Paint Chemicals
             Solvents, Hardeners, Accelerators, Catalysts, Thinners   $15,990.76
     Preparation materials
             sanding equipment, rags                                  $6,558.29
     Paint costs                                                      $26,386.84
     Hazardous Waste Disposal                                         $12,349.12
     EPA Reporting                                                    $1,500
     Labor Costs (Shipping Employees)                                 $52,125
Total                                                                  $832,796.01
Costs to implement new System
     Paint System
             5-Stage Wash System
             Conveyor System
             Curing oven
             Stack Package (Ventilation)
             Installation
             TOTAL                                                    $580,000
     Paint Booth/Accessories                                          $73,058
     2 additional full-time employees (Paint/Prep Workers)
             $16.33/hr x 40 hrs/wk x 50 wks x 2 Workers               $65,320
     Cost of New Powder Paint (2/3 cost of Wet Paint)                 $17,679.18
     Hazardous Waste Disposal                                         $1,467.86
     EPA Reporting
             One-time $1,100 fee + $35.71 per ton emitted             $1,308.81
Benefits
     Savings (20% of annual costs above)
             Shipping                                                 $143,577.20
             Paint Chemicals                                          $3,198.15
             Preparation materials                                    $1,311.66
             Paint Costs                                              $5,277.37
             Labor Costs (Shipping Employees)                         $10,425

Total Benefits                                                         $902,623.23
NET SAVINGS FOR FIRST YEAR                                             -$69,827.22
Cost/Benefit Analysis Over 5 Years
Costs with current paint system in place over 5 years
     Shipping out parts to be powder coated                           $3,589,430
     Paint Chemicals
             Solvents, Hardeners, Accelerators, Catalysts, Thinners   $79,953.78
     Preparation materials
             sanding equipment, rags                                  $32,791.45
     Paint costs                                                      $131,934.20
     Hazardous Waste Disposal                                         $61,745.60
     EPA Reporting                                                    $7,500
     Labor Costs (Shipping)                                           $260,625
Total                                                                  $4,163,980.03
Costs to implement new System
     Paint System
             5-Stage Wash System
             Conveyor System
             Curing Oven
             Stack Package (Ventilation)
             Installation
             TOTAL                                                    $580,000
     Paint Booth/Accessories                                          $73,058
     2 additional full-time employees (Paint/Prep Workers)
             $16.33/hr x 40 hrs/wk x 50 wks x 2 Workers x 5 yrs.      $326,600
     Cost of New Powder Paint (2/3 cost of Wet Paint)                 $88,395.90
     Hazardous Waste Disposal                                         $7,339.30
     EPA Reporting                                                    $2,144.05
Benefits Over 5 Years
     Savings (20% of costs above)
             Shipping                                                 $717,886
             Paint Chemicals                                          $15,990.76
             Preparation materials                                    $6,558.29
             Paint Costs                                              $26,386.85
             Labor Costs (Shipping Employees)                         $52,125

Total Benefits                                                         $1,896,484.14
LIFETIME NET SAVINGS (5 yrs.)                                          $2,267,495.90
Cost vs. Benefits over 5-Year Period


                                        Cost        Benefit

          $2,500,000.00
                                                              $2,267,495.90
          $2,000,000.00
          $1,500,000.00
Dollars




          $1,000,000.00                                           $832,796.01
           $500,000.00
                 $0.00
          -$500,000.00 1        2        3          4         5           6

                                             Year
References
   Larry Boehm, CHMM, Senior Environmental Specialist with AlphaTerra
    Science
   Marge Erdman, Accounting/Plant Controller for Everbrite, LLC
   Kelly Tomko, Freight Claim Coordinator/EPA Administrator for
    Everbrite, LLC
   Daniel Guirl, President of G.A.T. Systems
   Kristin Hart with the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
   Darren Nosek with Dietz Supply Company
   Registration Permits. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. 23
    April 2009. Printed 17 June 2009.
    http://dnr.wi.gov/air/permits/streamlining/regpermits.html
   Powder Coating Process. Nordson Corporation. 2009. Printed
    6-17-2009.
    http://www.nordson.com/Businesses/Powder/WhyPowder/powdercoatingproce
   Benefits of Powder Coating. Nordson Corporation. 2009. Printed
    6-17-2009.
    http://www.nordson.com/Businesses/Powder/WhyPowder/benefitsofpow
    dercoating.htm

Más contenido relacionado

Similar a Powder Coat Pp

Cvp In The Process Industries
Cvp In The Process IndustriesCvp In The Process Industries
Cvp In The Process IndustriesTerry Jackson
 
Finaly Copy Canty
Finaly Copy   CantyFinaly Copy   Canty
Finaly Copy CantyJohn Riddle
 
Sfcc calcc special events presentation
Sfcc calcc special events presentationSfcc calcc special events presentation
Sfcc calcc special events presentationsfathomas
 
6 Keys systems with Cost Benefit
6 Keys systems  with Cost Benefit6 Keys systems  with Cost Benefit
6 Keys systems with Cost BenefitCarlRoberts
 
Petrosonic presentation
Petrosonic presentationPetrosonic presentation
Petrosonic presentationVladimir
 
Investor Presentation Final 2- October 2016
Investor Presentation Final 2- October 2016Investor Presentation Final 2- October 2016
Investor Presentation Final 2- October 2016Tal Naglis
 
PRODUCTION OPTIMIZATION ASSESSMENT USING THAI, AND VAPEX EOR METHODS BY USING...
PRODUCTION OPTIMIZATION ASSESSMENT USING THAI, AND VAPEX EOR METHODS BY USING...PRODUCTION OPTIMIZATION ASSESSMENT USING THAI, AND VAPEX EOR METHODS BY USING...
PRODUCTION OPTIMIZATION ASSESSMENT USING THAI, AND VAPEX EOR METHODS BY USING...Mahmood Ajabbar
 
Case Study on Giberson Glass Studio
Case Study on Giberson Glass StudioCase Study on Giberson Glass Studio
Case Study on Giberson Glass StudioChandan Pahelwani
 
Working with Trade Allies to Enhance Energy Efficiency Programs
Working with Trade Allies to Enhance Energy Efficiency ProgramsWorking with Trade Allies to Enhance Energy Efficiency Programs
Working with Trade Allies to Enhance Energy Efficiency ProgramsCenter for Energy and Environment
 
Akuntansi keuangan aktiva tetap
Akuntansi keuangan aktiva tetapAkuntansi keuangan aktiva tetap
Akuntansi keuangan aktiva tetapjoni201112281
 
ACC 207 Final Project Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric .docx
ACC 207 Final Project Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric  .docxACC 207 Final Project Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric  .docx
ACC 207 Final Project Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric .docxnettletondevon
 
Benefits of NTPEP
Benefits of NTPEPBenefits of NTPEP
Benefits of NTPEPAASHTOTech
 
Understanding, Managing, and Reducing Cost of Quality
Understanding, Managing, and Reducing Cost of QualityUnderstanding, Managing, and Reducing Cost of Quality
Understanding, Managing, and Reducing Cost of QualitySafetyChain Software
 

Similar a Powder Coat Pp (20)

Cvp In The Process Industries
Cvp In The Process IndustriesCvp In The Process Industries
Cvp In The Process Industries
 
Nsr Executive Summary
Nsr Executive SummaryNsr Executive Summary
Nsr Executive Summary
 
Finaly Copy Canty
Finaly Copy   CantyFinaly Copy   Canty
Finaly Copy Canty
 
Ethan Handelman, Recap Real Estate Advisors
Ethan Handelman, Recap Real Estate AdvisorsEthan Handelman, Recap Real Estate Advisors
Ethan Handelman, Recap Real Estate Advisors
 
Sfcc calcc special events presentation
Sfcc calcc special events presentationSfcc calcc special events presentation
Sfcc calcc special events presentation
 
6 Keys systems with Cost Benefit
6 Keys systems  with Cost Benefit6 Keys systems  with Cost Benefit
6 Keys systems with Cost Benefit
 
Polyflow
Polyflow Polyflow
Polyflow
 
Petrosonic presentation
Petrosonic presentationPetrosonic presentation
Petrosonic presentation
 
Acctg presentation chap 19 bam disimulacion
Acctg presentation chap 19 bam disimulacionAcctg presentation chap 19 bam disimulacion
Acctg presentation chap 19 bam disimulacion
 
Investor Presentation Final 2- October 2016
Investor Presentation Final 2- October 2016Investor Presentation Final 2- October 2016
Investor Presentation Final 2- October 2016
 
PRODUCTION OPTIMIZATION ASSESSMENT USING THAI, AND VAPEX EOR METHODS BY USING...
PRODUCTION OPTIMIZATION ASSESSMENT USING THAI, AND VAPEX EOR METHODS BY USING...PRODUCTION OPTIMIZATION ASSESSMENT USING THAI, AND VAPEX EOR METHODS BY USING...
PRODUCTION OPTIMIZATION ASSESSMENT USING THAI, AND VAPEX EOR METHODS BY USING...
 
UV-Cured Powder Coating + Resource Productivity = Higher Profits
UV-Cured Powder Coating + Resource Productivity = Higher ProfitsUV-Cured Powder Coating + Resource Productivity = Higher Profits
UV-Cured Powder Coating + Resource Productivity = Higher Profits
 
TrashScan
TrashScanTrashScan
TrashScan
 
Case Study on Giberson Glass Studio
Case Study on Giberson Glass StudioCase Study on Giberson Glass Studio
Case Study on Giberson Glass Studio
 
Working with Trade Allies to Enhance Energy Efficiency Programs
Working with Trade Allies to Enhance Energy Efficiency ProgramsWorking with Trade Allies to Enhance Energy Efficiency Programs
Working with Trade Allies to Enhance Energy Efficiency Programs
 
Akuntansi keuangan aktiva tetap
Akuntansi keuangan aktiva tetapAkuntansi keuangan aktiva tetap
Akuntansi keuangan aktiva tetap
 
ACC 207 Final Project Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric .docx
ACC 207 Final Project Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric  .docxACC 207 Final Project Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric  .docx
ACC 207 Final Project Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric .docx
 
Benefits of NTPEP
Benefits of NTPEPBenefits of NTPEP
Benefits of NTPEP
 
Qit Powder Buster
Qit   Powder BusterQit   Powder Buster
Qit Powder Buster
 
Understanding, Managing, and Reducing Cost of Quality
Understanding, Managing, and Reducing Cost of QualityUnderstanding, Managing, and Reducing Cost of Quality
Understanding, Managing, and Reducing Cost of Quality
 

Powder Coat Pp

  • 1. Case Study: Installation of New Powder Coat Paint Line Everbrite, LLC Pardeeville,WI By Derek Gates
  • 2. Everbrite, LLC  A leading producer in indoor/outdoor electronic and neon advertising signs, menu boards, and scoreboards, etc.  Customers include McDonalds, Pizza Hut, Mobil gas station, DLK, and many more  Founded in 1927 in Milwaukee  Grown to about 1,200 employees in 11 different locations (5 in WI)
  • 3. Project Description  Project focus: paint line process in the sheet metal section of the facility  Concerns  Quality of paint job  Environmental emissions  Employee exposure to chemicals/fumes
  • 4. Current Sheet Metal Paint Process  Parts are prepared (manually sanded and wiped down) to help paint adhere to surface better  Parts are hung on a conveyor system  Parts go into paint booth via conveyor and are painted  Go into curing oven to bake and dry
  • 5. Problem ID: Current Paint Process  Open-Ended Wet Spray Paint Booth  System was grandfathered in; old equipment, ventilation, etc.  Leads to inadequate paint jobs and poor air purity  Many parts are “defective”- need to be re- prepped and re-painted  Employees handle and are exposed to amounts of solvents, paint thinners, etc. which are hazardous  Majority of Haz. Waste of facility produced here
  • 7.
  • 8.
  • 9. Problem ID: Current Process (Production)  Shipping  Some parts need to be powder coated, so they are shipped out; leads to issues with quality and hinders productivity  Lost time on labor-handling, inspecting, and inventory on shipped parts  WIP Materials
  • 10. Solution  Implement a new powder coating paint line  Will greatly reduce environmental safety concerns  Will increase quality of product, productivity, and lead to more business
  • 11. Solution: Proposed New Powder Paint Line  Preparation-5-Stage Wash system  Parts treated with chemicals to enhance ability of paint to adhere to surface  Powder Paint Booth  Bake Oven  Parts moved via conveyor system
  • 12. What is Powder Coating?  Applying dry paint to a surface  Paint powder is applied to the surface and put in an oven to bake  Results in a durable, even-coated finish  Preparation and baking are key to a good finish
  • 13. Advantages of Powder Coating  Releases little to no VOCs and HAPs into environment (solvents, thinners)  Reduces employee exposure to these harmful chemicals  Reduces burden of EPA compliance for facilities  Overspray of powder is easily recyclable  Better paint quality  No drips, runs, or other imperfections  Reduces defected parts; less preparation time  Durable, Non-Corrosive Finish
  • 14. Problem Solution: Air Emission Permit  Obtain a new air emission permit  Everbrite is currently under a Part 70 permit  Requires extensive reporting and not many advantages  Everbrite should obtain a Registration Operating Permit (ROP)
  • 15. ROP Permit  Allows facilities to change processes/do construction without obtaining other expensive construction permits  Saves time and money  Must stay within limits of ROP during construction  Less extensive and less frequent reporting and recordkeeping than Part 70  Easy application process; short waiting time  Don’t need to hire consultant to handle permit  Costs less than Part 70  Doesn’t Expire
  • 16. Emission Citations  Under Part 70- Automatically considered a High Priority Violation (HPV)  Forwarded to the EPA  Possibly referred to the Department of Justice
  • 17. Emission Citations  Under ROP- not automatically HPV  Facility is sent a Letter of Notification (LON)  Facility replies on how to make sure the violation doesn’t re-occur  Follow up visit *Depends on violation for both Part 70 and ROP  ROP most likely less serious than Part 70
  • 18. Expected Results/Benefits  VOC/HAP emissions will decrease  Less employee exposure  Less Hazardous waste produced  Less recording/reporting to EPA  Not as much administrative burden to keep records
  • 19. Benefits  Reduction in:  Shipping costs  Labor Costs  Paint/Chemical Costs  Better employee morale due to working with new equipment  Better quality of product
  • 20. Cost/Benefit Analysis for a New Dry Powder Coat Paint Line at Everbrite, LLC Annual costs with current paint system in place  Shipping out parts to be powder coated $717,886  Paint Chemicals  Solvents, Hardeners, Accelerators, Catalysts, Thinners $15,990.76  Preparation materials  sanding equipment, rags $6,558.29  Paint costs $26,386.84  Hazardous Waste Disposal $12,349.12  EPA Reporting $1,500  Labor Costs (Shipping Employees) $52,125 Total $832,796.01 Costs to implement new System  Paint System  5-Stage Wash System  Conveyor System  Curing oven  Stack Package (Ventilation)  Installation  TOTAL $580,000  Paint Booth/Accessories $73,058  2 additional full-time employees (Paint/Prep Workers)  $16.33/hr x 40 hrs/wk x 50 wks x 2 Workers $65,320  Cost of New Powder Paint (2/3 cost of Wet Paint) $17,679.18  Hazardous Waste Disposal $1,467.86  EPA Reporting  One-time $1,100 fee + $35.71 per ton emitted $1,308.81 Benefits  Savings (20% of annual costs above)  Shipping $143,577.20  Paint Chemicals $3,198.15  Preparation materials $1,311.66  Paint Costs $5,277.37  Labor Costs (Shipping Employees) $10,425 Total Benefits $902,623.23 NET SAVINGS FOR FIRST YEAR -$69,827.22
  • 21. Cost/Benefit Analysis Over 5 Years Costs with current paint system in place over 5 years  Shipping out parts to be powder coated $3,589,430  Paint Chemicals  Solvents, Hardeners, Accelerators, Catalysts, Thinners $79,953.78  Preparation materials  sanding equipment, rags $32,791.45  Paint costs $131,934.20  Hazardous Waste Disposal $61,745.60  EPA Reporting $7,500  Labor Costs (Shipping) $260,625 Total $4,163,980.03 Costs to implement new System  Paint System  5-Stage Wash System  Conveyor System  Curing Oven  Stack Package (Ventilation)  Installation  TOTAL $580,000  Paint Booth/Accessories $73,058  2 additional full-time employees (Paint/Prep Workers)  $16.33/hr x 40 hrs/wk x 50 wks x 2 Workers x 5 yrs. $326,600  Cost of New Powder Paint (2/3 cost of Wet Paint) $88,395.90  Hazardous Waste Disposal $7,339.30  EPA Reporting $2,144.05 Benefits Over 5 Years  Savings (20% of costs above)  Shipping $717,886  Paint Chemicals $15,990.76  Preparation materials $6,558.29  Paint Costs $26,386.85  Labor Costs (Shipping Employees) $52,125 Total Benefits $1,896,484.14 LIFETIME NET SAVINGS (5 yrs.) $2,267,495.90
  • 22. Cost vs. Benefits over 5-Year Period Cost Benefit $2,500,000.00 $2,267,495.90 $2,000,000.00 $1,500,000.00 Dollars $1,000,000.00 $832,796.01 $500,000.00 $0.00 -$500,000.00 1 2 3 4 5 6 Year
  • 23. References  Larry Boehm, CHMM, Senior Environmental Specialist with AlphaTerra Science  Marge Erdman, Accounting/Plant Controller for Everbrite, LLC  Kelly Tomko, Freight Claim Coordinator/EPA Administrator for Everbrite, LLC  Daniel Guirl, President of G.A.T. Systems  Kristin Hart with the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources  Darren Nosek with Dietz Supply Company  Registration Permits. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. 23 April 2009. Printed 17 June 2009. http://dnr.wi.gov/air/permits/streamlining/regpermits.html  Powder Coating Process. Nordson Corporation. 2009. Printed 6-17-2009. http://www.nordson.com/Businesses/Powder/WhyPowder/powdercoatingproce  Benefits of Powder Coating. Nordson Corporation. 2009. Printed 6-17-2009. http://www.nordson.com/Businesses/Powder/WhyPowder/benefitsofpow dercoating.htm