AI and IoT Trustmarks
•
2 recomendaciones•949 vistas
This document discusses artificial intelligence and the Internet of Things (IoT). It lists the background of Alexandra Deschamps-Sonsino, an industrial and interaction designer who is the first UK distributor of Arduino. The document then quotes Buckminster Fuller on the evolution of humanity and unpredictability of complex systems. It lists several principles, frameworks, and recommendations for developing trustworthy and secure IoT technologies, including the Adafruit IoT Bill of Rights, Arduino IoT Manifesto, and ENISA Baseline Security Recommendations for IoT. The document poses questions from Marshall McLuhan and Neil Postman about evaluating new technologies and their societal impacts. It concludes by mentioning Jozeph Weisenbaum
Recomendados
Recomendados
Más contenido relacionado
La actualidad más candente
La actualidad más candente (20)
Similar a AI and IoT Trustmarks
Similar a AI and IoT Trustmarks (20)
Más de Alexandra Deschamps-Sonsino
Más de Alexandra Deschamps-Sonsino (20)
Último
Último (20)
AI and IoT Trustmarks
- 1. Artificially Intelligent or why we always knew we’d be talking about all this at some point.
- 3. Industrial & interaction designer First UK distributor of the Arduino
- 4. Clients
- 5. Founder Good Night Lamp
- 6. London Internet of things Meetup
- 7. ‘Evolution is apparently intent that man fulfill a much greater destiny than that of being a simple muscle and reflex machine – a slave automaton- automation displaces automatons.’
- 8. ‘Behaviour of whole systems unpredicted by the separately observed behaviours of any of the system’s separate parts or any subassembly of the system’s parts.’
- 10. ‘We’re prepared for the apocalypse we want.’ - Unknown
- 12. We’re prepared for a mathematically coherent future.
- 15. trust/risk
- 19. lifecycle
- 22. openness
- 29. security
- 30. minimum cryptographic security on its backend and secure configuration backend which implements additional security options implement reliable and appropriate backend patching procedures which should be evidenced enforce a strong user identity policy clear admin user rights management
- 34. open tools
- 35. open tools
- 36. frameworks in time and space
- 37. Adafruit IoT Bill of Rights Adam Greenfield's Everyware Principles Arduino IoT Manifesto A trustmark for IoT Better Things BSI Kitemark CE, FCC, UL mark Charter of Trust CrowdSupply Proclamation of User Rights Cyber Independent Testing Lab Doteveryone trustworthy tech mark ENISA Baseline Security Recommendations for IoT Global Ecolabelling Network Greenpeace Guide to greener Electronics I am the Cavalry Five Star Automotive Cyber Safety Program IEEE Standard for Harmonization of Internet of Things (IoT) Devices and Systems IEEE Standard for Privacy and Security Architecture for Consumer Wireless Devices iFixit Repairability score Ind.ie Ethical Design Manifesto IoT and public interest IoT CyberSecurity Improvement Act of 2017 IoT Design Manifesto IoT Facts IoT Security Foundation Best Practice User Mark Application Note: Mapping the IoT Security Foundation’s Compliance Framework to the DCMS proposed Code of Practice for Security in Consumer IoT IoT Security Foundation Principles Jen Persson Making of an IoT Trust Mark Project Sopris Seven Properties of Highly Secure Devices Respects your freedom hardware product certification Secure by Design: Improving the cyber security of consumer Internet of Things Report Securing consumer trust in the IoT, Principles and Recommendations 2017 Security Checklist for IoT Seven Properties of Higly Secure Devices "The Internet of Things and challenges for consumer protection" Doteveryone Ethical Tech Directory
- 39. What does any artifact enlarge or enhance? What does it erode or obsolesce? What does it retrieve that has been earlier obsolesced? What does it reverse or flip into when pushed to the limits of its potential?
- 40. marshall mcluhan
- 41. What is the problem to which the technology is the solution? Whose problem is it? Which problem and what institutions might be more seriously harmed by a technological solution? What new problems might be created because we have solved this problem? What sort of people and institutions might acquire special economic and political power because of technological change? What changes in language are being enforced by new technologies and what is being gained and lost by such changes?
- 42. neil postman
- 45. Artificially Intelligent or why we always knew we’d be talking about all this at some point. @iotwatch alex@designswarm.com