Enviar búsqueda
Cargar
том том
•
0 recomendaciones
•
640 vistas
Ecolife Journal
Seguir
Denunciar
Compartir
Denunciar
Compartir
1 de 68
Descargar ahora
Descargar para leer sin conexión
Recomendados
3Q2010: Russian mobile VAS Market
3Q2010: Russian mobile VAS Market
Procontent.Ru Magazine
проки в городах европы Tom tom index
проки в городах европы Tom tom index
Ecolife Journal
гизатулин
гизатулин
Ecolife Journal
презентация форум лукина 2012
презентация форум лукина 2012
Ecolife Journal
обзор истории глобального потепления будыко - Ipcc - презентация и ссылки
обзор истории глобального потепления будыко - Ipcc - презентация и ссылки
Ecolife Journal
самсонов
самсонов
Ecolife Journal
самсонов зеленый сектор экономики – перспективы, проблемы,
самсонов зеленый сектор экономики – перспективы, проблемы,
Ecolife Journal
презентация форум лукина 2012
презентация форум лукина 2012
Ecolife Journal
Recomendados
3Q2010: Russian mobile VAS Market
3Q2010: Russian mobile VAS Market
Procontent.Ru Magazine
проки в городах европы Tom tom index
проки в городах европы Tom tom index
Ecolife Journal
гизатулин
гизатулин
Ecolife Journal
презентация форум лукина 2012
презентация форум лукина 2012
Ecolife Journal
обзор истории глобального потепления будыко - Ipcc - презентация и ссылки
обзор истории глобального потепления будыко - Ipcc - презентация и ссылки
Ecolife Journal
самсонов
самсонов
Ecolife Journal
самсонов зеленый сектор экономики – перспективы, проблемы,
самсонов зеленый сектор экономики – перспективы, проблемы,
Ecolife Journal
презентация форум лукина 2012
презентация форум лукина 2012
Ecolife Journal
скрипко перспектвы гибридов 4 2012
скрипко перспектвы гибридов 4 2012
Ecolife Journal
фортов интервью (губарев)
фортов интервью (губарев)
Ecolife Journal
Bhopal
Bhopal
Ecolife Journal
Kak uluchshit rabotu_uma
Kak uluchshit rabotu_uma
Ecolife Journal
спас на горе13
спас на горе13
Ecolife Journal
о деятельности росгидромета в 2013 году
о деятельности росгидромета в 2013 году
Ecolife Journal
проект резолюция слушаний 11 марта
проект резолюция слушаний 11 марта
Ecolife Journal
корпус экспертов экология и жизнь 2011
корпус экспертов экология и жизнь 2011
Ecolife Journal
Gillian olivieri
Gillian olivieri
Ecolife Journal
архи устойчивость спецвыпуск крыши (2)
архи устойчивость спецвыпуск крыши (2)
Ecolife Journal
капица, фортов в защиту науки номер 12
капица, фортов в защиту науки номер 12
Ecolife Journal
Epa plan 2014 proposal cleanpowerplan
Epa plan 2014 proposal cleanpowerplan
Ecolife Journal
Revich 13 11_13
Revich 13 11_13
Ecolife Journal
киселев с,н. выступление полностью
киселев с,н. выступление полностью
Ecolife Journal
рекомендации (13.06.13)
рекомендации (13.06.13)
Ecolife Journal
Russis eu-forum rus1
Russis eu-forum rus1
Ecolife Journal
капица 9 2012-11
капица 9 2012-11
Ecolife Journal
программа фортова для печати 16 05 13
программа фортова для печати 16 05 13
Ecolife Journal
зеленые против коричневых Pages from журнал брикс
зеленые против коричневых Pages from журнал брикс
Ecolife Journal
Novosibirsk 55 anniversary talk
Novosibirsk 55 anniversary talk
Ecolife Journal
LTC, Annual Forum, Greener California: Impacts of Senate Bill 375 and Winning...
LTC, Annual Forum, Greener California: Impacts of Senate Bill 375 and Winning...
LTC @ CSUSB
Contact Center Benchmark 2012
Contact Center Benchmark 2012
BeContactCenterBenchmark
Más contenido relacionado
Destacado
скрипко перспектвы гибридов 4 2012
скрипко перспектвы гибридов 4 2012
Ecolife Journal
фортов интервью (губарев)
фортов интервью (губарев)
Ecolife Journal
Bhopal
Bhopal
Ecolife Journal
Kak uluchshit rabotu_uma
Kak uluchshit rabotu_uma
Ecolife Journal
спас на горе13
спас на горе13
Ecolife Journal
о деятельности росгидромета в 2013 году
о деятельности росгидромета в 2013 году
Ecolife Journal
проект резолюция слушаний 11 марта
проект резолюция слушаний 11 марта
Ecolife Journal
корпус экспертов экология и жизнь 2011
корпус экспертов экология и жизнь 2011
Ecolife Journal
Gillian olivieri
Gillian olivieri
Ecolife Journal
архи устойчивость спецвыпуск крыши (2)
архи устойчивость спецвыпуск крыши (2)
Ecolife Journal
капица, фортов в защиту науки номер 12
капица, фортов в защиту науки номер 12
Ecolife Journal
Epa plan 2014 proposal cleanpowerplan
Epa plan 2014 proposal cleanpowerplan
Ecolife Journal
Revich 13 11_13
Revich 13 11_13
Ecolife Journal
киселев с,н. выступление полностью
киселев с,н. выступление полностью
Ecolife Journal
рекомендации (13.06.13)
рекомендации (13.06.13)
Ecolife Journal
Russis eu-forum rus1
Russis eu-forum rus1
Ecolife Journal
капица 9 2012-11
капица 9 2012-11
Ecolife Journal
программа фортова для печати 16 05 13
программа фортова для печати 16 05 13
Ecolife Journal
зеленые против коричневых Pages from журнал брикс
зеленые против коричневых Pages from журнал брикс
Ecolife Journal
Novosibirsk 55 anniversary talk
Novosibirsk 55 anniversary talk
Ecolife Journal
Destacado
(20)
скрипко перспектвы гибридов 4 2012
скрипко перспектвы гибридов 4 2012
фортов интервью (губарев)
фортов интервью (губарев)
Bhopal
Bhopal
Kak uluchshit rabotu_uma
Kak uluchshit rabotu_uma
спас на горе13
спас на горе13
о деятельности росгидромета в 2013 году
о деятельности росгидромета в 2013 году
проект резолюция слушаний 11 марта
проект резолюция слушаний 11 марта
корпус экспертов экология и жизнь 2011
корпус экспертов экология и жизнь 2011
Gillian olivieri
Gillian olivieri
архи устойчивость спецвыпуск крыши (2)
архи устойчивость спецвыпуск крыши (2)
капица, фортов в защиту науки номер 12
капица, фортов в защиту науки номер 12
Epa plan 2014 proposal cleanpowerplan
Epa plan 2014 proposal cleanpowerplan
Revich 13 11_13
Revich 13 11_13
киселев с,н. выступление полностью
киселев с,н. выступление полностью
рекомендации (13.06.13)
рекомендации (13.06.13)
Russis eu-forum rus1
Russis eu-forum rus1
капица 9 2012-11
капица 9 2012-11
программа фортова для печати 16 05 13
программа фортова для печати 16 05 13
зеленые против коричневых Pages from журнал брикс
зеленые против коричневых Pages from журнал брикс
Novosibirsk 55 anniversary talk
Novosibirsk 55 anniversary talk
Similar a том том
LTC, Annual Forum, Greener California: Impacts of Senate Bill 375 and Winning...
LTC, Annual Forum, Greener California: Impacts of Senate Bill 375 and Winning...
LTC @ CSUSB
Contact Center Benchmark 2012
Contact Center Benchmark 2012
BeContactCenterBenchmark
Lyons Second Workshop Results
Lyons Second Workshop Results
Jason Lally
GBR hospitality newsletter 2010 Q4
GBR hospitality newsletter 2010 Q4
GBR Consulting
C:\fakepath\keynote do mahony
C:\fakepath\keynote do mahony
daniellemartin
Keynote D OMahony
Keynote D OMahony
Tracy Hegarty
Namma Railu - The Proposal for Commuter Rail Service in Bangalore
Namma Railu - The Proposal for Commuter Rail Service in Bangalore
Khader Syed
Design and Implementation of Alcohol Detector and Accident Detection System u...
Design and Implementation of Alcohol Detector and Accident Detection System u...
ijtsrd
IRJET- Lane Detection using Neural Networks
IRJET- Lane Detection using Neural Networks
IRJET Journal
F uturemed wp5_final_2
F uturemed wp5_final_2
Andrea Campagna (Ph.D.)
Presentation 3Q12
Presentation 3Q12
CCR Relações com Investidores
Russian Internet Update - June 2012
Russian Internet Update - June 2012
Preston Carey
RIMS Update - Best Practice: Traffic Count Estimation
RIMS Update - Best Practice: Traffic Count Estimation
Simon Gough
Internet, sociální sítě, mobilní platformy - nové trendy
Internet, sociální sítě, mobilní platformy - nové trendy
Petr Krkavec
La Visión de EMBARQ en Transporte Urbano Sustentable - Holger Dalkmann
La Visión de EMBARQ en Transporte Urbano Sustentable - Holger Dalkmann
Fagner Glinski
When will we have a Gigabit Train?
When will we have a Gigabit Train?
techUK
Cargaload
Cargaload
Andrew Swiler
Wolfgang müller pietralla latest developents ind the mobility industry road-w...
Wolfgang müller pietralla latest developents ind the mobility industry road-w...
World Tourism Forum Lucerne
Tr@Ins3 Techno Economical Study Bart Lannoo
Tr@Ins3 Techno Economical Study Bart Lannoo
imec.archive
GPS en verplaatsingsgedrag
GPS en verplaatsingsgedrag
Kantar TNS
Similar a том том
(20)
LTC, Annual Forum, Greener California: Impacts of Senate Bill 375 and Winning...
LTC, Annual Forum, Greener California: Impacts of Senate Bill 375 and Winning...
Contact Center Benchmark 2012
Contact Center Benchmark 2012
Lyons Second Workshop Results
Lyons Second Workshop Results
GBR hospitality newsletter 2010 Q4
GBR hospitality newsletter 2010 Q4
C:\fakepath\keynote do mahony
C:\fakepath\keynote do mahony
Keynote D OMahony
Keynote D OMahony
Namma Railu - The Proposal for Commuter Rail Service in Bangalore
Namma Railu - The Proposal for Commuter Rail Service in Bangalore
Design and Implementation of Alcohol Detector and Accident Detection System u...
Design and Implementation of Alcohol Detector and Accident Detection System u...
IRJET- Lane Detection using Neural Networks
IRJET- Lane Detection using Neural Networks
F uturemed wp5_final_2
F uturemed wp5_final_2
Presentation 3Q12
Presentation 3Q12
Russian Internet Update - June 2012
Russian Internet Update - June 2012
RIMS Update - Best Practice: Traffic Count Estimation
RIMS Update - Best Practice: Traffic Count Estimation
Internet, sociální sítě, mobilní platformy - nové trendy
Internet, sociální sítě, mobilní platformy - nové trendy
La Visión de EMBARQ en Transporte Urbano Sustentable - Holger Dalkmann
La Visión de EMBARQ en Transporte Urbano Sustentable - Holger Dalkmann
When will we have a Gigabit Train?
When will we have a Gigabit Train?
Cargaload
Cargaload
Wolfgang müller pietralla latest developents ind the mobility industry road-w...
Wolfgang müller pietralla latest developents ind the mobility industry road-w...
Tr@Ins3 Techno Economical Study Bart Lannoo
Tr@Ins3 Techno Economical Study Bart Lannoo
GPS en verplaatsingsgedrag
GPS en verplaatsingsgedrag
Más de Ecolife Journal
Пролог: Безответная любовь... к родине
Пролог: Безответная любовь... к родине
Ecolife Journal
Перспективы ветроэнергетического рынка в Hроссии Stefan gsängeк at all
Перспективы ветроэнергетического рынка в Hроссии Stefan gsängeк at all
Ecolife Journal
экология из шваб 4-я промышленная 2016.shvab k.-topbusinessawards._chetvert...
экология из шваб 4-я промышленная 2016.shvab k.-topbusinessawards._chetvert...
Ecolife Journal
страницы из шваб 4-я промышленная 2016.shvab k.-topbusinessawards._chetvert...
страницы из шваб 4-я промышленная 2016.shvab k.-topbusinessawards._chetvert...
Ecolife Journal
нэи обзорная презентация
нэи обзорная презентация
Ecolife Journal
МНПЗ строит "Биосферу"
МНПЗ строит "Биосферу"
Ecolife Journal
фиговский магаршак цивилизация и утилизация 57(8 2006)
фиговский магаршак цивилизация и утилизация 57(8 2006)
Ecolife Journal
оценка урбанизированых территоий. фрагмент
оценка урбанизированых территоий. фрагмент
Ecolife Journal
Vtb 2016 3_12
Vtb 2016 3_12
Ecolife Journal
Vtb 16 2_11(1)
Vtb 16 2_11(1)
Ecolife Journal
Didgest ecolife 6 8
Didgest ecolife 6 8
Ecolife Journal
Digest ecolife n 9-10_z
Digest ecolife n 9-10_z
Ecolife Journal
тээмп суперконденсаторы, брошюра
тээмп суперконденсаторы, брошюра
Ecolife Journal
Eco route alexander ivanov sgem 2016 1
Eco route alexander ivanov sgem 2016 1
Ecolife Journal
алексадр иванов мониторинг на маршруте
алексадр иванов мониторинг на маршруте
Ecolife Journal
программа круглого стола в совете федерации
программа круглого стола в совете федерации
Ecolife Journal
ревич жара и здоровье 3 2011-подписной
ревич жара и здоровье 3 2011-подписной
Ecolife Journal
1603 visit to switzerland haefeli rus
1603 visit to switzerland haefeli rus
Ecolife Journal
презентация йорга Last js landfillmanagement rus
презентация йорга Last js landfillmanagement rus
Ecolife Journal
заявление гд чернобыль1
заявление гд чернобыль1
Ecolife Journal
Más de Ecolife Journal
(20)
Пролог: Безответная любовь... к родине
Пролог: Безответная любовь... к родине
Перспективы ветроэнергетического рынка в Hроссии Stefan gsängeк at all
Перспективы ветроэнергетического рынка в Hроссии Stefan gsängeк at all
экология из шваб 4-я промышленная 2016.shvab k.-topbusinessawards._chetvert...
экология из шваб 4-я промышленная 2016.shvab k.-topbusinessawards._chetvert...
страницы из шваб 4-я промышленная 2016.shvab k.-topbusinessawards._chetvert...
страницы из шваб 4-я промышленная 2016.shvab k.-topbusinessawards._chetvert...
нэи обзорная презентация
нэи обзорная презентация
МНПЗ строит "Биосферу"
МНПЗ строит "Биосферу"
фиговский магаршак цивилизация и утилизация 57(8 2006)
фиговский магаршак цивилизация и утилизация 57(8 2006)
оценка урбанизированых территоий. фрагмент
оценка урбанизированых территоий. фрагмент
Vtb 2016 3_12
Vtb 2016 3_12
Vtb 16 2_11(1)
Vtb 16 2_11(1)
Didgest ecolife 6 8
Didgest ecolife 6 8
Digest ecolife n 9-10_z
Digest ecolife n 9-10_z
тээмп суперконденсаторы, брошюра
тээмп суперконденсаторы, брошюра
Eco route alexander ivanov sgem 2016 1
Eco route alexander ivanov sgem 2016 1
алексадр иванов мониторинг на маршруте
алексадр иванов мониторинг на маршруте
программа круглого стола в совете федерации
программа круглого стола в совете федерации
ревич жара и здоровье 3 2011-подписной
ревич жара и здоровье 3 2011-подписной
1603 visit to switzerland haefeli rus
1603 visit to switzerland haefeli rus
презентация йорга Last js landfillmanagement rus
презентация йорга Last js landfillmanagement rus
заявление гд чернобыль1
заявление гд чернобыль1
том том
1.
TomTom European Congestion Index
2.
TomTom Congestion Index
Disclaimer All copyrights, commercial rights, design rights, trademarks and other elements considered intellectual property that are published in this report are reserved by TomTom International B.V.. You are permitted to use the contents of this report in online, offline and social media and other publication channels for non-commercial purposes with clear reference to TomTom International B.V. as its main source. You are not permitted to modify, compile, adapt or use any part of this report in any way for commercial purposes without a written agreement from TomTom International B.V.. For more information please contact congestionindex@tomtom.com. © 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. – 1
3.
TomTom Congestion Index
TomTom Congestion Index It is our mission to get drivers to their destinations faster, safer and greener. Over the years we have invested in new ideas and technologies with the aim of bringing significant benefits to drivers, businesses and society as a whole. In 2007 we started a groundbreaking initiative that helped us to understand how we could guide drivers in a better way. We set out to build a more precise view of traffic flow over the entire road network to enable us to give drivers more exact route information and arrival times. With the support of millions of TomTom customers we have captured anonymous travel time information in all the territories where we are active. Rather than relying on theoretical models, we are now able to understand real-life driving patterns by time of day, day of week, time of year and around special events. This initiative is unique in that we are able to capture, evaluate and redistribute vehicle-centric travel information on a global scale. Over the years we have built the world's largest database of historic travel times and the most detailed and accurate real- time traffic information available. Based on the insights we gained we have developed advanced routing technologies that help millions of drivers get to their destinations faster, safer and with lower emissions of greenhouse gases. Contrary to popular belief, there are often multiple ways to reach a destination and avoid traffic congestion. Finding the fastest route is a complex task. Now, thanks to advanced routing technologies, motorists can drive with dynamic navigation systems which quickly react and adjust routes to the ever changing traffic situations. By helping drivers to find a faster route we can also demonstrate that the total available capacity on the road network increases. If a small percentage of drivers uses different (and faster) routes, congestion can be alleviated across the entire road network, thereby benefitting all drivers. By offering a more accurate analysis of traffic flows, we help identify and pinpoint congestion trouble spots more effectively. And by routing traffic away from congested areas we can play a key role in easing congestion in cities and urban areas. Our historical archive of real travel times has paved the way for the creation of the TomTom Congestion Index – the most accurate and comprehensive barometer of traffic congestion in major cities all over the world. © 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. – 2
4.
TomTom Congestion Index
About the TomTom Congestion Index With the publication of the TomTom Congestion Index we are aiming to provide the general public, industry and policy makers with unique and unbiased information about congestion levels in urban areas*. The methodology that is used in this report compares travel times* during non-congested periods (free flow*) with travel times* in peak hours*. The difference is expressed as a percentage increase in travel time *. We take into account local roads, arterials and highways. All data is based on actual GPS based measurements and for each city* the sample size is expressed in total number of measured miles for the period. As well as assigning and ranking the overall congestion levels of over 120 cities* on different continents, the report evaluates the congestion levels* in cities at different times of the day and on different days of the week. Individual city reports include more detailed information such as the most congested day*, time delay per year for commuters* and congestion levels on highways* and local roads. To download a copy of the report go to: www.tomtom.com/congestionindex. If you would like to know more about TomTom's trafflc solutions, please contact your local TomTom office or sales@tomtom.com. For questions or comments about this report, please contact us at congestionindex@tomtom.com. Note: words with a * are explained on the keywords page at the end of the report. © 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. – 3
5.
TomTom Congestion Index Europe
Europe congestion level 24% 1 Moscow 3 W arsaw 4 Marseille 2 Istanbul 5 Palermo Top 3 - Increasing congestion Top 3 - Decreasing congestion Prev ious Increase in congestion Prev ious Decrease in congestion C ongestion 0 4 8 12 16 C urrent C ongestion 0 4 8 12 16 C urrent Leeds-Bradford18% 8 26% Bern 21% 9 12% Istanbul 49% 6 55% Málaga 15% 6 9% Moscow 62% 4 66% W arsaw 47% 5 42% Top 10 cities Rank CI change City Country Congestion Morning peak Evening peak Highways Non-Highways 1 Moscow Russia 66% 106% 138% 62% 68% 2 Istanbul Turkey 55% 80% 125% 58% 51% 3 Warsaw Poland 42% 84% 88% 39% 46% 4 Marseille France 40% 77% 77% 24% 50% 5 Palermo Italy 39% 64% 64% 27% 49% 6 Stuttgart Germany 33% 59% 67% 32% 34% 7 --- Paris France 33% 70% 65% 32% 34% 8 Rome Italy 33% 76% 63% 25% 37% 9 Hamburg Germany 32% 49% 55% 27% 36% 10 Brussels Belgium 32% 75% 81% 26% 37% Comparison per quarter © 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. – 4
6.
TomTom Congestion Index Europe Rank
CI change City Country Congestion Morning peak Evening peak Highways Non-Highways 1 Moscow Russia 66% 106% 138% 62% 68% 2 Istanbul Turkey 55% 80% 125% 58% 51% 3 Warsaw Poland 42% 84% 88% 39% 46% 4 Marseille France 40% 77% 77% 24% 50% 5 Palermo Italy 39% 64% 64% 27% 49% 6 Stuttgart Germany 33% 59% 67% 32% 34% 7 --- Paris France 33% 70% 65% 32% 34% 8 Rome Italy 33% 76% 63% 25% 37% 9 Hamburg Germany 32% 49% 55% 27% 36% 10 Brussels Belgium 32% 75% 81% 26% 37% 11 Dublin Ireland 29% 62% 62% 22% 39% 12 Stockholm Sweden 28% 62% 70% 25% 32% 13 --- Berlin Germany 28% 42% 50% 24% 32% 14 London United Kingdom 27% 56% 55% 14% 36% 15 --- Nice France 27% 41% 54% 15% 34% 16 Cologne Germany 26% 49% 54% 24% 32% 17 --- Lyon France 26% 58% 56% 21% 34% 18 Leeds-Bradford United Kingdom 26% 54% 59% 22% 31% 19 Vienna Austria 25% 43% 50% 17% 32% 20 Milan Italy 25% 70% 55% 20% 29% 21 Toulouse France 25% 76% 56% 20% 32% 22 Naples Italy 25% 40% 45% 13% 37% 23 Luxembourg Luxembourg 25% 52% 59% 16% 37% 24 Nottingham United Kingdom 24% 59% 52% 6% 32% 25 Budapest Hungary 24% 46% 45% 6% 33% 26 Manchester United Kingdom 24% 62% 59% 16% 33% 27 Munich Germany 24% 49% 42% 18% 33% 28 Prague Czech Republic 23% 52% 40% 18% 29% 29 Oslo Norway 23% 61% 75% 19% 30% 30 Strasbourg France 23% 41% 64% 18% 30% 31 Frankfurt am Main Germany 22% 48% 41% 17% 30% 32 Birmingham United Kingdom 22% 46% 45% 16% 31% 33 Liverpool United Kingdom 21% 38% 39% 4% 27% 34 Lille France 21% 53% 48% 16% 27% 35 Newcastle-Sunderland United Kingdom 21% 41% 43% 15% 26% 36 Lisbon Portugal 20% 45% 51% 10% 21% 37 Nantes France 20% 52% 49% 15% 27% 38 Genoa Italy 20% 37% 38% 11% 32% 39 Turin Italy 20% 44% 39% 10% 25% 40 The Hague Netherlands 20% 46% 45% 11% 27% 41 Rotterdam Netherlands 19% 38% 55% 13% 29% 42 Barcelona Spain 19% 46% 38% 15% 22% 43 Gothenburg Sweden 19% 33% 52% 17% 21% 44 Glasgow United Kingdom 18% 38% 42% 10% 25% 45 Ruhr region west Germany 18% 32% 35% 14% 29% 46 Helsinki Finland 18% 35% 40% 13% 23% 47 Porto Portugal 18% 31% 39% 9% 25% 48 Copenhagen Denmark 17% 42% 34% 8% 26% 49 Amsterdam Netherlands 17% 35% 39% 10% 29% 50 --- Ruhr region east Germany 16% 29% 30% 12% 25% 51 Palma de Mallorca Spain 16% 25% 22% 7% 20% 52 Madrid Spain 14% 39% 29% 8% 20% 53 Bern Switzerland 13% 24% 38% 1% 31% 54 Seville Spain 13% 24% 20% 9% 17% 55 Murcia Spain 12% 18% 15% 5% 22% 56 Valencia Spain 11% 18% 19% 5% 19% 57 Malmö Sweden 10% 14% 18% 6% 22% 58 Málaga Spain 10% 16% 12% 5% 12% 59 Zaragoza Spain 9% 13% 13% 0% 18% © 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. – 5
7.
TomTom Congestion Index Amsterdam
Congestion level 17% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 49/59 Congestion level on highways 10% Congestion level on non-highways 29% Delay per hour driven in peak period 22 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 61 h The weekly congestion pattern: Most congested specific day Fri 3 Feb 2012 Best and worst peak periods of the week Total network length 579 mi Total network length highways 129 mi Total network length non-highways 451 mi Total vehicle miles 39 947 817 mi Delay per hour driven in peak period Delay per hour Comparison per quarter © 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. – 6
8.
TomTom Congestion Index Barcelona
Congestion level 19% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 42/59 Congestion level on highways 15% Congestion level on non-highways 22% Delay per hour driven in peak period 25 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 67 h The weekly congestion pattern: Most congested specific day Wed 31 Oct 2012 Best and worst peak periods of the week Total network length 392 mi Total network length highways 105 mi Total network length non-highways 287 mi Total vehicle miles 14 512 014 mi Delay per hour driven in peak period Delay per hour Comparison per quarter © 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. – 7
9.
TomTom Congestion Index Berlin
Congestion level 28% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 13/59 Congestion level on highways 24% Congestion level on non-highways 32% Delay per hour driven in peak period 27 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 71 h The weekly congestion pattern: Most congested specific day Thu 6 Dec 2012 Best and worst peak periods of the week Total network length 1 786 mi Total network length highways 428 mi Total network length non-highways 1 358 mi Total vehicle miles 26 474 317 mi Delay per hour driven in peak period Delay per hour Comparison per quarter © 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. – 8
10.
TomTom Congestion Index Bern
Congestion level 13% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 53/59 Congestion level on highways 1% Congestion level on non-highways 31% Delay per hour driven in peak period 18 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 53 h The weekly congestion pattern: Most congested specific day Mon 3 Dec 2012 Best and worst peak periods of the week Total network length 127 mi Total network length highways 21 mi Total network length non-highways 105 mi Total vehicle miles 1 887 319 mi Delay per hour driven in peak period Delay per hour Comparison per quarter © 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. – 9
11.
TomTom Congestion Index Birmingham
Congestion level 22% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 32/59 Congestion level on highways 16% Congestion level on non-highways 31% Delay per hour driven in peak period 27 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 71 h The weekly congestion pattern: Most congested specific day Fri 6 Jul 2012 Best and worst peak periods of the week Total network length 1 643 mi Total network length highways 255 mi Total network length non-highways 1 388 mi Total vehicle miles 67 960 959 mi Delay per hour driven in peak period Delay per hour Comparison per quarter © 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. – 10
12.
TomTom Congestion Index Brussels
Congestion level 32% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 10/59 Congestion level on highways 26% Congestion level on non-highways 37% Delay per hour driven in peak period 47 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 101 h The weekly congestion pattern: Most congested specific day Fri 3 Feb 2012 Best and worst peak periods of the week Total network length 808 mi Total network length highways 122 mi Total network length non-highways 686 mi Total vehicle miles 22 968 318 mi Delay per hour driven in peak period Delay per hour Comparison per quarter © 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. – 11
13.
TomTom Congestion Index Budapest
Congestion level 24% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 25/59 Congestion level on highways 6% Congestion level on non-highways 33% Delay per hour driven in peak period 27 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 71 h The weekly congestion pattern: Most congested specific day Thu 6 Dec 2012 Best and worst peak periods of the week Total network length 1 312 mi Total network length highways 220 mi Total network length non-highways 1 092 mi Total vehicle miles 2 696 707 mi Delay per hour driven in peak period Delay per hour Comparison per quarter © 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. – 12
14.
TomTom Congestion Index Cologne
Congestion level 26% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 16/59 Congestion level on highways 24% Congestion level on non-highways 32% Delay per hour driven in peak period 30 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 76 h The weekly congestion pattern: Most congested specific day Wed 31 Oct 2012 Best and worst peak periods of the week Total network length 1 208 mi Total network length highways 350 mi Total network length non-highways 859 mi Total vehicle miles 25 278 683 mi Delay per hour driven in peak period Delay per hour Comparison per quarter © 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. – 13
15.
TomTom Congestion Index Copenhagen
Congestion level 17% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 48/59 Congestion level on highways 8% Congestion level on non-highways 26% Delay per hour driven in peak period 22 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 61 h The weekly congestion pattern: Most congested specific day Mon 10 Dec 2012 Best and worst peak periods of the week Total network length 813 mi Total network length highways 160 mi Total network length non-highways 652 mi Total vehicle miles 13 447 098 mi Delay per hour driven in peak period Delay per hour Comparison per quarter © 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. – 14
16.
TomTom Congestion Index Dublin
Congestion level 29% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 11/59 Congestion level on highways 22% Congestion level on non-highways 39% Delay per hour driven in peak period 37 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 87 h The weekly congestion pattern: Most congested specific day Thu 6 Dec 2012 Best and worst peak periods of the week Total network length 400 mi Total network length highways 135 mi Total network length non-highways 265 mi Total vehicle miles 2 714 751 mi Delay per hour driven in peak period Delay per hour Comparison per quarter © 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. – 15
17.
TomTom Congestion Index Frankfurt
am Main Congestion level 22% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 31/59 Congestion level on highways 17% Congestion level on non-highways 30% Delay per hour driven in peak period 26 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 69 h The weekly congestion pattern: Most congested specific day Mon 3 Dec 2012 Best and worst peak periods of the week Total network length 358 mi Total network length highways 103 mi Total network length non-highways 255 mi Total vehicle miles 6 140 015 mi Delay per hour driven in peak period Delay per hour Comparison per quarter © 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. – 16
18.
TomTom Congestion Index Genoa
Congestion level 20% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 38/59 Congestion level on highways 11% Congestion level on non-highways 32% Delay per hour driven in peak period 22 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 61 h The weekly congestion pattern: Most congested specific day Mon 30 Apr 2012 Best and worst peak periods of the week Total network length 207 mi Total network length highways 40 mi Total network length non-highways 167 mi Total vehicle miles 2 114 267 mi Delay per hour driven in peak period Delay per hour Comparison per quarter © 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. – 17
19.
TomTom Congestion Index Glasgow
Congestion level 18% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 44/59 Congestion level on highways 10% Congestion level on non-highways 25% Delay per hour driven in peak period 24 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 65 h The weekly congestion pattern: Most congested specific day Thu 20 Dec 2012 Best and worst peak periods of the week Total network length 645 mi Total network length highways 96 mi Total network length non-highways 549 mi Total vehicle miles 8 526 798 mi Delay per hour driven in peak period Delay per hour Comparison per quarter © 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. – 18
20.
TomTom Congestion Index Gothenburg
Congestion level 19% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 43/59 Congestion level on highways 17% Congestion level on non-highways 21% Delay per hour driven in peak period 25 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 67 h The weekly congestion pattern: Most congested specific day Tue 4 Dec 2012 Best and worst peak periods of the week Total network length 509 mi Total network length highways 66 mi Total network length non-highways 442 mi Total vehicle miles 2 440 932 mi Delay per hour driven in peak period Delay per hour Comparison per quarter © 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. – 19
21.
TomTom Congestion Index Hamburg
Congestion level 32% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 9/59 Congestion level on highways 27% Congestion level on non-highways 36% Delay per hour driven in peak period 31 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 78 h The weekly congestion pattern: Most congested specific day Thu 4 Oct 2012 Best and worst peak periods of the week Total network length 1 339 mi Total network length highways 266 mi Total network length non-highways 1 073 mi Total vehicle miles 21 885 431 mi Delay per hour driven in peak period Delay per hour Comparison per quarter © 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. – 20
22.
TomTom Congestion Index Helsinki
Congestion level 18% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 46/59 Congestion level on highways 13% Congestion level on non-highways 23% Delay per hour driven in peak period 22 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 61 h The weekly congestion pattern: Most congested specific day Fri 3 Feb 2012 Best and worst peak periods of the week Total network length 684 mi Total network length highways 193 mi Total network length non-highways 492 mi Total vehicle miles 12 190 825 mi Delay per hour driven in peak period Delay per hour Comparison per quarter © 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. – 21
23.
TomTom Congestion Index Istanbul
Congestion level 55% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 2/59 Congestion level on highways 58% Congestion level on non-highways 51% Delay per hour driven in peak period 64 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 118 h The weekly congestion pattern: Most congested specific day Thu 20 Dec 2012 Best and worst peak periods of the week Total network length 1 254 mi Total network length highways 249 mi Total network length non-highways 1 005 mi Total vehicle miles 3 162 487 mi Delay per hour driven in peak period Delay per hour Comparison per quarter © 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. – 22
24.
TomTom Congestion Index Leeds-Bradford
Congestion level 26% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 18/59 Congestion level on highways 22% Congestion level on non-highways 31% Delay per hour driven in peak period 33 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 81 h The weekly congestion pattern: Most congested specific day Wed 21 Nov 2012 Best and worst peak periods of the week Total network length 760 mi Total network length highways 98 mi Total network length non-highways 662 mi Total vehicle miles 22 733 164 mi Delay per hour driven in peak period Delay per hour Comparison per quarter © 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. – 23
25.
TomTom Congestion Index Lille
Congestion level 21% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 34/59 Congestion level on highways 16% Congestion level on non-highways 27% Delay per hour driven in peak period 30 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 76 h The weekly congestion pattern: Most congested specific day Fri 3 Feb 2012 Best and worst peak periods of the week Total network length 824 mi Total network length highways 101 mi Total network length non-highways 723 mi Total vehicle miles 15 327 918 mi Delay per hour driven in peak period Delay per hour Comparison per quarter © 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. – 24
26.
TomTom Congestion Index Lisbon
Congestion level 20% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 36/59 Congestion level on highways 10% Congestion level on non-highways 21% Delay per hour driven in peak period 28 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 73 h The weekly congestion pattern: Most congested specific day Fri 14 Dec 2012 Best and worst peak periods of the week Total network length 329 mi Total network length highways 16 mi Total network length non-highways 314 mi Total vehicle miles 5 136 977 mi Delay per hour driven in peak period Delay per hour Comparison per quarter © 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. – 25
27.
TomTom Congestion Index Liverpool
Congestion level 21% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 33/59 Congestion level on highways 4% Congestion level on non-highways 27% Delay per hour driven in peak period 23 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 63 h The weekly congestion pattern: Most congested specific day Wed 25 Jan 2012 Best and worst peak periods of the week Total network length 637 mi Total network length highways 68 mi Total network length non-highways 569 mi Total vehicle miles 8 608 822 mi Delay per hour driven in peak period Delay per hour Comparison per quarter © 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. – 26
28.
TomTom Congestion Index London
Congestion level 27% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 14/59 Congestion level on highways 14% Congestion level on non-highways 36% Delay per hour driven in peak period 33 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 81 h The weekly congestion pattern: Most congested specific day Fri 19 Oct 2012 Best and worst peak periods of the week Total network length 4 529 mi Total network length highways 438 mi Total network length non-highways 4 091 mi Total vehicle miles 234 340 725 mi Delay per hour driven in peak period Delay per hour Comparison per quarter © 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. – 27
29.
TomTom Congestion Index Luxembourg
Congestion level 25% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 23/59 Congestion level on highways 16% Congestion level on non-highways 37% Delay per hour driven in peak period 33 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 81 h The weekly congestion pattern: Most congested specific day Fri 13 Jul 2012 Best and worst peak periods of the week Total network length 201 mi Total network length highways 43 mi Total network length non-highways 157 mi Total vehicle miles 2 440 145 mi Delay per hour driven in peak period Delay per hour Comparison per quarter © 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. – 28
30.
TomTom Congestion Index Lyon
Congestion level 26% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 17/59 Congestion level on highways 21% Congestion level on non-highways 34% Delay per hour driven in peak period 34 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 83 h The weekly congestion pattern: Most congested specific day Fri 29 Jun 2012 Best and worst peak periods of the week Total network length 1 094 mi Total network length highways 219 mi Total network length non-highways 876 mi Total vehicle miles 24 731 792 mi Delay per hour driven in peak period Delay per hour Comparison per quarter © 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. – 29
31.
TomTom Congestion Index Málaga
Congestion level 10% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 58/59 Congestion level on highways 5% Congestion level on non-highways 12% Delay per hour driven in peak period 8 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 27 h The weekly congestion pattern: Most congested specific day Sat 17 Nov 2012 Best and worst peak periods of the week Total network length 155 mi Total network length highways 35 mi Total network length non-highways 120 mi Total vehicle miles 2 068 067 mi Delay per hour driven in peak period Delay per hour Comparison per quarter © 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. – 30
32.
TomTom Congestion Index Madrid
Congestion level 14% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 52/59 Congestion level on highways 8% Congestion level on non-highways 20% Delay per hour driven in peak period 20 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 57 h The weekly congestion pattern: Most congested specific day Fri 28 Sep 2012 Best and worst peak periods of the week Total network length 2 198 mi Total network length highways 758 mi Total network length non-highways 1 439 mi Total vehicle miles 60 261 299 mi Delay per hour driven in peak period Delay per hour Comparison per quarter © 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. – 31
33.
TomTom Congestion Index Malmö
Congestion level 10% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 57/59 Congestion level on highways 6% Congestion level on non-highways 22% Delay per hour driven in peak period 9 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 30 h The weekly congestion pattern: Most congested specific day Sun 2 Dec 2012 Best and worst peak periods of the week Total network length 255 mi Total network length highways 99 mi Total network length non-highways 155 mi Total vehicle miles 1 623 719 mi Delay per hour driven in peak period Delay per hour Comparison per quarter © 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. – 32
34.
TomTom Congestion Index Manchester
Congestion level 24% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 26/59 Congestion level on highways 16% Congestion level on non-highways 33% Delay per hour driven in peak period 36 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 86 h The weekly congestion pattern: Most congested specific day Fri 14 Dec 2012 Best and worst peak periods of the week Total network length 977 mi Total network length highways 153 mi Total network length non-highways 824 mi Total vehicle miles 28 511 575 mi Delay per hour driven in peak period Delay per hour Comparison per quarter © 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. – 33
35.
TomTom Congestion Index Marseille
Congestion level 40% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 4/59 Congestion level on highways 24% Congestion level on non-highways 50% Delay per hour driven in peak period 46 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 99 h The weekly congestion pattern: Most congested specific day Tue 10 Jul 2012 Best and worst peak periods of the week Total network length 305 mi Total network length highways 48 mi Total network length non-highways 257 mi Total vehicle miles 3 264 799 mi Delay per hour driven in peak period Delay per hour Comparison per quarter © 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. – 34
36.
TomTom Congestion Index Milan
Congestion level 25% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 20/59 Congestion level on highways 20% Congestion level on non-highways 29% Delay per hour driven in peak period 37 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 87 h The weekly congestion pattern: Most congested specific day Thu 20 Dec 2012 Best and worst peak periods of the week Total network length 1 465 mi Total network length highways 165 mi Total network length non-highways 1 300 mi Total vehicle miles 34 519 258 mi Delay per hour driven in peak period Delay per hour Comparison per quarter © 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. – 35
37.
TomTom Congestion Index Moscow
Congestion level 66% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 1/59 Congestion level on highways 62% Congestion level on non-highways 68% Delay per hour driven in peak period 74 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 127 h The weekly congestion pattern: Most congested specific day Thu 29 Nov 2012 Best and worst peak periods of the week Total network length 1 281 mi Total network length highways 231 mi Total network length non-highways 1 051 mi Total vehicle miles 1 253 022 mi Delay per hour driven in peak period Delay per hour Comparison per quarter © 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. – 36
38.
TomTom Congestion Index Munich
Congestion level 24% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 27/59 Congestion level on highways 18% Congestion level on non-highways 33% Delay per hour driven in peak period 27 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 71 h The weekly congestion pattern: Most congested specific day Tue 7 Feb 2012 Best and worst peak periods of the week Total network length 1 165 mi Total network length highways 329 mi Total network length non-highways 836 mi Total vehicle miles 19 356 201 mi Delay per hour driven in peak period Delay per hour Comparison per quarter © 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. – 37
39.
TomTom Congestion Index Murcia
Congestion level 12% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 55/59 Congestion level on highways 5% Congestion level on non-highways 22% Delay per hour driven in peak period 9 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 30 h The weekly congestion pattern: Most congested specific day Wed 2 May 2012 Best and worst peak periods of the week Total network length 201 mi Total network length highways 22 mi Total network length non-highways 180 mi Total vehicle miles 1 041 819 mi Delay per hour driven in peak period Delay per hour Comparison per quarter © 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. – 38
40.
TomTom Congestion Index Nantes
Congestion level 20% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 37/59 Congestion level on highways 15% Congestion level on non-highways 27% Delay per hour driven in peak period 30 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 76 h The weekly congestion pattern: Most congested specific day Sat 11 Aug 2012 Best and worst peak periods of the week Total network length 687 mi Total network length highways 119 mi Total network length non-highways 569 mi Total vehicle miles 10 486 164 mi Delay per hour driven in peak period Delay per hour Comparison per quarter © 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. – 39
41.
TomTom Congestion Index Naples
Congestion level 25% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 22/59 Congestion level on highways 13% Congestion level on non-highways 37% Delay per hour driven in peak period 25 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 67 h The weekly congestion pattern: Most congested specific day Tue 4 Dec 2012 Best and worst peak periods of the week Total network length 1 028 mi Total network length highways 154 mi Total network length non-highways 874 mi Total vehicle miles 6 674 113 mi Delay per hour driven in peak period Delay per hour Comparison per quarter © 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. – 40
42.
TomTom Congestion Index Newcastle-Sunderland
Congestion level 21% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 35/59 Congestion level on highways 15% Congestion level on non-highways 26% Delay per hour driven in peak period 25 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 67 h The weekly congestion pattern: Most congested specific day Wed 5 Dec 2012 Best and worst peak periods of the week Total network length 825 mi Total network length highways 109 mi Total network length non-highways 715 mi Total vehicle miles 10 211 266 mi Delay per hour driven in peak period Delay per hour Comparison per quarter © 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. – 41
43.
TomTom Congestion Index Nice
Congestion level 27% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 15/59 Congestion level on highways 15% Congestion level on non-highways 34% Delay per hour driven in peak period 29 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 74 h The weekly congestion pattern: Most congested specific day Wed 22 Feb 2012 Best and worst peak periods of the week Total network length 190 mi Total network length highways 27 mi Total network length non-highways 162 mi Total vehicle miles 1 398 188 mi Delay per hour driven in peak period Delay per hour Comparison per quarter © 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. – 42
44.
TomTom Congestion Index Nottingham
Congestion level 24% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 24/59 Congestion level on highways 6% Congestion level on non-highways 32% Delay per hour driven in peak period 33 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 81 h The weekly congestion pattern: Most congested specific day Wed 11 Apr 2012 Best and worst peak periods of the week Total network length 263 mi Total network length highways 12 mi Total network length non-highways 251 mi Total vehicle miles 8 926 692 mi Delay per hour driven in peak period Delay per hour Comparison per quarter © 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. – 43
45.
TomTom Congestion Index Oslo
Congestion level 23% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 29/59 Congestion level on highways 19% Congestion level on non-highways 30% Delay per hour driven in peak period 41 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 93 h The weekly congestion pattern: Most congested specific day Mon 9 Jan 2012 Best and worst peak periods of the week Total network length 331 mi Total network length highways 78 mi Total network length non-highways 254 mi Total vehicle miles 3 605 887 mi Delay per hour driven in peak period Delay per hour Comparison per quarter © 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. – 44
46.
TomTom Congestion Index Palermo
Congestion level 39% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 5/59 Congestion level on highways 27% Congestion level on non-highways 49% Delay per hour driven in peak period 38 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 89 h The weekly congestion pattern: Most congested specific day Thu 6 Dec 2012 Best and worst peak periods of the week Total network length 203 mi Total network length highways 31 mi Total network length non-highways 171 mi Total vehicle miles 1 004 862 mi Delay per hour driven in peak period Delay per hour Comparison per quarter © 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. – 45
47.
TomTom Congestion Index Palma
de Mallorca Congestion level 16% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 51/59 Congestion level on highways 7% Congestion level on non-highways 20% Delay per hour driven in peak period 14 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 43 h The weekly congestion pattern: Most congested specific day Mon 15 Oct 2012 Best and worst peak periods of the week Total network length 181 mi Total network length highways 27 mi Total network length non-highways 153 mi Total vehicle miles 1 115 553 mi Delay per hour driven in peak period Delay per hour Comparison per quarter © 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. – 46
48.
TomTom Congestion Index Paris
Congestion level 33% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 7/59 Congestion level on highways 32% Congestion level on non-highways 34% Delay per hour driven in peak period 40 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 92 h The weekly congestion pattern: Most congested specific day Thu 20 Dec 2012 Best and worst peak periods of the week Total network length 4 870 mi Total network length highways 891 mi Total network length non-highways 3 979 mi Total vehicle miles 192 596 535 mi Delay per hour driven in peak period Delay per hour Comparison per quarter © 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. – 47
49.
TomTom Congestion Index Porto
Congestion level 18% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 47/59 Congestion level on highways 9% Congestion level on non-highways 25% Delay per hour driven in peak period 21 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 59 h The weekly congestion pattern: Most congested specific day Tue 25 Sep 2012 Best and worst peak periods of the week Total network length 600 mi Total network length highways 103 mi Total network length non-highways 496 mi Total vehicle miles 4 977 589 mi Delay per hour driven in peak period Delay per hour Comparison per quarter © 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. – 48
50.
TomTom Congestion Index Prague
Congestion level 23% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 28/59 Congestion level on highways 18% Congestion level on non-highways 29% Delay per hour driven in peak period 27 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 71 h The weekly congestion pattern: Most congested specific day Mon 16 Jul 2012 Best and worst peak periods of the week Total network length 655 mi Total network length highways 145 mi Total network length non-highways 510 mi Total vehicle miles 8 535 237 mi Delay per hour driven in peak period Delay per hour Comparison per quarter © 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. – 49
51.
TomTom Congestion Index Rome
Congestion level 33% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 8/59 Congestion level on highways 25% Congestion level on non-highways 37% Delay per hour driven in peak period 41 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 93 h The weekly congestion pattern: Most congested specific day Fri 3 Feb 2012 Best and worst peak periods of the week Total network length 802 mi Total network length highways 135 mi Total network length non-highways 667 mi Total vehicle miles 19 840 544 mi Delay per hour driven in peak period Delay per hour Comparison per quarter © 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. – 50
52.
TomTom Congestion Index Rotterdam
Congestion level 19% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 41/59 Congestion level on highways 13% Congestion level on non-highways 29% Delay per hour driven in peak period 28 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 73 h The weekly congestion pattern: Most congested specific day Fri 3 Feb 2012 Best and worst peak periods of the week Total network length 772 mi Total network length highways 129 mi Total network length non-highways 644 mi Total vehicle miles 38 785 588 mi Delay per hour driven in peak period Delay per hour Comparison per quarter © 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. – 51
53.
TomTom Congestion Index Ruhr
region east Congestion level 16% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 50/59 Congestion level on highways 12% Congestion level on non-highways 25% Delay per hour driven in peak period 17 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 50 h The weekly congestion pattern: Most congested specific day Wed 12 Dec 2012 Best and worst peak periods of the week Total network length 1 877 mi Total network length highways 388 mi Total network length non-highways 1 489 mi Total vehicle miles 23 367 598 mi Delay per hour driven in peak period Delay per hour Comparison per quarter © 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. – 52
54.
TomTom Congestion Index Ruhr
region west Congestion level 18% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 45/59 Congestion level on highways 14% Congestion level on non-highways 29% Delay per hour driven in peak period 20 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 57 h The weekly congestion pattern: Most congested specific day Sat 30 Jun 2012 Best and worst peak periods of the week Total network length 1 862 mi Total network length highways 425 mi Total network length non-highways 1 437 mi Total vehicle miles 32 290 729 mi Delay per hour driven in peak period Delay per hour Comparison per quarter © 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. – 53
55.
TomTom Congestion Index Seville
Congestion level 13% Ranking Ranking of city compared to continent 54/59 Congestion level on highways 9% Congestion level on non-highways 17% Delay per hour driven in peak period 12 min Delay per year with a 30 min commute 38 h The weekly congestion pattern: Most congested specific day Thu 27 Sep 2012 Best and worst peak periods of the week Total network length 323 mi Total network length highways 70 mi Total network length non-highways 253 mi Total vehicle miles 4 076 508 mi Delay per hour driven in peak period Delay per hour Comparison per quarter © 2013 TomTom International BV. All rights reserved. – 54
Descargar ahora