6. Principles remain similar i e open and fair
i.e.
competition, transparency and value-for-money
(or previously “lowest cost meeting
specifications”)
ifi i ”)
Procurement processes were very manual
IM3B – Government Instruction Manual on
Procurement prescriptive rules for manual
handling of procurement exercises
g p
Rules for quotations vs tenders
Estimated procurement value (EPV)
◦ >=$3,000 < $30,000 – quotations
◦ > $70,000- tenders
6
8. Quotations
◦ Less onerous compliance wise to tenders
◦ Confidentiality of quotations
◦ Fax quotations vs mailed quotations
l d
◦ Dedicated fax, officer opening etc.
◦ Posting of quotations on notice board
g q
◦ Finance Circular No 3/2010 [11 August 2010] Changes
to the Quotation Process
Minimum Conditions of Contract for Quotation
Publication of Quotation Schedule and Corrigendum Changes
P bli i
Publication of Reasons f Quotations that are “Cancelled” or
fR for Q i h “C ll d”
“No Award”
8
9. Tenders
◦ Offer by vendors – more legal documentation as it
is binding
◦ Confidentiality and integrity important
Tender boxes system with dual key
Tender opening committee
Tender witnessing officers
Evaluation b committee
E l i by i
Award by approving authorities based on value
◦ Posting of bids on notice boards
9
10. Centralisation to de-centralisation
◦ THEN
Central procurement office (CPO)
Stationeries e.g. pens obtained via CPO
Savings from bulk purchases but spoilage from stock
obsolescence, matching demand/supply
◦ NOW
Decentralised
E.g. e-Catalogue buy, bulk tender, GeBIZ
You buy what you need, block budget aproach
10
11. IM3B to IM on procurement
◦ THEN
Instruction manuals came in paper files
Updating was a pain, manually cross out super-ceded
paras, paste over new paras etc.
People were more controls & rules conscious
◦ NOW
Web based
Web-based
Ease of reference and ease of forgetting (in some
cases)
)
11
12. Inherent Risks
◦ Procurement is susceptible to corruption (in
general)
◦ E.g. vendors gifts, ang-pows, free samples
◦ Non-compliances can threaten openness, fairness
and transparency occur
◦ Laxity in contract management can result in loss of
value-for-money
al e for mone
◦ Report of the Auditor-General highlights cases of
non-compliance
non compliance
12
13. In the past:
◦ AG’s Report 1994/1995
Audit of Purchases under United States Foreign Military
Sales Programme
Review of Financial Systems of Singapore Armed Forces
Sports Association
S A i i
Compliance with Government Procurement Procedures
by Statutory Boards
13
17. Recently – Report of the Auditor-General
FY2008/09, Auditor-General’s Overview
Areas of concern
◦ Laxity in procurement and contract management
◦ Lack of financial prudence in procurement and poor
management of contracts and agreements
◦ Resulting in higher expenditure for goods and
g g g
services
17
18. Areas of concern (cont’d)
(cont d)
◦ Under-performance not detected
◦ Penalties for non-performance not imposed
non performance
◦ Revenues due not collected
◦ Little or no assurance of value-for-money in
y
projects carried out
18
23. People
◦ Clear from AGO report that lapses are due to the
way people interpret and enforce the rules as well
as implementing the procedures
◦ IM3B now more principles-based, i.e. more room
for people to interpret hence critical to educate
staff handling procedure about how to apply the
principles
◦ IM3B now provides case studies to help us
◦ But still need to inculcate controls consciousness
23
24. People
◦ Segregation of responsibilities
Not one person do everything
GeBIZ – different roles, e.g. goods received and goods
inspection must be different officers, purchasing
officer also cannot be approving etc.
ffi l b i
Previously can circumvent if manual, now with GeBIZ
roles, more difficult
Evaluation team for tenders shouldn’t all be from the
same dept/team
◦ Education and awareness of IM 3B (and 3G)
◦ Trade-off between controls and efficiency
24
25. System of procurement
◦ Implement systems and processes that adhere to
IM3
◦ But public agencies do vary in implementation
E.g. of SBs that had dubious quotations
◦ Get internal audit to review
◦ Perhaps external audit may review
However, does not focus too much on internal controls
over procurement, i.e. more concerned about validity
and authorisation, completeness of recording of
purchasing and payment transactions then
procurement principles: openness, fairness and
transparency
25
26. GeBIZ: A game changer
◦ Controls are built into the procurement process
◦ More difficult (but not impossible!) to circumvent
relative to manual processes
◦ Examples
Openness of web invitations to quotes and invitations
to tenders and request for proposals (global)
Routing for approvals
Publication of awards
f
◦ Make full use of GeBIZ
Because you HAVE to (SBs MUST follow IM3)
Because it’s good for your agency
26
27. Some issues for procurement managers to
consider:
◦ To what extent does your agency adhere to IM3B/G?
◦ To what extent is your standard operating
p
procedures for p
procurement in line with IM3B/G?
◦ How familiar are your people with IM3B/G principles
and procedures (i.e. GeBIZ use)
◦ Have you set-up assurance and audit of
d d f
procurement
Get your internal audit to look into it
Ask your external auditor to look into it
27
28. Understand your own control and compliance
issues first
Auditor-General s
Auditor General’s Office will carry out audits
on a rotational basis
◦ Your turn for procurement or contracts audit by
AGO will (eventually!) come
◦ At least minimise or reduce number of findings by
g y
AGO (or your agency will be featured in Report of
the Auditor-General FY 20XX/XX
28