Se ha denunciado esta presentación.
Utilizamos tu perfil de LinkedIn y tus datos de actividad para personalizar los anuncios y mostrarte publicidad más relevante. Puedes cambiar tus preferencias de publicidad en cualquier momento.


401 visualizaciones

Publicado el

Asynchronous programming in JS: streams (node.js and WHAT-WG) with a backgrounder on events and promises.

Publicado en: Internet
  • Sé el primero en comentar


  1. 1. Streams Asynchronous programming in JS Eugene Lazutkin, 4/5/2016, ClubAjax, Dallas, TX @uhop,
  2. 2. Asynchronous programming AKA EDP: Event-Driven Programming. Present in JS from day 1: Browsers are event-driven inherently.
  3. 3. Events Basic primitives of asynchronous programming. Support a publisher/subscriber model. Publisher: emits an object. Subscriber: registers a callback.
  4. 4. Subscribers All receive an emited object. All independent from each other. A callback can: Stop DOM propagation. Stop processing by others.
  5. 5. Events: problems Semantics is an out-of-band knowledge. Not composable
  6. 6. Events: semantics No info on its frequency. Is it singular, or multiple? No info on valid sequence of events. Are all events independent? Is any order valid?
  7. 7. Events: example A le reader can emit three types of events: OPEN DATA(with read data) DONE A valid sequence: OPEN, DATA, DATA, DONE.
  8. 8. Events: example fail How to interpret these: DONE, DATA, OPEN. OPEN, OPEN, DATA. OPEN, DONE, OPEN, DONE.
  9. 9. Events: example x Document event emitters? Use better primitives? Go high-level? Possible x: add a state machine.
  10. 10. Events: composability Tried to wait for N events? Possible with a bunch of boilerplate. Callbacks are hard to compose.
  11. 11. Events: clunky API node.addEventListener(type, cb); node.removeEventListener(type, cb); event.preventDefault(); event.stopPropagation(); event.stopImmediatePropagation();
  12. 12. Promise AKA future, AKA deferred. A proxy object for a not-yet-available result. Most implementations do not allow to observe result (or lack of thereof) other than by registering a callback.
  13. 13. Promise vs. Event Promise is a one-off deal. Callbacks for success and failure are different. Subscribers can be chained. They can pass different results down a pipe.
  14. 14. Promise: independent promise.then(x => x + 1); promise.then(x => x + 2); promise.then(x => x + 3); If promiseis resolved with 0, each subscriber will receive 0.
  15. 15. Promise: pipeline promise. then(x => x + 1). then(x => x + 2). then(x => x + 3); If promiseis resolved with 0, subscribers will receive 0, 1, 3.
  16. 16. Promise: limitations Not really primitive. Does not work with repeated events. Does not help with sequencing events.
  17. 17. Promise: why??? Represents a result of a future operation. Can be passed anywhere. Composable.
  18. 18. Promise: alternatives var count = 2; function countdown () { if (!--count) console.log("Done!"); } a.addCallback(countdown); b.addCallback(countdown); Done!will be printed only when both a and bare nished (in any order).
  19. 19. Promise: all() Promise.all([a, b]). then(() => console.log("Done!")); The result of multiple promises is a promise too. Compose away!
  20. 20. Promise: counter-argument But we can wrap our function too! And we can make it to accept N functions! And it will call one callback too!
  21. 21. Promise: not so easy This aggregate function will depend on a convention: E.g., the last argument of a function is always a callback. No way to use synchronous, callback- less functions.
  22. 22. Promise: strikes back! If we do it right, at the end we will get … a Promiseobject. It may have a different API, yet a similar functionality.
  23. 23. Promise vs. callback fun(x, cb); // roughly eqivalent to fun(x).then(cb);
  24. 24. Promise vs. cb & err fun(x, (err, data) => {}); // roughly eqivalent to fun(x).then(data => {}, err => {});
  25. 25. Finally: streams!
  26. 26. Streams: why? They represent a sequential asynchronous I/O. Can process unlimited amount of data with a small predictable buffer. Can read/process/write in parallel saving time.
  27. 27. Streams: node.js node.js includes streams. Modelled after Unix streams. Can be les, pipes, network connections. Any sequential I/O can be modelled.
  28. 28. Streams: node.js High-level: encapsulate events. Can be: Readable Writable Both (Duplex/ Transform)
  29. 29. node.js: ReadableAPI Events: data, end, error. Read bytes: read([size]). Pipe data: pipe(destination).
  30. 30. node.js: WritableAPI Events: drain, finish, error. Write bytes: write(chunk). End writing: end().
  31. 31. node.js: Duplex Implements both APIs. Contains two independent channels: Reading + writing. Example: TCP socket.
  32. 32. node.js: Transform Implements both APIs. Reads from a readable side. Does something with it. Writes it to a writable side. Example: encoding.
  33. 33. node.js: example Copy all data from one stream to another: readable.on('end', () => console.log('Done!')); readable.pipe(writable);
  34. 34. node.js: pipeline Compress a le: var r, z, w; r = fs.createReadStream('f.txt'), z = zlib.createGzip(), w = fs.createWriteStream('f.txt.gz'); r.pipe(z).pipe(w);
  35. 35. node.js: time savings Read Block Read Block Read Block Write Block Write Block Write Block Xform Block Xform Block Xform Block Read Block Read Block Read Block Write Block Write Block Write Block Xform Block Xform Block Xform Block Sequential read­transform­write Asynchronous stream Delay Total
  36. 36. node.js: implementation How to implement custom streams? Just implement necessary methods. Relax, and watch them being called. Custom transform rulez!
  37. 37. node.js: custom API Readable: _read(size) uses push(chunk) Writable: _write(chunk, enc, cb) opt: _writev(chunks, cb) Dupleximplements both.
  38. 38. node.js: custom Transform _transform(chunk, enc, cb) opt: _flush(cb) uses push(chunk)to pass on transformed data.
  39. 39. node.js: null example (part 1) const util = require('util'), T = require('streams').Transform; util.inherits(Null, T); function Null() {; }
  40. 40. node.js: null example (part 2) Null.prototype._transform = function (data, _, cb) { this.push(data); cb(); };
  41. 41. node.js: upper case example UpperCase.prototype._transform = function (data, enc, cb) { let str = data.toString(enc); this.push(str.toUpperCase()); cb(); };
  42. 42. Novices: thinking Aha! Stream is a concept! Why do we even need streams as implementation? We can create an arbitrary object with necessary methods. No need for heavy-weight libraries.
  43. 43. node.js: reality What if our pipe components have different throughputs? What happens, if we push more water in a pipe, then it can drain. We have to manage buffers by regulating a throughput.
  44. 44. node.js: more API It is OK to drain fast. It is not OK to pump in too fast. Readablehas more: pause()— stop pumping. resume()— start pumping.
  45. 45. node.js: like a plumber Now when we send data, we pause(). When we are done, we can resume(). Otherwise we may have too many I/O requests “in ight”.
  46. 46. Novices: thinking “Cool concept, but not for me!” “Who needs to process text?” “I deal with SQL, and OOP!” “I don’t save binaries on disk!”
  47. 47. node.js: object mode We read and/or write arbitrary objects, not strings of buffers. It is a userland feature: Nothing in node.js library. npm offers a lot ὠ
  48. 48. node.js: object streams Any part (or both) of Duplexor Transformcan be in object mode. Set a required option to true: readableObjectMode writableObjectMode It should be set at construction.
  49. 49. node.js: lter example (part 1) const util = require('util'), T = require('streams').Transform; util.inherits(Filter, T); function Filter() {, { readableObjectMode: true, writableObjectMode: true }); }
  50. 50. node.js: lter example (part 2) Filter.prototype._transform = function (data, _, cb) { if(data.color == 'red'){ this.push(data); } cb(); };
  51. 51. node.js: object sources Parsing text les: XML, JSON, CSV Reading from database. There are npm modules for that. I wrote two: stream-json stream-csv-enhanced
  52. 52. node.js: working object When you got objects, you can: Filter Augment Clean Transform and so on…
  53. 53. node.js: project library Object mode streams allow: Create a library of components to process your data. Construct custom pipelines out of them.
  54. 54. node.js: composability Composability makes it all possible. Creating libraries and pipelines are easy. It will have a decent performance by default.
  55. 55. Philosophy Remember data ow programming? Pipelines of object mode streams can be used for that. Remember event streams? Object mode streams again. Remember Array Extras?
  56. 56. node.js: back to earth Pipeline has a “tax” per object. The smaller object you have, the more relative overhead. Doesn’t make any sense to process bytes in object mode. Group small objects.
  57. 57. Experts: thinking “What node.js? Browser!” “I am a front-end dev!” “What’s in it for me?”
  58. 58. Streams: WHATWG WHATWG got us covered: New Streams standard is under development. Will be used in Fetch — replacement for XHR. Likely to be used in File API. For use client- and server- side.
  59. 59. WHATWG vs. node.js (part 1) Most functionality is preserved. Modern API: Promises instead of callbacks. BYOB mode: “Bring your own buffer”. Zero-copy pipelines!
  60. 60. WHATWG vs. node.js (part 2) Backpressure is introduced. Automated management of a throughput. Explicit splitting of a stream. Handles backpressure too. Pipeline can have trees!
  61. 61. WHATWG vs. node.js (part 3) Reader is separated from a stream. No accidental reads to disrupt a pipeline. “Revealing constructor pattern” is used. The same advantages and drawbacks as ES6 Promise constructor.
  62. 62. WHATWG vs. node.js (part 4) No special Duplexstream. Transformstream is a wrapped pair of Readableand Writable. Totally separate API.
  63. 63. That’s all, folks!