+971581248768>> SAFE AND ORIGINAL ABORTION PILLS FOR SALE IN DUBAI AND ABUDHA...
What Really Works: Reflections on Applied Methods in a Real World Interdisciplinary Project
1. Knowledge Technologies Institute
1
Elisabeth Lex, Peter Kraker, Sebastian Dennerlein 2014
What Really Works: Reflections on Applied Methods
in a Real World Interdisciplinary Project
Elisabeth Lex
Univ. Ass.
Knowledge Technologies Institute
Graz University of Technology, Austria
e-mail: elisabeth.lex@tugraz.at
web: http://elisabethlex.info
2. Knowledge Technologies Institute
2
Elisabeth Lex, Peter Kraker, Sebastian Dennerlein 2014
Overview
Interdisciplinary project Smart Pharma
We combined
• pharmaceutical engineering
• computer science
• psychology
to develop a collaborative pharmaceutical
knowledge management system that fits the
needs of pharmaceutical engineers
3. Knowledge Technologies Institute
3
Elisabeth Lex, Peter Kraker, Sebastian Dennerlein 2014
Our Approach
• We used Bronstein's model of
interdisciplinary collaboration
• Describes components of
optimal collaboration
• Domain Independent
• Strong practical side
4. Knowledge Technologies Institute
4
Elisabeth Lex, Peter Kraker, Sebastian Dennerlein 2014
Real World Setting: Smart Pharma
• Knowledge was generated from large pool of scientific
articles, lab reports, package inserts,..
• Computer scientists: Data mining/Visual Analytics for analysis of
scientic publications and research data
• Algorithms tailored towards pharmaceutical domain with help of
pharmaceutical engineers
• Knowledge about pharmaceutical processes was
transformed into domain and process models
• Psychologist: Expert in modelling, process construction and on how to
design a wiki for collaborative knowledge construction.
• Pharmaceutical engineer: Domain expert
• Validation and feedback: all
5. Knowledge Technologies Institute
5
Elisabeth Lex, Peter Kraker, Sebastian Dennerlein 2014
Implementation 1/2
• Start: Series of face-to-face kick-off meetings
• Then: collaborators reflected and discussed about
the offers separately and met again with new
proposals and ideas
à Iterative, multistage step, helped develop shared understanding
and common goal
• Agreement on common project target and outcome
à Leads to collective ownership of project goals, complementary
subtasks and responsibilities, i.e. interdependence in Bronstein's
model
6. Knowledge Technologies Institute
6
Elisabeth Lex, Peter Kraker, Sebastian Dennerlein 2014
Implementation 2/2
• Two types of interdisciplinary tasks:
• Single-discipline tasks tackled in cooperative manner, e.g. software
development or preparation of domain specic process data
(interdependence component of Bronstein's model)
• Tasks in collaborative manner, i.e. tasks whose fullment relies on
the complementary skill of the disciplines.
• Collaborative tasks tackled by smaller focus teams
à flexibility and newly created professional activities component.
à Iterative sharing of domain knowledge (reflection on process,
flexibility and collective ownership of goals)
à Interdisciplinary trainings
7. Knowledge Technologies Institute
7
Elisabeth Lex, Peter Kraker, Sebastian Dennerlein 2014
Challenges
• Collaborative tasks: require a lot of communication,
face-to-face time to sit and work together and
willingness to learn from each other
• Willingness to share (domain) knowledge: knowledge
means market advantage
• Finding the right tool for communication
• Finding a common language between people from
different domains
• Setting priorities: strategies for the appreciation of
interdisciplinary projects required
8. Knowledge Technologies Institute
8
Elisabeth Lex, Peter Kraker, Sebastian Dennerlein 2014
Lessons Learned
• Bronstein‘s model fits: its components have to be
used for the right task: interdependence for
cooperative phases
• Collective ownershop of goals and newly created
professional activities for collaborative phases
• Reflection on the process and flexibility essential for
both collaborative and cooperative phases
• Extension of the model:
• interdisciplinary trainings
• use of suitable tools and technologies for communication and to
manage goals and expectations
• shared knowledge about the situation, methods and operators
9. Knowledge Technologies Institute
9
Elisabeth Lex, Peter Kraker, Sebastian Dennerlein 2014
Next Steps
• Evaluate the model in the interdisciplinary IP FP7
Learning Layers project
• 4 year project
• Goal: develop tools and infrastructure to scale
informal learning at the workplace
• Co-design activities carried out in interdisciplinary
teams to develop tools for better collaboration
• GPs, nurses, healthcare staff, psychologists, computer scientists,...
• Hypothesis: Phases of collaboration and
cooperations crucial“
Our approach was guided by Bronsteins Model of Collaboration. It describes components of interdisciplinary collaboration between social workers and other professionals: interdependence, newly created professional activities, flexibility, collective ownership of goals, and reflection on process. Part two of the model consists of four influences on collaboration: professional role, structural characteristics, personal characteristics and a history of collaboration.
Each collaborator presented her domain and viewpoint on the interdisciplinary teamwork, resulting in a mutual offer from each discipline.
For example, a
psychologist regularly collaborated face-to-face with a phar-
maceutical engineer to understand the main concepts of the
domain and how they were interlinked. Together, they mod-
elled this domain knowledge, which resulted in a mutual
knowledge transfer about domain knowledge as well as in a
training in modelling.
newly joining persons can be trained to eciently contribute
to interdisciplinary work.