2. DOCUMENT INFORMATION
Document Title : Business Process for CLTD VIDEO STREAMING
Document Number : ICT-CLTD VS 01
Revision Number : 00.0
Author(s) : Mr S Gegana
: Mr N TSOTSO
Date Written : 2011-10-27
Date Revised : 2011-xx-xx
Status : DRAFT
Project Name : CLTD VIDEO STREAMING
Project ID : ICT-CLTD VS 01
DOCUMENT AUTHORISATION
Approved By (Sign)
Name (Capacity) FC Mlungu (Materials Developer (CLTD))
Date Approved 07/11/2011
Approved By (Sign)
Name (Capacity)
Date Approved
Approved By (Sign)
Name (Capacity)
Date Approved
Page | 2
3. REVISION SUMMARY
Rev. No. Paragraph/Summary of Changes Date
1 07/11/2011
STAKEHOLDERS LIST
Name Title Category of Stakeholder
(Refer to Note Below)
N Tsotso Mr R
S Gegana Mr R
C Walker Mr A
M Magewu Mr C
F.C. Mlungu Mr A
S Cwala Mr A
NOTE
R Document Author Name must appear as the author of the document
A Accountable Name must appear as an authorizer in the document
C Must be consulted Name must appear in the RTS of the document
I Must be informed Name must appear in the Distribution List of the document
Page | 3
4. Table of Contents
1. Keywords, Abbreviations and Acronyms ....................................................................... 5
2. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 5
3. scope ............................................................................................................................ 5
4. Purpose......................................................................................................................... 5
5. CURRENT SYSTEM ..................................................................................................... 5
6. PROPOSED SYSTEM .................................................................................................. 6
7. New Requirements ........................................................................................................ 8
7.1Security requirements ........................................................................................... 8
7.2 Support requirements .................................................................................. 8
8. ASSUMPTIONS AND CONSTRAINTS ......................................................................... 8
9. Appendix A: DOCUMENT REVIEW TRACKING SHEET .............................................. 9
Page | 4
5. 1. KEYWORDS, ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS
List all the abbreviations and acronyms used in this document here.
Abbreviations & Acronyms Description
WSU Walter Sisulu University
VS Video Streaming
ICT Information Communication and Technology
2. INTRODUCTION
The video streaming system is a visual system that can play/stream flash videos and mp4
type of videos locally through synchronization.
3.SCOPE
The video streaming system will allow video and audio files to be loaded to the ICT
streaming system by lecturers, and lecturers will create a link in WISeUp which will point to
that particular video/audio in the ICT video streaming system.
4.PURPOSE
The purpose of this document is to:
Introduce a system that will decrease load on the internet bandwidth so as to provide
effective and efficient video sharing platform.
Have a system that will make it easy for students to download and view videos for
lecturers and students, possible such videos can be transferred to their portable
devices.
5.CURRENT SYSTEM
The current system uses WISeUp to load videos which offers mpeg, avi and quicktime
videos, these video formats occupy a lot of space and they are not easy to view or
download. With this current system the video take too long to open and sometime would not
open.
Page | 5
6. 6. PROPOSED SYSTEM
A visual system that can play/stream flash videos and mp4 type of videos locally (per
campus) through synchronization. A system that will make it easy for students and lecturers
to view and download videos, possible such videos be transferred to their portable devices
so as to promote blended learning. Lecturers will be able to download videos and place them
on localized servers.
View and
Lecturer Upload Student
Download
Video Streaming Learning Material
Services Services
Click the link
Link Created Download and
Load Video to view the
on WiSeUp Save Videos
Video
ICT Video
Streaming WiSeUp
System
Figure1. Business Process for CLTD VIDEO STREAMING SYSTEM
Page | 6
7. Business Process for CLTD VIDEO STREAMING SYSTEM
Title CLTD video streaming system
Description Video Streaming
Primary Actor Student
Secondary Actor Lecturer
Preconditions: User stream/Play video
Post conditions: User easily view and download video
Main Success Scenario 1. Lecturers will upload videos in the ICT Video
Streaming System.
2. Lecturers will save the videos/audio in a
localized server so as to decrease load on the
internet bandwidth.
3. Once the video has been successfully
uploaded on a local server, the students will
view and download a video through a link on
WiSeUp system.
4. The student will either view or save the video
in their portable devices.
Business rules The ICT Video Streaming will allow lecturers to
upload videos.
The students will only view and download videos
from WiSeUp.
The system should play .flv video files and .mp4
video files formats
6.1 SUMMARY OF IMPROVEMENTS
The video streaming system that can play/stream flash videos and mp4 type of videos locally
through synchronization. The system will allow user to easily download and view videos.
The user will download videos and place them on a localized server so as decrease load on
the internet bandwidth. To provide an efficient video sharing platform.
Page | 7
8. To help support lecturers and students in learning and teaching through digital inclusion by
way of multimedia.
7.NEW REQUIREMENTS
7.1Security requirements
The system will be accessed by students and lectuers.
7.2 Support requirements
The ICT department will be responsible to support the infrastructure of the system.
8.ASSUMPTIONS AND CONSTRAINTS
The system won’t take long to implement and the project will be completed using tools and
techniques adopted by WSU. The proposed system will best fit in our infrastructure.
Page | 8
9. 9. APPENDIX A: DOCUMENT REVIEW TRACKING SHEET
It is of vital importance that all reviewers indicate their rating when completing the Review
Tracking Sheet. The following ratings apply:
Rating 1: Full agreement (Agree with the content of the document with no input /
comments other that typographical or semantic corrections – document can be
submitted for approval)
Rating 2: Provisional/conditional agreement (Agree with the content this far but
recommends certain changes/inputs, which are to be indicated in the Remarks
column – document needs to be updated with the reviewers comments, version
stepped and submitted to all reviewers for a further review. This process will be
repeated until such time as all reviewers provide a rating 1)
Rating 3: Rejection (Do not agree at all – need to be discussed)
Name Capacity Rating
Mr C Walker Director
Remarks:
Actions Taken:
Name Capacity Rating
Mr M Magewu Deputy Director
Remarks:
Actions Taken:
Name Capacity Rating
Mr F.C Mlungu Materials Developer
Remarks:
Actions Taken:
Name Capacity Rating
Mr L.S. Cwala E-Administrator
Remarks:
Actions Taken:
Note 1: No document can be distributed for approval before the ratings, remarks and
actions taken have been duly completed on the above RTS.
Note 2: The reviewers’ rating cannot be considered as approval.
Note 3: If an issue or dispute between the reviewers arises, the approval authority’s
approval shall govern the issue or subject matter and overrule the ratings captured in
the RTS.
Page | 9
