Agile Testing and Test Management Collide
•Descargar como KEY, PDF•
0 recomendaciones•545 vistas
Learn a new Open Source Test (OST) testing approach that will change your world view on how you do testing today. Frank Cohen of PushToTest, Keith Cook, and Sanjay Zalavadia of Zephyr will explain how to repurpose your User Acceptance Testing (UAT) efforts to surface and solve performance bottlenecks and functional issues. These issues are normally caught after you release!
Recomendados
Recomendados
Más contenido relacionado
La actualidad más candente
La actualidad más candente (20)
Destacado
Destacado (17)
Similar a Agile Testing and Test Management Collide
Similar a Agile Testing and Test Management Collide (20)
Más de Clever Moe
Más de Clever Moe (20)
Último
Último (20)
Agile Testing and Test Management Collide
- 1. 85% Pure Agile Testing and Management WHERE TESTING AND TEST MANAGEMENT COLLIDE TestMaker 6 and Zephyr Frank Cohen, +01 408-871-0122, fcohen@pushtotest.com Sanjay Zalavadia, sanjay.zalavadia@getzephyr.com Keith Cook, keith.cook@getzephyr.com June 14, 2011
- 2. Open Source Test Automation Intellectual Property of PushToTest. (c) 2009 All rights reserved. Watch The Screencast ‣“Where Agile Testing and Test Management Collide” ‣http://www.pushtotest.com/agile-testing-test-management ‣http://www.pushtotest.com/screencastcentral
- 3. Open Source Test Automation About PushToTest 3
- 4. Open Source Test Automation About PushToTest 3
- 5. Open Source Test Automation About PushToTest ‣Our Mission: We Test, For A More Reliable World 3
- 6. Open Source Test Automation About PushToTest ‣Our Mission: We Test, For A More Reliable World ‣Make It Easier To Move From Manual To Automated Testing 3
- 7. Open Source Test Automation About PushToTest ‣Our Mission: We Test, For A More Reliable World ‣Make It Easier To Move From Manual To Automated Testing ‣Support Advanced Testing, including Agile, Load, Integration 3
- 8. Open Source Test Automation About PushToTest ‣Our Mission: We Test, For A More Reliable World ‣Make It Easier To Move From Manual To Automated Testing ‣Support Advanced Testing, including Agile, Load, Integration ‣Open Source Testing (OST) For Everyone 3
- 9. Open Source Test Automation Intellectual Property of PushToTest. (c) 2009 All rights reserved. Team ‣fcohen@pushtotest.com Founder, PushToTest Frank Cohen, CEO and ‣Zephyr, Zalavadia Professional Services Sanjay Director of sanjay.zalavadia@getzephyr.com ‣Zephyr, VP of Sales and Business Development Keith Cook keith.cook@getzephyr.com
- 10. Open Source Test Automation Slides on Twitter ‣http://twitter.com/fcohen ‣Please retweet ‣Please follow me ‣#ost 5
- 11. Open Source Test Automation 6
- 12. Open Source Test Automation Test Management 6
- 13. Open Source Test Automation 7
- 14. Open Source Test Automation Open Source Testing (OST) 7
- 15. Open Source Test Automation Why An OST Alternative? ‣the Internet Professional does a great job for testing a small part of HP QuickTest ‣Functional Testing (Smoke, Regression, Integration) ‣Windows using ActiveX ‣Flash, Flex ‣MS Internet Explorer ‣Web 2.0 with Coding Effort ‣Best Money Can Buy 8
- 16. Open Source Test Automation OST For Everywhere Else ‣Open Source Testing Tools ‣TestMaker Object Designer ‣Selenium ‣Sahi ‣Unit Tests (Java, Ruby, Python, PHP) ‣Record in WebKit based browsers (Chrome, Safari, Opera), IE, Firefox ‣Agile Testing, Agile Performance Testing and Production Monitoring ‣Rich Internet Applications (RIA,) Mobile, Pads ‣OST For Everyone (Developers, Testers, Business Managers) 9
- 17. Open Source Test Automation OST Architecture Application Under Test Web, RIA, BPM, SOA 10
- 18. Open Source Test Automation OST Architecture Application Under Test Web, RIA, BPM, SOA Continuous Integration Test Management 10
- 19. Open Source Test Automation OST Architecture Application Under Test Web, RIA, BPM, SOA Continuous Integration Test Management 10
- 20. Open Source Test Automation OST Architecture Application Under Test Web, RIA, BPM, SOA Test Operation Console Designer Grid and Cloud Repository Results Analysis Record/Playback Test Deployment MySQL RDBMS Business Intelligence Tool Continuous Integration Test Management 10
- 21. Open Source Test Automation OST Architecture Application Under Test PTTMonitor Web, RIA, BPM, SOA CPU, Net, Memory Test Injector Bundles ScriptRunners Data Production Libraries MySQL, HtmlUnit Sahi, Selenium, SoapUI, Java csv files, rdbms queries Test Operation Console Designer Grid and Cloud Repository Results Analysis Record/Playback Test Deployment MySQL RDBMS Business Intelligence Tool Continuous Integration Test Management 10
- 22. Open Source Test Automation Where To Go From Here ‣Sanjay Zalavadia, sanjay.zalavadia@getzephyr.com ‣Keith Cook, keith.cook@getzephyr.com ‣Watch A Screencast and Tutorial ‣http://www.pushtotest.com/screencastcentral ‣Attend An Open Source Test Workshop ‣http://workshop.pushtotest.com ‣Ask For A Proposal on Licenses, Training, Support, Consulting ‣Call +01 408 871 0122, sales@pushtotest.com 11
Notas del editor
- \n
- \n
- We’re planning some very big changes in our technology.\nBecause over the past 6 months we’ve seen some very big changes in our customers.\n
- We’re planning some very big changes in our technology.\nBecause over the past 6 months we’ve seen some very big changes in our customers.\n
- We’re planning some very big changes in our technology.\nBecause over the past 6 months we’ve seen some very big changes in our customers.\n
- We’re planning some very big changes in our technology.\nBecause over the past 6 months we’ve seen some very big changes in our customers.\n
- We’re planning some very big changes in our technology.\nBecause over the past 6 months we’ve seen some very big changes in our customers.\n
- We’re planning some very big changes in our technology.\nBecause over the past 6 months we’ve seen some very big changes in our customers.\n
- We’re planning some very big changes in our technology.\nBecause over the past 6 months we’ve seen some very big changes in our customers.\n
- We’re planning some very big changes in our technology.\nBecause over the past 6 months we’ve seen some very big changes in our customers.\n
- We’re planning some very big changes in our technology.\nBecause over the past 6 months we’ve seen some very big changes in our customers.\n
- We’re planning some very big changes in our technology.\nBecause over the past 6 months we’ve seen some very big changes in our customers.\n
- We’re planning some very big changes in our technology.\nBecause over the past 6 months we’ve seen some very big changes in our customers.\n
- We’re planning some very big changes in our technology.\nBecause over the past 6 months we’ve seen some very big changes in our customers.\n
- \n
- Your slides from todays “Where Testing and Test Management Collide” webinar are at http://www.slideshare.net/agoucher/youre-doing-it-wrong\n
- \n
- \n
- HP QuickTest Professional runs only in Windows environments. It relies on largely obsolete Windows-only technologies such as ActiveX\nQTP cannot test with all browser types and versions. In particular it does not support Webkit based browsers such as Chrome and Safari, or Opera\nHigh licensing costs often mean that the tool is not widely used in an organization, but instead is limited to a smaller testing team. This encourages a siloed approach to QA/testing where testing is performed as a separate phase rather than a collaborative approach where QA/testers work closely with the business and development teams (as is advocated by newer agile approaches to software development\n$6000 USD Per Seat, Plus $1500 Annual Maintenance\n
- HP QuickTest Professional runs only in Windows environments. It relies on largely obsolete Windows-only technologies such as ActiveX\nQTP cannot test with all browser types and versions. In particular it does not support Webkit based browsers such as Chrome and Safari, or Opera\nHigh licensing costs often mean that the tool is not widely used in an organization, but instead is limited to a smaller testing team. This encourages a siloed approach to QA/testing where testing is performed as a separate phase rather than a collaborative approach where QA/testers work closely with the business and development teams (as is advocated by newer agile approaches to software development\n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n
- \n