Sean McClowry, General Manager - Knowledge Management / ICT Services, and Dr Klaas Alphen, Senior Advisor, CCS Projects, presented at the Global CCS Institutes Members Meeting (Rotterdam 2011).

1. SHARING NEW INFORMATION FROM PROJECTS AROUND THE WORLD Sean McClowry – General Manager, Knowledge Management 10 May 2011 WWW.GLOBALCCSINSTITUTE.COM

2. 1 INTRODUCTION Framework We have created an advanced framework on which we are executing Content We have valuable knowledge to share from projects, content partners and the Institute Platforms We have developed sophisticated digital platforms to enhance dissemination and collaboration Engagement We need your participation to make this work

3. 2 OUR MISSION: share knowledge to accelerate deployment of CCS Measure and Review

5. KNOWLEDGE TOPICS COVERED 4

6. FUNDED PROJECTS: Examples of recent deliverables from RCI and Tenaska Trailblazer 5

7. FUNDED PROJECTS: Upcoming deliverables from Europe 6

8. FUNDED PROJECTS : Upcoming deliverables from North America 7

9. FUNDED PROJECTS: Accessing key deliverables 8

10. 9 GLOBAL STATUS OF CCS: 2010

12. Takes a CCS project application through the approval process in a regulatory test exercise.

13. Suitable for national and regional governments.

14. Produced by SCCS researchers on behalf of the Scottish Government and supported by the Institute.10

16. Resources and governance;

17. Stakeholder engagement;

18. Regulatory analysis; and

19. Preparation for the event.

20. A one-day workshop allows stakeholders to test the regulatory system using a selected CCS project (real or simulated).

21. Managed follow-up to communicate exercise findings, agree actions and deliver benefits is critical.11

23. Each CCS project and community is unique:

24. Every project requires an tailored engagement process.

25. Regions may have vastly different approaches.

26. Consistent themes are emerging on areas of importance:

27. Establish effective levels of trust with local communities.

28. Communicate the case for CCS with balanced information in an ongoing dialogue with local stakeholders.

29. Ensure that outreach activities reflect a partnership approach involving joint decision making.

30. Understand the local context and identify the social value proposition.12 SHARING KNOWLEDGE ON PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT

32. A practical guide for project proponents to plan their engagement .

33. Provides a range of methods and activities for addressing social considerations for successful CCS project deployment.

34. Built from real case studies .

35. Will improve over time as it is used by more projects.13 SHARING KNOWLEDGE ON PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT: Toolkit

36. 14 SHARING KNOWLEDGE ON PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT: Toolkit

38. Information Gathering

39. Initial local contact

40. Public announcement

41. Legislative Briefings

42. Stakeholder Identification

43. Jobs

44. Information Gathering

45. Value Proposition15 SHARING KNOWLEDGE ON PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT: Tenaska Trailblazer

47. Community Representative

48. Project Website/E-mail

49. Civic Group Presentations

50. Earned Media

51. Open House

52. Advertising

53. Air Quality Permit

54. Water Conservation

55. Legislative Outreach16 SHARING KNOWLEDGE ON PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT: Tenaska Trailblazer

56. 17 SHARING KNOWLEDGE ON PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT: Tenaska Trailblazer

58. Tenaska Trailblazer Report

59. Communications and Engagement Toolkit for CCS Projects

60. Case Studies:

61. What happened in Barendrecht?

62. Carson CCS

63. FutureGen

64. CO2CRC Otway Project Case Study

65. ZeroGen

66. Towards a Public Communication and Engagement Strategy ... (Scottish Centre for Carbon Capture)

67. Best Practices for Public Outreach and Education for Carbon Storage (US DoE)

68. Community Engagement Guidelines (WRI)18 SHARING KNOWLEDGE ON PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT: Learn more

70. Conversations

71. Opinions

72. Toolkits

74. Involves about key staff of ~15 major CCS-related organisations in Japan.

75. Collaboration is face-to-face and on the Institute’s extranet.

76. Facilitators include JGC and its partners (Quintessa, AIST and McKinley).

77. Focused on identifying decisions and sharing knowledge on

78. National energy portfolio changes after the earthquake, tsunami and nuclear crisis.

79. Role of CCS in a revised national energy portfolio, e.g., enhancement of the fossil power stations.

80. Risks associated with earthquakes and tsunamis on underground storage of CCS in Japan.

81. Risk of seismic activity induced by CO2 injection.

82. Will publish a public summary report in August20 HOW WE ENGAGE: Japanese CCS knowledge network

83. HOW WE ENGAGE: OpenCCS project methodology An open and collaboratively developed CCS methodology, covering ... Industry Capture Power Capture Transport Storage Execute Evaluate Operate Define Identify Closure

84. 22 HOW WE ENGAGE: OpenCCS project methodology http://www.globalccsinstitute.com/openccs

85. 23 HOW WE ENGAGE: OpenCCS project methodology

87. Peer recognitionMotivation Willing to publish non-confidential information in exchange for greater access to information from other experts. Contact requirements Wants to be notified about any opportunity to contribute expertise in field. A

88. 25 NEXT STEPS Framework We’ll continue to improve on our approach based on your feedback Content Our library of knowledge products and expertise will grow over time Platform We base our approach around knowledge platforms and will be making many improvements Engagement Success will come with your participation

89. www.globalccsinstitute.com 26