Local Authority Initiatives to rebalance housing stock

1. Glynn Williams Dip.Arch (Hons) RIBA Chartered Architects FEASIBILITY STUDY Using Modern Methods of Construction (MMC) to improve the balance of CHP Housing Stock providing greater flexibility and diversity for tenant accommodation. Chelmer Housing Partnership 25th October 2007 Issue C 8th September 2007 Issue 1

3. Economy

4. Certainty of cost

5. Certainty of delivery

6. Skills shortage

7. Quality of finished product

8. Revisions to Building Regulations

9. Government and environmental initiatives

10. Waste reduction and controlChelmer Housing Partnership 25th October 2007 Issue C 8th September 2007 Issue 1

12. Ensure robust detailing

13. Collaborative working

14. Constantly monitor progress

15. FeedbackChelmer Housing Partnership 25th October 2007 Issue C

17. Cost

18. Time

19. Quality

20. Standard components:

21. Quicker manufacture

22. Design consistency

23. Procurement:

24. Reduced site supervision

25. Simplified inspections

26. Less movement / shrinkage

27. Environmental considerations:

28. Less wastage

29. Reduced impact on neighbourhood

30. Site Safety

31. For operatives

32. For residents and general publicChelmer Housing Partnership 25th October 2007 Issue C 11th Septemer 207 Issue 1

33. Glynn William Dip.Arch (Hons) RIBA Chartered Architects a. Standard MMC pod forming bedroom with optional built in wardrobe unit b. Link section with roof drainage linked to existing guttering c. Small paved plant area allowing shelter and natural light into existing room a c b Light tube (natural light) Alternative pod location for end of terrace properties - Access through store from hallway Existing and proposed plans 3D Visualisations DESIGN STATEMENT Design is based on standardised MMC pod size of 4.0m x 3.3mbedroom (& poss. cup’d with “link” to existing property to retain daylight to existing rooms and providing small plant courtyard. Drainage from new roofs would run into existing gutter and downpipe. Potential to provide water-butt for garden watering Folio 56 – Typical Unit Chelmer Housing Partnership 25th October 2007 Issue C 11th September 2007 Issue 1

34. Glynn William Dip.Arch (Hons) RIBA Chartered Architects a. Standard MMC pod forming bedroom with optional built in wardrobe unit b. Link section with roof drainage linked to existing guttering c. Small paved plant area allowing shelter and natural light into existing room a c b splay at window Existing and proposed plans 3D Visualisations DESIGN STATEMENT Design is based on standardised MMC pod size of 4.0m x 3.3mbedroom (& poss. cup’d with “link” to existing property to retain daylight to existing rooms and providing small plant courtyard. Drainage from new roofs would run into existing gutter and downpipe. Potential to provide water-butt for garden watering Folio 57 – Typical Unit Chelmer Housing Partnership 25th October 2007 Issue C 11th September 2007 Issue 1

36. Site levels

37. Floor levels

38. Eaves/roof levels

39. Services:

40. Manholes

41. Rodding eyes

42. SWVP’s

43. RWP’s

44. Localised conditions:

45. Outbuildings

46. Boundary types – hedges, fences, trees

47. Ground finish and conditions

48. Statutory Approvals:

49. Planning Permission

50. Building Regulations Approval25th October 2007 Issue C 11th September 2007 Issue 1

52. Site Survey

53. Design

54. Planning Application

55. Building Regulations Application

56. Specification

57. Production Information

58. Off Site Pre-Assembly:

59. Typical “link” incl. all fittings & services

60. 4m x 3.3m pod incl. all fittings & services

61. On Site Activities:

62. Ground preparations and outhouse demolitions

63. Delivery and final positioning of pod

64. Installation of “link”

65. Services connections

67. 1d

68. 2d

69. 6-8wks

70. 2d - Building Notice

71. £22,747

72. Following approval

73. £2,535

74. 3d

75. 1d

76. 2d

77. 1d

78. 2dPrepared in conjunction with Adroit Modular Building Systems £26,90810 weeks Excl. 17.5% VAT 25th October 2007 Issue C 11th September 2007 Issue 1