SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 28
Descargar para leer sin conexión
Politics and the
Supreme Court:
From Roe v. Wade to
'Bong Hits 4 Jesus'

Nick Wiebe
Jan. 25, 2008
What is the Supreme Court?

               The only court
                specifically mandated by
                the constitution
               Made up of 9 Judges
               Highest court in the land
               Decide on cases by
                voting
               The group of Judges in
                the majority write the
                binding decision of the
                court
What is the Supreme Court?




th ese i m ag es ar e i n t h e p u b l i c d o m ai n
The Weakest Branch?
So why are people pissed off?

   “Judicial Activism”
    now a major political
    issue
   Justice Sunday
       Attended by
        thousands
       Nationally telecast




                 i m ag e so u r c e: h t tp ://w w w .p er r sp ec t i v es.c o m /i m ag es/u n j u std ay _ 081 005.j p g
The Warren Court (1953-1969)

                Led by Chief Justice Earl
                 Warren
                Decided a series of
                 controversial cases:
                      Brown v. Board of
                       Education, Griswold v.
                       Connecticut, Engel v. Vital,
                       and others

               “I n c i v i l i z ed l i f e, l aw f l o ats i n a sea o f
               eth i c s.” -- E ar l W ar r en
1965: Griswold v. Connecticut
         Connecticut Law prohibited the use of any contraceptive drug
          (but was rarely enforced)
         The Court found the law unconstitutional on the basis that it
          violates the right the right to privacy
         Problem: the right to privacy is not mentioned in the
          Constitution.
                Warren Court rational: right to privacy is part of the
                 “penumbras” of other rights protected by the
                 constitution

“I th i n k th i s i s an
u n c o m m o n l y si l l y l aw .” --
Ju sti c e P o tt er S t ew ar t
th
                              14 Amendment

    “...n o r sh al l an y State d ep r i v e an y p er so n o f l i f e, l i b er ty, o r p r o p er ty,
    w i th o u t d u e p r o cess o f l aw ; n o r d en y to an y p er so n w i th i n i ts
    j u r i sd i cti o n th e eq u al p r o tecti o n o f th e l aw s.” -- T h e F o u r teen t h A m en d m en t


    These lines are know as the due process
     clause and the equal protection clause
    Substantive due process:
          concept of liberty protects an implicit set of rights
          source of a number of 'penumbra' rights (along with
           the Bill of Rights)
1973: Roe v. Wade
   Texas law banned abortion in all cases
   Supreme Court overturned this law, and deemed abortion to be
    a fundamental right, included in the right to privacy
   But:
         States do have an legitimate interest in protecting fetuses,
          though they don't count as persons under the 14th
          amendment
         Court therefore set up a system of trimesters:
                  1st trimester: no State restriction on abortion
                  2nd trimester: State can regulate abortion in ways related
                   to mother's health
              
                   3rd trimester: State can restrict abortion

    i m ag e so u r c e: h ttp ://ev o l v ef i sh .c o m /S h i r tI m ag es/S h i r tI m ag esS m al l /C o at H an g er S l ash -S m al l .g i f
Where does R v. W stand now?

   Some members of the current court seem
    inclined to overturn Roe v. Wade
   But are there five?
   Judges hold life term, and usually don't retire
   To change the make-up of the Supreme Court,
    you need people to die (at the right time)
Antonin Scalia

       Appointed by Ronald
        Regan, 1986
       Conservative Roman
        Catholic
       Death Watch: Age 71
            drinks the blood of orphans
             to keep fit

L aw stu d en t: “H e's j u st i r r i tati n g . H e's l i k e o n e o f
th o se p eo p l e w h o m astu r b ates to S c al i a d ec i si o n s.”
-- O v er h ear d i n N ew Y o r k .c o m
Clarence Thomas

   Appointed by H.W.
    Bush, 1991
   Angry, angry man
   Death Watch: Age 59
       But happy people live
        longer
John Roberts
        Appointed by George
         W. Bush, 2005
        Current Chief Justice
        Handsomest Supreme
         Court Judge?
        Death Watch: Age 52
               Had a seizure last year
    “I w o u l d p r ef er to d i sc u ss S h ak esp ear e's d o u b l e
    en ten d r e an d th e l atu s r ec tu m o f c o n i c sec ti o n s
    w i th o u t a b l o n d e g i g g l i n g an d b l u sh i n g b eh i n d
    m e.”
    -- Jo h n R o b er ts, ag e 1 7
Samuel Alito

       Appointed by George W.
        Bush, 2006
       Scalito?
       very conservative
       Death Watch: Age 57
           If only...
Conservative Legal Philosophies

   Textualism
       Looks at the meaning
        of the words in a
        piece of legislation
   Originalism
       Looks to the intent of
        the legislators
   Judicial restraint
2007: Morse v. Frederick

   High School students were
    suspended for displaying this
    banner outside the school
    grounds during a school
    event
   Court ruled this not a
    violation of 1st amendment
    right to free speech since the
    sign advocated illegal drug
    use (which the school has an
    interest in discouraging)
   Decision based (partially) on
    originalist reasoning
Ruth Bader Ginsburg

             Appointed by Bill
              Clinton, 1993
             Perhaps the most
              liberal
             Silliest Glasses?
             Death Watch: Age 74
                 Cancer survivor
Steven Breyer


   Appointed by Bill
    Clinton, 1994
   ?
   Death Watch: Age 69
John Paul Stevens

   Appointed by Gerald
    Ford, 1975
   Old
   So Old
   Death Watch: Age 87
       Very Old
David Souter

          Appointed by George
           H.W. Bush, 1990
          Proved less conservative
           than expected
          Death Watch: Age 68
                 revenge killing by G.H.W
                  Bush?


    “S o u ter 's sty l e i s n o ti c eab l y n o n -l eg al ”
    -- C o n ser v ap ed i a
Anthony Kennedy

   Appointed by Ronald
    Regan, 1988
   Swing voter
   Hard to predict
   Death Watch: Age 71
       worn out from both
        sides perpetually
        sucking up to him?
2003: Lawrence v. Texas

      Texas law criminalized homosexual sodomy
      The Court ruled overturned this law (and all
       similar laws in other states)
      Legal basis: Substantive due process
            Ruled that state had no legitimate interest in
             banning gay sex
            However, did not extend suspect classification to
             sexual orientation

“T o d ay ’s o p i n i o n i s th e p r o d u c t o f a C o u r t... th at h as l arg el y si g n ed o n to th e so -
c al l ed h o m o sex u al ag en d a” -- Ju sti c e A n to n i n S c al i a
Suspect Classification and Strict Scrutiny

   Legislation often singles out a group of citizens
    (e.g. the unemployed)
   Equal protection clause guarantees all people
    equal protection under the law
   How to resolve this?
       For most cases, rational-basis test: Gov't action a
        rational means to a legitimate end
       For cases involving Suspect Classifications (e.g.
        Race):
            Strict Scrutiny: compelling gov't interest, narrowly
             tailored, least restrictive means
2000: United States v. Morrison

   Virginia Tech student raped by Antonio
    Morrison
       She filed suit against him under Violence Against
        Women Act
            allows victim of gender-motivated violence to sue their
             attacker in civil court
Commerce Clause

    “T h e C o n g r ess sh al l h av e p o w er . . . T o r eg u l ate co m m er ce w i th
    f o r ei g n n ati o n s, an d am o n g th e sev er al states, an d w i th th e I n d i an
    tr i b es;” -- A r ti c l e I , S ec ti o n 8, C l au se 3 o f U .S . C o n sti t u t i o n



    Narrow vs. Broad View of the Commerce
     Clause
          Strict limits on what Congress is allowed to legislate
           on?
2000: United States v. Morrison


   is Violence Against Women Act an overreach of
    Congressional power?
   Court ruled that it was, and struck down the act.
2007: Ledbetter v. Goodyear
   Lily Ledbetter worked as a manager for
    Goodyear Tire for 19 years. For all that time,
    she was paid less than her male colleagues
   She sued under Civil Rights Act,
       prohibits discrimination by employers on basis of
        race, religion, gender, etc.
2007: Ledbetter v. Goodyear

   Basic issue: Does the Statute of Limitations
    apply?
       She sued 19 years after initial pay was set
       Claims must be filed not more than 180 days after
        discrimination took place
   Court ruled that continued effect of an act of
    discrimination does not reset Statute of
    Limitations

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente

Unit 5 judicial branch academic
Unit 5   judicial branch academicUnit 5   judicial branch academic
Unit 5 judicial branch academic
Fredrick Smith
 
Unit 5 judicial branch academic
Unit 5   judicial branch academicUnit 5   judicial branch academic
Unit 5 judicial branch academic
Fredrick Smith
 
Wilson Ch18 19
Wilson Ch18 19Wilson Ch18 19
Wilson Ch18 19
rcambou
 
The Judicial Branch
The Judicial BranchThe Judicial Branch
The Judicial Branch
Dan Hess
 
The Eighth Amendment 2
The Eighth Amendment 2The Eighth Amendment 2
The Eighth Amendment 2
leeann1993
 
01/04/13 RESPONSE To 11/05/12 US Supreme Court Documents Returned
01/04/13  RESPONSE To 11/05/12 US Supreme Court Documents Returned01/04/13  RESPONSE To 11/05/12 US Supreme Court Documents Returned
01/04/13 RESPONSE To 11/05/12 US Supreme Court Documents Returned
VogelDenise
 

La actualidad más candente (20)

36 supreme court-cases
36 supreme court-cases36 supreme court-cases
36 supreme court-cases
 
Judicial Branch
Judicial BranchJudicial Branch
Judicial Branch
 
Unit 5 judicial branch academic
Unit 5   judicial branch academicUnit 5   judicial branch academic
Unit 5 judicial branch academic
 
Unit 5 judicial branch academic
Unit 5   judicial branch academicUnit 5   judicial branch academic
Unit 5 judicial branch academic
 
Why The American Legal System Is Unique
Why The American Legal System Is UniqueWhy The American Legal System Is Unique
Why The American Legal System Is Unique
 
Ch 5 presentation
Ch 5 presentationCh 5 presentation
Ch 5 presentation
 
11&12.judicial branch
11&12.judicial branch11&12.judicial branch
11&12.judicial branch
 
US Case Law Kassahel Augustin
US Case Law Kassahel AugustinUS Case Law Kassahel Augustin
US Case Law Kassahel Augustin
 
ap gov chap 5
ap gov chap 5ap gov chap 5
ap gov chap 5
 
Fourteenth Amendment II Brandon-L-Blankenship
Fourteenth Amendment II Brandon-L-BlankenshipFourteenth Amendment II Brandon-L-Blankenship
Fourteenth Amendment II Brandon-L-Blankenship
 
Wilson Ch18 19
Wilson Ch18 19Wilson Ch18 19
Wilson Ch18 19
 
Job Material
Job MaterialJob Material
Job Material
 
Judicial branch
Judicial branch Judicial branch
Judicial branch
 
The Judicial Branch
The Judicial BranchThe Judicial Branch
The Judicial Branch
 
The Eighth Amendment 2
The Eighth Amendment 2The Eighth Amendment 2
The Eighth Amendment 2
 
Case law project
Case law projectCase law project
Case law project
 
Fourteenth Amendment Brandon-L-Blankenship
Fourteenth Amendment Brandon-L-BlankenshipFourteenth Amendment Brandon-L-Blankenship
Fourteenth Amendment Brandon-L-Blankenship
 
01/04/13 RESPONSE To 11/05/12 US Supreme Court Documents Returned
01/04/13  RESPONSE To 11/05/12 US Supreme Court Documents Returned01/04/13  RESPONSE To 11/05/12 US Supreme Court Documents Returned
01/04/13 RESPONSE To 11/05/12 US Supreme Court Documents Returned
 
Chapter 2 - An Overview of the U.S. Legal System
Chapter 2 - An Overview of the U.S. Legal SystemChapter 2 - An Overview of the U.S. Legal System
Chapter 2 - An Overview of the U.S. Legal System
 
The American legal system: An overview
The American legal system: An overviewThe American legal system: An overview
The American legal system: An overview
 

Similar a Politics and the Supreme Court (15)

John G. Roberts
John G. RobertsJohn G. Roberts
John G. Roberts
 
Human Rights A341- Notes Year 10
Human Rights A341- Notes Year 10Human Rights A341- Notes Year 10
Human Rights A341- Notes Year 10
 
Abortion Choice
Abortion ChoiceAbortion Choice
Abortion Choice
 
The History Of The Death Penalty
The History Of The Death PenaltyThe History Of The Death Penalty
The History Of The Death Penalty
 
Promoting human rights and responsibilities
Promoting human rights and responsibilitiesPromoting human rights and responsibilities
Promoting human rights and responsibilities
 
Roevwadeaapfinal2
Roevwadeaapfinal2Roevwadeaapfinal2
Roevwadeaapfinal2
 
Roevwadeaapfinal2
Roevwadeaapfinal2Roevwadeaapfinal2
Roevwadeaapfinal2
 
Furman at-40
Furman at-40Furman at-40
Furman at-40
 
Death Penalty
Death PenaltyDeath Penalty
Death Penalty
 
4 Sources Of Laws In The US
4 Sources Of Laws In The US4 Sources Of Laws In The US
4 Sources Of Laws In The US
 
PS 101 Civil Liberties & Civil Rights
PS 101 Civil Liberties & Civil RightsPS 101 Civil Liberties & Civil Rights
PS 101 Civil Liberties & Civil Rights
 
The Judiciary
The JudiciaryThe Judiciary
The Judiciary
 
Supreme court
Supreme courtSupreme court
Supreme court
 
5 civil liberties 2 classes
5 civil liberties 2 classes5 civil liberties 2 classes
5 civil liberties 2 classes
 
Chapter6
Chapter6Chapter6
Chapter6
 

Politics and the Supreme Court

  • 1. Politics and the Supreme Court: From Roe v. Wade to 'Bong Hits 4 Jesus' Nick Wiebe Jan. 25, 2008
  • 2. What is the Supreme Court?  The only court specifically mandated by the constitution  Made up of 9 Judges  Highest court in the land  Decide on cases by voting  The group of Judges in the majority write the binding decision of the court
  • 3. What is the Supreme Court? th ese i m ag es ar e i n t h e p u b l i c d o m ai n
  • 5. So why are people pissed off?  “Judicial Activism” now a major political issue  Justice Sunday  Attended by thousands  Nationally telecast i m ag e so u r c e: h t tp ://w w w .p er r sp ec t i v es.c o m /i m ag es/u n j u std ay _ 081 005.j p g
  • 6. The Warren Court (1953-1969)  Led by Chief Justice Earl Warren  Decided a series of controversial cases:  Brown v. Board of Education, Griswold v. Connecticut, Engel v. Vital, and others “I n c i v i l i z ed l i f e, l aw f l o ats i n a sea o f eth i c s.” -- E ar l W ar r en
  • 7. 1965: Griswold v. Connecticut  Connecticut Law prohibited the use of any contraceptive drug (but was rarely enforced)  The Court found the law unconstitutional on the basis that it violates the right the right to privacy  Problem: the right to privacy is not mentioned in the Constitution.  Warren Court rational: right to privacy is part of the “penumbras” of other rights protected by the constitution “I th i n k th i s i s an u n c o m m o n l y si l l y l aw .” -- Ju sti c e P o tt er S t ew ar t
  • 8. th 14 Amendment “...n o r sh al l an y State d ep r i v e an y p er so n o f l i f e, l i b er ty, o r p r o p er ty, w i th o u t d u e p r o cess o f l aw ; n o r d en y to an y p er so n w i th i n i ts j u r i sd i cti o n th e eq u al p r o tecti o n o f th e l aw s.” -- T h e F o u r teen t h A m en d m en t  These lines are know as the due process clause and the equal protection clause  Substantive due process:  concept of liberty protects an implicit set of rights  source of a number of 'penumbra' rights (along with the Bill of Rights)
  • 9. 1973: Roe v. Wade  Texas law banned abortion in all cases  Supreme Court overturned this law, and deemed abortion to be a fundamental right, included in the right to privacy  But:  States do have an legitimate interest in protecting fetuses, though they don't count as persons under the 14th amendment  Court therefore set up a system of trimesters:  1st trimester: no State restriction on abortion  2nd trimester: State can regulate abortion in ways related to mother's health  3rd trimester: State can restrict abortion i m ag e so u r c e: h ttp ://ev o l v ef i sh .c o m /S h i r tI m ag es/S h i r tI m ag esS m al l /C o at H an g er S l ash -S m al l .g i f
  • 10. Where does R v. W stand now?  Some members of the current court seem inclined to overturn Roe v. Wade  But are there five?  Judges hold life term, and usually don't retire  To change the make-up of the Supreme Court, you need people to die (at the right time)
  • 11. Antonin Scalia  Appointed by Ronald Regan, 1986  Conservative Roman Catholic  Death Watch: Age 71  drinks the blood of orphans to keep fit L aw stu d en t: “H e's j u st i r r i tati n g . H e's l i k e o n e o f th o se p eo p l e w h o m astu r b ates to S c al i a d ec i si o n s.” -- O v er h ear d i n N ew Y o r k .c o m
  • 12. Clarence Thomas  Appointed by H.W. Bush, 1991  Angry, angry man  Death Watch: Age 59  But happy people live longer
  • 13. John Roberts  Appointed by George W. Bush, 2005  Current Chief Justice  Handsomest Supreme Court Judge?  Death Watch: Age 52  Had a seizure last year “I w o u l d p r ef er to d i sc u ss S h ak esp ear e's d o u b l e en ten d r e an d th e l atu s r ec tu m o f c o n i c sec ti o n s w i th o u t a b l o n d e g i g g l i n g an d b l u sh i n g b eh i n d m e.” -- Jo h n R o b er ts, ag e 1 7
  • 14. Samuel Alito  Appointed by George W. Bush, 2006  Scalito?  very conservative  Death Watch: Age 57  If only...
  • 15. Conservative Legal Philosophies  Textualism  Looks at the meaning of the words in a piece of legislation  Originalism  Looks to the intent of the legislators  Judicial restraint
  • 16. 2007: Morse v. Frederick  High School students were suspended for displaying this banner outside the school grounds during a school event  Court ruled this not a violation of 1st amendment right to free speech since the sign advocated illegal drug use (which the school has an interest in discouraging)  Decision based (partially) on originalist reasoning
  • 17. Ruth Bader Ginsburg  Appointed by Bill Clinton, 1993  Perhaps the most liberal  Silliest Glasses?  Death Watch: Age 74  Cancer survivor
  • 18. Steven Breyer  Appointed by Bill Clinton, 1994  ?  Death Watch: Age 69
  • 19. John Paul Stevens  Appointed by Gerald Ford, 1975  Old  So Old  Death Watch: Age 87  Very Old
  • 20. David Souter  Appointed by George H.W. Bush, 1990  Proved less conservative than expected  Death Watch: Age 68  revenge killing by G.H.W Bush? “S o u ter 's sty l e i s n o ti c eab l y n o n -l eg al ” -- C o n ser v ap ed i a
  • 21. Anthony Kennedy  Appointed by Ronald Regan, 1988  Swing voter  Hard to predict  Death Watch: Age 71  worn out from both sides perpetually sucking up to him?
  • 22. 2003: Lawrence v. Texas  Texas law criminalized homosexual sodomy  The Court ruled overturned this law (and all similar laws in other states)  Legal basis: Substantive due process  Ruled that state had no legitimate interest in banning gay sex  However, did not extend suspect classification to sexual orientation “T o d ay ’s o p i n i o n i s th e p r o d u c t o f a C o u r t... th at h as l arg el y si g n ed o n to th e so - c al l ed h o m o sex u al ag en d a” -- Ju sti c e A n to n i n S c al i a
  • 23. Suspect Classification and Strict Scrutiny  Legislation often singles out a group of citizens (e.g. the unemployed)  Equal protection clause guarantees all people equal protection under the law  How to resolve this?  For most cases, rational-basis test: Gov't action a rational means to a legitimate end  For cases involving Suspect Classifications (e.g. Race):  Strict Scrutiny: compelling gov't interest, narrowly tailored, least restrictive means
  • 24. 2000: United States v. Morrison  Virginia Tech student raped by Antonio Morrison  She filed suit against him under Violence Against Women Act  allows victim of gender-motivated violence to sue their attacker in civil court
  • 25. Commerce Clause “T h e C o n g r ess sh al l h av e p o w er . . . T o r eg u l ate co m m er ce w i th f o r ei g n n ati o n s, an d am o n g th e sev er al states, an d w i th th e I n d i an tr i b es;” -- A r ti c l e I , S ec ti o n 8, C l au se 3 o f U .S . C o n sti t u t i o n  Narrow vs. Broad View of the Commerce Clause  Strict limits on what Congress is allowed to legislate on?
  • 26. 2000: United States v. Morrison  is Violence Against Women Act an overreach of Congressional power?  Court ruled that it was, and struck down the act.
  • 27. 2007: Ledbetter v. Goodyear  Lily Ledbetter worked as a manager for Goodyear Tire for 19 years. For all that time, she was paid less than her male colleagues  She sued under Civil Rights Act,  prohibits discrimination by employers on basis of race, religion, gender, etc.
  • 28. 2007: Ledbetter v. Goodyear  Basic issue: Does the Statute of Limitations apply?  She sued 19 years after initial pay was set  Claims must be filed not more than 180 days after discrimination took place  Court ruled that continued effect of an act of discrimination does not reset Statute of Limitations