Sample content
Jim’s Case Analysis
BUS 680
1. What are the potential costs to this lack or training? Why do you think the company operated in this manner?
There are many possible costs to this lack of training. First of all, there’s the cost of broker water lines as well as the cost of phone lines. Secondly, there’s the cost of resources and time {required} to go into the hole and repair the utility lines. Thirdly, there’s the cost of lack of morale in the workers linked to repairing broker lines. Fourth, there’s the cost of discontentment in the operators themselves and the operator leaving the job. Lastly, there’s the cost of having the work done inefficiently. All these costs amount to a big problem when on the job site. The workers feel beaten and feel like they must do double the work due to the one worker not doing their job in an efficient way. This can lead to actually losing the excellent workers and keeping the bad workers. In this instan
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
BUS 680 Week 4 Jims Case Analysis 2015 version
1. BUS 680 Week 4 Jims Case Analysis
Link : http://uopexam.com/product/bus-680-week-4-jims-case-analysis/
Sample content
Jim’s Case Analysis
BUS 680
2. 1. What are the potential costs to this lack or training? Why do you think the
company operated in this manner?
There are many possible costs to this lack of training. First of all, there’s
the cost of broker water lines as well as the cost of phone lines. Secondly,
there’s the cost of resources and time {required} to go into the hole and
repair the utility lines. Thirdly, there’s the cost of lack of morale in the
workers linked to repairing broker lines. Fourth, there’s the cost of
discontentment in the operators themselves and the operator leaving the job.
Lastly, there’s the cost of having the work done inefficiently. All these costs
amount to a big problem when on the job site. The workers feel beaten and feel like
they must do double the work due to the one worker not doing their job in an
efficient way. This can lead to actually losing the excellent workers and keeping the
bad workers. In this instance it’s not regarding a bad worker but instead a
badly trained worker. The organization must have taken the time to train the worker
correctly particularly on {this sort of} risky item of equipment.
The organization worked in this way since they thought that the tractor and the
backhoe were completely foolproof. Additionally, the organization thought that the
operators might know the career by learning from mistakes. This was clearly a
wrong stance because the workers were clearly making errors and the organization
only cussed at him and continued his way. The truth that the worker {required to}
search for guidance was a significant issue. The company or administrator must
have been the person to contact him and to assist him when he required it. The
organization felt that the time saved not having the workers through training was
the best idea since they thought the machine to be fool proof. They were obviously
wrong in this presumption.
2. What type of training would you recommend: OJT, classroom, or a
combination? Describe what the training might entail.
The sort of training I would suggest would be a mix of on-job-training and
classroom training. The training would involve teaching the operator the essential
functioning of the tractor and backhoe in a classroom. And in the
http://uopexam.com/product/bus-680-week-4-jims-case-analysis/