Intro for Wageningen UR researchers

1. “Organize your author identities”
Social Media Cafe
6 October 2015, Hugo Besemer & Ellen Fest

2. Scholarly identities
http://viaf.org/viaf/2853922633/
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7274-0000
http://wu.academia.edu/MemyselfandI
http://www.researcherid.com/rid/A-4161-2002
http://www.mendeley.com/profiles/me-myselfandi
http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Me_Myselfandi
http://scholar.google.com/citations?user=3iDBE-MAAAA0
http://academic.research.microsoft.com/Author/34073815
http://www.narcis.nl/person/info:eu-repo/dai/nl/33714253Y
Impressive, uh?

3. What we want to achieve
 Inform your choice which profiles are important for you
 Find the best workflow for you to populate your profiles

4. Content
 “The big picture”
 ORCID
 Search engines (Web of Science – Scopus – Google
Scholar)
 Local systems
 Scholarly social media
 Flows between profiles

5. Content
 “The big picture”
 ORCID
 Search engines (Web of Science – Scopus – Google
Scholar)
 Local systems
 Scholarly social media
 Flows between profiles

6. the online IDENTITY labyrinth
6
We@WUR

7. ID’s from Search engines
Google Scholar - Web of Science - Scopus
• Add personal profile
• Find and claim your publications
+ Calculate your H-index easier
Local registry
Metis → Pure
• Submit papers via your group’s
contact person
+ Overview of Wageningen output
+ Used for visitations, tenure track etc.
ID’s from Social networks
ResearchGate – Academia.edu – Mendeley - Scholarmate
• Add personal file
• Import papers that you want to share
+ Interacting with peers
Local Profile
WE@WUR
• Create profile
• Add ID’s
+ Wageningen UR yellow
pages
+ Online visibility
Integrating ID’s
ORCID
• Create profile
• Add ID’s
+ It is becoming general
+ Identification for funders,
publishers
We@WUR
Staff
Pubs

8. ID’s from Search engines
Google Scholar - Web of Science - Scopus
• Add personal profile
• Find and claim your publications
+ Calculate your H-index easier
Local registry
Metis → Pure
• Submit papers via your group’s
contact person
+ Overview of Wageningen output
+ Used for visitations, tenure track etc.
ID’s from Social networks
ResearchGate – Academia.edu – Mendeley - Scholarmate
• Add personal file
• Import papers that you want to share
+ Interacting with peers
Local Profile
WE@WUR
• Create profile
• Add ID’s
+ Wageningen UR yellow
pages
+ Online visibility
Integrating ID’s
ORCID
• Create profile
• Add ID’s
+ It is becoming general
+ Identification for funders,
publishers
Staff
Pubs

9. ID’s from Search engines
Google Scholar - Web of Science - Scopus
• Add personal profile
• Find and claim your publications
+ Calculate your H-index easier
ID’s from Social networks
ResearchGate – Academia.edu – Mendeley - Scholarmate
• Add personal file
• Import papers that you want to share
+ Interacting with peers
Local Profile
WE@WUR
• Create profile
• Add ID’s
+ Wageningen UR yellow
pages
+ Online visibility
Integrating ID’s
ORCID
• Create profile
• Add ID’s
+ It is becoming general
+ Identification for funders,
publishers
Local registry
Metis → Pure
• Submit papers via your group’s
contact person
+ Overview of Wageningen output
+ Used for visitations, tenure track etc.
Staff
Pubs

10. Content
 “The big picture”
 ORCID
 Search engines (Web of Science – Scopus – Google
Scholar)
 Local systems
 Scholarly social media
 Flows between profiles

11. ORCID is becoming de-facto standard for the
identification of scientists
For publishers
and funders

12. ORCID background
 Open Researcher and Contributor ID
 Registry open since October 2012
 Over 1.5 Million ID’s served (2015-08-03)
 Not-for-profit with members (publishers, institutions)
 Researchers have complete control which information
(and which works) is shared:
= World - Trusted parties - Hidden

14. If you have authored books or reports you
may have an ISNI

15. ISNI => ORCID

16. ISNI => ORCID

17. Background ISNI and ORCID
 ISNI is for the creative industry (people associated with
books, music, TV shows, whatever)
 International Standard Name Identifier
 ORCID is an ISNI (4x4 digits, ORCID has a reserved
range) but:
 ISNI and ORCID registries are maintained by different
organisations, so:
 one person can have both an ISNI and an ORCID
But one ISNI or ORCID can not have
more than one person attached to it

18. Content
 “The big picture”
 ORCID
 Search engines (Web of Science – Scopus – Google
Scholar)
 Local systems
 Scholarly social media
 Flows between profiles

19. Why important?
 calculate your own h-index
 data collection for bibliometric analysis (e.g. job
application)
 populating ORCID
 show on your webpage

20. Scopus Author Identifier
 grouped via an algorithm by Scopus
 1 author can have more Identifiers
 to check: perform an Author Search
 merge Identifiers

22. merge!

24. Scopus Author Identifier
 grouped via an algorithm
 1 author can have more Identifiers
 to check: perform an Author Search
 merge Identifiers
 connect Scopus Author details and publications to
ORCID → orcid.scopusfeedback.com

27. Web of Science (WoS)
 ResearcherID → group your publications in WoS
 register at www.researcherid.com
● perform author search to identify your publications

28. A record set is a set of publications automatically grouped by Web of Science based
on author, subject and affiliation.

30. Web of Science (WoS)
 ResearcherID → group your publications in WoS
 register at www.researcherid.com
● author search to identify your publications
● import function in ResearcherID (WoS, Endnote,
RIS)

32. Web of Science (WoS)
 ResearcherID → group your publications in WoS
 register at www.researcherid.com
● author search to identify your publications
● import function in ResearcherID (WoS, Endnote,
RIS)
● exchange with ORCID

34. Web of Science (WoS)
 ResearcherID → group your publications in WoS
 register at www.researcherid.com
● author search to identify your publications
● import function in ResearcherID (WoS, Endnote,
RIS)
● add your ORCID
 you have to update your ResearcherID regularly!

35. Google Scholar
 largest set of publications → books, book chapters,
reports
 undefined what is in and what not

37. Google Scholar
 largest set of publications → books, book chapters,
reports
 undefined what is in and what not
 verification email-address → at your institution
 search publications (author search) or add manually

39. Google Scholar
 largest set of publications → books, book chapters, reports
 undefined what is in and what not
 verification email-address → at your institution
 search publications (author search) or add manually
 add publications and check!
 make your profile public available

41. Content
 “The big picture”
 ORCID
 Search engines (Web of Science – Scopus – Google
Scholar)
 Local systems
 Scholarly social media

42. Staff Publications - Metis
 registry of all Wageningen UR output
 tenure track & visitations rely on Metis-data
 all your publications linked to your wur-profile
 one author ID in Staff Publications
 go to my library (login) and check your publication list

44. Staff Publications
 registry of all Wageningen UR output
 tenure track & visitations rely on Metis-data
 all your publications linked to your wur-profile
 one author ID in Staff Publications
 go to my library (login) and check your publication list
 perform an advanced author search

48. Staff Publications
 registry of all Wageningen UR output
 tenure track & visitations rely on Metis-data
 all your publications linked to your wur-profile
 one author ID in Staff Publications
 go to my library (login) and check your publication list
 perform an advanced author search
 request to merge your publications under one "MetisNr"
 send email to way.library@wur.nl

49. update WE@WUR
 yellow pages of Wageningen UR
 important for your visibility on the web
 add your author IDs, publications lists, social networks
to your WE@WUR profile

51. Key publications
• link to article
• manually entry
• add picture
Publication lists
• Academia.edu
• Google Scholar Citations
• Narcis
• ResearchGate
• ORCID
• Scholarmate.com
• Scopus
• WageningenUR
• Web of Science
• Other list
Researcher ID's
• ORCID
• METIS-ID
• ISNI
• DAI
• Scopus Author ID
• WoS - ResearcherID
• Google Scholar
Citations

52. Social media
• Facebook • Pinterest
• Flickr • ResearchGate
• Foursquare • Skype
• Google Scholar
Citations
• Twitter
• Google+ • YouTube
• Linkedin • other networks

53. update We@WUR
 add your author IDs, publications lists, social networks
to your we@wur profile
 identify Key Publications
 make your profile public
 improve your online visibility

54. Content
 “The big picture”
 ORCID
 Search engines (Web of Science – Scopus – Google
Scholar)
 Local systems
 Scholarly social media
 Flows between profiles

55. Things you can do on most
networks
• Create a profile
• Follow people and subject
groups
• Request papers from an
authors
• Upload papers to share
them

56. Murray, Meg. "ANALYSIS OF A SCHOLARLY SOCIAL NETWORKING SITE:
THE CASE OF THE DORMANT USER." SAIS 2014 Proceedings (2014).
http://saisconferencemgmt.org/proceedings/2014/Murray.pdf

57. What they offer
Companies Registered users
(latest)
Wageningen users
(24-8-2015, my
estimate)
What’s special
ResearchGate 6 m 559
Good coverage in Scholar
Academia.edu They say 24.191.648 231 Good coverage in Google
Scholarmate 2 m 17
Recommender services
Chinese community
Mendeley 2.5 m 557 Reference manager

58. Users are lazy with their profiles

59. But they upload their papers

60. More research into usage
 Little overlap [1]
 Weak correlation with citedness [1]
 Moderate relationship with traditional metrics and ResearchGate metrics[2]
 Correlation between Mendeley libraries and citedness [3]
 India, Brazil taking advantage of ResearchGate, China and Russia lagging
behind [2]
 Social scientists (at an Indian university) found it more useful than scientists
[4]
 Highly cited European authors do not have profiles [5]

61. Content
 “The big picture”
 ORCID
 Search engines (Web of Science – Scopus – Google
Scholar)
 Local systems
 Scholarly social media
 Flows between profiles

62. Summary

63. ID’s from Search engines
Google Scholar - Web of Science
- Scopus
ris-export
Local registry
Metis → Pure
ID’s from Social networks
Mendeley - ResearchGate
Academia.edu – Scholarmate
Local Profile
WE@WUR
Integrating ID’s
ORCID
direct
direct
Staff
Pubs
direct
BibTeX
BibTeX
addlink

64. Go to:
www.wageningenur.nl/en/Expertise-Services/Facilities/Library/
Expertise/Write-cite/Profiles.htm
to find more information and guides

65. Thanks to Ria,
Marianne, Luzma and
Jan-Willem for using
their profiles
http://www.slideshare.net/hugobesemer
http://www.slideshare.net/EllenFest
65

66. References
 1] Ortega, J. L. (2015). Relationship between altmetric and bibliometric indicators across academic
social sites : The case of CSIC ’ s members. Journal of Informetrics, 9(1), 39–49.
doi:10.1016/j.joi.2014.11.004
 [2] Thelwall, M. Kousha, K (2013) ResearchGate : Disseminating , Communicating and Measuring
Scholarship. Journal of the American Society for information Science
 [3] Li, Xuemei, and Mike Thelwall. "F1000, Mendeley and traditional bibliometric indicators." Proceedings
of the 17th international conference on science and technology indicators. Vol. 2. 2012.
 [4] Chakraborty, N. (2012). Activities and reasons for using social networking sites by research scholars
in NEHU: A study on Facebook and ResearchGate. Planner-2012, 19-27.
 [5] Mas Bleda, A., Thelwall, M., Kousha, K. & Aguillo, I. (2013). European highly cited scientists’
presence in the social web. In J. Gorraiz, E. Schiebel, C. Gumpenberger, M. Hörlesberger and H. Moed
(Eds.), 14th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference (ISSI 2013), (pp. 98-
109). Vienna: Austria.