4. The Rijks Museum found out that yellow copies of
Vermeer’s Milkmaid became so persistent on the web
that visitors started to believe the original was a fake...
See: Pro.europeana.eu/yellow-milkmaid
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
5. At Europeana we used this as a case study to
investigate the risks and benefits of pushing for openly
licensed metadata in the cultural heritage sector
See: Pro.europeana.eu/yellow-milkmaid
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
6. Europeana has been quite successful in aggregating metadata
brary
ch LI
l Dut
Roya
pe ana
TE E uro C
C
L -B
Y-
N
C
APENET
National Archive
Lo
uv
re
2008-2011
rchief
Drents a
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
7. While this had been an essential pre-requisite for access and
distribution....
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
8. It did not allow for re-distribution through Linked Open Data...
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
27. But strong case studies, technical developments and different
performance indicators would alter this equation...
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
28. there is a strong need for real life
examples of increased user
engagement and app development
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
29. We need to redefine performance indicators beyond
visits to the institutions website
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
30. Work needs to be done to connect the information
through semantic relations, persistent identifiers
and improved multi-ligual functionalities
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
31. from september 12 2012 all europeana
metadata have been released under a
CC0 waiver
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
32. But we are not quite there yet...
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
34. Issue 1: in this ‘linear model’, there is not enough sense of
shared ownership and cooperation: can a ‘Commons’ help?
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
35. Issue 2: So far we have opened up metadata. How about the
Content?
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
36. Issue 3: Should there be room for paid services alongside free
resources in the Commons?
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
37. Issue 4: What kind of a governing structure are we talking
about here?
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
39. Can we rethink Europeana as a more collaborative, distributed model?
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
40. should we redefine Europana as the collective wish to make our cultural
heritage available for all to power social and economic growth?
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
41. We could think of Europeana as a collectively owned infrastructure (Cloud)
Where all the partners contribute to the cloud (metadata, (open) content,
software, knowledge)
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
42. bs
La
n
pe
O
mework
Licensing Fra s
model
iness
Bus
EDM
Kno
wled
ge s
har
ing
And Europeana Office acts as the facilitator of this collectively owned
(Europeana Network) space
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
43. e s
u stri
nd
eat ive i
Cr
GLAM
Everyone is invited to act as a distributor by building services on top
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
44. ns ?
m mo
o
r a lC
C ultu
Perhaps we can even call the reusable part of this our contribution to the ‘Cultural
Commons’....
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
45. Recommendations: Europeana should play a role in:
*standardising (data model, licensing, etc.)
* showcase the value (metrics, case studies, ..)
* but be inclusive, complete
*Define (rigid) standards for contributions to the
commons
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
46. Thank you
Harry Verwayen
harry.verwayen@kb.nl
Wednesday, September 19, 2012
47. What kind of innovation do you have in mind?
Value Proposition
Activities Relationship
Resources
<add text>
Stakeholders
Partners Channels
Costs Benefits
Wednesday, September 19, 2012