The political economy of the agricultural negotiations: What to expect? How to move forward?
1. INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE
IFPRI
The Political Economy of
the Agricultural Negotiations:
What to Expect? How to Move Forward?
Eugenio Díaz-Bonilla
“Options for global agricultural trade after Nairobi
Highlights of the 10th World Trade Organization ministerial
conference and next steps.”
February 23, 2016
2. IFPRI
General Context
Heterogeneity across countries/interests
Economic cycles and trends
Different interests, visions, and roles
• Traditional dilemma of agricultural policies:
high prices (helping producers, supply);
low prices (helping consumers, demand)
Economic, political, and legal issues
Page 2
3. IFPRI
Land Structure
Page 3
Land structure: Average size of holdings and concentration
Region/country Average size Gini index
Africa 2.9 0.53
Asia Developing 2.2 0.57
LAC 87.1 0.82
USA 187.0 0.64
EU 27.3 0.59
Japan/Korea 1.1 0.47
Canada 349.1 0.74
Source: FAO.
5. IFPRI
PSEs OECD
Page 5
1995–1999 2000–2004 2005–2009 2010–2014
Developed
countries a
Total USD
billion
218.4 206.5 218.0 217.8
without EU
USD billion
103.9 104.9 91.4 107.6
EU % total 52.4 49.2 58.0 50.6
Japan % total 25.1 23.0 19.1 25.5
US % total 16.1 21.1 15.0 15.4
Developing
countries b
Total USD
billion
15.6 46.5 101.2 282.9
w/o China 13.9 27.3 50.3 78.1
China % total 11.2 41.2 50.3 72.4
a/ The developed countries included are Australia, Canada, European Union, Japan, New Zealand,
Norway, Switzerland, and the United States.
b/ The developing countries included are Chile, Mexico, Turkey, Brazil, China, Indonesia, Kazakhstan,
Russian Federation, South Africa, and Ukraine.
Source: OECD
6. IFPRI
Page 6
3 developed
17 developing
USA
EU, Japan,
Korea,
Switzerland,
Norway
Several groups
of developing
countries:
LDCs
G-33
NorthSouth “Farmers Not
Competitive”
Agriculture is
special
“Farmers
Competitive”
Agriculture
treated as other
sectors
G-20
Cairns Group
Trade Groups
7. IFPRI
Other Actors
Negotiators/diplomats
• Expand own policy space; restrict others.
• Producers’ view; partial equilibrium
• Legal approach
Economists
• Coordination problems: international rules as “public good”
• Welfare measured by consumption; general equilibrium
• Full employment, smooth adjustment vs unemployment, transition costs
Politicians
• Shorter term problems of producers AND consumers
Civil society
• Preference for protectionism (even though is tax on food)
• Developing countries as societies of small farmers with food surpluses
• Market concentration; world economy more volatile
Page 7
8. IFPRI
Conclusions
Two broad narratives in negotiations
• AoA as SDT for industrialized countries
• Developing countries very different; they have a lot of policy
space.
Green Box
• Separate public goods from income support; within the latter
identify social safety net for the poor
Developed countries
• Environmental payments. Truly decoupled income support.
Reduce market protection.
Better categories for SDT?
• Typology food security (Diaz-Bonilla et al 2000; Diaz-Bonilla and
Thomas, 2015, 2016)
• Systemically important countries?
Export restrictions disciplines Page 8
9. IFPRI
Conclusions
Acknowledge problems of small and marginal farmers
in developing countries, particularly SSA and Asia
(“specific factors of production,” unemployment,
transition costs)
• Balance poor consumers and poor producers.
• International income safety net focused on poverty in low income
developing countries? It would also help with SDG1 and SDG2.
Analysis of implications of COP21 and SDGs for
international trading system. Avoid fragmentation of
multilateral trade system (SDG17).
Page 9
10. IFPRI
Conclusions
Acknowledge problems of small and marginal farmers
in developing countries, particularly SSA and Asia
(“specific factors of production,” unemployment,
transition costs)
• Balance poor consumers and poor producers.
• International income safety net focused on poverty in low income
developing countries? It would also help with SDG1 and SDG2.
Analysis of implications of COP21 and SDGs for
international trading system. Avoid fragmentation of
multilateral trade system (SDG17).
Page 9