Indian Dental Academy: will be one of the most relevant and exciting training center with best faculty and flexible training programs for dental professionals who wish to advance in their dental practice,Offers certified courses in Dental implants,Orthodontics,Endodontics,Cosmetic Dentistry, Prosthetic Dentistry, Periodontics and General Dentistry.
On National Teacher Day, meet the 2024-25 Kenan Fellows
Developments in the Occlusal patterns of artificial Teeth / orthodontic continuing education
1. THE DEVELOPMENTS IN THE
OCCLUSAL PATTERNS OF
ARTIFICIAL TEETH
INDIAN DENTAL ACADEMY
Leader in continuing dental education
www.indiandentalacademy.com
www.indiandentalacademy.com
2. CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION.
SPECIFICATIONS OF POSTEROIR
ARTIFICIAL TEETH- BY SEARS AND
PLEASURE.
GROUPS OF ARTIFICIAL TEETH.
HISTORYOF DEVELOPMENT.
EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES.
CONCLUSION.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
3. INTRODUCTION
The occlusal surfaces are the primary
concern in selecting the form of the
posterior teeth.
According to Gysi “ Artificial teeth can
be properly formed only by the
application of the knowledge of the
conditions under which they must
function .”
www.indiandentalacademy.com
4. SPECIFICATIONS FOR POSTERIOR
TEETH FORM-SEARS AND PLEASURE
1. No interferring projections between centric
and eccentric tooth positions to restrict
mandibular movements.
2. It is possible to set them in cross-bite
relationship if necessary.
3. Working occlusal area should be lingually
placed from the ridge crest.
4. It should provide bilateral balance without
sacrificing ideal angle of working occlusal
surface
www.indiandentalacademy.com
5. SPECIFICATIONS(CONT)
5. Bulk of teeth should be sufficient to make
satisfactory contact with tongue and fill
buccal vestibule.
6. All working surfaces should be at right
angles to the direction of closing force.
7. Teeth may be altered by grinding without
losing their mechanical (or) esthetic
advantage
8. Occusal form should permit compensation
for change in ridge relation.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
6. SPECIFICATIONS(CONT)
9. No wells or hollows in which food can
pack.
10.They must present degree of cutting
efficiency required to cut fibrous
foods and thus diminishing trauma to
tissues.
11. Relation of opposing occlusal
surfaces must not interfere with
arrangement of anterior teeth.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
7. GROUPS OF ARTIFICIAL TEETH
Based on occlusal form of posterior
teeth they are Grouped into 2 types
ANTOMIC AND NON-ANTOMIC TEETH
www.indiandentalacademy.com
8. ANATOMIC TEETH
1. Simulate natural
tooth form.
2. Have cuspal height
with varying cuspal
inclines.
3. Three dimensional
intercuspation
4. More efficient in
mastication.
5. Increased
horizontal forceswww.indiandentalacademy.com
9. NON-ANTOMIC TEETH
1. Doesn’t simulate
natural teeth form.
2. No cuspal height
with flat cuspal
form.
3. Two dimensional
Intercupation.
4. Not efficient in
mastication.
5. Decreased
horizontal forces but
increased vertical
forces
www.indiandentalacademy.com
10. 18th
century
In olden days artificial teeth were
carved from stone, wood, ivory,
metal and even human teeth used to
replace lost tooth.
As these are not esthetic,long lasting
and dosen’t perform masticatory
function well, search for an ideal
artifical tooth has began.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
12. TRUBYTE TEETH-Dr.Alfred Gysi
FEATURES:
Teeth had cuspal
angle of 33
degrees,
Transverse ridges
present and were
intended for tight
interdigitation
www.indiandentalacademy.com
13. TRUBYTE TEETH-1913
PRINCIPAL:
Designed to function harmoniously
with incisal and condylar guidances
simulating natural tooth.
ADVATAGES:
1.Simulated natural tooth form.
DISADVATAGES:
1.Dislodgement of denture in severly
resorbed ridges.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
14. CROSS-BITE TEETH(GYSI)-1928
Principle:
“mortar and pestle”
Action by Brenner and
payne.
-Features: Buccal cusps
are grinded.
Disadvantage:
Shifting of denture
bases .
www.indiandentalacademy.com
15. CHANNEL TEETH-SEAR’S(1928)
FEATURES:
Channels run
mesio-distally, with
working occlusal
surface 1mm to
1.5mm width. The
buccal and lingual
plane fall away
from central
horizontal fossa.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
16. SEAR’S CHANNEL TEETH
PRINCIPLE:
For efficient cutting and to prevent denture
base instability channels were created on
occlusal surfaces running mesio-distally
ADVANTAGES:
Free movement in antero-posterior
direction.
DISADVATAGES:
1.Lock and interference in lateral
excursions.
2.No food table.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
18. PRINCIPLE:
To promote shearing action buccal and lingual inclines
were eliminated, which is an outstanding feature of
AVERY brothers teeth.
ADVATAGE:
Shearing of food in lateral excursions
DISADVATAGE:
Food accumulates in buccal vestibule
When food floats over to the balancing side it is
subjected to rubbing action not shearing action.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
19. FRENCH’s posterior teeth(1935)
FEATURES:
Eliminated buccal
cups.
No antero-posterior
cuspal inclines.
Central groove running
in mesio-dista sirection
but with very shallow
bucco-lingul inclines to
reduce lateral thrust
www.indiandentalacademy.com
20. PRINCIPLE:
Design placed the occlusal forces
lingually.
ADVANTAGE:
1.Greater denture stability.
DISADVANTAGE:
1.Did not provide for balancing
contacts in either lateral or
prorusive excursions.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
21. McGRANE’S CUVED CUSP(1936)
FEATURES:
Antero-posterior
lock without buccal
and lingual inclines
www.indiandentalacademy.com
22. PRINCIPLE:
Curved cusp teeth are designed to lock antero-
posteriorly and free laterally in an arc corresponding
to an arbitary radius from each vertical rotational axis
of the right and left condyles.
ADVATAGES:
1.NO TRAUMA TO THE TISSUES ON WORKING SIDE.
2.Shear food in harmonius with lateral condylar
guidance.
DIADVANTAGES:
1.NO METHOD FOR ADJUSTMENT IN CASES WHERE
INTERFERENCES OCCURS.
2.No attempt made to get balanced occlusion.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
23. HALL-INVERTED CUSP(1929)
FEATURES:
No cuspal
inclinations, flat
occlusal
surface,cutting
blades
incorporated in
occlusal carvings,
sluiceways are
included.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
25. INVERTED CUSP TEETH
PRINCIPLE:
Function by simulating the action of
machine used to design cusps.
ADVANTAGE:
1.Decreased horizontal forces on teeth.
DISADVANTAGES:
1.Centrifugal force which clears the cups of
debris is not present in mouth and lower
teeth tend to retain teeth.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
26. NELSON- CHOPPING BLOCK-(1934)
FEATURES:
Flat occlusal surfaces
with numerous ridges.
Ridges on mandibular
teeth run transeversly
and in maxilla they
rum mesio-distally.
ADVANTAGES:
Ridges run
perpendicular to one
another in contact an
efficient shredding and
cutting action was
claimed.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
27. SWENSON-NONLOCK-(1939)
FEATURES:
These are essentially
flat teeth with
sluiceways for
shredding and allowing
food to clear the
occlusal table.
ADVATAGES:
They provided
balancing contacts.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
28. HARDY’S-VO (1946)
Vitallium occlusal (VO)
metal insert placed in
upper and lower teeth
A narrow zigzag of
vitallium ribbon was
embeded on the
occlusal surface and
ran mesio-distally
establishing a
narrow,flat, convoluted
metal surface that was
raised slightly above
encasing the resin
www.indiandentalacademy.com
29. HARDY’S-VO- TEETH
ADVATAGES:
1.Better chewing
efficiency.
DISADVANTAGE:
1.Tongue irritation due to
metal insert.
MODIFIED HARDY’
TEETH:
Raising the plastic which
is molded around the
insert so it is high
enough on lingual
surface to prevent
tongue making contact.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
30. EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES TO
EVALUATE CHEWING EFFICIENCY
OF DIFFERENT ARTIFICIAL TEETH
THOMPSON- In 1937 tested 33 degree cusp
teeth,20 degree teeth, Hall’s teeth, and
Sear’s channel teeth.
He found Sear’s channel teeth were least
efficient .
SOBOLICK-In 1938 tested on duplicate
dentures with different occlusal forms for
each individual and ranked their effeciency
in following order,Halls inverted cusp,true-
kusp,french’s and lastly tru-byte teeth.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
31. OTHER POSTERIOR TEETH WITH
DIFFERENT OCCLUSAL FORMS
MYERSON; SHER-CUSP- 1951
COOK ; COOKS METAL- 1952
DEVAN ; NEUTROCENTRIC- 1954
BRADER ; CUTTER BAR - 1957
FRUSH ; LINEAR OCCLUSAL- 1967
www.indiandentalacademy.com
32. CONCLUSION
As various posterior teeth different occlusal
forms has evolved, It is the clinician
responsibility to choose suitable teeth with
occlusal form for a particular patient
keeping following in mind
1. Health and preservation of supporting
tissues.
2. Denture stability.
3. Forces directed to the ridge.
4. Masticatory efficiency.
5. Esthetics and phonetics.
www.indiandentalacademy.com
33. For more details please visit
www.indiandentalacademy.com
www.indiandentalacademy.com