Sara Bird is an education officer at Newcastle University Library who runs an outreach program to improve secondary school students' information literacy skills and prepare them for university. The program has worked with over 5,000 students over 3 years. Sessions cover topics like evaluating sources, avoiding plagiarism, and using library resources. Feedback shows the sessions raise awareness of reliable research techniques and help the transition to higher education. The goal is to develop information literacy early and foster collaboration between school and university librarians.
6. Background
• Request for research session from one teacher
– Trial of new EPQ
– Awareness of lack of Information Literacy in
Secondary Schools
– Growing problems with transition from Year 13 to
undergraduate
– Newcastle University mission statement
14. Reflection through…..
• Thinking skills
– Forced to stop and think
– Have to come to a decision
• Collaborative
• Be able to justify decision
• No right or wrong answer
– Great for debrief
21. Feedback
• Bristol Online Survey
– Ask all teachers to fill in online feedback (not all
do)
– Mix of quantitative and qualitative feedback
• Have started to try to capture feedback on the
day
25. Research ‐ EQUATE
• Stage 1 – Year 10 GCSE History (mixed ability)
– Mantle of the expert
– Research Renaissance medicine
– Write and present presentation
– We would research their research techniques
– pre‐questionnaire, snowboard, drawing of a
library, turning point, observation
27. Research: preferred resources to use
for research
• Have to accept that students will always use google….but
• raised awareness of reliability
• raised awareness of other resources and their reliability, e.g.
encyclopaedias
28. Research ‐ EQUATE
• Stage two – Year 12 EPQ students
– Taught information literacy session as described
earlier
– less detailed study to see if their research habits
change through our intervention
29. Research – most used resources for research
Pre‐visit Post‐visit
• Pre‐visit: internet was the most popular, with google being the most favoured, followed
by reputable websites and wikipedia
• The most notable change was the increase in value of the library
• Surprisingly people dropped in popularity – this may be due to the students being more
information literate and not feeling they needed the support of people as much.
• Post‐visit: other than google there appeared to be a general raised awareness of the
usefulness of all the resources
30. Impact: general
• Harder to show
– “This visit is now incorporated into the International
Relations A2 course” (History A level teacher)
– “….Hearing Uni staff reinforcing what we’ve said is
invaluable and forces students to start taking their
research seriously.” (school librarian)
– “It’s always great and we will be back for next year.
It’s essential for our EPQ students.” (teacher)
31. Impact: research
• Treating them as university students introduced
them to a new learning environment, which for
some was aspirational.
• We can never stop them using Google and
Wikipedia, but we can raise awareness of the need
for reliability, cross‐referencing and
trustworthiness.
• It is never too early or too late to intervene in
developing students' research skills.
32. Impact: research
• The visit to our university library had a huge impact
on students' awareness of what resources a
university library can offer
• Students' raised awareness of the need to use
reliable and trustworthy resources when carrying
out research
• Being given the opportunity to do independent
research helped make them into independent
learners (we hope!)
34. Our Purpose
• Develop Information Literacy skills in school
from an early age.
• Encourage the sharing of good teaching
practice between library staff in the school
and Higher Education sectors.
• Produce an online
teaching toolkit.
Bridging the Divide
35. Shadowing
schemes in the
Online local area to
promote the
surveys differences across
the sector.
User perception of
Focus Information
Groups Literacy through
sessions taught
and observed