SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 39
Descargar para leer sin conexión
Measure 06 
typ*: 
TM 
length: 
5,4 km 
average traffic volume 
public transport 
on measure: 
30000 persons per 24h 
maximum traffic volume 
public transport 
on measure: 
38600 persons per 24h 
minimum traffic volume 
public transport 
on measure: 
15000 persons per 24h 
The traffic Volume results from the 
Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will 
be different when framework 
conditions (e.g. structural data or 
road network with several 
measures) will change 
The optimistic scenario includes an 
equal supply in Marschrutkas like 
in the analysis. If the supply in 
Marschrutkas will be reduced, 
there will be shiftings in the traffic 
demand to other means public 
transport. 
TM - Tramway 
TB - 
short description: 
comment: 
benefit: 
traffic performance: 
time in traffic: 
CO2 - emission: 
ranking: 
roughly cost estimation 
based on general 
characteristic cost 
values, maintenance 
costs about 20 years 
estimated tamm waggon 
costs are based on 1 mio. 
UAH for a used tram 
investment costs: 
Trolleybus 
difference between realization case and no 
realization case 
19,2 Mio. Person-km/year 
347,2 Tsd. Person-h/year 
-1926,1 t/year 
79,7 Mio. UAH 
57,8 Mio. UAH 
The difference in traffic 
volume between 
realisation case and no-realisation 
case refers to 
one single measure in the 
optimistic scenatio 2030. 
The Ranking is based on 
the Dynamic Prime Costs 
for the CO2-Emissions. 4 
maintenance costs: 
total costs: 
Costs for additional need 
of tram waggons: 
Tramway line 4 
* Types: 
Tramway track to Sykhiv from the existing end point stop vul. Mushaka vul. V. Stusa, Prospekt Chervonoy Kalyny 
to Sykhiv 
137,5 Mio. UAH 
7 Mio. UAH 
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.1 page 1/13
Measure 07 
typ*: 
TM 
length: 
3.2 km 
average traffic volume 
public transport 
on measure: 
15600 persons per 24h 
maximum traffic volume 
public transport 
on measure: 
15600 persons per 24h 
minimum traffic volume 
public transport 
on measure: 
15600 persons per 24h 
The traffic Volume results from the 
Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will 
be different when framework 
conditions (e.g. structural data or 
road network with several 
measures) will change 
The optimistic scenario includes an 
equal supply in Marschrutkas like 
in the analysis. If the supply in 
Marschrutkas will be reduced, 
there will be shiftings in the traffic 
demand to other means public 
transport. 
TM - Tramway 
TB - 
short description: 
comment: 
benefit: 
traffic performance: 
time in traffic: 
CO2 - emission: 
ranking: 
Tramway line 4 
* Types: 
Tramway track: Sykhiv, vul. Vernadskoho, Bus terminal vul. Stryyska 
Trolleybus 
difference between realization case and no 
realization case 
8.8 Mio. Person-km/year 
73.8 Tsd. Person-h/year 
-889.4 t/year 
6 
49.1 Mio. UAH 
21.6 Mio. UAH 
70.7 Mio. UAH 
The difference in traffic 
volume between 
realisation case and no-realisation 
case refers to 
one single measure in the 
optimistic scenatio 2030. 
The Ranking is based on 
the Dynamic Prime Costs 
for the CO2-Emissions. 
roughly cost estimation 
based on general 
investment costs: characteristic cost 
values, maintenance 
maintenance costs: 
costs about 20 years 
total costs: 
estimated tamm waggon 
costs are based on 1 mio. 
UAH for a used tram Costs for additional need 
of tram waggons: 3 Mio. UAH 
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.1 page 2/13
Measure 08 
typ*: 
TM 
length: 
3.2 km 
Tramway line 3 and line 5 
average traffic volume 
public transport 
on measure: 
12700 persons per 24h 
(Line 3) 
9800 persons per 24h 
(Line 5) 
maximum traffic volume 
public transport 
on measure: 
12700 persons per 24h 
(Line 3) 
9800 persons per 24h 
(Line 5) 
minimum traffic volume 
public transport 
on measure: 
12700 persons per 24h 
(Line 3) 
9800 persons per 24h 
(Line 5) 
* Types: 
TM - Tramway 
TB - 
short description: 
comment: 
The optimistic scenario includes an equal supply in Marschrutkas like in the analysis. If the supply in Marschrutkas will be reduced, 
there will be shiftings in the traffic demand to other means public transport. 
benefit: 
traffic performance: 
time in traffic: 
CO2 - emission: 
ranking: 
difference between realization case and no 
realization case 
33.3 Mio. Person-km/year 
589.8 Tsd. Person-h/year 
-3342.9 t/year 
3 
The difference in traffic 
volume between 
realisation case and no-realisation 
case refers to 
one single measure in the 
optimistic scenatio 2030. 
The Ranking is based on 
the Dynamic Prime Costs 
for the CO2-Emissions. 
Trolleybus 
Tramway track: Bus Terminal vul. Stryyska to vul. Knyahyny Olhy 
The traffic Volume results from the 
Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will 
be different when framework 
conditions (e.g. structural data or 
road network with several 
measures) will change 
40.8 Mio. UAH 
18.4 Mio. UAH 
roughly cost estimation 
based on general 
characteristic cost 
values, maintenance 
costs about 20 years 
maintenance costs: 
total costs: 
estimated tamm waggon 
costs are based on 1 mio. 
UAH for a used tram Costs for additional need 
of tram waggons: 
59.2 Mio. UAH 
6 Mio. UAH 
investment costs: 
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.1 page 3/13
Measure 09 
typ*: 
TM 
length: 
6.9 km 6.3 km 
(Line 2) (Line 6) 
average traffic volume 
public transport 
on measure: 
15900 persons per 24h 
(Line 2) 
9200 persons per 24h 
(Line 6) 
maximum traffic volume 
public transport 
on measure: 
27300 persons per 24h 
(Line 2) 
9600 persons per 24h 
(Line 6) 
minimum traffic volume 
public transport 
on measure: 
2900 persons per 24h 
(Line 2) 
400 persons per 24h 
(Line 6) 
TM - Tramway 
TB - 
comment: 
The optimistic scenario includes an equal supply in Marschrutkas like in the analysis. If the supply in Marschrutkas will be reduced, 
there will be shiftings in the traffic demand to other means public transport. 
benefit: 
traffic performance: 
time in traffic: 
CO2 - emission: 
ranking: 
difference between realization case and no 
realization case 
16.7 Mio. Person-km/year 
The difference in traffic 
volume between 
realisation case and no-realisation 
case refers to 
one single measure in the 
optimistic scenatio 2030. 
The Ranking is based on 
the Dynamic Prime Costs 
for the CO2-Emissions. 
Tramway line 2 and line 6 
* Types: 
Reconstruction of Tramway Line 2 and 6 (EBRD) 
The traffic Volume results from the 
Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will 
be different when framework 
conditions (e.g. structural data or 
road network with several 
measures) will change 
short description: 
Trolleybus 
251.2 Tsd. Person-h/year 
-1675.2 t/year 
11 
120.0 Mio. UAH 
141.3 Mio. UAH 
261.3 Mio. UAH 
12 Mio. UAH 
roughly cost estimation 
based on general 
investment costs: characteristic cost 
values, maintenance 
maintenance costs: 
costs about 20 years 
total costs: 
estimated tamm waggon 
costs are based on 1 mio. 
UAH for a used tram Costs for additional need 
of tram waggons: 
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.1 page 4/13
Measure 10 
typ*: 
TM 
length: 
6.9 km 
Trolleybus line 12 
average traffic volume 
public transport 
on measure: 
15900 persons per 24h 
maximum traffic volume 
public transport 
on measure: 
27300 persons per 24h 
minimum traffic volume 
public transport 
on measure: 
2900 persons per 24h 
The traffic Volume results from the 
Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will 
be different when framework 
conditions (e.g. structural data or 
road network with several 
measures) will change 
The optimistic scenario includes an 
equal supply in Marschrutkas like 
in the analysis. If the supply in 
Marschrutkas will be reduced, 
there will be shiftings in the traffic 
demand to other means public 
transport. 
* Types: 
TM - Tramway 
TB - 
comment: 
benefit: 
traffic performance: 
time in traffic: 
CO2 - emission: 
ranking: 
maintenance costs: 
10 
49.1 Mio. UAH 
10.2 Mio. UAH 
3.5 Mio. UAH 
Extension Line 12: to vul. Shevchenka 
105.7 Tsd. Person-h/year 
-453.7 t/year 
Costs for additional 
need of trolleybusses: 
difference between realization case and no 
realization case 
short description: 
Trolleybus 
The difference in traffic 
volume between 
realisation case and no-realisation 
case refers to 
one single measure in the 
optimistic scenatio 2030. 
The Ranking is based on 
the Dynamic Prime Costs 
for the CO2-Emissions. 
roughly cost estimation investment costs: 
based on general 
characteristic cost 
values, maintenance 
costs about 20 years 
total costs: 
estimated tamm waggon 
costs are based on 3,5 mio. 
UAH for a new trolleybus 
investment costs include costs for 
construction of new road 
4.5 Mio. Person-km/year 
59.3 Mio. UAH 
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.1 page 5/13
Measure 11 
typ*: 
TM 
length: 
3.4 km 
Trolleybus line 24 
average traffic volume 
public transport 
on measure: 
5900 persons per 24h 
maximum traffic volume 
public transport 
on measure: 
6900 persons per 24h 
minimum traffic volume 
public transport 
on measure: 
5200 persons per 24h 
The traffic Volume results from the 
Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will 
be different when framework 
conditions (e.g. structural data or 
road network with several 
measures) will change 
The optimistic scenario includes an 
equal supply in Marschrutkas like 
in the analysis. If the supply in 
Marschrutkas will be reduced, 
there will be shiftings in the traffic 
demand to other means public 
transport. 
TM - Tramway 
TB - 
Extension of Line 24: Prospekt Chervonoy Kalyny, vul. Khutorivka to vul. Stryyska 
comment: 
The line 24 in the model goes alternately to vul. Stryyska (measure 11) and to vul. Karbyshev (measure 14). In case the measure 11 
will not be realised it was assumed that all trips go to vul. Karbyshev (measure 14). 
benefit: 
traffic performance: 
time in traffic: 
CO2 - emission: 
ranking: 
maintenance costs: 23.1 Mio. UAH 
The difference in traffic 
volume between 
realisation case and no-realisation 
case refers to 
one single measure in the 
optimistic scenatio 2030. 
The Ranking is based on 
the Dynamic Prime Costs 
for the CO2-Emissions. 
difference between realization case and no 
realization case 
4.7 Mio. Person-km/year 
99.4 Tsd. Person-h/year 
-470.4 t/year 
roughly cost estimation 
based on general 
characteristic cost 
values, maintenance 
costs about 20 years 
total costs: 
estimated tamm waggon 
costs are based on 3,5 mio. 
UAH for a new trolleybus Costs for additional 
need of trolleybusses: 
short description: 
Trolleybus 
35.8 Mio. UAH 
10.5 Mio. UAH 
investment costs does not include 
costs for construction of new road 
* Types: 
12.7 Mio. UAH 
investment costs: 
5 
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.1 page 6/13
Measure 12 
typ*: 
TM 
length: 
4.3 km 
Trolleybus line 24 
average traffic volume 
public transport 
on measure: 
2700 persons per 24h 
maximum traffic volume 
public transport 
on measure: 
5100 persons per 24h 
minimum traffic volume 
public transport 
on measure: 
1000 persons per 24h 
The traffic Volume results from the 
Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will 
be different when framework 
conditions (e.g. structural data or 
road network with several 
measures) will change 
The optimistic scenario includes an 
equal supply in Marschrutkas like 
in the analysis. If the supply in 
Marschrutkas will be reduced, 
there will be shiftings in the traffic 
demand to other means public 
transport. 
* Types: 
TM - Tramway 
TB - 
Extension Line 11/24: vul. Dzh. Vashyngtona, vul. Pasichna, Mayorivka, vul. Medovoy Pechery 
comment: 
The measure 12 was added to the model as independent sub-line of the trolleybus line 24 from vul. Zelena to the end ofvul. Medovoy 
Pechery 
benefit: 
traffic performance: 
time in traffic: 
CO2 - emission: 
ranking: 
maintenance costs: 
19.2 Tsd. Person-h/year 
-105.4 t/year 
13 
16.0 Mio. UAH 
29.2 Mio. UAH 
17.5 Mio. UAH 
Costs for additional 
need of trolleybusses: 
difference between realization case and no 
realization case 
short description: 
Trolleybus 
The difference in traffic 
volume between 
realisation case and no-realisation 
case refers to 
one single measure in the 
optimistic scenatio 2030. 
The Ranking is based on 
the Dynamic Prime Costs 
for the CO2-Emissions. 
roughly cost estimation investment costs: 
based on general 
characteristic cost 
values, maintenance 
costs about 20 years 
total costs: 
estimated tamm waggon 
costs are based on 3,5 mio. 
UAH for a new trolleybus 
investment costs does not include 
costs for construction of new road 
1.0 Mio. Person-km/year 
45.3 Mio. UAH 
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.1 page 7/13
Measure 13 
typ*: 
TM 
length: 
1.0 km 
Trolleybus line 24 
average traffic volume 
public transport 
on measure: 
7200 persons per 24h 
maximum traffic volume 
public transport 
on measure: 
8700 persons per 24h 
minimum traffic volume 
public transport 
on measure: 
5400 persons per 24h 
The traffic Volume results from the 
Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will 
be different when framework 
conditions (e.g. structural data or 
road network with several 
measures) will change 
The optimistic scenario includes an 
equal supply in Marschrutkas like 
in the analysis. If the supply in 
Marschrutkas will be reduced, 
there will be shiftings in the traffic 
demand to other means public 
transport. 
* Types: 
TM - Tramway 
TB - 
Extension of Trolley bus line 24 for 1 Kilometer from cinema in Zone „Santa Barbara“ 
comment: 
benefit: 
traffic performance: 
time in traffic: 
CO2 - emission: 
ranking: 
8 
4.5 Mio. UAH 
maintenance costs: 8.2 Mio. UAH 
The difference in traffic 
volume between 
realisation case and no-realisation 
case refers to 
one single measure in the 
optimistic scenatio 2030. 
The Ranking is based on 
the Dynamic Prime Costs 
for the CO2-Emissions. 
difference between realization case and no 
realization case 
1.2 Mio. Person-km/year 
18.6 Tsd. Person-h/year 
-120.2 t/year 
investment costs does not include 
costs for construction of new road 
estimated tamm waggon 
costs are based on 3,5 mio. 
UAH for a new trolleybus Costs for additional 
need of trolleybusses: 
short description: 
Trolleybus 
12.6 Mio. UAH 
3.5 Mio. UAH 
The measure 13 was added to model as blind line within the trolleybus line. 
roughly cost estimation investment costs: 
based on general 
characteristic cost 
values, maintenance 
costs about 20 years 
total costs: 
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.1 page 8/13
Measure 14 
typ*: 
TM 
length: 
3.3 km 
Trolleybus line 24 
average traffic volume 
public transport 
on measure: 
1400 persons per 24h 
maximum traffic volume 
public transport 
on measure: 
2000 persons per 24h 
minimum traffic volume 
public transport 
on measure: 
1000 persons per 24h 
The traffic Volume results from the 
Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will 
be different when framework 
conditions (e.g. structural data or 
road network with several 
measures) will change 
The optimistic scenario includes an 
equal supply in Marschrutkas like 
in the analysis. If the supply in 
Marschrutkas will be reduced, 
there will be shiftings in the traffic 
demand to other means public 
transport. 
* Types: 
TM - Tramway 
TB - 
Construction of 2.5 km new Trolley bus line from cinema to the existing line on vul. Karbyshev over Sykhiv Bridge 
for passenger transport from Sykhiv - Novyy Lviv, connection of two highly passenger frequented parts of the city 
Sykhiv und Novyy Lviv and shortest Line from Sykhiv in the city centre (Pl. Petrushevycha) over vul. Stusa 
comment: 
The trolleybus line 1 is out of order because of the realised tram line 4. The line 24 in the model goes from the cinema alternately to 
vul. Stryyska (measure 11) and to vul. Karbyshev (measure 14).In case the measure 14 is not realised, it was assumed that all trips go 
tovul. Stryyska (measure 11). 
benefit: 
traffic performance: 
time in traffic: 
CO2 - emission: 
ranking: 
9 
12.3 Mio. UAH 
maintenance costs: 22.4 Mio. UAH 
The difference in traffic 
volume between 
realisation case and no-realisation 
case refers to 
one single measure in the 
optimistic scenatio 2030. 
The Ranking is based on 
the Dynamic Prime Costs 
for the CO2-Emissions. 
difference between realization case and no 
realization case 
3.2 Mio. Person-km/year 
73.4 Tsd. Person-h/year 
-320.5 t/year 
investment costs does not include 
costs for construction of new road 
estimated tamm waggon 
costs are based on 3,5 mio. 
UAH for a new trolleybus Costs for additional 
need of trolleybusses: 
short description: 
Trolleybus 
34.7 Mio. UAH 
10.5 Mio. UAH 
roughly cost estimation investment costs: 
based on general 
characteristic cost 
values, maintenance 
costs about 20 years 
total costs: 
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.1 page 9/13
Measure 16 
typ*: 
TM 
length: 
5.0 km 
Trolleybus line 2 
average traffic volume 
public transport 
on measure: 
3100 persons per 24h 
maximum traffic volume 
public transport 
on measure: 
7200 persons per 24h 
minimum traffic volume 
public transport 
on measure: 
900 persons per 24h 
The traffic Volume results from the 
Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will 
be different when framework 
conditions (e.g. structural data or 
road network with several 
measures) will change 
The optimistic scenario includes an 
equal supply in Marschrutkas like 
in the analysis. If the supply in 
Marschrutkas will be reduced, 
there will be shiftings in the traffic 
demand to other means public 
transport. 
* Types: 
TM - Tramway 
TB - 
Extension Line 2 to vul. Trolleybusna (circle line in 2 directions: Kulparkivska-Naukova-Trolleybusna, V.Velykoho) - 
chance to create new lines to connect Sykhiv) 
comment: 
benefit: 
traffic performance: 
time in traffic: 
CO2 - emission: 
ranking: 
maintenance costs: 
101.6 Tsd. Person-h/year 
-434.8 t/year 
7 
14.9 Mio. UAH 
27.2 Mio. UAH 
7.0 Mio. UAH 
Costs for additional 
need of trolleybusses: 
difference between realization case and no 
realization case 
short description: 
Trolleybus 
The difference in traffic 
volume between 
realisation case and no-realisation 
case refers to 
one single measure in the 
optimistic scenatio 2030. 
The Ranking is based on 
the Dynamic Prime Costs 
for the CO2-Emissions. 
roughly cost estimation investment costs: 
based on general 
investment costs does not include 
characteristic cost 
costs for construction of new road 
values, maintenance 
costs about 20 years 
total costs: 
estimated tamm waggon 
costs are based on 3,5 mio. 
UAH for a new trolleybus 
4.3 Mio. Person-km/year 
42.1 Mio. UAH 
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.1 page 10/13
Measure 17 
typ*: 
TM 
length: 
1.2 km (8.2 km) 
shifting (whole line) 
Trolleybus line 3 
average traffic volume 
public transport 
on measure: 
11000 persons per 24h 
maximum traffic volume 
public transport 
on measure: 
18000 persons per 24h 
minimum traffic volume 
public transport 
on measure: 
3100 persons per 24h 
The traffic Volume results from the 
Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will 
be different when framework 
conditions (e.g. structural data or 
road network with several 
measures) will change 
The optimistic scenario includes an 
equal supply in Marschrutkas like 
in the analysis. If the supply in 
Marschrutkas will be reduced, 
there will be shiftings in the traffic 
demand to other means public 
transport. 
* Types: 
TM - Tramway 
TB - 
Shifting of one line (one direction) from vul. Stryyska to vul. Trolleybusna over vul. V. Velykoho - increase of 
traffic flows by the double line on vul. Rubachka 
comment: 
Measure 17 includes a doubling on the vul. Rubachka by doubling of the time table of the whole line. The benefits and costs were 
calculated together with measure 18. 
benefit: 
traffic performance: 
time in traffic: 
CO2 - emission: 
ranking: 
1 
4.5 Mio. UAH 
maintenance costs: 8.2 Mio. UAH 
The difference in traffic 
volume between 
realisation case and no-realisation 
case refers to 
one single measure in the 
optimistic scenatio 2030. 
The Ranking is based on 
the Dynamic Prime Costs 
for the CO2-Emissions. 
difference between realization case and no 
realization case 
7.2 Mio. Person-km/year 
169.7 Tsd. Person-h/year 
-725.5 t/year 
investment costs does not include 
costs for construction of new road 
estimated tamm waggon 
costs are based on 3,5 mio. 
UAH for a new trolleybus Costs for additional 
need of trolleybusses: 
short description: 
Trolleybus 
12.6 Mio. UAH 
14.0 Mio. UAH 
roughly cost estimation investment costs: 
based on general 
characteristic cost 
values, maintenance 
costs about 20 years 
total costs: 
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.1 page 11/13
Measure 18 
typ*: 
TM 
length: 
1.2 km (8.2 km) 
shifting (whole line) 
Trolleybus line 3 
average traffic volume 
public transport 
on measure: 
11000 persons per 24h 
maximum traffic volume 
public transport 
on measure: 
18000 persons per 24h 
minimum traffic volume 
public transport 
on measure: 
3100 persons per 24h 
The traffic Volume results from the 
Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will 
be different when framework 
conditions (e.g. structural data or 
road network with several 
measures) will change 
The optimistic scenario includes an 
equal supply in Marschrutkas like 
in the analysis. If the supply in 
Marschrutkas will be reduced, 
there will be shiftings in the traffic 
demand to other means public 
transport. 
* Types: 
TM - Tramway 
TB - 
Analogue (Measure 17) shifting of the Line in one direction from vul. Trolleybusna to vul. Stryyska over Naukova 
(right turn is no bar for the other traffic) Line can be an important Trolley bus connection to Bus Terminal and 
Stadion 
comment: 
Measure 18 includes a doubling on the vul. Rubachka by doubling of the time table of the whole line. The benefits and costs were 
calculated together with measure 17. 
benefit: 
traffic performance: 
time in traffic: 
CO2 - emission: 
ranking: 
maintenance costs: 
169.7 Tsd. Person-h/year 
-725.5 t/year 
2 
4.5 Mio. UAH 
8.2 Mio. UAH 
0.0 Mio. UAH 
Costs for additional 
need of trolleybusses: 
difference between realization case and no 
realization case 
short description: 
Trolleybus 
The difference in traffic 
volume between 
realisation case and no-realisation 
case refers to 
one single measure in the 
optimistic scenatio 2030. 
The Ranking is based on 
the Dynamic Prime Costs 
for the CO2-Emissions. 
roughly cost estimation investment costs: 
based on general 
investment costs does not include 
characteristic cost 
costs for construction of new road 
values, maintenance 
costs about 20 years 
total costs: 
estimated tamm waggon 
costs are based on 3,5 mio. 
UAH for a new trolleybus 
7.2 Mio. Person-km/year 
12.6 Mio. UAH 
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.1 page 12/13
Measure 19 
typ*: 
TM 
length: 
2.0 km 
Trolleybus line 5 
average traffic volume 
public transport 
on measure: 
1900 persons per 24h 
maximum traffic volume 
public transport 
on measure: 
1900 persons per 24h 
minimum traffic volume 
public transport 
on measure: 
1900 persons per 24h 
The traffic Volume results from the 
Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will 
be different when framework 
conditions (e.g. structural data or 
road network with several 
measures) will change 
The optimistic scenario includes an 
equal supply in Marschrutkas like 
in the analysis. If the supply in 
Marschrutkas will be reduced, 
there will be shiftings in the traffic 
demand to other means public 
transport. 
* Types: 
TM - Tramway 
TB - 
comment: 
benefit: 
traffic performance: 
time in traffic: 
CO2 - emission: 
ranking: 
12 
59.5 Mio. UAH 
maintenance costs: 13.6 Mio. UAH 
The difference in traffic 
volume between 
realisation case and no-realisation 
case refers to 
one single measure in the 
optimistic scenatio 2030. 
The Ranking is based on 
the Dynamic Prime Costs 
for the CO2-Emissions. 
difference between realization case and no 
realization case 
2.8 Mio. Person-km/year 
59.9 Tsd. Person-h/year 
-279.5 t/year 
investment costs include costs for 
construction of new road 
estimated tamm waggon 
costs are based on 3,5 mio. 
UAH for a new trolleybus Costs for additional 
need of trolleybusses: 
short description: 
Trolleybus 
73.1 Mio. UAH 
3.5 Mio. UAH 
Future close connection of the Bus terminal to the Stadion by trolley bus 
roughly cost estimation investment costs: 
based on general 
characteristic cost 
values, maintenance 
costs about 20 years 
total costs: 
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.1 page 13/13
Measure 01 
typ*: 
A 
lanes: 
length: 
tunnel/bridges: 
average traffic 
volume on measure: 
maximum traffic 
volume on measure: 
minimum traffic 
volume on measure: 
A - 
B - Main road network with 
moving traffic 
C - Road network of general 
relevance with regulated 
traffic 
D - Road and traffic organisation 
comment: 
investment costs: 
* Types: 
Motorway/ highway 
CO2 - emission: 
ranking: 
roughly cost estimation 
based on general 
characteristic cost 
values, maintenance 
costs about 20 years 
maintenance costs: 
total costs: 
difference between realization case and no 
realization case 
costs: 
Completion of the road circle 
The traffic Volume results from the 
Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will 
be different when framework 
conditions (e.g. structural data or 
road network with several 
measures) will change 
traffic performance: 
short description: 
The difference in traffic 
volume between 
realisation case and no-realisation 
case refers to 
one single measure in the 
optimistic scenatio 2030. 
The Ranking is based on 
the Dynamic Prime Costs 
for the CO2-Emissions. 
benefit: 
time in traffic: 
Completion of the road circle 
national measure not included in urban budget 
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 1/26
Measure 02 
typ*: 
A 
lanes: 
length: 
tunnel/bridges: 
average traffic 
volume on measure: 
maximum traffic 
volume on measure: 
minimum traffic 
volume on measure: 
A - 
B - Main road network with 
moving traffic 
C - Road network of general 
relevance with regulated 
traffic 
D - Road and traffic organisation 
Extension of the entire road circle to four lanes 
comment: 
Extension of the entire road circle to four lanes 
* Types: 
national measure not included in urban budget 
The difference in traffic 
volume between 
realisation case and no-realisation 
case refers to 
one single measure in the 
optimistic scenatio 2030. 
The Ranking is based on 
the Dynamic Prime Costs 
for the CO2-Emissions. 
benefit: 
time in traffic: 
The traffic Volume results from the 
Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will 
be different when framework 
conditions (e.g. structural data or 
road network with several 
measures) will change 
short description: 
Motorway/ highway 
traffic performance: 
difference between realization case and no 
realization case 
costs: investment costs: 
roughly cost estimation 
based on general 
characteristic cost 
values, maintenance 
costs about 20 years 
CO2 - emission: 
ranking: 
maintenance costs: 
total costs: 
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 2/26
Measure 03 
typ*: 
B 
lanes: 
4 
length: 
10 km 
tunnel/bridges: 
yes / yes 
average traffic 
volume on measure: 
42300 Veh/24h 
maximum traffic 
volume on measure: 
58500 Veh/24h 
minimum traffic 
volume on measure: 
32300 Veh/24h 
A - 
B - Main road network with 
moving traffic 
C - Road network of general 
relevance with regulated 
traffic 
D - Road and traffic organisation 
Construction of a main road near city centre, which will carry all traffic flows through the city centre in north-south 
direction (cp. current master plan) 
Course: from exit to Kiev, vul. Khmelnytskoho, over railway line Lviv-Krasne, over High Castle, with tunneled 
sections, new section alongside Shevchenkivskyy Gay, crossing vul. Lychakivska, Zelena, Stusa, along vul. Ivana 
Franka and vul. Stryyska to the exit to Stryy 
comment: 
The traffic Volume results from the 
Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will 
be different when framework 
conditions (e.g. structural data or 
road network with several 
measures) will change 
short description: 
* Types: 
Motorway/ highway 
difference between realization case and no 
realization case 
-21 Mio. Veh-km/year 
-2038 Tsd. Veh-h/year 
- 5871 t/year 
6 
1399 Mio. UAH 
234.8 Mio. UAH 
roughly cost estimation 
based on general 
characteristic cost 
values, maintenance 
costs about 20 years 
investment costs: 
maintenance costs: 
total costs: 
Chorda - Axis 
1633.8 Mio. UAH 
The difference in traffic 
volume between 
realisation case and no-realisation 
case refers to 
one single measure in the 
optimistic scenatio 2030. 
The Ranking is based on 
the Dynamic Prime Costs 
for the CO2-Emissions. 
benefit: 
traffic performance: 
time in traffic: 
CO2 - emission: 
ranking: 
costs: 
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 3/26
Measure 04 
typ*: 
B 
lanes: 
4 
length: 
20 km 
tunnel/bridges: 
no / yes 
average traffic 
Small inner circle 
volume on measure: 
36600 Veh/24h 
maximum traffic 
volume on measure: 
58300 Veh/24h 
minimum traffic 
volume on measure: 
16700 Veh/24h 
* Types: 
A - 
B - Main road network with 
moving traffic 
C - Road network of general 
relevance with regulated 
traffic 
D - Road and traffic organisation 
comment: 
roughly cost estimation 
based on general 
characteristic cost 
values, maintenance 
costs about 20 years 
maintenance costs: 
difference between realization case and no 
realization case 
- 8221 t/year 
4 
1167.5 Mio. UAH 
total costs: 1395.7 Mio. UAH 
The difference in traffic 
volume between 
realisation case and no-realisation 
case refers to 
one single measure in the 
optimistic scenatio 2030. 
The Ranking is based on 
the Dynamic Prime Costs 
for the CO2-Emissions. 
benefit: 
traffic performance: 
time in traffic: 
CO2 - emission: 
-27 Mio. Veh-km/year 
-4828 Tsd. Veh-h/year 
228.2 Mio. UAH 
ranking: 
costs: investment costs: 
The traffic Volume results from the 
Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will 
be different when framework 
conditions (e.g. structural data or 
road network with several 
measures) will change 
short description: 
Motorway/ highway 
The inner circle is planned to proceed from the industrial centre Sykhiv, alongside the railway line Lviv-Khodoriv 
at vul. Luhanska, crossing the railway line Lviv-Mostyska-frontier, vul. Syayvo, Levandivska, Yeroshenka, 
Lypynskoho, through the northern industrial zone, crossing the railway line Lviv-Krasne, vul. Bogdanivska 
(planned) through the south-eastern industrial zone, vul. Pasychna, to the industrial centre Sykhiv 
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 4/26
Measure 05 
typ*: 
B 
lanes: 
4 
length: 
27 km 
tunnel/bridges: 
no / yes 
average traffic 
Peripheral semi-circle 
volume on measure: 
33100 Veh/24h 
maximum traffic 
volume on measure: 
46500 Veh/24h 
minimum traffic 
volume on measure: 
18400 Veh/24h 
The traffic Volume results from the 
Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will 
be different when framework 
conditions (e.g. structural data or 
road network with several 
measures) will change 
A - 
B - Main road network with 
moving traffic 
C - Road network of general 
relevance with regulated 
traffic 
D - Road and traffic organisation 
Route: from Sykhiv industrial zone, vul Khutorivka, Naukova, Ryashivska, crossing of vul. Horodotska and railway 
lines Lviv-Stryy and Lviv-Mostyska-frontier, new main road Roksolyani (planned), near residential area Ryasne, 
through forest park zone, to the northern residential area Zboyska and to the exit towards Kiev 
comment: 
difference between realization case and no 
realization case 
-79 Mio. Veh-km/year 
3 
total costs: 1631.7 Mio. UAH 
The difference in traffic 
volume between 
realisation case and no-realisation 
case refers to 
one single measure in the 
optimistic scenatio 2030. 
The Ranking is based on 
the Dynamic Prime Costs 
for the CO2-Emissions. 
benefit: 
traffic performance: 
time in traffic: 
CO2 - emission: 
ranking: 
costs: investment costs: 
-6985 Tsd. Veh-h/year 
short description: 
* Types: 
Motorway/ highway 
259.2 Mio. UAH 
roughly cost estimation 
based on general 
characteristic cost 
values, maintenance 
costs about 20 years 
maintenance costs: 
- 20553 t/year 
1372.5 Mio. UAH 
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 5/26
Measure 06 
typ*: 
B 
lanes: 
4 
length: 
8.5 km 
tunnel/bridges: 
no / no 
average traffic 
volume on measure: 
24500 Veh/24h 
maximum traffic 
volume on measure: 
32800 Veh/24h 
minimum traffic 
volume on measure: 
11100 Veh/24h 
The traffic Volume results from the 
Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will 
be different when framework 
conditions (e.g. structural data or 
road network with several 
measures) will change 
A - 
B - Main road network with 
moving traffic 
C - Road network of general 
relevance with regulated 
traffic 
D - Road and traffic organisation 
Exit Ternopil - from band main road alongside Glynyanskyy Trakt to the circle bypass 
comment: 
difference between realization case and no 
realization case 
-3 Mio. Veh-km/year 
-425 Tsd. Veh-h/year 
9 
67 Mio. UAH 
roughly cost estimation 
based on general 
characteristic cost 
values, maintenance 
costs about 20 years 
maintenance costs: 
Exit Ternopil 
- 666 t/year 
335 Mio. UAH 
short description: 
* Types: 
Motorway/ highway 
total costs: 422 Mio. UAH 
The difference in traffic 
volume between 
realisation case and no-realisation 
case refers to 
one single measure in the 
optimistic scenatio 2030. 
The Ranking is based on 
the Dynamic Prime Costs 
for the CO2-Emissions. 
benefit: 
traffic performance: 
time in traffic: 
CO2 - emission: 
ranking: 
costs: investment costs: 
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 6/26
Measure 07 
typ*: 
B 
lanes: 
4 
length: 
6.5 km 
tunnel/bridges: 
no / no 
average traffic 
Exit Ivano-Frankivsk 
volume on measure: 
25500 Veh/24h 
maximum traffic 
volume on measure: 
49100 Veh/24h 
minimum traffic 
volume on measure: 
20400 Veh/24h 
The traffic Volume results from the 
Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will 
be different when framework 
conditions (e.g. structural data or 
road network with several 
measures) will change 
A - 
B - Main road network with 
moving traffic 
C - Road network of general 
relevance with regulated 
traffic 
D - Road and traffic organisation 
Exit Ivano-Frankivsk - from the circle connection and peripheral semi-circle to Sykhiv alongside vul. Zelena to 
the circle bypass 
comment: 
difference between realization case and no 
realization case 
-0.8 Mio. Veh-km/year 
14 
total costs: 354.1 Mio. UAH 
The difference in traffic 
volume between 
realisation case and no-realisation 
case refers to 
one single measure in the 
optimistic scenatio 2030. 
The Ranking is based on 
the Dynamic Prime Costs 
for the CO2-Emissions. 
benefit: 
traffic performance: 
time in traffic: 
CO2 - emission: 
ranking: 
costs: investment costs: 
-203 Tsd. Veh-h/year 
short description: 
* Types: 
Motorway/ highway 
59.1 Mio. UAH 
roughly cost estimation 
based on general 
characteristic cost 
values, maintenance 
costs about 20 years 
maintenance costs: 
-112 t/year 
295 Mio. UAH 
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 7/26
Measure 08 
typ*: 
B 
lanes: 
4 
length: 
6.8 km 
tunnel/bridges: 
no / yes 
average traffic 
volume on measure: 
15800 Veh/24h 
maximum traffic 
volume on measure: 
18900 Veh/24h 
minimum traffic 
volume on measure: 
6800 Veh/24h 
A - 
B - Main road network with 
moving traffic 
C - Road network of general 
relevance with regulated 
traffic 
D - Road and traffic organisation 
comment: 
difference between realization case and no 
realization case 
0.3 Mio. Veh-km/year 
-274 Tsd. Veh-h/year 
22 
54.9 Mio. UAH 
roughly cost estimation 
based on general 
characteristic cost 
values, maintenance 
costs about 20 years 
maintenance costs: 
Exit Zhovkva 
27 t/year 
289 Mio. UAH 
Exit Zhovkva - from band main road to the northern bypass motorway 
The traffic Volume results from the 
Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will 
be different when framework 
conditions (e.g. structural data or 
road network with several 
measures) will change 
short description: 
* Types: 
Motorway/ highway 
total costs: 343.9 Mio. UAH 
The difference in traffic 
volume between 
realisation case and no-realisation 
case refers to 
one single measure in the 
optimistic scenatio 2030. 
The Ranking is based on 
the Dynamic Prime Costs 
for the CO2-Emissions. 
benefit: 
traffic performance: 
time in traffic: 
CO2 - emission: 
ranking: 
costs: investment costs: 
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 8/26
Measure 09 
typ*: 
B 
lanes: 
4 
length: 
6.2 km 
tunnel/bridges: 
no / yes 
average traffic 
volume on measure: 
28700 Veh/24h 
maximum traffic 
volume on measure: 
57600 Veh/24h 
minimum traffic 
volume on measure: 
5200 Veh/24h 
A - 
B - Main road network with 
moving traffic 
C - Road network of general 
relevance with regulated 
traffic 
D - Road and traffic organisation 
comment: 
difference between realization case and no 
realization case 
-1 Mio. Veh-km/year 
11 
total costs: 340.1 Mio. UAH 
The difference in traffic 
volume between 
realisation case and no-realisation 
case refers to 
one single measure in the 
optimistic scenatio 2030. 
The Ranking is based on 
the Dynamic Prime Costs 
for the CO2-Emissions. 
benefit: 
traffic performance: 
time in traffic: 
CO2 - emission: 
ranking: 
costs: investment costs: 
-203 Tsd. Veh-h/year 
Exit Horodok - from inner circle at vul. Horodotska to Konopnyca 
The traffic Volume results from the 
Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will 
be different when framework 
conditions (e.g. structural data or 
road network with several 
measures) will change 
short description: 
* Types: 
Motorway/ highway 
58.1 Mio. UAH 
roughly cost estimation 
based on general 
characteristic cost 
values, maintenance 
costs about 20 years 
maintenance costs: 
Exit Horodok 
-376 t/year 
282 Mio. UAH 
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 9/26
Measure 10 
typ*: 
B 
lanes: 
4 
length: 
8.8 km 
tunnel/bridges: 
no / yes 
average traffic 
volume on measure: 
20400 Veh/24h 
maximum traffic 
volume on measure: 
34300 Veh/24h 
minimum traffic 
volume on measure: 
12300 Veh/24h 
The traffic Volume results from the 
Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will 
be different when framework 
conditions (e.g. structural data or 
road network with several 
measures) will change 
A - 
B - Main road network with 
moving traffic 
C - Road network of general 
relevance with regulated 
traffic 
D - Road and traffic organisation 
Exit Yavoriv - from inner circle at vul. Shevchenka through Ryasne industrial zone to the peripheral circle 
comment: 
difference between realization case and no 
realization case 
-1 Mio. Veh-km/year 
-231 Tsd. Veh-h/year 
13 
86.1 Mio. UAH 
roughly cost estimation 
based on general 
characteristic cost 
values, maintenance 
costs about 20 years 
maintenance costs: 
Exit Yavoriv 
-235 t/year 
408 Mio. UAH 
short description: 
* Types: 
Motorway/ highway 
total costs: 494.1 Mio. UAH 
The difference in traffic 
volume between 
realisation case and no-realisation 
case refers to 
one single measure in the 
optimistic scenatio 2030. 
The Ranking is based on 
the Dynamic Prime Costs 
for the CO2-Emissions. 
benefit: 
traffic performance: 
time in traffic: 
CO2 - emission: 
ranking: 
costs: investment costs: 
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 10/26
Measure 11 
typ*: 
B 
lanes: 
4 
length: 
4 km 
Road construction Vernadskyy prospekt 
tunnel/bridges: 
no / yes 
average traffic 
volume on measure: 
12300 Veh/24h 
maximum traffic 
volume on measure: 
14700 Veh/24h 
minimum traffic 
volume on measure: 
6500 Veh/24h 
A - 
B - Main road network with 
moving traffic 
C - Road network of general 
relevance with regulated 
traffic 
D - Road and traffic organisation 
comment: 
difference between realization case and no 
realization case 
-0.4 Mio. Veh-km/year 
15 
total costs: 249.4 Mio. UAH 
The difference in traffic 
volume between 
realisation case and no-realisation 
case refers to 
one single measure in the 
optimistic scenatio 2030. 
The Ranking is based on 
the Dynamic Prime Costs 
for the CO2-Emissions. 
benefit: 
traffic performance: 
time in traffic: 
CO2 - emission: 
ranking: 
costs: investment costs: 
-204 Tsd. Veh-h/year 
Road construction Vernadskyy Prospekt, 3.2 km length 
The traffic Volume results from the 
Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will 
be different when framework 
conditions (e.g. structural data or 
road network with several 
measures) will change 
short description: 
* Types: 
Motorway/ highway 
39.9 Mio. UAH 
roughly cost estimation 
based on general 
characteristic cost 
values, maintenance 
costs about 20 years 
maintenance costs: 
-45 t/year 
209.5 Mio. UAH 
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 11/26
Measure 12 
typ*: 
B 
lanes: 
length: 
tunnel/bridges: 
no / no 
total traffic volume 
heading to the node: 
84500 Veh/24h 
cross section 
with highest traffic 
volume at the node 
45200 Veh/24h 
cross section 
with least traffic 
volume at the node 
39000 Veh/24h 
A - 
Motorway/ highway 
B - Main road network with 
moving traffic 
C - Road network of general 
relevance with regulated 
traffic 
D - Road and traffic organisation 
Complete extension of crossing vul. Stryyska - vul. Khutorivska, Naukova (multilevel solution) 
comment: 
The traffic Volume results from the 
Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will 
be different when framework 
conditions (e.g. structural data or 
road network with several 
measures) will change 
difference between realization case and no 
realization case 
0.1 Mio. Veh-km/year 
-124 Tsd. Veh-h/year 
17 
3.6 Mio. UAH 
roughly cost estimation 
based on general 
characteristic cost 
values, maintenance 
costs about 20 years 
benefit: 
traffic performance: 
time in traffic: 
CO2 - emission: 
maintenance costs: 
15 Mio. UAH 
short description: 
total costs: 18.6 Mio. UAH 
The difference in traffic 
volume between 
realisation case and no-realisation 
case refers to 
one single measure in the 
optimistic scenatio 2030. 
The Ranking is based on 
the Dynamic Prime Costs 
for the CO2-Emissions. 
Crossing vul. Stryyska - vul. Khutorivska, Naukova 
* Types: 
65 t/year 
ranking: 
costs: investment costs: 
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 12/26
Measure 16 
New main roads in western residential/ industrial areas 
typ*: 
C 
lanes: 
4 
length: 
4.5 km 
tunnel/bridges: 
no / yes 
average traffic 
volume on measure: 
9200 Veh/24h 
maximum traffic 
volume on measure: 
9700 Veh/24h 
minimum traffic 
volume on measure: 
8400 Veh/24h 
The traffic Volume results from the 
Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will 
be different when framework 
conditions (e.g. structural data or 
road network with several 
measures) will change 
A - 
B - Main road network with 
moving traffic 
C - Road network of general 
relevance with regulated 
traffic 
D - Road and traffic organisation 
New main roads in the western residential and industrial areas with connection to the motorway Lviv-Mostyska-frontier 
comment: 
difference between realization case and no 
realization case 
-4 Mio. Veh-km/year 
-394 Tsd. Veh-h/year 
5 
40.1 Mio. UAH 
roughly cost estimation 
based on general 
characteristic cost 
values, maintenance 
costs about 20 years 
maintenance costs: 
-964 t/year 
199.5 Mio. UAH 
short description: 
* Types: 
Motorway/ highway 
total costs: 239.6Mio. UAH 
The difference in traffic 
volume between 
realisation case and no-realisation 
case refers to 
one single measure in the 
optimistic scenatio 2030. 
The Ranking is based on 
the Dynamic Prime Costs 
for the CO2-Emissions. 
benefit: 
traffic performance: 
time in traffic: 
CO2 - emission: 
ranking: 
costs: investment costs: 
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 13/26
Measure 17 
typ*: 
C 
lanes: 
4 
length: 
2.8 km 
Connection of city with southern districts 
tunnel/bridges: 
no / no 
average traffic 
volume on measure: 
16500 Veh/24h 
maximum traffic 
volume on measure: 
18900 Veh/24h 
minimum traffic 
volume on measure: 
15700 Veh/24h 
The traffic Volume results from the 
Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will 
be different when framework 
conditions (e.g. structural data or 
road network with several 
measures) will change 
A - 
B - Main road network with 
moving traffic 
C - Road network of general 
relevance with regulated 
traffic 
D - Road and traffic organisation 
Vul. Kulparkivska and Knyahyni Olhy - connection of central urban districts with southern residential areas and 
Sokilnyky 
comment: 
difference between realization case and no 
realization case 
-0.6 Mio. Veh-km/year 
10 
total costs: 142.9Mio. UAH 
The difference in traffic 
volume between 
realisation case and no-realisation 
case refers to 
one single measure in the 
optimistic scenatio 2030. 
The Ranking is based on 
the Dynamic Prime Costs 
for the CO2-Emissions. 
benefit: 
traffic performance: 
time in traffic: 
CO2 - emission: 
ranking: 
costs: investment costs: 
-260 Tsd. Veh-h/year 
short description: 
* Types: 
Motorway/ highway 
23.4 Mio. UAH 
roughly cost estimation 
based on general 
characteristic cost 
values, maintenance 
costs about 20 years 
maintenance costs: 
-178 t/year 
119.5 Mio. UAH 
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 14/26
Measure 18 
Traffic improvement between vul. Zelena/ vul. Sakharova 
typ*: 
D 
lanes: 
2 
length: 
3.8 km 
tunnel/bridges: 
no / no 
average traffic 
volume on measure: 
11000 Veh/24h 
maximum traffic 
volume on measure: 
20800 Veh/24h 
minimum traffic 
volume on measure: 
2000 Veh/24h 
The traffic Volume results from the 
Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will 
be different when framework 
conditions (e.g. structural data or 
road network with several 
measures) will change 
A - 
B - Main road network with 
moving traffic 
C - Road network of general 
relevance with regulated 
traffic 
D - Road and traffic organisation 
Traffic improvement on the section between vul. Zelena and vul. Sakharova (vul. Franko, Rustaveli, Voloska, 
Sarytskykh, Vitovskoho, Kopernyka). 
Planning of one-way-streets at vul. Franko, Rustaveli, Voloska, Zarytskykh, Saksahanskoho 
Planning of reconstruction of vul. Voloska - road extension near Stryyskyy-market to 3 lanes with organisation of 
one-way-streets and extension of vul. Rustaveli near vul. Archypenka 
Reorganisation of bus- and electric public transport 
comment: 
difference between realization case and no 
realization case 
2 Mio. Veh-km/year 
28 Tsd. Veh-h/year 
16 
33.5 Mio. UAH 
roughly cost estimation 
based on general 
characteristic cost 
values, maintenance 
costs about 20 years 
maintenance costs: 
622 t/year 
131.3 Mio. UAH 
short description: 
* Types: 
Motorway/ highway 
total costs: 164.8 Mio. UAH 
The difference in traffic 
volume between 
realisation case and no-realisation 
case refers to 
one single measure in the 
optimistic scenatio 2030. 
The Ranking is based on 
the Dynamic Prime Costs 
for the CO2-Emissions. 
benefit: 
traffic performance: 
time in traffic: 
CO2 - emission: 
ranking: 
costs: investment costs: 
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 15/26
Measure 19 
Improvement of the traffic scheme at Pl. Petrushevycha 
typ*: 
D 
lanes: 
2 
length: 
1.1 km 
tunnel/bridges: 
no / no 
average traffic 
volume on measure: 
6000 Veh/24h 
maximum traffic 
volume on measure: 
15200 Veh/24h 
minimum traffic 
volume on measure: 
1500 Veh/24h 
The traffic Volume results from the 
Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will 
be different when framework 
conditions (e.g. structural data or 
road network with several 
measures) will change 
A - 
B - Main road network with 
moving traffic 
C - Road network of general 
relevance with regulated 
traffic 
D - Road and traffic organisation 
Improvement of the traffic scheme at Pl. Petrushevycha, at vul. Saksahanskoho and Zelena incl. establishment of 
one-way-streets and access from vul. Saksahanskoho to Pl. Petrushevycha via vul. Kostomarova (extended by 
partial demolition of buildings) and traffic light controlled crossings - relief of crossing vul. Zelena – vul. Franka 
The basic traffic scheme provides the establishment of a one-way-street and the effective utilisation of vul. 
Sarytskykh: Planning of an access to this street from vul. Vitovskoho (left corner of the park, in front of park 
entrance). inspection of th variant of continuation of vul. Sarytskykh towards vul. Bohuna (perspective 2012- 
2015). 
comment: 
difference between realization case and no 
realization case 
0.3 Mio. Veh-km/year 
20 
total costs: 56.1 Mio. UAH 
The difference in traffic 
volume between 
realisation case and no-realisation 
case refers to 
one single measure in the 
optimistic scenatio 2030. 
The Ranking is based on 
the Dynamic Prime Costs 
for the CO2-Emissions. 
benefit: 
traffic performance: 
time in traffic: 
CO2 - emission: 
ranking: 
costs: investment costs: 
-19 Tsd. Veh-h/year 
short description: 
* Types: 
Motorway/ highway 
12.5 Mio. UAH 
roughly cost estimation 
based on general 
characteristic cost 
values, maintenance 
costs about 20 years 
maintenance costs: 
97 t/year 
43.6 Mio. UAH 
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 16/26
Measure 20 
Reconstruktion of sections in north-eastern city centre 
typ*: 
D 
lanes: 
2 
length: 
2 km 
tunnel/bridges: 
no / no 
average traffic 
volume on measure: 
8000 Veh/24h 
maximum traffic 
volume on measure: 
12200 Veh/24h 
minimum traffic 
volume on measure: 
3100 Veh/24h 
The traffic Volume results from the 
Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will 
be different when framework 
conditions (e.g. structural data or 
road network with several 
measures) will change 
A - 
B - Main road network with 
moving traffic 
C - Road network of general 
relevance with regulated 
traffic 
D - Road and traffic organisation 
Reconstruction of several sections to improve traffic flows in the north-eastern city centre: alongside Lychakivska, 
Halytskyy place, Prospekt Svoboda and vul. Pidvalna by planned intensified utilisation of the streets Sankovetska, 
Lysenka, Vynnychenka 
required reconstruction of parts of vul. Lysenka (executed), opening of a small part of vul. Vynnychenka (approx. 
70 m), to secure the left-hand exit to vul. Kryvonosa and the ascension to vul. Honta by circumnavigating 
perspectively: partial reconstruction of Vynnychenka, to redirect traffic flows from vul. Franka to Honta through 
Vynnychenka which will relieve Pidvalna. demolition of a salient quoin at vul. Honta to increase the passage 
capacity 
comment: 
difference between realization case and no 
realization case 
0.2 Mio. Veh-km/year 
27 Tsd. Veh-h/year 
21 
19.1 Mio. UAH 
roughly cost estimation 
based on general 
characteristic cost 
values, maintenance 
costs about 20 years 
maintenance costs: 
74 t/year 
72 Mio. UAH 
short description: 
* Types: 
Motorway/ highway 
total costs: 91.1 Mio. UAH 
The difference in traffic 
volume between 
realisation case and no-realisation 
case refers to 
one single measure in the 
optimistic scenatio 2030. 
The Ranking is based on 
the Dynamic Prime Costs 
for the CO2-Emissions. 
benefit: 
traffic performance: 
time in traffic: 
CO2 - emission: 
ranking: 
costs: investment costs: 
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 17/26
Measure 21 
3-lane road connection of Kharkivska with Musorskoho 
typ*: 
D 
lanes: 
3 
length: 
1.4 km 
tunnel/bridges: 
no / yes 
average traffic 
volume on measure: 
13300 Veh/24h 
maximum traffic 
volume on measure: 
16000 Veh/24h 
minimum traffic 
volume on measure: 
10900 Veh/24h 
The traffic Volume results from the 
Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will 
be different when framework 
conditions (e.g. structural data or 
road network with several 
measures) will change 
A - 
B - Main road network with 
moving traffic 
C - Road network of general 
relevance with regulated 
traffic 
D - Road and traffic organisation 
Radical relief of the city centre from transit traffic on Lychakivska, Mayorivka, Zelena by construction of a 3-lane 
road as a connection of Kharkivska with Musorskoho near Znesinnya park - redirection of traffic flows on vul. 
Korduba and tunnel entrance to Promyslova and Khmelnytskoho, through Saklynskykh to Kovelska and Polova to 
the northern district of the city 
comment: 
The 3-laned road construction measure goes via Chorda - Axis (measure 3), for measure 21 only the drives to the Chorda - Axis were 
modelled as measure. 
difference between realization case and no 
realization case 
0.8 Mio. Veh-km/year 
19 
total costs: 74.9 Mio. UAH 
The difference in traffic 
volume between 
realisation case and no-realisation 
case refers to 
one single measure in the 
optimistic scenatio 2030. 
The Ranking is based on 
the Dynamic Prime Costs 
for the CO2-Emissions. 
benefit: 
traffic performance: 
time in traffic: 
CO2 - emission: 
ranking: 
costs: investment costs: 
22 Tsd. Veh-h/year 
short description: 
* Types: 
Motorway/ highway 
14.2 Mio. UAH 
roughly cost estimation 
based on general 
characteristic cost 
values, maintenance 
costs about 20 years 
maintenance costs: 
154 t/year 
60.7 Mio. UAH 
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 18/26
Measure 22 
Abscission of the corner on crossing Pstrak/ Kleparivska 
typ*: 
D 
lanes: 
2 
length: 
1.2 km 
tunnel/bridges: 
no / no 
average traffic 
volume on measure: 
8100 Veh/24h 
maximum traffic 
volume on measure: 
10500 Veh/24h 
minimum traffic 
volume on measure: 
6200 Veh/24h 
The traffic Volume results from the 
Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will 
be different when framework 
conditions (e.g. structural data or 
road network with several 
measures) will change 
A - 
B - Main road network with 
moving traffic 
C - Road network of general 
relevance with regulated 
traffic 
D - Road and traffic organisation 
Abscission of the sharp corner at the green area on the street crossing Pstrak and Kleparivska, to allow for an 
active traffic flow from Horodocka via J.Mudroho to Kleparivska and onto north, radical reconstruction of vul. Y 
Mudroho (currently under construction) 
comment: 
difference between realization case and no 
realization case 
-0.2 Mio. Veh-km/year 
3 Tsd. Veh-h/year 
12 
13.0 Mio. UAH 
roughly cost estimation 
based on general 
characteristic cost 
values, maintenance 
costs about 20 years 
maintenance costs: 
-53 t/year 
46.2 Mio. UAH 
short description: 
* Types: 
Motorway/ highway 
total costs: 59.2 Mio. UAH 
The difference in traffic 
volume between 
realisation case and no-realisation 
case refers to 
one single measure in the 
optimistic scenatio 2030. 
The Ranking is based on 
the Dynamic Prime Costs 
for the CO2-Emissions. 
benefit: 
traffic performance: 
time in traffic: 
CO2 - emission: 
ranking: 
costs: investment costs: 
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 19/26
Measure 23 
typ*: 
D 
lanes: 
2 
length: 
0.5 km 
Reconstruction Chuprynky and Melnyka 
tunnel/bridges: 
no / no 
average traffic 
volume on measure: 
7500 Veh/24h 
maximum traffic 
volume on measure: 
11000 Veh/24h 
minimum traffic 
volume on measure: 
4900 Veh/24h 
The traffic Volume results from the 
Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will 
be different when framework 
conditions (e.g. structural data or 
road network with several 
measures) will change 
A - 
B - Main road network with 
moving traffic 
C - Road network of general 
relevance with regulated 
traffic 
D - Road and traffic organisation 
Reconstruction vul. Chuprynky (partly executed) and Melnyka to intensify traffic flows from Horbachevskoho to 
Antonovycha for relief of vul. Sakharova and Kopernyka as well as the city centre 
Traffic from Antonovycha via vul. Bandery, Nevskoho and Ozarkevycha will be directed via Horodotska and 
Y.Mudroho-Pstraka-Kleparivska to the north of the city. 
comment: 
difference between realization case and no 
realization case 
0.2 Mio. Veh-km/year 
18 
total costs: 34.0 Mio. UAH 
The difference in traffic 
volume between 
realisation case and no-realisation 
case refers to 
one single measure in the 
optimistic scenatio 2030. 
The Ranking is based on 
the Dynamic Prime Costs 
for the CO2-Emissions. 
benefit: 
traffic performance: 
time in traffic: 
CO2 - emission: 
ranking: 
costs: investment costs: 
-133 Tsd. Veh-h/year 
short description: 
* Types: 
Motorway/ highway 
8.5 Mio. UAH 
roughly cost estimation 
based on general 
characteristic cost 
values, maintenance 
costs about 20 years 
maintenance costs: 
75 t/year 
25.5 Mio. UAH 
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 20/26
Measure 24 
typ*: 
D 
lanes: 
3 
length: 
1 km 
Enlarging of sections of vul. Kopernyka 
tunnel/bridges: 
no / no 
average traffic 
volume on measure: 
14200 Veh/24h 
maximum traffic 
volume on measure: 
15700 Veh/24h 
minimum traffic 
volume on measure: 
8700 Veh/24h 
The traffic Volume results from the 
Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will 
be different when framework 
conditions (e.g. structural data or 
road network with several 
measures) will change 
A - 
B - Main road network with 
moving traffic 
C - Road network of general 
relevance with regulated 
traffic 
D - Road and traffic organisation 
Enlarging of sections of vul. Kopernyka (Kopernyka-Verbytskoho, Kopernyka-Bandery, Kopernyka-Stefanyka) to 
improve the situation on vul. Sakharova and Vitovskoho towards city centre at the expense of the pavement 
comment: 
difference between realization case and no 
realization case 
-0.5 Mio. Veh-km/year 
-46 Tsd. Veh-h/year 
8 
12.0 Mio. UAH 
roughly cost estimation 
based on general 
characteristic cost 
values, maintenance 
costs about 20 years 
maintenance costs: 
-117 t/year 
45.5 Mio. UAH 
short description: 
* Types: 
Motorway/ highway 
total costs: 57.5 Mio. UAH 
The difference in traffic 
volume between 
realisation case and no-realisation 
case refers to 
one single measure in the 
optimistic scenatio 2030. 
The Ranking is based on 
the Dynamic Prime Costs 
for the CO2-Emissions. 
benefit: 
traffic performance: 
time in traffic: 
CO2 - emission: 
ranking: 
costs: investment costs: 
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 21/26
Measure 25 
3-lane-road between vul. Slovatskoho and Lepkoho 
typ*: 
D 
lanes: 
3 
length: 
0.4 km 
tunnel/bridges: 
no / no 
average traffic 
volume on measure: 
13600 Veh/24h 
maximum traffic 
volume on measure: 
14100 Veh/24h 
minimum traffic 
volume on measure: 
13200 Veh/24h 
The traffic Volume results from the 
Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will 
be different when framework 
conditions (e.g. structural data or 
road network with several 
measures) will change 
A - 
B - Main road network with 
moving traffic 
C - Road network of general 
relevance with regulated 
traffic 
D - Road and traffic organisation 
Start of the construction of a 3-lane-road between vul. Slovatskoho and Lepkoho through the green area in front of 
Franko memorial (relocation of the stopping points at university to secure the construction of the south-western 
circle aroung the city centre and the relief of vul. Sichovykh Striltsiv. 
comment: 
difference between realization case and no 
realization case 
-0.1 Mio. Veh-km/year 
23 
total costs: 23.0 Mio. UAH 
The difference in traffic 
volume between 
realisation case and no-realisation 
case refers to 
one single measure in the 
optimistic scenatio 2030. 
The Ranking is based on 
the Dynamic Prime Costs 
for the CO2-Emissions. 
benefit: 
traffic performance: 
time in traffic: 
CO2 - emission: 
ranking: 
costs: investment costs: 
-59 Tsd. Veh-h/year 
short description: 
* Types: 
Motorway/ highway 
4.8 Mio. UAH 
roughly cost estimation 
based on general 
characteristic cost 
values, maintenance 
costs about 20 years 
maintenance costs: 
0.2 t/year 
18.2 Mio. UAH 
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 22/26
Measure 26 
Finalisation 1st phase connection Zaliznychna/ Lutskoho 
typ*: 
D 
lanes: 
2 
length: 
0.3 km 
tunnel/bridges: 
no / no 
average traffic 
volume on measure: 
15100 Veh/24h 
maximum traffic 
volume on measure: 
16600 Veh/24h 
minimum traffic 
volume on measure: 
10800 Veh/24h 
The traffic Volume results from the 
Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will 
be different when framework 
conditions (e.g. structural data or 
road network with several 
measures) will change 
A - 
B - Main road network with 
moving traffic 
C - Road network of general 
relevance with regulated 
traffic 
D - Road and traffic organisation 
Finalisation of 1st phase workings for the connection of Zaliznychna and Lutskoho for traffic flows from district 
Pryvokzalnyy to vul.Shevchenka and relief of Horodotska 
comment: 
difference between realization case and no 
realization case 
-1 Mio. Veh-km/year 
-155 Tsd. Veh-h/year 
1 
1.4 Mio. UAH 
roughly cost estimation 
based on general 
characteristic cost 
values, maintenance 
costs about 20 years 
maintenance costs: 
-222 t/year 
7,8 Mio. UAH 
short description: 
* Types: 
Motorway/ highway 
total costs: 9.2 Mio. UAH 
The difference in traffic 
volume between 
realisation case and no-realisation 
case refers to 
one single measure in the 
optimistic scenatio 2030. 
The Ranking is based on 
the Dynamic Prime Costs 
for the CO2-Emissions. 
benefit: 
traffic performance: 
time in traffic: 
CO2 - emission: 
ranking: 
costs: investment costs: 
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 23/26
Measure 27 
Roundabout at crossing prospekt Chornovola, Pid Dubom 
typ*: 
D 
lanes: 
length: 
tunnel/bridges: 
no / no 
total traffic volume 
heading to the node: 
42300 Veh/24h 
cross section 
with highest traffic 
volume at the node 
31000 Veh/24h 
cross section 
with least traffic 
volume at the node 
8100 Veh/24h 
The traffic Volume results from the 
Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will 
be different when framework 
conditions (e.g. structural data or 
road network with several 
measures) will change 
A - 
Motorway/ highway 
B - Main road network with 
moving traffic 
C - Road network of general 
relevance with regulated 
traffic 
D - Road and traffic organisation 
Construction of a roundabout instead of crossing Prospekt Chornovola, Pid Dubom and Kulisha 
comment: 
traffic performance: 
time in traffic: 
CO2 - emission: 
ranking: 
benefit: 
costs: investment costs: 
* Types: 
difference between realization case and no 
realization case 
-1 Mio. Veh-km/year 
-81 Tsd. Veh-h/year 
-244 t/year 
2 
1.7 Mio. UAH 
roughly cost estimation 
based on general 
characteristic cost 
values, maintenance 
costs about 20 years 
maintenance costs: 
9.9 Mio. UAH 
short description: 
total costs: 11.6 Mio. UAH 
The difference in traffic 
volume between 
realisation case and no-realisation 
case refers to 
one single measure in the 
optimistic scenatio 2030. 
The Ranking is based on 
the Dynamic Prime Costs 
for the CO2-Emissions. 
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 24/26
Measure 28 
Measures for redirection traffic vul. Kulisha/ Chornovola 
typ*: 
D 
lanes: 
length: 
tunnel/bridges: 
average traffic 
volume on measure: 
12700 Veh/24h 
maximum traffic 
volume on measure: 
16000 Veh/24h 
minimum traffic 
volume on measure: 
10200 Veh/24h 
A - 
B - Main road network with 
moving traffic 
C - Road network of general 
relevance with regulated 
traffic 
D - Road and traffic organisation 
Organisational measures for the redirection of traffic flows and to activate car and bus traffic through vul. 
Dzherelna to relieve vul. Kulisha and Chornovola 
comment: 
total costs: 
traffic organisation only 
The difference in traffic 
volume between 
realisation case and no-realisation 
case refers to 
one single measure in the 
optimistic scenatio 2030. 
The Ranking is based on 
the Dynamic Prime Costs 
for the CO2-Emissions. 
benefit: 
traffic performance: 
time in traffic: 
CO2 - emission: 
ranking: 
costs: investment costs: 
The traffic Volume results from the 
Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will 
be different when framework 
conditions (e.g. structural data or 
road network with several 
measures) will change 
short description: 
* Types: 
Motorway/ highway 
roughly cost estimation 
based on general 
characteristic cost 
values, maintenance 
costs about 20 years 
maintenance costs: 
difference between realization case and no 
realization case 
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 25/26
Measure 29 
typ*: 
D 
lanes: 
4 
length: 
0.2 km 
tunnel/bridges: 
yes / no 
average traffic 
volume on measure: 
15000 Veh/24h 
maximum traffic 
volume on measure: 
18000 Veh/24h 
minimum traffic 
volume on measure: 
12700 Veh/24h 
The traffic Volume results from the 
Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will 
be different when framework 
conditions (e.g. structural data or 
road network with several 
measures) will change 
A - 
B - Main road network with 
moving traffic 
C - Road network of general 
relevance with regulated 
traffic 
D - Road and traffic organisation 
Inspection of possibilities for tunnel construction under the tramway line on vul. Khmelnytskoho for activation of 
the street parallel to vul. Zamarstyniyska 
comment: 
tunnel construction under the tramway line 
difference between realization case and no 
realization case 
-2 Mio. Veh-km/year 
-150 Tsd. Veh-h/year 
7 
17.9 Mio. UAH 
roughly cost estimation 
based on general 
characteristic cost 
values, maintenance 
costs about 20 years 
maintenance costs: 
-402 t/year 
113 Mio. UAH 
short description: 
* Types: 
Motorway/ highway 
total costs: 130.9 Mio. UAH 
The difference in traffic 
volume between 
realisation case and no-realisation 
case refers to 
one single measure in the 
optimistic scenatio 2030. 
The Ranking is based on 
the Dynamic Prime Costs 
for the CO2-Emissions. 
benefit: 
traffic performance: 
time in traffic: 
CO2 - emission: 
ranking: 
costs: investment costs: 
© ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 26/26

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente

TRR RTOR Flow Profile Impacts 2016
TRR RTOR Flow Profile Impacts 2016TRR RTOR Flow Profile Impacts 2016
TRR RTOR Flow Profile Impacts 2016
David K. Hale, Ph.D.
 
Modeling Truck Movements: A Comparison between the Quick Response Freight Man...
Modeling Truck Movements: A Comparison between the Quick Response Freight Man...Modeling Truck Movements: A Comparison between the Quick Response Freight Man...
Modeling Truck Movements: A Comparison between the Quick Response Freight Man...
inventionjournals
 
Mastersresearch 06-02-16
Mastersresearch 06-02-16Mastersresearch 06-02-16
Mastersresearch 06-02-16
Matthias Hess
 
Street Design Final Submission
Street Design Final SubmissionStreet Design Final Submission
Street Design Final Submission
Gordon Best
 

La actualidad más candente (20)

Chapter 6 Fundamentals of traffic flow
Chapter 6 Fundamentals of traffic flowChapter 6 Fundamentals of traffic flow
Chapter 6 Fundamentals of traffic flow
 
A Framework for Traffic Planning and Forecasting using Micro-Simulation Calib...
A Framework for Traffic Planning and Forecasting using Micro-Simulation Calib...A Framework for Traffic Planning and Forecasting using Micro-Simulation Calib...
A Framework for Traffic Planning and Forecasting using Micro-Simulation Calib...
 
Accessibility Analysis and Modeling in Public Transport Networks - A Raster b...
Accessibility Analysis and Modeling in Public Transport Networks - A Raster b...Accessibility Analysis and Modeling in Public Transport Networks - A Raster b...
Accessibility Analysis and Modeling in Public Transport Networks - A Raster b...
 
Simulation of Traffic Flow - Density
Simulation of Traffic Flow - DensitySimulation of Traffic Flow - Density
Simulation of Traffic Flow - Density
 
A comparison of_north_american_and_european_railwa
A comparison of_north_american_and_european_railwaA comparison of_north_american_and_european_railwa
A comparison of_north_american_and_european_railwa
 
Big data analysis and scheduling optimization system oriented assembly proces...
Big data analysis and scheduling optimization system oriented assembly proces...Big data analysis and scheduling optimization system oriented assembly proces...
Big data analysis and scheduling optimization system oriented assembly proces...
 
City lines designing hybrid hub and-spoke transit system with urban big data
City lines designing hybrid hub and-spoke transit system with urban big dataCity lines designing hybrid hub and-spoke transit system with urban big data
City lines designing hybrid hub and-spoke transit system with urban big data
 
Priority infrastructure projects
Priority infrastructure projects Priority infrastructure projects
Priority infrastructure projects
 
Urban transportation system - methods of route assignment
Urban transportation system - methods of route assignmentUrban transportation system - methods of route assignment
Urban transportation system - methods of route assignment
 
TRR RTOR Flow Profile Impacts 2016
TRR RTOR Flow Profile Impacts 2016TRR RTOR Flow Profile Impacts 2016
TRR RTOR Flow Profile Impacts 2016
 
Modeling Truck Movements: A Comparison between the Quick Response Freight Man...
Modeling Truck Movements: A Comparison between the Quick Response Freight Man...Modeling Truck Movements: A Comparison between the Quick Response Freight Man...
Modeling Truck Movements: A Comparison between the Quick Response Freight Man...
 
Kate White 101 solutions-10-12-2015-NCST Brief-Induced_Travel
Kate White 101 solutions-10-12-2015-NCST Brief-Induced_TravelKate White 101 solutions-10-12-2015-NCST Brief-Induced_Travel
Kate White 101 solutions-10-12-2015-NCST Brief-Induced_Travel
 
D04412429
D04412429D04412429
D04412429
 
Mastersresearch 06-02-16
Mastersresearch 06-02-16Mastersresearch 06-02-16
Mastersresearch 06-02-16
 
Street Design Final Submission
Street Design Final SubmissionStreet Design Final Submission
Street Design Final Submission
 
Path loss analysis
Path loss analysisPath loss analysis
Path loss analysis
 
Application of a Markov chain traffic model to the Greater Philadelphia Region
Application of a Markov chain traffic model to the Greater Philadelphia RegionApplication of a Markov chain traffic model to the Greater Philadelphia Region
Application of a Markov chain traffic model to the Greater Philadelphia Region
 
Introduction of vissim software
Introduction of vissim softwareIntroduction of vissim software
Introduction of vissim software
 
Accessibility analysis of public transport networks in urban areas
Accessibility analysis of public transport networks in urban areasAccessibility analysis of public transport networks in urban areas
Accessibility analysis of public transport networks in urban areas
 
Modal split analysis
Modal split analysis Modal split analysis
Modal split analysis
 

Similar a Annex 3 01

Sebastian Emig - silver bullet for future urban mobilitity or waste of money
Sebastian Emig - silver bullet for future urban mobilitity or waste of moneySebastian Emig - silver bullet for future urban mobilitity or waste of money
Sebastian Emig - silver bullet for future urban mobilitity or waste of money
imadhammoud
 
Ports in Short Sea Shipping. A critical assessment of the European Maritime T...
Ports in Short Sea Shipping. A critical assessment of the European Maritime T...Ports in Short Sea Shipping. A critical assessment of the European Maritime T...
Ports in Short Sea Shipping. A critical assessment of the European Maritime T...
Ancor Suárez Alemán
 
tramwaysvsbrtseng-161104061524
tramwaysvsbrtseng-161104061524tramwaysvsbrtseng-161104061524
tramwaysvsbrtseng-161104061524
Erik Geensen
 
Towards an effective transitioning of public transport system in Ghana
Towards an effective transitioning of public transport system in GhanaTowards an effective transitioning of public transport system in Ghana
Towards an effective transitioning of public transport system in Ghana
Institute for Transport Studies (ITS)
 
20320140505003 2
20320140505003 220320140505003 2
20320140505003 2
IAEME Publication
 
RV 2014: Complete Streets- From Policy to Implementation by Gregory Thompson
RV 2014: Complete Streets- From Policy to Implementation by Gregory ThompsonRV 2014: Complete Streets- From Policy to Implementation by Gregory Thompson
RV 2014: Complete Streets- From Policy to Implementation by Gregory Thompson
Rail~Volution
 
A-TWENTY-YEAR-TRACKING-OF-THE-TRAFFIC-SERVICE-QUALITY-IN-A-DOWNTOWN-NETWORK-T...
A-TWENTY-YEAR-TRACKING-OF-THE-TRAFFIC-SERVICE-QUALITY-IN-A-DOWNTOWN-NETWORK-T...A-TWENTY-YEAR-TRACKING-OF-THE-TRAFFIC-SERVICE-QUALITY-IN-A-DOWNTOWN-NETWORK-T...
A-TWENTY-YEAR-TRACKING-OF-THE-TRAFFIC-SERVICE-QUALITY-IN-A-DOWNTOWN-NETWORK-T...
Milad Kiaee
 

Similar a Annex 3 01 (20)

Amsterdam Rail System: Part of the Accessible and Liveable City
Amsterdam Rail System: Part of the Accessible and Liveable CityAmsterdam Rail System: Part of the Accessible and Liveable City
Amsterdam Rail System: Part of the Accessible and Liveable City
 
Data driven public_transportation_operation_by_trips_jaehong_min
Data driven public_transportation_operation_by_trips_jaehong_minData driven public_transportation_operation_by_trips_jaehong_min
Data driven public_transportation_operation_by_trips_jaehong_min
 
Session 43 Per Kågeson
Session 43 Per KågesonSession 43 Per Kågeson
Session 43 Per Kågeson
 
Sebastian Emig - silver bullet for future urban mobilitity or waste of money
Sebastian Emig - silver bullet for future urban mobilitity or waste of moneySebastian Emig - silver bullet for future urban mobilitity or waste of money
Sebastian Emig - silver bullet for future urban mobilitity or waste of money
 
ALTERNATE ROPEWAY TRANSIT SYSTEM FOR MANPADA ROAD
ALTERNATE ROPEWAY TRANSIT SYSTEM FOR MANPADA ROADALTERNATE ROPEWAY TRANSIT SYSTEM FOR MANPADA ROAD
ALTERNATE ROPEWAY TRANSIT SYSTEM FOR MANPADA ROAD
 
sustainable transport
sustainable transportsustainable transport
sustainable transport
 
28.01.2013, The UB-Metro toward a world competitive city - Ulaanbaatar, Dr. K...
28.01.2013, The UB-Metro toward a world competitive city - Ulaanbaatar, Dr. K...28.01.2013, The UB-Metro toward a world competitive city - Ulaanbaatar, Dr. K...
28.01.2013, The UB-Metro toward a world competitive city - Ulaanbaatar, Dr. K...
 
Ports in Short Sea Shipping. A critical assessment of the European Maritime T...
Ports in Short Sea Shipping. A critical assessment of the European Maritime T...Ports in Short Sea Shipping. A critical assessment of the European Maritime T...
Ports in Short Sea Shipping. A critical assessment of the European Maritime T...
 
20090304-HSR-TxRailAdvocates
20090304-HSR-TxRailAdvocates20090304-HSR-TxRailAdvocates
20090304-HSR-TxRailAdvocates
 
tramwaysvsbrtseng-161104061524
tramwaysvsbrtseng-161104061524tramwaysvsbrtseng-161104061524
tramwaysvsbrtseng-161104061524
 
SMART Seminar Series: A Systems approach to Transport Planning for Revitalizi...
SMART Seminar Series: A Systems approach to Transport Planning for Revitalizi...SMART Seminar Series: A Systems approach to Transport Planning for Revitalizi...
SMART Seminar Series: A Systems approach to Transport Planning for Revitalizi...
 
Towards an effective transitioning of public transport system in Ghana
Towards an effective transitioning of public transport system in GhanaTowards an effective transitioning of public transport system in Ghana
Towards an effective transitioning of public transport system in Ghana
 
4. CombinedAssessment
4. CombinedAssessment4. CombinedAssessment
4. CombinedAssessment
 
Road Pricing And The Reduction...Powerpoint
Road Pricing And The Reduction...PowerpointRoad Pricing And The Reduction...Powerpoint
Road Pricing And The Reduction...Powerpoint
 
Feasibility Study of Mass Transport in Nasik City
Feasibility Study of Mass Transport in Nasik CityFeasibility Study of Mass Transport in Nasik City
Feasibility Study of Mass Transport in Nasik City
 
20320140505003 2
20320140505003 220320140505003 2
20320140505003 2
 
20320140505003 2
20320140505003 220320140505003 2
20320140505003 2
 
RV 2014: Complete Streets- From Policy to Implementation by Gregory Thompson
RV 2014: Complete Streets- From Policy to Implementation by Gregory ThompsonRV 2014: Complete Streets- From Policy to Implementation by Gregory Thompson
RV 2014: Complete Streets- From Policy to Implementation by Gregory Thompson
 
A-TWENTY-YEAR-TRACKING-OF-THE-TRAFFIC-SERVICE-QUALITY-IN-A-DOWNTOWN-NETWORK-T...
A-TWENTY-YEAR-TRACKING-OF-THE-TRAFFIC-SERVICE-QUALITY-IN-A-DOWNTOWN-NETWORK-T...A-TWENTY-YEAR-TRACKING-OF-THE-TRAFFIC-SERVICE-QUALITY-IN-A-DOWNTOWN-NETWORK-T...
A-TWENTY-YEAR-TRACKING-OF-THE-TRAFFIC-SERVICE-QUALITY-IN-A-DOWNTOWN-NETWORK-T...
 
Let's reduce CO2 emissions even more!
Let's reduce CO2 emissions even more!Let's reduce CO2 emissions even more!
Let's reduce CO2 emissions even more!
 

Más de investinlviv

львів з ним варто познайомитися
львів з ним варто познайомитисяльвів з ним варто познайомитися
львів з ним варто познайомитися
investinlviv
 
львів 2012 для міжнародників eng
львів 2012 для міжнародників engльвів 2012 для міжнародників eng
львів 2012 для міжнародників eng
investinlviv
 
Katalog vilnyh vyrobnychyh_ploshch
Katalog vilnyh vyrobnychyh_ploshchKatalog vilnyh vyrobnychyh_ploshch
Katalog vilnyh vyrobnychyh_ploshch
investinlviv
 
Catalogue of existing_industrial_and_warehousing_premises
Catalogue of existing_industrial_and_warehousing_premisesCatalogue of existing_industrial_and_warehousing_premises
Catalogue of existing_industrial_and_warehousing_premises
investinlviv
 
Booklet industrial park_2
Booklet industrial park_2Booklet industrial park_2
Booklet industrial park_2
investinlviv
 
Booklet industrial park_ua
Booklet industrial park_uaBooklet industrial park_ua
Booklet industrial park_ua
investinlviv
 
Industrial park beztpf
Industrial park beztpfIndustrial park beztpf
Industrial park beztpf
investinlviv
 
Business park in_lviv_bez_tpf
Business park in_lviv_bez_tpfBusiness park in_lviv_bez_tpf
Business park in_lviv_bez_tpf
investinlviv
 
Залучення інвестицій на місцевому рівні
Залучення інвестицій на місцевому рівніЗалучення інвестицій на місцевому рівні
Залучення інвестицій на місцевому рівні
investinlviv
 
Залучення інвестицій на місцевому рівні eng
Залучення інвестицій на місцевому рівні engЗалучення інвестицій на місцевому рівні eng
Залучення інвестицій на місцевому рівні eng
investinlviv
 

Más de investinlviv (15)

львів з ним варто познайомитися
львів з ним варто познайомитисяльвів з ним варто познайомитися
львів з ним варто познайомитися
 
львів 2012 для міжнародників eng
львів 2012 для міжнародників engльвів 2012 для міжнародників eng
львів 2012 для міжнародників eng
 
Strategy Lviv
Strategy LvivStrategy Lviv
Strategy Lviv
 
Katalog vilnyh vyrobnychyh_ploshch
Katalog vilnyh vyrobnychyh_ploshchKatalog vilnyh vyrobnychyh_ploshch
Katalog vilnyh vyrobnychyh_ploshch
 
Catalogue of existing_industrial_and_warehousing_premises
Catalogue of existing_industrial_and_warehousing_premisesCatalogue of existing_industrial_and_warehousing_premises
Catalogue of existing_industrial_and_warehousing_premises
 
Euro rail eng_full
Euro rail eng_fullEuro rail eng_full
Euro rail eng_full
 
Booklet industrial park_2
Booklet industrial park_2Booklet industrial park_2
Booklet industrial park_2
 
Annex 3 1_ua_dorogy
Annex 3 1_ua_dorogyAnnex 3 1_ua_dorogy
Annex 3 1_ua_dorogy
 
Booklet industrial park_ua
Booklet industrial park_uaBooklet industrial park_ua
Booklet industrial park_ua
 
Eurorail ukr
Eurorail ukrEurorail ukr
Eurorail ukr
 
Industrial park beztpf
Industrial park beztpfIndustrial park beztpf
Industrial park beztpf
 
Business park in_lviv_bez_tpf
Business park in_lviv_bez_tpfBusiness park in_lviv_bez_tpf
Business park in_lviv_bez_tpf
 
World bank macro update october 2014 eng fin
World bank macro update october 2014 eng finWorld bank macro update october 2014 eng fin
World bank macro update october 2014 eng fin
 
Залучення інвестицій на місцевому рівні
Залучення інвестицій на місцевому рівніЗалучення інвестицій на місцевому рівні
Залучення інвестицій на місцевому рівні
 
Залучення інвестицій на місцевому рівні eng
Залучення інвестицій на місцевому рівні engЗалучення інвестицій на місцевому рівні eng
Залучення інвестицій на місцевому рівні eng
 

Último

Corporate Presentation Probe Canaccord Conference 2024.pdf
Corporate Presentation Probe Canaccord Conference 2024.pdfCorporate Presentation Probe Canaccord Conference 2024.pdf
Corporate Presentation Probe Canaccord Conference 2024.pdf
Probe Gold
 
Top Rated Call Girls In Podanur 📱 {7001035870} VIP Escorts Podanur
Top Rated Call Girls In Podanur 📱 {7001035870} VIP Escorts PodanurTop Rated Call Girls In Podanur 📱 {7001035870} VIP Escorts Podanur
Top Rated Call Girls In Podanur 📱 {7001035870} VIP Escorts Podanur
dharasingh5698
 
VIP Call Girls Kheda 7001035870 Whatsapp Number, 24/07 Booking
VIP Call Girls Kheda 7001035870 Whatsapp Number, 24/07 BookingVIP Call Girls Kheda 7001035870 Whatsapp Number, 24/07 Booking
VIP Call Girls Kheda 7001035870 Whatsapp Number, 24/07 Booking
dharasingh5698
 
Corporate Presentation Probe May 2024.pdf
Corporate Presentation Probe May 2024.pdfCorporate Presentation Probe May 2024.pdf
Corporate Presentation Probe May 2024.pdf
Probe Gold
 
Ambala Escorts Service ☎️ 6378878445 ( Sakshi Sinha ) High Profile Call Girls...
Ambala Escorts Service ☎️ 6378878445 ( Sakshi Sinha ) High Profile Call Girls...Ambala Escorts Service ☎️ 6378878445 ( Sakshi Sinha ) High Profile Call Girls...
Ambala Escorts Service ☎️ 6378878445 ( Sakshi Sinha ) High Profile Call Girls...
mriyagarg453
 

Último (20)

SME IPO Opportunity and Trends of May 2024
SME IPO Opportunity and Trends of May 2024SME IPO Opportunity and Trends of May 2024
SME IPO Opportunity and Trends of May 2024
 
countries with the highest gold reserves in 2024
countries with the highest gold reserves in 2024countries with the highest gold reserves in 2024
countries with the highest gold reserves in 2024
 
The Leonardo 1Q 2024 Results Presentation
The Leonardo 1Q 2024 Results PresentationThe Leonardo 1Q 2024 Results Presentation
The Leonardo 1Q 2024 Results Presentation
 
Corporate Presentation Probe Canaccord Conference 2024.pdf
Corporate Presentation Probe Canaccord Conference 2024.pdfCorporate Presentation Probe Canaccord Conference 2024.pdf
Corporate Presentation Probe Canaccord Conference 2024.pdf
 
Best investment platform in india-Falcon Invoice Discounting
Best investment platform in india-Falcon Invoice DiscountingBest investment platform in india-Falcon Invoice Discounting
Best investment platform in india-Falcon Invoice Discounting
 
Balaji Nagar ( Call Girls ) Pune 6297143586 Hot Model With Sexy Bhabi Ready...
Balaji Nagar ( Call Girls ) Pune  6297143586  Hot Model With Sexy Bhabi Ready...Balaji Nagar ( Call Girls ) Pune  6297143586  Hot Model With Sexy Bhabi Ready...
Balaji Nagar ( Call Girls ) Pune 6297143586 Hot Model With Sexy Bhabi Ready...
 
(INDIRA) Call Girl Kashmir Call Now 8617697112 Kashmir Escorts 24x7
(INDIRA) Call Girl Kashmir Call Now 8617697112 Kashmir Escorts 24x7(INDIRA) Call Girl Kashmir Call Now 8617697112 Kashmir Escorts 24x7
(INDIRA) Call Girl Kashmir Call Now 8617697112 Kashmir Escorts 24x7
 
VVIP Pune Call Girls Handewadi WhatSapp Number 8005736733 With Elite Staff An...
VVIP Pune Call Girls Handewadi WhatSapp Number 8005736733 With Elite Staff An...VVIP Pune Call Girls Handewadi WhatSapp Number 8005736733 With Elite Staff An...
VVIP Pune Call Girls Handewadi WhatSapp Number 8005736733 With Elite Staff An...
 
Deutsche EuroShop | Annual Report 2023 (EN)
Deutsche EuroShop | Annual Report 2023 (EN)Deutsche EuroShop | Annual Report 2023 (EN)
Deutsche EuroShop | Annual Report 2023 (EN)
 
Collective Mining | Corporate Presentation - May 2024
Collective Mining | Corporate Presentation - May 2024Collective Mining | Corporate Presentation - May 2024
Collective Mining | Corporate Presentation - May 2024
 
Top Rated Call Girls In Podanur 📱 {7001035870} VIP Escorts Podanur
Top Rated Call Girls In Podanur 📱 {7001035870} VIP Escorts PodanurTop Rated Call Girls In Podanur 📱 {7001035870} VIP Escorts Podanur
Top Rated Call Girls In Podanur 📱 {7001035870} VIP Escorts Podanur
 
VIP Call Girls Kheda 7001035870 Whatsapp Number, 24/07 Booking
VIP Call Girls Kheda 7001035870 Whatsapp Number, 24/07 BookingVIP Call Girls Kheda 7001035870 Whatsapp Number, 24/07 Booking
VIP Call Girls Kheda 7001035870 Whatsapp Number, 24/07 Booking
 
(👉゚9999965857 ゚)👉 VIP Call Girls Friends Colony 👉 Delhi 👈 : 9999 Cash Payment...
(👉゚9999965857 ゚)👉 VIP Call Girls Friends Colony 👉 Delhi 👈 : 9999 Cash Payment...(👉゚9999965857 ゚)👉 VIP Call Girls Friends Colony 👉 Delhi 👈 : 9999 Cash Payment...
(👉゚9999965857 ゚)👉 VIP Call Girls Friends Colony 👉 Delhi 👈 : 9999 Cash Payment...
 
Nicola Mining Inc. Corporate Presentation May 2024
Nicola Mining Inc. Corporate Presentation May 2024Nicola Mining Inc. Corporate Presentation May 2024
Nicola Mining Inc. Corporate Presentation May 2024
 
Corporate Presentation Probe May 2024.pdf
Corporate Presentation Probe May 2024.pdfCorporate Presentation Probe May 2024.pdf
Corporate Presentation Probe May 2024.pdf
 
Pakistani Call girls in Ajman +971563133746 Ajman Call girls
Pakistani Call girls in Ajman +971563133746 Ajman Call girlsPakistani Call girls in Ajman +971563133746 Ajman Call girls
Pakistani Call girls in Ajman +971563133746 Ajman Call girls
 
Western Copper and Gold - May 2024 Presentation
Western Copper and Gold - May 2024 PresentationWestern Copper and Gold - May 2024 Presentation
Western Copper and Gold - May 2024 Presentation
 
Dubai Call Girls O525547&19 Calls Girls In Dubai (L0w+Charger)
Dubai Call Girls O525547&19 Calls Girls In Dubai (L0w+Charger)Dubai Call Girls O525547&19 Calls Girls In Dubai (L0w+Charger)
Dubai Call Girls O525547&19 Calls Girls In Dubai (L0w+Charger)
 
Ambala Escorts Service ☎️ 6378878445 ( Sakshi Sinha ) High Profile Call Girls...
Ambala Escorts Service ☎️ 6378878445 ( Sakshi Sinha ) High Profile Call Girls...Ambala Escorts Service ☎️ 6378878445 ( Sakshi Sinha ) High Profile Call Girls...
Ambala Escorts Service ☎️ 6378878445 ( Sakshi Sinha ) High Profile Call Girls...
 
(👉゚9999965857 ゚)👉 VIP Call Girls Greater Noida 👉 Delhi 👈 : 9999 Cash Payment...
(👉゚9999965857 ゚)👉 VIP Call Girls Greater Noida  👉 Delhi 👈 : 9999 Cash Payment...(👉゚9999965857 ゚)👉 VIP Call Girls Greater Noida  👉 Delhi 👈 : 9999 Cash Payment...
(👉゚9999965857 ゚)👉 VIP Call Girls Greater Noida 👉 Delhi 👈 : 9999 Cash Payment...
 

Annex 3 01

  • 1. Measure 06 typ*: TM length: 5,4 km average traffic volume public transport on measure: 30000 persons per 24h maximum traffic volume public transport on measure: 38600 persons per 24h minimum traffic volume public transport on measure: 15000 persons per 24h The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change The optimistic scenario includes an equal supply in Marschrutkas like in the analysis. If the supply in Marschrutkas will be reduced, there will be shiftings in the traffic demand to other means public transport. TM - Tramway TB - short description: comment: benefit: traffic performance: time in traffic: CO2 - emission: ranking: roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years estimated tamm waggon costs are based on 1 mio. UAH for a used tram investment costs: Trolleybus difference between realization case and no realization case 19,2 Mio. Person-km/year 347,2 Tsd. Person-h/year -1926,1 t/year 79,7 Mio. UAH 57,8 Mio. UAH The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions. 4 maintenance costs: total costs: Costs for additional need of tram waggons: Tramway line 4 * Types: Tramway track to Sykhiv from the existing end point stop vul. Mushaka vul. V. Stusa, Prospekt Chervonoy Kalyny to Sykhiv 137,5 Mio. UAH 7 Mio. UAH © ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.1 page 1/13
  • 2. Measure 07 typ*: TM length: 3.2 km average traffic volume public transport on measure: 15600 persons per 24h maximum traffic volume public transport on measure: 15600 persons per 24h minimum traffic volume public transport on measure: 15600 persons per 24h The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change The optimistic scenario includes an equal supply in Marschrutkas like in the analysis. If the supply in Marschrutkas will be reduced, there will be shiftings in the traffic demand to other means public transport. TM - Tramway TB - short description: comment: benefit: traffic performance: time in traffic: CO2 - emission: ranking: Tramway line 4 * Types: Tramway track: Sykhiv, vul. Vernadskoho, Bus terminal vul. Stryyska Trolleybus difference between realization case and no realization case 8.8 Mio. Person-km/year 73.8 Tsd. Person-h/year -889.4 t/year 6 49.1 Mio. UAH 21.6 Mio. UAH 70.7 Mio. UAH The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions. roughly cost estimation based on general investment costs: characteristic cost values, maintenance maintenance costs: costs about 20 years total costs: estimated tamm waggon costs are based on 1 mio. UAH for a used tram Costs for additional need of tram waggons: 3 Mio. UAH © ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.1 page 2/13
  • 3. Measure 08 typ*: TM length: 3.2 km Tramway line 3 and line 5 average traffic volume public transport on measure: 12700 persons per 24h (Line 3) 9800 persons per 24h (Line 5) maximum traffic volume public transport on measure: 12700 persons per 24h (Line 3) 9800 persons per 24h (Line 5) minimum traffic volume public transport on measure: 12700 persons per 24h (Line 3) 9800 persons per 24h (Line 5) * Types: TM - Tramway TB - short description: comment: The optimistic scenario includes an equal supply in Marschrutkas like in the analysis. If the supply in Marschrutkas will be reduced, there will be shiftings in the traffic demand to other means public transport. benefit: traffic performance: time in traffic: CO2 - emission: ranking: difference between realization case and no realization case 33.3 Mio. Person-km/year 589.8 Tsd. Person-h/year -3342.9 t/year 3 The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions. Trolleybus Tramway track: Bus Terminal vul. Stryyska to vul. Knyahyny Olhy The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change 40.8 Mio. UAH 18.4 Mio. UAH roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years maintenance costs: total costs: estimated tamm waggon costs are based on 1 mio. UAH for a used tram Costs for additional need of tram waggons: 59.2 Mio. UAH 6 Mio. UAH investment costs: © ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.1 page 3/13
  • 4. Measure 09 typ*: TM length: 6.9 km 6.3 km (Line 2) (Line 6) average traffic volume public transport on measure: 15900 persons per 24h (Line 2) 9200 persons per 24h (Line 6) maximum traffic volume public transport on measure: 27300 persons per 24h (Line 2) 9600 persons per 24h (Line 6) minimum traffic volume public transport on measure: 2900 persons per 24h (Line 2) 400 persons per 24h (Line 6) TM - Tramway TB - comment: The optimistic scenario includes an equal supply in Marschrutkas like in the analysis. If the supply in Marschrutkas will be reduced, there will be shiftings in the traffic demand to other means public transport. benefit: traffic performance: time in traffic: CO2 - emission: ranking: difference between realization case and no realization case 16.7 Mio. Person-km/year The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions. Tramway line 2 and line 6 * Types: Reconstruction of Tramway Line 2 and 6 (EBRD) The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change short description: Trolleybus 251.2 Tsd. Person-h/year -1675.2 t/year 11 120.0 Mio. UAH 141.3 Mio. UAH 261.3 Mio. UAH 12 Mio. UAH roughly cost estimation based on general investment costs: characteristic cost values, maintenance maintenance costs: costs about 20 years total costs: estimated tamm waggon costs are based on 1 mio. UAH for a used tram Costs for additional need of tram waggons: © ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.1 page 4/13
  • 5. Measure 10 typ*: TM length: 6.9 km Trolleybus line 12 average traffic volume public transport on measure: 15900 persons per 24h maximum traffic volume public transport on measure: 27300 persons per 24h minimum traffic volume public transport on measure: 2900 persons per 24h The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change The optimistic scenario includes an equal supply in Marschrutkas like in the analysis. If the supply in Marschrutkas will be reduced, there will be shiftings in the traffic demand to other means public transport. * Types: TM - Tramway TB - comment: benefit: traffic performance: time in traffic: CO2 - emission: ranking: maintenance costs: 10 49.1 Mio. UAH 10.2 Mio. UAH 3.5 Mio. UAH Extension Line 12: to vul. Shevchenka 105.7 Tsd. Person-h/year -453.7 t/year Costs for additional need of trolleybusses: difference between realization case and no realization case short description: Trolleybus The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions. roughly cost estimation investment costs: based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years total costs: estimated tamm waggon costs are based on 3,5 mio. UAH for a new trolleybus investment costs include costs for construction of new road 4.5 Mio. Person-km/year 59.3 Mio. UAH © ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.1 page 5/13
  • 6. Measure 11 typ*: TM length: 3.4 km Trolleybus line 24 average traffic volume public transport on measure: 5900 persons per 24h maximum traffic volume public transport on measure: 6900 persons per 24h minimum traffic volume public transport on measure: 5200 persons per 24h The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change The optimistic scenario includes an equal supply in Marschrutkas like in the analysis. If the supply in Marschrutkas will be reduced, there will be shiftings in the traffic demand to other means public transport. TM - Tramway TB - Extension of Line 24: Prospekt Chervonoy Kalyny, vul. Khutorivka to vul. Stryyska comment: The line 24 in the model goes alternately to vul. Stryyska (measure 11) and to vul. Karbyshev (measure 14). In case the measure 11 will not be realised it was assumed that all trips go to vul. Karbyshev (measure 14). benefit: traffic performance: time in traffic: CO2 - emission: ranking: maintenance costs: 23.1 Mio. UAH The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions. difference between realization case and no realization case 4.7 Mio. Person-km/year 99.4 Tsd. Person-h/year -470.4 t/year roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years total costs: estimated tamm waggon costs are based on 3,5 mio. UAH for a new trolleybus Costs for additional need of trolleybusses: short description: Trolleybus 35.8 Mio. UAH 10.5 Mio. UAH investment costs does not include costs for construction of new road * Types: 12.7 Mio. UAH investment costs: 5 © ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.1 page 6/13
  • 7. Measure 12 typ*: TM length: 4.3 km Trolleybus line 24 average traffic volume public transport on measure: 2700 persons per 24h maximum traffic volume public transport on measure: 5100 persons per 24h minimum traffic volume public transport on measure: 1000 persons per 24h The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change The optimistic scenario includes an equal supply in Marschrutkas like in the analysis. If the supply in Marschrutkas will be reduced, there will be shiftings in the traffic demand to other means public transport. * Types: TM - Tramway TB - Extension Line 11/24: vul. Dzh. Vashyngtona, vul. Pasichna, Mayorivka, vul. Medovoy Pechery comment: The measure 12 was added to the model as independent sub-line of the trolleybus line 24 from vul. Zelena to the end ofvul. Medovoy Pechery benefit: traffic performance: time in traffic: CO2 - emission: ranking: maintenance costs: 19.2 Tsd. Person-h/year -105.4 t/year 13 16.0 Mio. UAH 29.2 Mio. UAH 17.5 Mio. UAH Costs for additional need of trolleybusses: difference between realization case and no realization case short description: Trolleybus The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions. roughly cost estimation investment costs: based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years total costs: estimated tamm waggon costs are based on 3,5 mio. UAH for a new trolleybus investment costs does not include costs for construction of new road 1.0 Mio. Person-km/year 45.3 Mio. UAH © ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.1 page 7/13
  • 8. Measure 13 typ*: TM length: 1.0 km Trolleybus line 24 average traffic volume public transport on measure: 7200 persons per 24h maximum traffic volume public transport on measure: 8700 persons per 24h minimum traffic volume public transport on measure: 5400 persons per 24h The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change The optimistic scenario includes an equal supply in Marschrutkas like in the analysis. If the supply in Marschrutkas will be reduced, there will be shiftings in the traffic demand to other means public transport. * Types: TM - Tramway TB - Extension of Trolley bus line 24 for 1 Kilometer from cinema in Zone „Santa Barbara“ comment: benefit: traffic performance: time in traffic: CO2 - emission: ranking: 8 4.5 Mio. UAH maintenance costs: 8.2 Mio. UAH The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions. difference between realization case and no realization case 1.2 Mio. Person-km/year 18.6 Tsd. Person-h/year -120.2 t/year investment costs does not include costs for construction of new road estimated tamm waggon costs are based on 3,5 mio. UAH for a new trolleybus Costs for additional need of trolleybusses: short description: Trolleybus 12.6 Mio. UAH 3.5 Mio. UAH The measure 13 was added to model as blind line within the trolleybus line. roughly cost estimation investment costs: based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years total costs: © ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.1 page 8/13
  • 9. Measure 14 typ*: TM length: 3.3 km Trolleybus line 24 average traffic volume public transport on measure: 1400 persons per 24h maximum traffic volume public transport on measure: 2000 persons per 24h minimum traffic volume public transport on measure: 1000 persons per 24h The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change The optimistic scenario includes an equal supply in Marschrutkas like in the analysis. If the supply in Marschrutkas will be reduced, there will be shiftings in the traffic demand to other means public transport. * Types: TM - Tramway TB - Construction of 2.5 km new Trolley bus line from cinema to the existing line on vul. Karbyshev over Sykhiv Bridge for passenger transport from Sykhiv - Novyy Lviv, connection of two highly passenger frequented parts of the city Sykhiv und Novyy Lviv and shortest Line from Sykhiv in the city centre (Pl. Petrushevycha) over vul. Stusa comment: The trolleybus line 1 is out of order because of the realised tram line 4. The line 24 in the model goes from the cinema alternately to vul. Stryyska (measure 11) and to vul. Karbyshev (measure 14).In case the measure 14 is not realised, it was assumed that all trips go tovul. Stryyska (measure 11). benefit: traffic performance: time in traffic: CO2 - emission: ranking: 9 12.3 Mio. UAH maintenance costs: 22.4 Mio. UAH The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions. difference between realization case and no realization case 3.2 Mio. Person-km/year 73.4 Tsd. Person-h/year -320.5 t/year investment costs does not include costs for construction of new road estimated tamm waggon costs are based on 3,5 mio. UAH for a new trolleybus Costs for additional need of trolleybusses: short description: Trolleybus 34.7 Mio. UAH 10.5 Mio. UAH roughly cost estimation investment costs: based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years total costs: © ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.1 page 9/13
  • 10. Measure 16 typ*: TM length: 5.0 km Trolleybus line 2 average traffic volume public transport on measure: 3100 persons per 24h maximum traffic volume public transport on measure: 7200 persons per 24h minimum traffic volume public transport on measure: 900 persons per 24h The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change The optimistic scenario includes an equal supply in Marschrutkas like in the analysis. If the supply in Marschrutkas will be reduced, there will be shiftings in the traffic demand to other means public transport. * Types: TM - Tramway TB - Extension Line 2 to vul. Trolleybusna (circle line in 2 directions: Kulparkivska-Naukova-Trolleybusna, V.Velykoho) - chance to create new lines to connect Sykhiv) comment: benefit: traffic performance: time in traffic: CO2 - emission: ranking: maintenance costs: 101.6 Tsd. Person-h/year -434.8 t/year 7 14.9 Mio. UAH 27.2 Mio. UAH 7.0 Mio. UAH Costs for additional need of trolleybusses: difference between realization case and no realization case short description: Trolleybus The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions. roughly cost estimation investment costs: based on general investment costs does not include characteristic cost costs for construction of new road values, maintenance costs about 20 years total costs: estimated tamm waggon costs are based on 3,5 mio. UAH for a new trolleybus 4.3 Mio. Person-km/year 42.1 Mio. UAH © ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.1 page 10/13
  • 11. Measure 17 typ*: TM length: 1.2 km (8.2 km) shifting (whole line) Trolleybus line 3 average traffic volume public transport on measure: 11000 persons per 24h maximum traffic volume public transport on measure: 18000 persons per 24h minimum traffic volume public transport on measure: 3100 persons per 24h The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change The optimistic scenario includes an equal supply in Marschrutkas like in the analysis. If the supply in Marschrutkas will be reduced, there will be shiftings in the traffic demand to other means public transport. * Types: TM - Tramway TB - Shifting of one line (one direction) from vul. Stryyska to vul. Trolleybusna over vul. V. Velykoho - increase of traffic flows by the double line on vul. Rubachka comment: Measure 17 includes a doubling on the vul. Rubachka by doubling of the time table of the whole line. The benefits and costs were calculated together with measure 18. benefit: traffic performance: time in traffic: CO2 - emission: ranking: 1 4.5 Mio. UAH maintenance costs: 8.2 Mio. UAH The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions. difference between realization case and no realization case 7.2 Mio. Person-km/year 169.7 Tsd. Person-h/year -725.5 t/year investment costs does not include costs for construction of new road estimated tamm waggon costs are based on 3,5 mio. UAH for a new trolleybus Costs for additional need of trolleybusses: short description: Trolleybus 12.6 Mio. UAH 14.0 Mio. UAH roughly cost estimation investment costs: based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years total costs: © ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.1 page 11/13
  • 12. Measure 18 typ*: TM length: 1.2 km (8.2 km) shifting (whole line) Trolleybus line 3 average traffic volume public transport on measure: 11000 persons per 24h maximum traffic volume public transport on measure: 18000 persons per 24h minimum traffic volume public transport on measure: 3100 persons per 24h The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change The optimistic scenario includes an equal supply in Marschrutkas like in the analysis. If the supply in Marschrutkas will be reduced, there will be shiftings in the traffic demand to other means public transport. * Types: TM - Tramway TB - Analogue (Measure 17) shifting of the Line in one direction from vul. Trolleybusna to vul. Stryyska over Naukova (right turn is no bar for the other traffic) Line can be an important Trolley bus connection to Bus Terminal and Stadion comment: Measure 18 includes a doubling on the vul. Rubachka by doubling of the time table of the whole line. The benefits and costs were calculated together with measure 17. benefit: traffic performance: time in traffic: CO2 - emission: ranking: maintenance costs: 169.7 Tsd. Person-h/year -725.5 t/year 2 4.5 Mio. UAH 8.2 Mio. UAH 0.0 Mio. UAH Costs for additional need of trolleybusses: difference between realization case and no realization case short description: Trolleybus The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions. roughly cost estimation investment costs: based on general investment costs does not include characteristic cost costs for construction of new road values, maintenance costs about 20 years total costs: estimated tamm waggon costs are based on 3,5 mio. UAH for a new trolleybus 7.2 Mio. Person-km/year 12.6 Mio. UAH © ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.1 page 12/13
  • 13. Measure 19 typ*: TM length: 2.0 km Trolleybus line 5 average traffic volume public transport on measure: 1900 persons per 24h maximum traffic volume public transport on measure: 1900 persons per 24h minimum traffic volume public transport on measure: 1900 persons per 24h The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change The optimistic scenario includes an equal supply in Marschrutkas like in the analysis. If the supply in Marschrutkas will be reduced, there will be shiftings in the traffic demand to other means public transport. * Types: TM - Tramway TB - comment: benefit: traffic performance: time in traffic: CO2 - emission: ranking: 12 59.5 Mio. UAH maintenance costs: 13.6 Mio. UAH The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions. difference between realization case and no realization case 2.8 Mio. Person-km/year 59.9 Tsd. Person-h/year -279.5 t/year investment costs include costs for construction of new road estimated tamm waggon costs are based on 3,5 mio. UAH for a new trolleybus Costs for additional need of trolleybusses: short description: Trolleybus 73.1 Mio. UAH 3.5 Mio. UAH Future close connection of the Bus terminal to the Stadion by trolley bus roughly cost estimation investment costs: based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years total costs: © ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.1 page 13/13
  • 14. Measure 01 typ*: A lanes: length: tunnel/bridges: average traffic volume on measure: maximum traffic volume on measure: minimum traffic volume on measure: A - B - Main road network with moving traffic C - Road network of general relevance with regulated traffic D - Road and traffic organisation comment: investment costs: * Types: Motorway/ highway CO2 - emission: ranking: roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years maintenance costs: total costs: difference between realization case and no realization case costs: Completion of the road circle The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change traffic performance: short description: The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions. benefit: time in traffic: Completion of the road circle national measure not included in urban budget © ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 1/26
  • 15. Measure 02 typ*: A lanes: length: tunnel/bridges: average traffic volume on measure: maximum traffic volume on measure: minimum traffic volume on measure: A - B - Main road network with moving traffic C - Road network of general relevance with regulated traffic D - Road and traffic organisation Extension of the entire road circle to four lanes comment: Extension of the entire road circle to four lanes * Types: national measure not included in urban budget The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions. benefit: time in traffic: The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change short description: Motorway/ highway traffic performance: difference between realization case and no realization case costs: investment costs: roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years CO2 - emission: ranking: maintenance costs: total costs: © ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 2/26
  • 16. Measure 03 typ*: B lanes: 4 length: 10 km tunnel/bridges: yes / yes average traffic volume on measure: 42300 Veh/24h maximum traffic volume on measure: 58500 Veh/24h minimum traffic volume on measure: 32300 Veh/24h A - B - Main road network with moving traffic C - Road network of general relevance with regulated traffic D - Road and traffic organisation Construction of a main road near city centre, which will carry all traffic flows through the city centre in north-south direction (cp. current master plan) Course: from exit to Kiev, vul. Khmelnytskoho, over railway line Lviv-Krasne, over High Castle, with tunneled sections, new section alongside Shevchenkivskyy Gay, crossing vul. Lychakivska, Zelena, Stusa, along vul. Ivana Franka and vul. Stryyska to the exit to Stryy comment: The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change short description: * Types: Motorway/ highway difference between realization case and no realization case -21 Mio. Veh-km/year -2038 Tsd. Veh-h/year - 5871 t/year 6 1399 Mio. UAH 234.8 Mio. UAH roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years investment costs: maintenance costs: total costs: Chorda - Axis 1633.8 Mio. UAH The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions. benefit: traffic performance: time in traffic: CO2 - emission: ranking: costs: © ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 3/26
  • 17. Measure 04 typ*: B lanes: 4 length: 20 km tunnel/bridges: no / yes average traffic Small inner circle volume on measure: 36600 Veh/24h maximum traffic volume on measure: 58300 Veh/24h minimum traffic volume on measure: 16700 Veh/24h * Types: A - B - Main road network with moving traffic C - Road network of general relevance with regulated traffic D - Road and traffic organisation comment: roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years maintenance costs: difference between realization case and no realization case - 8221 t/year 4 1167.5 Mio. UAH total costs: 1395.7 Mio. UAH The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions. benefit: traffic performance: time in traffic: CO2 - emission: -27 Mio. Veh-km/year -4828 Tsd. Veh-h/year 228.2 Mio. UAH ranking: costs: investment costs: The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change short description: Motorway/ highway The inner circle is planned to proceed from the industrial centre Sykhiv, alongside the railway line Lviv-Khodoriv at vul. Luhanska, crossing the railway line Lviv-Mostyska-frontier, vul. Syayvo, Levandivska, Yeroshenka, Lypynskoho, through the northern industrial zone, crossing the railway line Lviv-Krasne, vul. Bogdanivska (planned) through the south-eastern industrial zone, vul. Pasychna, to the industrial centre Sykhiv © ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 4/26
  • 18. Measure 05 typ*: B lanes: 4 length: 27 km tunnel/bridges: no / yes average traffic Peripheral semi-circle volume on measure: 33100 Veh/24h maximum traffic volume on measure: 46500 Veh/24h minimum traffic volume on measure: 18400 Veh/24h The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change A - B - Main road network with moving traffic C - Road network of general relevance with regulated traffic D - Road and traffic organisation Route: from Sykhiv industrial zone, vul Khutorivka, Naukova, Ryashivska, crossing of vul. Horodotska and railway lines Lviv-Stryy and Lviv-Mostyska-frontier, new main road Roksolyani (planned), near residential area Ryasne, through forest park zone, to the northern residential area Zboyska and to the exit towards Kiev comment: difference between realization case and no realization case -79 Mio. Veh-km/year 3 total costs: 1631.7 Mio. UAH The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions. benefit: traffic performance: time in traffic: CO2 - emission: ranking: costs: investment costs: -6985 Tsd. Veh-h/year short description: * Types: Motorway/ highway 259.2 Mio. UAH roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years maintenance costs: - 20553 t/year 1372.5 Mio. UAH © ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 5/26
  • 19. Measure 06 typ*: B lanes: 4 length: 8.5 km tunnel/bridges: no / no average traffic volume on measure: 24500 Veh/24h maximum traffic volume on measure: 32800 Veh/24h minimum traffic volume on measure: 11100 Veh/24h The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change A - B - Main road network with moving traffic C - Road network of general relevance with regulated traffic D - Road and traffic organisation Exit Ternopil - from band main road alongside Glynyanskyy Trakt to the circle bypass comment: difference between realization case and no realization case -3 Mio. Veh-km/year -425 Tsd. Veh-h/year 9 67 Mio. UAH roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years maintenance costs: Exit Ternopil - 666 t/year 335 Mio. UAH short description: * Types: Motorway/ highway total costs: 422 Mio. UAH The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions. benefit: traffic performance: time in traffic: CO2 - emission: ranking: costs: investment costs: © ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 6/26
  • 20. Measure 07 typ*: B lanes: 4 length: 6.5 km tunnel/bridges: no / no average traffic Exit Ivano-Frankivsk volume on measure: 25500 Veh/24h maximum traffic volume on measure: 49100 Veh/24h minimum traffic volume on measure: 20400 Veh/24h The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change A - B - Main road network with moving traffic C - Road network of general relevance with regulated traffic D - Road and traffic organisation Exit Ivano-Frankivsk - from the circle connection and peripheral semi-circle to Sykhiv alongside vul. Zelena to the circle bypass comment: difference between realization case and no realization case -0.8 Mio. Veh-km/year 14 total costs: 354.1 Mio. UAH The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions. benefit: traffic performance: time in traffic: CO2 - emission: ranking: costs: investment costs: -203 Tsd. Veh-h/year short description: * Types: Motorway/ highway 59.1 Mio. UAH roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years maintenance costs: -112 t/year 295 Mio. UAH © ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 7/26
  • 21. Measure 08 typ*: B lanes: 4 length: 6.8 km tunnel/bridges: no / yes average traffic volume on measure: 15800 Veh/24h maximum traffic volume on measure: 18900 Veh/24h minimum traffic volume on measure: 6800 Veh/24h A - B - Main road network with moving traffic C - Road network of general relevance with regulated traffic D - Road and traffic organisation comment: difference between realization case and no realization case 0.3 Mio. Veh-km/year -274 Tsd. Veh-h/year 22 54.9 Mio. UAH roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years maintenance costs: Exit Zhovkva 27 t/year 289 Mio. UAH Exit Zhovkva - from band main road to the northern bypass motorway The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change short description: * Types: Motorway/ highway total costs: 343.9 Mio. UAH The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions. benefit: traffic performance: time in traffic: CO2 - emission: ranking: costs: investment costs: © ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 8/26
  • 22. Measure 09 typ*: B lanes: 4 length: 6.2 km tunnel/bridges: no / yes average traffic volume on measure: 28700 Veh/24h maximum traffic volume on measure: 57600 Veh/24h minimum traffic volume on measure: 5200 Veh/24h A - B - Main road network with moving traffic C - Road network of general relevance with regulated traffic D - Road and traffic organisation comment: difference between realization case and no realization case -1 Mio. Veh-km/year 11 total costs: 340.1 Mio. UAH The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions. benefit: traffic performance: time in traffic: CO2 - emission: ranking: costs: investment costs: -203 Tsd. Veh-h/year Exit Horodok - from inner circle at vul. Horodotska to Konopnyca The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change short description: * Types: Motorway/ highway 58.1 Mio. UAH roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years maintenance costs: Exit Horodok -376 t/year 282 Mio. UAH © ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 9/26
  • 23. Measure 10 typ*: B lanes: 4 length: 8.8 km tunnel/bridges: no / yes average traffic volume on measure: 20400 Veh/24h maximum traffic volume on measure: 34300 Veh/24h minimum traffic volume on measure: 12300 Veh/24h The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change A - B - Main road network with moving traffic C - Road network of general relevance with regulated traffic D - Road and traffic organisation Exit Yavoriv - from inner circle at vul. Shevchenka through Ryasne industrial zone to the peripheral circle comment: difference between realization case and no realization case -1 Mio. Veh-km/year -231 Tsd. Veh-h/year 13 86.1 Mio. UAH roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years maintenance costs: Exit Yavoriv -235 t/year 408 Mio. UAH short description: * Types: Motorway/ highway total costs: 494.1 Mio. UAH The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions. benefit: traffic performance: time in traffic: CO2 - emission: ranking: costs: investment costs: © ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 10/26
  • 24. Measure 11 typ*: B lanes: 4 length: 4 km Road construction Vernadskyy prospekt tunnel/bridges: no / yes average traffic volume on measure: 12300 Veh/24h maximum traffic volume on measure: 14700 Veh/24h minimum traffic volume on measure: 6500 Veh/24h A - B - Main road network with moving traffic C - Road network of general relevance with regulated traffic D - Road and traffic organisation comment: difference between realization case and no realization case -0.4 Mio. Veh-km/year 15 total costs: 249.4 Mio. UAH The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions. benefit: traffic performance: time in traffic: CO2 - emission: ranking: costs: investment costs: -204 Tsd. Veh-h/year Road construction Vernadskyy Prospekt, 3.2 km length The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change short description: * Types: Motorway/ highway 39.9 Mio. UAH roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years maintenance costs: -45 t/year 209.5 Mio. UAH © ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 11/26
  • 25. Measure 12 typ*: B lanes: length: tunnel/bridges: no / no total traffic volume heading to the node: 84500 Veh/24h cross section with highest traffic volume at the node 45200 Veh/24h cross section with least traffic volume at the node 39000 Veh/24h A - Motorway/ highway B - Main road network with moving traffic C - Road network of general relevance with regulated traffic D - Road and traffic organisation Complete extension of crossing vul. Stryyska - vul. Khutorivska, Naukova (multilevel solution) comment: The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change difference between realization case and no realization case 0.1 Mio. Veh-km/year -124 Tsd. Veh-h/year 17 3.6 Mio. UAH roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years benefit: traffic performance: time in traffic: CO2 - emission: maintenance costs: 15 Mio. UAH short description: total costs: 18.6 Mio. UAH The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions. Crossing vul. Stryyska - vul. Khutorivska, Naukova * Types: 65 t/year ranking: costs: investment costs: © ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 12/26
  • 26. Measure 16 New main roads in western residential/ industrial areas typ*: C lanes: 4 length: 4.5 km tunnel/bridges: no / yes average traffic volume on measure: 9200 Veh/24h maximum traffic volume on measure: 9700 Veh/24h minimum traffic volume on measure: 8400 Veh/24h The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change A - B - Main road network with moving traffic C - Road network of general relevance with regulated traffic D - Road and traffic organisation New main roads in the western residential and industrial areas with connection to the motorway Lviv-Mostyska-frontier comment: difference between realization case and no realization case -4 Mio. Veh-km/year -394 Tsd. Veh-h/year 5 40.1 Mio. UAH roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years maintenance costs: -964 t/year 199.5 Mio. UAH short description: * Types: Motorway/ highway total costs: 239.6Mio. UAH The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions. benefit: traffic performance: time in traffic: CO2 - emission: ranking: costs: investment costs: © ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 13/26
  • 27. Measure 17 typ*: C lanes: 4 length: 2.8 km Connection of city with southern districts tunnel/bridges: no / no average traffic volume on measure: 16500 Veh/24h maximum traffic volume on measure: 18900 Veh/24h minimum traffic volume on measure: 15700 Veh/24h The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change A - B - Main road network with moving traffic C - Road network of general relevance with regulated traffic D - Road and traffic organisation Vul. Kulparkivska and Knyahyni Olhy - connection of central urban districts with southern residential areas and Sokilnyky comment: difference between realization case and no realization case -0.6 Mio. Veh-km/year 10 total costs: 142.9Mio. UAH The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions. benefit: traffic performance: time in traffic: CO2 - emission: ranking: costs: investment costs: -260 Tsd. Veh-h/year short description: * Types: Motorway/ highway 23.4 Mio. UAH roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years maintenance costs: -178 t/year 119.5 Mio. UAH © ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 14/26
  • 28. Measure 18 Traffic improvement between vul. Zelena/ vul. Sakharova typ*: D lanes: 2 length: 3.8 km tunnel/bridges: no / no average traffic volume on measure: 11000 Veh/24h maximum traffic volume on measure: 20800 Veh/24h minimum traffic volume on measure: 2000 Veh/24h The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change A - B - Main road network with moving traffic C - Road network of general relevance with regulated traffic D - Road and traffic organisation Traffic improvement on the section between vul. Zelena and vul. Sakharova (vul. Franko, Rustaveli, Voloska, Sarytskykh, Vitovskoho, Kopernyka). Planning of one-way-streets at vul. Franko, Rustaveli, Voloska, Zarytskykh, Saksahanskoho Planning of reconstruction of vul. Voloska - road extension near Stryyskyy-market to 3 lanes with organisation of one-way-streets and extension of vul. Rustaveli near vul. Archypenka Reorganisation of bus- and electric public transport comment: difference between realization case and no realization case 2 Mio. Veh-km/year 28 Tsd. Veh-h/year 16 33.5 Mio. UAH roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years maintenance costs: 622 t/year 131.3 Mio. UAH short description: * Types: Motorway/ highway total costs: 164.8 Mio. UAH The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions. benefit: traffic performance: time in traffic: CO2 - emission: ranking: costs: investment costs: © ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 15/26
  • 29. Measure 19 Improvement of the traffic scheme at Pl. Petrushevycha typ*: D lanes: 2 length: 1.1 km tunnel/bridges: no / no average traffic volume on measure: 6000 Veh/24h maximum traffic volume on measure: 15200 Veh/24h minimum traffic volume on measure: 1500 Veh/24h The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change A - B - Main road network with moving traffic C - Road network of general relevance with regulated traffic D - Road and traffic organisation Improvement of the traffic scheme at Pl. Petrushevycha, at vul. Saksahanskoho and Zelena incl. establishment of one-way-streets and access from vul. Saksahanskoho to Pl. Petrushevycha via vul. Kostomarova (extended by partial demolition of buildings) and traffic light controlled crossings - relief of crossing vul. Zelena – vul. Franka The basic traffic scheme provides the establishment of a one-way-street and the effective utilisation of vul. Sarytskykh: Planning of an access to this street from vul. Vitovskoho (left corner of the park, in front of park entrance). inspection of th variant of continuation of vul. Sarytskykh towards vul. Bohuna (perspective 2012- 2015). comment: difference between realization case and no realization case 0.3 Mio. Veh-km/year 20 total costs: 56.1 Mio. UAH The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions. benefit: traffic performance: time in traffic: CO2 - emission: ranking: costs: investment costs: -19 Tsd. Veh-h/year short description: * Types: Motorway/ highway 12.5 Mio. UAH roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years maintenance costs: 97 t/year 43.6 Mio. UAH © ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 16/26
  • 30. Measure 20 Reconstruktion of sections in north-eastern city centre typ*: D lanes: 2 length: 2 km tunnel/bridges: no / no average traffic volume on measure: 8000 Veh/24h maximum traffic volume on measure: 12200 Veh/24h minimum traffic volume on measure: 3100 Veh/24h The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change A - B - Main road network with moving traffic C - Road network of general relevance with regulated traffic D - Road and traffic organisation Reconstruction of several sections to improve traffic flows in the north-eastern city centre: alongside Lychakivska, Halytskyy place, Prospekt Svoboda and vul. Pidvalna by planned intensified utilisation of the streets Sankovetska, Lysenka, Vynnychenka required reconstruction of parts of vul. Lysenka (executed), opening of a small part of vul. Vynnychenka (approx. 70 m), to secure the left-hand exit to vul. Kryvonosa and the ascension to vul. Honta by circumnavigating perspectively: partial reconstruction of Vynnychenka, to redirect traffic flows from vul. Franka to Honta through Vynnychenka which will relieve Pidvalna. demolition of a salient quoin at vul. Honta to increase the passage capacity comment: difference between realization case and no realization case 0.2 Mio. Veh-km/year 27 Tsd. Veh-h/year 21 19.1 Mio. UAH roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years maintenance costs: 74 t/year 72 Mio. UAH short description: * Types: Motorway/ highway total costs: 91.1 Mio. UAH The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions. benefit: traffic performance: time in traffic: CO2 - emission: ranking: costs: investment costs: © ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 17/26
  • 31. Measure 21 3-lane road connection of Kharkivska with Musorskoho typ*: D lanes: 3 length: 1.4 km tunnel/bridges: no / yes average traffic volume on measure: 13300 Veh/24h maximum traffic volume on measure: 16000 Veh/24h minimum traffic volume on measure: 10900 Veh/24h The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change A - B - Main road network with moving traffic C - Road network of general relevance with regulated traffic D - Road and traffic organisation Radical relief of the city centre from transit traffic on Lychakivska, Mayorivka, Zelena by construction of a 3-lane road as a connection of Kharkivska with Musorskoho near Znesinnya park - redirection of traffic flows on vul. Korduba and tunnel entrance to Promyslova and Khmelnytskoho, through Saklynskykh to Kovelska and Polova to the northern district of the city comment: The 3-laned road construction measure goes via Chorda - Axis (measure 3), for measure 21 only the drives to the Chorda - Axis were modelled as measure. difference between realization case and no realization case 0.8 Mio. Veh-km/year 19 total costs: 74.9 Mio. UAH The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions. benefit: traffic performance: time in traffic: CO2 - emission: ranking: costs: investment costs: 22 Tsd. Veh-h/year short description: * Types: Motorway/ highway 14.2 Mio. UAH roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years maintenance costs: 154 t/year 60.7 Mio. UAH © ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 18/26
  • 32. Measure 22 Abscission of the corner on crossing Pstrak/ Kleparivska typ*: D lanes: 2 length: 1.2 km tunnel/bridges: no / no average traffic volume on measure: 8100 Veh/24h maximum traffic volume on measure: 10500 Veh/24h minimum traffic volume on measure: 6200 Veh/24h The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change A - B - Main road network with moving traffic C - Road network of general relevance with regulated traffic D - Road and traffic organisation Abscission of the sharp corner at the green area on the street crossing Pstrak and Kleparivska, to allow for an active traffic flow from Horodocka via J.Mudroho to Kleparivska and onto north, radical reconstruction of vul. Y Mudroho (currently under construction) comment: difference between realization case and no realization case -0.2 Mio. Veh-km/year 3 Tsd. Veh-h/year 12 13.0 Mio. UAH roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years maintenance costs: -53 t/year 46.2 Mio. UAH short description: * Types: Motorway/ highway total costs: 59.2 Mio. UAH The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions. benefit: traffic performance: time in traffic: CO2 - emission: ranking: costs: investment costs: © ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 19/26
  • 33. Measure 23 typ*: D lanes: 2 length: 0.5 km Reconstruction Chuprynky and Melnyka tunnel/bridges: no / no average traffic volume on measure: 7500 Veh/24h maximum traffic volume on measure: 11000 Veh/24h minimum traffic volume on measure: 4900 Veh/24h The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change A - B - Main road network with moving traffic C - Road network of general relevance with regulated traffic D - Road and traffic organisation Reconstruction vul. Chuprynky (partly executed) and Melnyka to intensify traffic flows from Horbachevskoho to Antonovycha for relief of vul. Sakharova and Kopernyka as well as the city centre Traffic from Antonovycha via vul. Bandery, Nevskoho and Ozarkevycha will be directed via Horodotska and Y.Mudroho-Pstraka-Kleparivska to the north of the city. comment: difference between realization case and no realization case 0.2 Mio. Veh-km/year 18 total costs: 34.0 Mio. UAH The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions. benefit: traffic performance: time in traffic: CO2 - emission: ranking: costs: investment costs: -133 Tsd. Veh-h/year short description: * Types: Motorway/ highway 8.5 Mio. UAH roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years maintenance costs: 75 t/year 25.5 Mio. UAH © ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 20/26
  • 34. Measure 24 typ*: D lanes: 3 length: 1 km Enlarging of sections of vul. Kopernyka tunnel/bridges: no / no average traffic volume on measure: 14200 Veh/24h maximum traffic volume on measure: 15700 Veh/24h minimum traffic volume on measure: 8700 Veh/24h The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change A - B - Main road network with moving traffic C - Road network of general relevance with regulated traffic D - Road and traffic organisation Enlarging of sections of vul. Kopernyka (Kopernyka-Verbytskoho, Kopernyka-Bandery, Kopernyka-Stefanyka) to improve the situation on vul. Sakharova and Vitovskoho towards city centre at the expense of the pavement comment: difference between realization case and no realization case -0.5 Mio. Veh-km/year -46 Tsd. Veh-h/year 8 12.0 Mio. UAH roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years maintenance costs: -117 t/year 45.5 Mio. UAH short description: * Types: Motorway/ highway total costs: 57.5 Mio. UAH The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions. benefit: traffic performance: time in traffic: CO2 - emission: ranking: costs: investment costs: © ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 21/26
  • 35. Measure 25 3-lane-road between vul. Slovatskoho and Lepkoho typ*: D lanes: 3 length: 0.4 km tunnel/bridges: no / no average traffic volume on measure: 13600 Veh/24h maximum traffic volume on measure: 14100 Veh/24h minimum traffic volume on measure: 13200 Veh/24h The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change A - B - Main road network with moving traffic C - Road network of general relevance with regulated traffic D - Road and traffic organisation Start of the construction of a 3-lane-road between vul. Slovatskoho and Lepkoho through the green area in front of Franko memorial (relocation of the stopping points at university to secure the construction of the south-western circle aroung the city centre and the relief of vul. Sichovykh Striltsiv. comment: difference between realization case and no realization case -0.1 Mio. Veh-km/year 23 total costs: 23.0 Mio. UAH The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions. benefit: traffic performance: time in traffic: CO2 - emission: ranking: costs: investment costs: -59 Tsd. Veh-h/year short description: * Types: Motorway/ highway 4.8 Mio. UAH roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years maintenance costs: 0.2 t/year 18.2 Mio. UAH © ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 22/26
  • 36. Measure 26 Finalisation 1st phase connection Zaliznychna/ Lutskoho typ*: D lanes: 2 length: 0.3 km tunnel/bridges: no / no average traffic volume on measure: 15100 Veh/24h maximum traffic volume on measure: 16600 Veh/24h minimum traffic volume on measure: 10800 Veh/24h The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change A - B - Main road network with moving traffic C - Road network of general relevance with regulated traffic D - Road and traffic organisation Finalisation of 1st phase workings for the connection of Zaliznychna and Lutskoho for traffic flows from district Pryvokzalnyy to vul.Shevchenka and relief of Horodotska comment: difference between realization case and no realization case -1 Mio. Veh-km/year -155 Tsd. Veh-h/year 1 1.4 Mio. UAH roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years maintenance costs: -222 t/year 7,8 Mio. UAH short description: * Types: Motorway/ highway total costs: 9.2 Mio. UAH The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions. benefit: traffic performance: time in traffic: CO2 - emission: ranking: costs: investment costs: © ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 23/26
  • 37. Measure 27 Roundabout at crossing prospekt Chornovola, Pid Dubom typ*: D lanes: length: tunnel/bridges: no / no total traffic volume heading to the node: 42300 Veh/24h cross section with highest traffic volume at the node 31000 Veh/24h cross section with least traffic volume at the node 8100 Veh/24h The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change A - Motorway/ highway B - Main road network with moving traffic C - Road network of general relevance with regulated traffic D - Road and traffic organisation Construction of a roundabout instead of crossing Prospekt Chornovola, Pid Dubom and Kulisha comment: traffic performance: time in traffic: CO2 - emission: ranking: benefit: costs: investment costs: * Types: difference between realization case and no realization case -1 Mio. Veh-km/year -81 Tsd. Veh-h/year -244 t/year 2 1.7 Mio. UAH roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years maintenance costs: 9.9 Mio. UAH short description: total costs: 11.6 Mio. UAH The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions. © ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 24/26
  • 38. Measure 28 Measures for redirection traffic vul. Kulisha/ Chornovola typ*: D lanes: length: tunnel/bridges: average traffic volume on measure: 12700 Veh/24h maximum traffic volume on measure: 16000 Veh/24h minimum traffic volume on measure: 10200 Veh/24h A - B - Main road network with moving traffic C - Road network of general relevance with regulated traffic D - Road and traffic organisation Organisational measures for the redirection of traffic flows and to activate car and bus traffic through vul. Dzherelna to relieve vul. Kulisha and Chornovola comment: total costs: traffic organisation only The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions. benefit: traffic performance: time in traffic: CO2 - emission: ranking: costs: investment costs: The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change short description: * Types: Motorway/ highway roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years maintenance costs: difference between realization case and no realization case © ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 25/26
  • 39. Measure 29 typ*: D lanes: 4 length: 0.2 km tunnel/bridges: yes / no average traffic volume on measure: 15000 Veh/24h maximum traffic volume on measure: 18000 Veh/24h minimum traffic volume on measure: 12700 Veh/24h The traffic Volume results from the Optimistic Scenario 2030 and will be different when framework conditions (e.g. structural data or road network with several measures) will change A - B - Main road network with moving traffic C - Road network of general relevance with regulated traffic D - Road and traffic organisation Inspection of possibilities for tunnel construction under the tramway line on vul. Khmelnytskoho for activation of the street parallel to vul. Zamarstyniyska comment: tunnel construction under the tramway line difference between realization case and no realization case -2 Mio. Veh-km/year -150 Tsd. Veh-h/year 7 17.9 Mio. UAH roughly cost estimation based on general characteristic cost values, maintenance costs about 20 years maintenance costs: -402 t/year 113 Mio. UAH short description: * Types: Motorway/ highway total costs: 130.9 Mio. UAH The difference in traffic volume between realisation case and no-realisation case refers to one single measure in the optimistic scenatio 2030. The Ranking is based on the Dynamic Prime Costs for the CO2-Emissions. benefit: traffic performance: time in traffic: CO2 - emission: ranking: costs: investment costs: © ARGE Lviv Urban Transport 2009 annex 3.2 page 26/26