This document summarizes a presentation on increasing scrutiny of science and how it has become more public. It discusses how trust in science has declined among conservatives over time and remains high among the general public compared to trust in other institutions like the president. It also examines what fuels mistrust, including focusing only on rare cases of misconduct instead of addressing systemic issues. Key lessons from controversies like arsenic-based life are presented, along with the growing role of blogs in policing misconduct and journals increasingly embracing post-publication peer review to promote integrity. Contact information is provided for following up.