Investment in The Coconut Industry by Nancy Cheruiyot
Inventory 1213683812410770-9
1. Outline for Managing Inventory
Global Company Profile: Green Gear Cycling
Functions of Inventory
Types of Inventory
Inventory Management
ABC Analysis
Record Accuracy
Control of Service Inventory
Inventory Models
Independent versus Dependent Demand
Holding, Ordering, and Setup Costs
3. Green Gear Cycling
Bike Friday - a bike in a suitcase
Mass customization
fast throughput
low inventory
work cells
generalized machine (reduce setups)
Balance between inventory holding cost and
availability
Aggressive attention to reducing cycle time
of whole process
4. The Functions of Inventory
To ”decouple” or separate various parts
of the production process
To provide a stock of goods that will
provide a “selection” for customers
To take advantage of quantity discounts
To hedge against inflation and upward
price changes
5. Inventory Classifications
Inventory
Process Number Demand
Other
stage & Value Type
Raw Material A Items Maintenance
Independent
WIP & Finished B Items Dependent
Dependent
Goods C Items Operating
6. Types of Inventory
Direct Inventory
Raw material
Work-in-progress (WIP)
Finished goods
Indirect Inventory
Stored capacity
Maintenance/repair/operating supply
7. The Material Flow Cycle and
WIP
Other Wait Move Queue Setup Run
Input Time Time Time Time Time Output
Cycle Time
Run time: Job is at machine and being worked on
Setup time: Job is at the work station, and the work
station is being "setup."
Queue time: Job is where it should be, but is not
being processed because other work precedes it.
Move time: The time a job spends in transit
Wait time: When one process is finished, but the job
is waiting to be moved to the next work area.
Other: "Just-in-case" inventory.
8. Sources of Waste
JIT “fights” seven types of waste
Waste of motion --excessive or unnecessary human activity
Waste of waiting --jobs waiting to be processed
Waste of inventory --building up unnecessary inventory
stocks
Waste of conveyance --jobs being unnecessary moved
Waste of processing --excessive or unnecessary operations
Waste of overproduction --producing more than demanded
Waste of correction (defective products) --waste due to
scrap, rework, repair, etc.
9. Independent vs. Dependent
Demand
Independent demand - demand for item
is independent of demand for any other
item
EOQ Models
Dependent demand - demand for item is
dependent upon the demand for some
other item
MRP Systems
10. Disadvantages of Inventory
Higher costs
Ordering (or setup) cost
Costs of processing, clerks’ wages etc.
Holding (or carrying) cost
Building lease, insurance, opportunity, taxes
etc.
Difficult to control
Hides production problems
11. Inventory Tracking
JIT and mass customization requires
knowledge of location of all goods in order
to precisely control the production plan
Requires ERP data, barcode technology, RF
and electronic communications to track
inventory in transit, on the shop floor, and in
the warehouse
In JIT system, warehouse is less a
warehouse than a “pass through facility.”
Inaccurate inventory tracking is worse than
no information
12. Holding Costs Breakdown
(Approximate Ranges)
Category Cost as a
% of Inventory Value
6%
Housing costs
(3 - 10%
Material handling costs 3%
(1 - 3.5%0
Labor and administration 3%
cost (3 - 5%)
Investment costs 11%
(6 - 24%)
Pilferage, scrap, and 3%
obsolescence (2 - 5%)
13. EOQ Model:
Minimize the overall Costs
Cost
e
t Curv
otal Cos Curve
T ost
C
ing
Hold
Ordering & Setup Costs Curve
Optimal Order Quantity
Order Quantity (Q*)
14. Inventory Holding Costs
Obsolescence
Insurance
Extra staffing
Interest
Pilferage
Damage
Warehousing
Etc.
15. Ordering Costs & Setup Costs
Order processing
Clerical support
Clean-up costs
Re-tooling costs
Relocation or adjustment costs
16. Objective:
Why holding cost increase?
Why order cost decrease?
Two underlying inventory question
How much to order (e.g. finding EOQ)
When to order (e.g. finding ROP)
17. Underline Decisions Supported
by EOQ Models
Objective: Minimizing the total inventory costs
How much to order (Economic Order Quantity)
When to order? (Reorder Point)
How often should we place orders (Ordering
Period)
Others
How to Take advantage of quantity discount
What if the lead time and demand are not constant?
Heuristics: Fixed Period Systems
18. Basic EOQ Model (Constant
Demand and Lead Time)
Inventory Level
Optimal Average
Order Inventory
Quantity (Q*/2)
(Q*)
Reorder
Point
(ROP)
Time
Lead Time
19. Derive the EOQ: Finding Q*
that Minimizes the Total Costs
Total inventory cost = Order (Setup) cost + Holding cost
D Q
TC = S + H
Q 2
To minimize TC, we set the derivative of TC with
respect to Q* equal to 0
d (TC ) − DS H
= ( 2 )+ = 0
dQ Q 2
Thus,
2DS
Q* =
H
20. EOQ Model Equations: How
much to Order
Optimal Order Quantity 2 ×D ×S
= Q* =
H
Expected Number of Orders = N = D
Q*
Expected Time Between Orders Working Days / Year
=T =
N
D = Demand per year
S = Setup (order) cost per order
H = Holding (carrying) cost
21. Reorder Point: When to
Order?
When there is lead time between order
and delivery, we need to identify the
reorder point to avoid out of stock.
This provides answer for the second
inventory “When to order?”
ROP = (Demand per day)(Lead time for
a new order in days) = d × L
D
d=
Working Days / Year
22. EOQ Example
Electronic Assembler, Inc. has to order 2920 TX5 circuit boards per year. The ordering
cost is $80 per order; and the holding cost per unit per year is $50. The purchase
price is $28. The items can be delivered in 5 days. The company would like to
reduce its inventory costs by determining the optimal number of circuit boards to
obtain per order. The conditions of ordering and inventory handling satisfy the
assumptions of the EOQ model.
Annual demand D = 2,920 units
Daily demand d = 2,920/365=8 units
Holding cost H = $50 per unit per year
Ordering cost S = $80 per order
Purchase price P = $28 per unit
Lead time LT = 5 days
Answer the following questions with detailed calculations and explanation:
1. Optimal quantity per order (EOQ):
2. Annual total relevant costs (optimal):
3. Annual total costs (optimal):
4. Number of orders per year:
5. Inventory cycle time (Nd=365 working days per year):
6. Reorder Point (ROP):
23. Production Order Quantity
Model
Allows partial receipt of material
Other EOQ assumptions apply
Suited for production environment
Material produced, used immediately
Provides production lot size
Lower holding cost than EOQ model
24. POQ Model
Inventory Level
Optimal Average
Order Inventory
Quantity
(Q*)
Reorder
Point
(ROP)
Time
Lead Time
25. POQ Model Inventory Levels
Inventory Level
Production portion of cycle
Demand portion of cycle with no
supply
Supply Supply
Time
Begins Ends
26. POQ Model Inventory Levels
Inventory Level
Inventory level with no demand
Production Max. Inventory
Portion of Cycle Q·(1- d/p)
Q*
Time
Supply Supply Demand portion of cycle
Begins Ends with no supply
27. POQ Model Equations
= Q* = 2*D*S
Optimal Order Quantity
p
H* 1 -
( )
d
p
Maximum inventory level = Q *
( 1 -
d
p )
D
Setup Cost = * S D = Demand per year
Q
S = Setup cost
Holding Cost = 0.5 * H * Q
( )
1-
d
p
H = Holding cost
d = Demand per day
p = Production per day
28. Quantity Discount Model
Answers how much to order &
when to order
Allows quantity discounts
Reduced price when item is purchased in
larger quantities
Other EOQ assumptions apply
Trade-off is between lower price &
increased holding cost
29. Quantity Discount Model
How Much to Order?
Total
Cost Discount 1 Discount 2
Initial Price Price Price
or t1
TC f ount Dis coun
sc or
N o Di TC f
t2
c oun
Di s
for
TC
Quantity which would
be ordered
Order
Quantity to Quantity to Quantity
Lowest cost not in earn earn
discount range Discount 1 Discount 2
30. Probabilistic Models
Allow demand and lead time to vary
Follows normal distribution
Other EOQ assumptions apply
Consider service level & safety stock
Service level = 1 - Probability of stockout
Higher service level means more safety
stock
More safety stock means higher ROP
31. Probabilistic Models
When to Order?
Frequency Service
Inventory Level
Level P(Stockout)
Optimal
Order
X
Quantity SS
ROP
Reorder
Point
(ROP)
Safety Stock (SS)
Place Receive Time
order Lead Time order
32. ABC Classification: Pareto Principle
(Critical few and trivial many)
% Annual $ Usage Class % $ Vol % Items
100 A 80 15
B 15 30
80
C 5 55
60
40
A
B
20 C
0
0 50 100
% of Inventory Items
33. Heuristics: Fixed Period Model
Orders placed at fixed intervals
Inventory brought up to target amount
Amount ordered varies
No continuous inventory count
Possibility of stockout between intervals
Useful when vendors visit routinely
Example: P&G representative visits every
2 weeks
35. Implementing JIT via Agile
Inventory Management
Traditional: inventory exists in case
problems arise
JIT objective: Eliminate redundant
inventory
JIT requires
Small lot sizes
Low setup time
Containers for fixed number of parts
JIT inventory: Minimum inventory to
keep system running (lean but agile)
36. Lowering Inventory
Reduces Waste
Work in process inventory level
(hides problems)
Unreliable Capacity
Scrap
Vendors Imbalances
37. Lowering Inventory
Reduces Waste
Reducing inventory reveals
problems so they can be solved.
WIP
Unreliable Capacity
Scrap
Vendors Imbalances
38. To Lower Inventory,
Reduce Lot Sizes
Inventory Level
Average
Lot Size 200 inventory = 40 Average inventory
= 100
Lot Size 80
Average inventory = (Lot size)/2 Time
40. Unless Setup Costs are
Reduced
Cost
l Cost
Tota Cos
t
Ho l di ng
Setup Cost
New optimal Original
optimal Lot Size
lot size
lot size
41. Steps to Reduce Setup Time
(Honda Assembly Line)
90 min
Initial Setup Time
Separate setup into preparation, and actual
Step 1 setup, doing as much as possible while the
machine/process is running (save 30 minutes)
60 min
Move material closer and improve
Step 2 material handling (save 20
minutes) 45 min
Standardize and
Step 3 improve tooling
(save 15 minutes) 25 min
Use one-touch system to
eliminate adjustments (save 10
Step 4 15 min
minutes)
Step 5 13 min
Training operators and
standardizing work
procedures (save 2 minutes)
42. Reducing Lot Sizes Increases
the Number of Lots
Small lots increase flexibility to meet customer
demands
Strategies for eliminating waste
and for eliminating waiting
43. Freeze Part of the Schedule
JIT Small Lots
A A B B B C A A B B B C
Time
Flexibility between Nissan plant and Dealers
Five day before delivery: 100% flexibility
Four day before: Freeze number of each model
Three day before: Freeze change color
Two day: Freeze major options
One day before: Freeze minor options
44. JIT Scheduling
Involves timing of operations
JIT requires
Communicating schedules to suppliers
Level schedules
Arrange flexible schedule for small lots (jelly
bean scheduling)
Freeze part of schedule nearest due date
Kanban techniques
45. Kanban
Japanese word for card
Pronounced ‘kahn-bahn’ (not ‘can-ban’)
Authorizes production from downstream
operations
‘Pulls’ material through plant
May be a card, flag, verbal signal, empty
container, real time message (stock broker,
football player) etc.
Most common example: use fixed-number
containers or work permits to coordinate
actions
Add or remove containers to change production rate
While most students recognize inventory as a “stock of material,” the notion of inventory as a “stored capacity” probably merits explicit discussion.
This slide provides a more detailed view of the material flow cycle. Students might be asked to comment on the impact of each element on the overall time. Questions such as: - why do we need these times? - how can they be reduced? - would we wish to eliminate these elements entirely? might be helpful.
Of the items listed on this slide, the least obvious to most students is the manner in which inventory can be used to hide production problems.
Note that this slide suggest holding costs are, on average, about 26% of the inventory value
You might ask students if they can identify an industry for which the cost of obsolescence is particularly important. Is the number of such industries likely to grow or decline? The same question could be asked regarding pilferage. The question could be asked in a more general manner: Are there industries for which one or another of the areas listed is of particular or unusual importance?
One should link this model to the assumptions. You should also explore, at least briefly, how this picture would change if the assumptions were not met.
For some students, it is most important at this point to explain in detail the meaning and significance of each equation. It might be helpful to actually work through a numerical example.
One way to approach this is as an EOQ model with the instantaneous replenishment assumption relaxed. The following slide (EOQ Model modified to show changes for POQ) allows you to do this if you wish. Otherwise, skip it and move on.
Given that students recognize that production takes place for only a portion of the cycle, you might ask how one determines the appropriate length of the production period. If they understand the model, they will perceive that the production period is determined by the POQ.
Here again, it may be helpful to actually go through a numerical example, but it will probably be necessary to explain in detail the meaning and significance of each equation
Students will probably need help interpreting this slide. The overlays do, however, allow you to step through your argument. It is important to stress that after one identifies the quantities which would actually be ordered, there remains the task of calculating total cost for each quantity.
One point to stress here is that this is simply an extension of the original EOQ model where we are now allowing the demand to vary. Students should become accustomed to seeking such extensions as the need arises. The next slide presents a graphical view of this model.
32
Are we back to Pareto analysis?
This represents a model in which orders are based upon time, not the quantity needed. The following slide provides a graphical representation.
Students should be asked to draw their own connection between inventory and problems. Given that inventory exists in case of problems, if we wish to eliminate inventory, we also must eliminate problems. Again the notion that JIT is not simply an inventory methodology.
The analogy presented in this and the next four slides may help to illustrate the action of inventory in hiding problems.
The next several slides look at the process and consequences of reducing inventory.
In discussing this slide, it is helpful to stress the caveat that JIT works given that other problems are solved. JIT not only requires the solution of other problems, it also helps in diagnosis.
Students should be asked what problems they would expect to encounter when trying to introduce schedules appropriate to JIT.