2. The Purpose: The goal of my research is to discover: Why students and teachers should use Digital Interactive Note booking during class lectures in distanceeducation? Could this teaching method improve computerized testing scores?

3. Outline Topics & Subtopics Technology Insisted Instruction Recall study technique note-taking Examining the differences in examinee performance on computerized testing using digital note-booking in the classroom. Comparison paper pencil test and computer test Electronic note-taking

5. Guided learning using the combination of traditional lectures and TEC together is the most beneficial style of students learning.

7. According to Forsyth (1997), Computer based teaching methods: 1.Improve the transfer of information. 2.Increased instructional focus 3.Enhanced Motivation. 4.Stimulates creative Expression. No dull text, because I need Vivid graphics too!

8. Which learning Style is Effective to enhance improving conceptual knowledge when testing? notes

10. Computerized Teaching According to Forsyth, “Skinner early vision of a teaching machine that would shape students’ behavior through reinforcement”(p.207)

12. Student Surveys Questionnaire Class and university records Variables LearningOutcomes

13. Effectiveness http://www.cengagebrain.com/shop/content/tuckman00348_0495500348_01.01_toc.pdf

14. Effectiveness of Digital

15. Paper and Pencil Testing Research that opposes my theory that use of digital tools more effective? Pearson: Test, Measure, and Research Computer-Based & Paper-Pencil Test Comparability Studies http://www.pearsonassessments.com/NR/rdonlyres/93727FC9-96D3-4EA5-B807-5153EF17C431/0/Bulletin_9.pdf

16. & Computerized Testing

17. Computer Testing Associated withAnxiety Do Digital note-booking help decrease anxiety when taking computerized tests? Will digital note-booking in classroom decrease anxiety when taking computer formatted tests ?

18. Digital Tools: Enhance Digital Note-Taking

19. Time

20. Bridging our Future in Learning Is Digital note-booking in our future? Computerized Testing is a fast effective academic measurement tool. If computer-based testing is in our future, then digital note-taking skills need to be adaptive in our teaching.

22. References: Forsyth, D. R., & Archer, C. R. (1997). Technologically assisted instruction and student mastery, motivation, and matriculation. Teaching of Psychology, 24, 207–212. Gijlers, H. H., Saab, N. N., Van Joolingen, W. R., De Jong, T. T., & Van Hout-Wolters, B. M. (2009). Interaction between tool and talk: how instruction and tools support consensus building in collaborative inquiry-learning environments. Journal Computer Assisted Learning, 25(3), 252- 267. Retrieved from EBSCOhost. Kronzer, Nicole. (2009, July 10). Writing Digital: Teaching Poetry.[Video] Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com. Landrum, R. (2010). Faculty and Student Perceptions of Providing Instructor Lecture Notes to Students: Match or Mismatch? Teaching of Psychology,37(3), 216-221. Retrieved from EBSCOhost. Lawson, T. J., Bodle, J. H., & McDonough, T. A. (2007). Methods & Techniques: Techniques for Increasing Student Learning From Educational Videos: Notes Versus Guiding Questions. Teaching of Psychology, 34(2), 90-93. Retrieved from EBSCOhost. Pemberton, J. R., Borrego Jr., J., & Cohen, L. M. (2006). Using Interactive Computer Technology to Enhance Learning. Teaching of Psychology, 33(2), 145-147 .Retrieved from EBSCOhost.

23. References: Proserpio, L., & Gioia, D. A. (2007). Teaching the Virtual Generation. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6(1), 69-80. Retrieved from EBSCOhost. Rhodes, T. L. (2011). Making Learning Visible and Meaningful Through Portfolios. Change, 43(1), 6-13. Retrieved from EBSCOhost. Säljö, R. R. (2010). Digital tools and challenges to institutional traditions of learning: technologies, social memory and the nature of learning. Journal of Assisted Learning, 26(1), 53-64. Retrieved from EBSCOhost. Todoroki, S., Konishi, T., & Inoue, S. (2006). Blog-based research notebook: Personal informatics workbench for high-throughput experimentation. Applied Surface Science, 252 (7), 2640-2645. Retrieved from EBSCOhost. Wang, Hong & Shin, D. (2009). Computer- Based & Paper-Pencil Test Comparability Studies. Pearson Assessment,(9), 1-6. Retrieved from http://www.pearsonassessments.com.