Similar a The effects of minimum and conventional tillage systems on maize grain yield and soil fertility in western Ethiopia. Tolessa Debele Dilalessa
Poster29: Improving the sustainability of cassava-based cropping systems for ...CIAT
Similar a The effects of minimum and conventional tillage systems on maize grain yield and soil fertility in western Ethiopia. Tolessa Debele Dilalessa (20)
Kisan Call Centre - To harness potential of ICT in Agriculture by answer farm...
The effects of minimum and conventional tillage systems on maize grain yield and soil fertility in western Ethiopia. Tolessa Debele Dilalessa
1. The effects of minimum and conventional
tillage systems on maize grain yield and soil
fertility in western Ethiopia
Tolessa Debele
5th World Congress on Conservation Agriculture
Incorporating 3rd Farming System Conference
26 – 29 September 2011
Brisbane, Australia
2. Introduction
• The major maize producing areas
high yield potential
favorable environments.
• However, national average maize yield of 2.2 t/ha
• The inability to increase yield is attributed to:
non-sustainable cropping practices, particularly plow- or
hoe-based cultivation,
soil and water loss due to erosion and
Declining soil fertility
• To overcome these inabilities:
Various management practices have to be
considered
3. Introduction …
• Generally, CT has been world-wide the basic tool
of cropping for centuries
It has been therefore an integral part of traditional
and/or conventional agriculture.
• However, the need to produce more food
for an increasing population
with decreasing soil and water resources
caused a shift to MT
• MT is recognized for its role in conservation of
both soil and water on account of CRs remaining
on the surface
4. Objectives
to evaluate the effects of tillage
system, residue management and nitrogen
fertilization on maize grain yield in western
Ethiopia
To determine the effects of the integrated
management practices on some soil fertility
parameters.
5. Methodolgy
• Experiments on integrated soil management practices
were conducted at five site for five-years in western
Ethiopia.
• The experiments were laid out in a RCBD with three
replications.
• Three tillage systems:
MTRR = Minimum tillage with residue retention,
MTRV = Minimum tillage with residue removal
CT = conventional tillage
• Three N fertilization levels:
Recommended rate i.e. 92 kg N/ha
25% less & 25% more than recommended rate
6. Methodology….
• The experimental plots were kept permanent to observe
the carry-over effects over years
• For the MTRR and MTRV treatments soil
disturbance was restricted to the absolute
minimum,
viz. the soil was disturbed only to place the seed in
the soil at the time of sowing.
• In contrast, for CT treatments the soil was
plowed 3 times prior to sowing to obtain a
suitable seedbed.
9. 8000 a a MTRR MTRV CT
7000 b a
a a a a
b
6000 b b a
b b b
c
Grain yield (kg ha-1)
b b
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2000-2004
Years
Figure 1. Mean grain yield of five sites as affected by tillage systems.
Bars for each year with the same letter are not significantly different at
5% probability.
10. Table 2. Effect of tillage system, residue
management and N fertilization on maize grain
yield
N levels Tillage system (T)
(kg/ha) MTRR MTRV CT Mean
69 5953 5595 5210 5586
92 6513 6173 5868 6185
115 6953 6450 6227 6543
Mean 6471 6073 5768
LSD(0.05) T or N = 394 T x N = ns
13. Organic C (%) N (g kg-1)
1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 1.0 1.3 1.5 1.8 2.0
0.0 0.0
Soil depth (cm)
LSD(0.0 0.25
Soil depth (cm)
7.5 7.5
0.21 ns
15.0 0.17 15.0
ns MTRR
ns MTRR
22.5 22.5 MTRV
MTRV
ns CT ns CT
30.0 30.0
Figure 5. Effect of tillage systems on OC at four depth
intervals
14. P (mg kg-1) K (mg kg-1)
5 10 15 20 25 150 175 200 225 250
0.0 0.0
LSD(0.05) LSD(0.05)
Soil depth (cm)
2.0
Soil depth (cm)
7.5 7.5 19
ns 17
15.0 MTRR 15.0
ns MTRV ns MTRR
22.5 CT 22.5 MTRV
ns ns CT
30.0 30.0
Figure 7. Effect of tillage systems on available P content of
soils at four depth intervals
15. Conclusions
• On average, MTRR increased grain yield by:
6.6% as compared to MTRV and
12.2% as compared to CT
• MTRR increased maize grain yield particularly when
maize crop faced terminal drought as compared to
MTRV and CT.
• When crop residues are removed, it takes at least two
years before adverse effects on grain yield reductions
become evident
• When crop residues are retained on the surface, it
requires at least two years before the beneficial influence
on grain yield are realized.
16. Conclusions …
• The grain yield was not affected by the
interaction of tillage system and N fertilization.
• Consequently, the recommended fertilizer rate of
92 kg N/ha for CT maize was also found
adequate for MT maize.
17. Conclusions …
• After 5 years the influence of the tillage systems
on PR, pH, organic C, total N, extractable P and
K was confined to the upper 0-15cm which is the
plow layer.
• In comparison with CT, MTRR resulted in a
higher PR and lower pH which is alarming
since both of them should be managed carefully for
sustainable cropping.
• However, MTRR resulted in higher contents of
organic C, total N, extractable P and K which is
reassuring
since all of them can be very beneficial for
sustainable cropping.
18. The way forward
• The results proved that MTRR can be introduced
successfully in the study area:
when it coincides with fertilization of 92 kg
N/ha
• However, MTRV is not an option at all to replace
CT from a soil quality point of view.
• The replacement of CT with MTRR should
contribute to sustainable maize production in
Ethiopia.