3. F R O M T H E P R O D U C E R ’ S O R M A N U FA C T U R E R ’ S S TA N D P O I N T, A N U N D E R S TA N D I N G O F C O M P E T I T I V E S T R U C T U R E A N D
T H E C H A N G E S TA K I N G P L A C E I N T H AT S T R U C T U R E A R E C R U C I A L F O R S U C C E S S F U L C H A N N E L D E S I G N A N D
M A N A G E M E N T. I N D E S I G N I N G T H E M A R K E T I N G C H A N N E L , T H E C H A N N E L M A N A G E R N E E D S T O D E T E R M I N E W H I C H K I N D S
O F D I S T R I B U TO R S A N D / O R D E A L E R S C A N P R O V I D E T H E M O S T E F F I C I E N T A N D E F F E C T I V E D I S T R I B U T I O N O F T H E F I R M ’ S
P R O D U C T S . B U T G I V E N T H AT T H E C O M P E T I T I V E S T R U C T U R E O F D I S T R I B U T O R S A N D D E A L E R S C H A N G E S , S O M E T I M E S
R A P I D LY. C O N V E N T I O N A L I D E A S A B O U T T H E K I N D S O F D E A L E R S O R D I S T R I B U TO R S T H AT S H O U L D S E L L PA RT I C U L A R
P R O D U C T S C A N Q U I C K LY B E C O M E O B S O L E T E .
4. TYPES OF COMPETITION
1. Horizontal competition
2. Intertype competition
3. Vertical competition
4. Channel system competition
5. HORIZONTAL
competition between firms of the same
type; for example, an automobile
manufacturer versus another automobile
manufacturer, a plumbing supply
wholesaler versus another plumbing
supply wholesaler, or one supermarket
versus another. This is the most visible
and frequently discussed form of
competition. In economic theory, much of
the treatment of competition deals with
this horizontal type, although it is usually
referred to simply as competition, and
often the firms involved are producers or
manufacturers rather than wholesalers or
retailers.
6. INTERTYPE
This is competition between different
types of firms at the same channel level;
for example, the off-price store versus
the department store or the merchant
wholesaler versus agents and brokers.
8. VERTICAL
Refers to competition between channel
members at different levels in the
channel, such as retailer versus
wholesaler, wholesaler versus
manufacturer, or manufacturer versus
retailer.
10. CHANNEL SYSTEM
Refers to complete channels competing
with other complete channels. In order for
channels to compete as complete units,
they must be organized, cohesive
organizations.
12. Corporate channels, production and marketing facilities are owned by the same company;
Firestone Tire & Rubber Company and Sherwin-Williams Company (paints) are examples.
Contractual channel, independent channel members—producers or manufacturers, wholesalers,
and retailers—are linked by a formal contractual agreement. Wholesaler- sponsored voluntary
chains, retailer cooperatives, and franchise systems are the three major forms of contractual
marketing systems.
Administered channel systems result from strong domination by one of the channel members
(frequently a manufacturer) over the other members. This dominant position is a function of the
leverage that the dominant channel member can achieve based on a monopoly of supply, special
expertise, strong consumer acceptance of its products, or other factors.
14. BUT WHAT HAPPENS IN CHANNEL
CONFLICT?
•Channel conflict can also occur when there has been over production. This
results in a surplus of products in the market place.
• Channel conflict occurs when manufacturers (brands) disinter
mediate their channel partners, such as distributors, retailers, dealers,
and sales representatives, by selling their products direct to
consumers through general marketing methods and/or over
the internet through e-Commerce.
• Newer versions of products, changes in trends, insolvency of wholesalers
and retailers and the distribution of damaged goods also affect channel
conflict. In this connection, a company's stock clearance strategy is of
importance
20. HOW TO MANAGE CONFLICT
Adoption of Super ordinate Goals
Exchange Of Employees
Co-Optation
Diplomacy By:-
Mediation
Negotiation
Legal Route
21. DILUTION &
CANNIBALIZATION:-
Marketers must be careful not to dilute
their brands through inappropriate
channels.
Exclusive dealings often includes
exclusive territorial agreements.
Such practices increase dealer confidence
& enthusiasm. Moreover it is perfectly
legal.
Some major brands adopt the policy of
“Full-Line Forcing”.
Although such tying agreements are not
illegal, but somehow they lower the
quality of the competition.