3. Adrian Johns:
• Full Professor, University of Chicago
• Department of History
• Areas of Expertise:
• history of the sciences
• history of the book and media
• intellectual piracy and property from the
Renaissance to the present
Saturday, February 2, 13
8. Jess:
How do I critique, interpret, and/or
respond to history?
Saturday, February 2, 13
9. How does craft come
into all this?
Saturday, February 2, 13
10. Tamara:
The thing about pirates or craftsmen of any guild is this: “pirates
were essentially members of any social institution of civility of
which was not integrated with the broader commonwealth’s. The
point was that most collective groups, such as guilds, companies, or
universities, maintained customary practices that both bound them
together and secured them as harmonious elements in the
commonwealth…A pirate crew was a collective, all right, but it
honored no propriety recognizable to the commonwealth at large,
and it owed no allegiance to the common good” (37).
Saturday, February 2, 13
11. Lindsey:
... Johns writes that “Precisely when authorship took on
a judge of public authority, through crafts of the
printed book, its violation came to be seen as a
paramount transgression—as an offense against the
common good akin to the crime of brigand, bandit, or
pirate” (19). I turn to this quote because it highlights
the beginnings of the cultural capital of the printed
book. The cultural concept of “a book” is still a
profound and resonating form of authority in today’s
culture even in spite of the age of new media. While I
recognize that a book, a printed book, carries cultural
capital or as Johns puts it “a judge of public authority,”
I wonder at what exactly about print that affords that
authority and capital. ...
Saturday, February 2, 13
12. It is a given that print—a printed book—gives an artifact authority.
The prominence and importance of print is highlighted by the fact
that one a book was put into print, concepts of piracy began.
What is it about print that caused such the public to
see piracy as “a paramount transgression” that still
exists centuries later in our culture?
Saturday, February 2, 13
13. Jess:
By mid-18th century: “plagiary could be piratical; so could
epitomizing, or abridging, or even translating” (46). At what point is
knowledge public property? To me, this idea of translating being
piratical is interesting because that, as well as abridging, challenges
many of the current conceptions of being a compiler or even
translator. What’s at stake in calling these things “piracy”?
Saturday, February 2, 13