1. Elementa Group Introduction – 2010 CONFIDENTIAL - This information is shared for discussion purposes only

3. Eliminating landfills

5. Small environmental footprint

6. Modular and scalable

7. Robust, tested, off-the-shelf systems & equipment

8. Unparalleled energy and economic efficiency

10. Proprietary processes with IP ownership

11. Demonstrated experience – and success

12. In-house business and technology expertise – 25 employees and growing

14. Requires only minimal preparation of waste

15. Exceedingly low air emissions (well below stringent international standards)

16. Self-sustaining closed-loop system

18. Sustainably reduces GHG emissions

19. High conversion efficiency

20. Steady, reliable based power output

22. Operational in 2001

23. Operated in combination with Westfalen coal-fired plant

24. Capacity of 100,000 tonnes/yr

25. MSW Pyrolysis Plant in Burgau, Germany

26. Operational in 1984

28. Operating since the fall of 2007

29. Capacity of 3 tonnes/day (increasing to 7 tonne/day)

31. Waste to Energy (WTE) Technology Comparison Notes: 1 Allsopp, Costner and Johnston (2001). Incineration and Human Health. Greenpeace Research Laboratories. 2 Noriyuki, Toshimi, Hiroyuki, Yoshiyuki, Yasuaki and Mazumi, (2000). Operation Report of 220 ton/day Pyrolysis Gasification and Melting System for Municipal Solid Waste. Yame Seibu Clean Center-Mitsui Recycling 21. 3 Plasco Energy Group (2008). Presentation to the Environmental Protection Committee of Port Moody. 4 Lehder Environmental Services Ltd. (2008). Draft Effluent and Emission Calculations. Note: Elementa’s Dioxin and Furan emissions are approximately 1/35 and 1/41 (respectively) of the Ontario and EU Dioxin/Furan emission limits of 0.08 ng/m3 and 0.092 ng/m3 (respectively) and 1/4000 of California’s limit of 9 ng/m3.

32. Air Emissions Actual Results

34. Reduces GHG emissions

36. Technical advisory board

38. Use standard process equipment (shredder, gas cleaning rotary kiln, etc.)

40. Expressions of interest from around the world