Library Support for Journal Publishing: Emphasis on multi-modal open peer review through Ada
•Descargar como PPTX, PDF•
1 recomendación•656 vistas
Brief review of University of Oregon Libraries Journal Publishing program followed by in-depth look at Ada. Content also provided by Sarah Hamid and Bryce Peake
Recomendados
Recomendados
Más contenido relacionado
La actualidad más candente
La actualidad más candente (20)
Destacado
Destacado (16)
Similar a Library Support for Journal Publishing: Emphasis on multi-modal open peer review through Ada
Similar a Library Support for Journal Publishing: Emphasis on multi-modal open peer review through Ada (20)
Más de Karen Estlund
Más de Karen Estlund (12)
Último
Último (20)
Library Support for Journal Publishing: Emphasis on multi-modal open peer review through Ada
- 1. Library Support for Journal Publishing Emphasis on multi-modal open peer review through Ada University of Victoria, July 7, 2015 Karen Estlund, kestlund@uoregon.edu Based on: “Publishing Ada: A Retrospective Look at the First Three Years of an Open Peer Review Multi-Modal Journal” with Sarah Hamid and Bryce Peake. Coalition for Networked Information (CNI) spring meeting, Seattle, Washington, 2015.
- 2. Outline • Open Access Journal Publishing @ UO Libraries • Ada and Fembot • Open Peer Review • Multimodal • Infrastructure & Costs http://adanewmedia.org
- 3. Open Access Journal Publishing @ UO Libraries • 5* Journals - All Interdisciplinary: Humanities & Social Sciences • Platforms: • OJS (hosted by Oregon State University Libraries & Press) • Wordpress w/ Comment Press • Wordpress w/ Annotum Theme • Wordpress w/ ISSU http://library.uoregon.edu/digitalscholarship/open-access-publishing * 1 forthcoming, OJS submission also used for campus symposiums
- 4. Ada: A Journal of Gender, New Media, and Technology http://adanewmedia.org
- 5. Published by: With significant support from: Publishing Ada & &
- 6. The Fembot Collective & Ada
- 7. Infrastructure & Hosting Marrero, J. F. (2011 July 3), https://www.flickr.com/photos/jfmfoto/5902024151/ CC-BY-NC-ND 2.0
- 9. Multi-modal & Interactive Zylinska, J. (2014) iEarth. Ada: A Journal of Gender, New Media, and Technology, No.5. doi:10.7264/N36W98CFRuberg, B., (2015) Curating with a Click: The Art That Participatory Media Leaves Behind. Ada: A Journal of Gender, New Media, and Technology, No.7. doi:10.7264/N3PR7T8X
- 10. Multi-level Peer Review Accepted for Publication Suggestions for Alternative Publication Suggestions for Resubmission Not Accepted for Publication
- 12. Open Peer Review in Action
- 13. Open Peer Review
- 14. Training for Open Peer Review
- 15. Review Labor
- 16. Review Process Feedback “I like that it’s mentorship focused. I get to ask myself ‘how can I help make this piece publishable,’ rather than acting as some kind of gatekeeper for a competition-driven scarcity that is traditional journals.”
- 17. Comments on Articles By the Numbers 2,405 Items
- 18. Preserving Ada
- 19. Digital Preservation Process • Backup Pro Plan purchased through Bluehost • Issue Preservation - after each issue is published: • SQL data dumps • Copy public-html directory from webserver • Harvest entire site with ArchiveIt! • Article Preservation • Harvesting through site • Harvesting articles hosted elsewhere with ArchiveIt! • Media files requested in highest resolution and sent via FTP to web team for integration into UO Libraries digital preservation processes
- 23. Scheduling Editorial & Production Team Slide content by Sarah Hamid
- 24. Project Management & Documentation
- 25. Documentation & Manual Labor Slide content by Sarah Hamid
- 26. Spam
- 27. Assessment
- 28. Some Metrics
- 29. Metric-driven writing + building ● web is set up for articles about the web to succeed ○ 94k inbound links, 19k were originally pinged by our articles. Slide content by Bryce Peake
- 30. Metric-driven writing + building ● People who show up not for a specific article are going to issues, but not in ‘lead article’ order ○ We now randomize article order on front page. Slide content by Bryce Peake
- 31. Comparators [This slide intentionally left blank.]
- 32. Benchmarks Digital Commons Journals - Ave. Downloads per article at end of 2013: 297 Ada - Not Downloadable! - 1691 Pageviews per article (eliminating quick exits) - 1559 PageViews per article for year 1 (eliminating quick exits) “Library-led Publishing with bepress Digital Commons: Data and Benchmarks Report” (July 2014) http://digitalcommons.bepress.com/cgi/viewco ntent.cgi?article=1001&context=journals
- 33. Ada Personnel Successes ● Graduate Students ○ Chelsea Bullock (early proj. manager) - Marion Brittain Postdoc Fellow @ Georgia Institute of Technology ○ Mél Hogan (first Fembot Advisory Board member) - Asst. Prof. of Media Studies, Illinois Institute of Tech ○ Brian Reece (DSC graduate student) - Assoc. Dir. for Assessment + Communication, Toppel Career Center @ University of Miami ○ Bryce Peake (first Webmistress) - Intel fellowship, Asst. Prof. of Media + Communication Studies @ University of Maryland Baltimore County ● Faculty ○ Carol Stabile - ACLS ○ Radhika Gajjala - Fulbright Fellow, Norway Slide content by Bryce Peake
- 34. Costs
- 35. Infrastructure Costs • Web Hosting •WordPress MultiSite w/CommentPress •URLs •Email •FTP • Back-up • Spam Blocker • Google Drive / Dropbox • EZID for DOIs • Archive-It! • Preservation Storage
- 36. Labor Costs • GTF • Designer • Manager • Copy Editing • System Updates • User Account Tech Support • CSS Modifications • Interactive Development
Notas del editor
- Publishing since 2011, started with one existing journal and two new journals on OJS Part of DSC since 2012; Ada started in 2012, too; Part of a larger publishing program Quality over quantity; pressure for more journals
- Review original goals
- move-able, sustainable, value-driven throughout wind farm a bit too slow
- First issue BY-NC-ND (not included in above numbers); website content default options for which license, open culture issues
- what labor to put into different types of functionality? Embed on site or link out?
- Not accepted items not made public Beta Review Level 1, Level 2, too many levels / naming issues
- in-person sessions Restricted to collective for comments in review new people can be added to collective
- Copy edits, feedback, questions and confirmation Writing online and perception of comments Using the system and user account support; ajax delays how do you review multimodal in peer review what kinds of changes can be made to multi-modal?
- author time for dialogue is at a premium Bad anonymous behavior, at best unhelpful What to do when junior people review senior people’s work
- Ephemeral okay? Embed on site or linking relationship longterm?
- Just text okay? Javascript issues
- Library indexing issues; MLA Bibliography Google Scholar and Highwire Press <meta> tags Wordpress and Metadata issues
- Dropbox (Fembot and Ada documentation) Experimented w/Trello now trying Asana
- Too much manual
- Comments and accounts
- Article over issue PDF support
- Where is the data? No one is sharing Altmetrics have no context
- It is unclear whether their average is just for 2013 (one year) or the six years of their total data from the rest of the report. Since our articles are read online rather than downloaded (except for the option from issue 1), we can’t really compare stats with these, but I tried to only calculate stats that had an average time where it looked like someone at least skimmed the page. Time is totally arbitrary according to me though. These stats do not include AdaReview.