Recomendados
Recomendados
Más contenido relacionado
La actualidad más candente
La actualidad más candente (15)
Destacado
Destacado (16)
Similar a 2011 Distinguished Evaluator: The Health Foundation of Greater Cincinnati
Similar a 2011 Distinguished Evaluator: The Health Foundation of Greater Cincinnati (20)
Último
Último (20)
2011 Distinguished Evaluator: The Health Foundation of Greater Cincinnati
- 1. Distinguished Evaluator SeriesBuilding Evaluation Capacity June 14, 2011
- 2. An Invitation to tell it Like it is
- 3. Evaluation HOOP? HELP? NOT-FOR PROFIT
- 4. In what ways is evaluation a hoop to jump through for not-for-profits?
- 5. In what ways is evaluation a help for not-for-profits?
- 6. How did HFGC evaluation get from 1998 to 2011?
- 7. We had some lofty evaluation thoughts Funder and NFP on the same page Increase Sustainability Data Driven Decision Making Empowering
- 8. How Do For-Profits and Not-For-Profits Differ? For-Profits Not-For-Profits Care Center Cost Center Care Center Cost Center
- 9. How are Research and Evaluation Designs Different? Basic Research Applied Research Evidence Based -Practice Evaluation
- 10. Who should do the evaluating? External Evaluator Internal Evaluator (build internal capabilities)
- 11. Lots of Reading on Evaluation State-of the Art
- 13. KaZammmm
- 14. Logic Model Process Evaluations (What you do) Formative Stuff Outcome Evaluations (What happens because you do it) Summative Stuff
- 15. Logic Model (Logical Framework) Activities and Outcomes Approach Project theory Story Approach Story of why and how the project works Demonstrates connections between program science, the program operations, and expected outcomes
- 17. What We Sort of Knew and Where We Didn’t Know Much Problem Intervention Outcomes
- 19. Implementation
- 21. Created a mutually agreeable evaluation plan HFGC created the boxes (evaluation forms) Grantees filled boxes in a way that worked for them HFGC shared the wisdom learned over time from successful and unsuccessful projects Evaluation plan part of mutual expectations in contract
- 22. Evaluation Use Grantees asked to review plan quarterly Make changes if needed Review next quarter Get assistance from Program Officer if needed HFGC learned that groups of similar grantees helped one another established grantee groups Grantees provided input and plan simplified
- 23. We Learned that to truly be useful that grantmaking was more than $$$ Workshops Evaluation Communications Business Plan Many others Policy and advocacy work Individual and Group consultation Technical Assistance
- 24. We evaluated our approaches to evaluation Grantee Perception Study Sustainability Study Workshop Evaluations
- 25. Revisit Use of Evaluation (2011-????)
- 26. So for the rest of the day we will Look at how others around the country are evaluating (PBS film) Reflect on evaluation in our organizations Hear a panel of experts and the wisdom of the audience
Notas del editor
- Audience Discussion
- Discussion examples of the way evaluation is a helpRural CIT teams can be the national modelCMHC can get large federal grantsNew programs can disseminate outcomes and become a levy partner
- Not-for-profit mission directed but revenue is importantFor-profit Care is important because without it there is no profit
- Basic Research done in universities and laboratories. Involves the research method . Expensive.Applied Research to see if it works in the real world. Rigor control or comparison groups. Uses research method. If it works and it is practice oriented we say we have an evidence-based practice.Evaluation the practice has already been researched and shown to be effective we want to know if we get the same outcomes with our clients.
- Internal evaluator -Increased capacity External evaluator – need capacity for monitoring and interaction with the evaluator. Should be in the contract.
- 6.6 million results when you search for “logic model”
- First is there a use or does it use up precious resources?If there is a use what it is, what has happened in technology and otherwise that should influence what and how we evaluate?