This document provides guidance on effective internet searching strategies. It discusses defining your search topic, identifying appropriate search locations, developing effective search queries, and evaluating the credibility of sources. Key recommendations include planning your search offline first by identifying questions and keywords. When searching, consider specialized databases and directories instead of only major search engines. Techniques for evaluating sources include examining the URL, domain, author credentials, and date of publication. Sources should be cross-referenced from different credible locations.
2. Internet
Search
Strategies
1. What am I looking for?
2. Where should I look?
3. How can I find what I’m looking for?
4. How do I know if what I find is credible?
5. How do I cite my sources?
4. Broad or general information?
Specific data or facts?
Expert opinions?
Alternative or Differing Perspectives?
Reduce lab time and frustration…
Offline Search — Make a Plan
5. Before Online Search…
Do Offline Search
What are the questions?
What are the keywords?
Develop the queries
Choose the resources
12. Subject Directories
Built by information specialists
Selected, evaluated, annotated
Organized into subject categories
Librarians’ Internet Index (lii.org)
By a group of California library professionals
Infomine
By UC consortium of library professionals
MEL
Michigan Electronic Library
Pro vs. Con
15. Subscription Databases
InfoTrac Junior Edition
http://infotrac.galegr oup.com/itweb/temp88056
Home access password: temp_log
Other specialized collections:
War & Terrorism, Religion
Pro vs. Con
16. What About Wikipedia?
Wikipedia
How does it work?
The criticism of Wikipedia
When should it be used?
How should it be used?
How shouldn’t it be used?
17. Google’s Page Rank
PR(A) = (1-d) + d(PR(t1)/C(t1) + ... + PR(tn)/C(tn))
BEFORE you search:
“Crawls” pages on the public web
Copies text & images, builds database
WHEN you search:
Automatically ranks pages in your results
Word occurrence and location on page
Popularity - a link to a page is a vote for that page
Over 200 factors applied to result of a search
19. Be Specific
War of 1812 history vs. war of 1812 economic causes
Word forced to appear on the page +keyword
+transportation +system +future
(NO SPACE between + and the keyword)
Specify exact phrases “put the phrase in quotes”
“global warming”
“Holocaust survivors”
“World Trade Center”
Exclude a word -keyword (NO space between – and keyword)
+American +Poetry -sonnet
20. The asterisk is a wildcard *
It will find alternate suffixes.
Organiz* would find:
Organize, organizes, organization,
organizing, etc.
interview* would find:
Interview, interviews, interviewing,
interviewer
21. Possible Queries
Lebanon war
Lebanon civil war
Lebanon “civil war”
“Lebanese civil war” +causes
Then from there use strategies to pull from specific domains or
specific file types, etc.
“Lebanese civil war” +causes site:gov
“Lebanese civil war” +causes site:edu
"lebanese civil war" +causes site:edu filetype:ppt
22. Get Smart
Understanding Domains
What are the most reliable domains?
Country codes
http://www.iana.org/cctld/cctld-whois.htm
Examining the URL
http://www.emich.edu/graduate/users/history/crimestat.html
23. Red Flags
Look at the URL
~ , % , users, members, people, public, blog
Wordpress, blogspot, typepad, edublogs
Geocities, angelfire, lycos, yahoo, tripod, AOL
24. Narrow the Search
Website or domain
site:whitehouse.gov “global warming”
site:edu “global warming”
File type
filetype:ppt site:edu “global warming”
Google advanced search page
25. Google Results Page
Missing Page? Use Cache
Related pages
On a result page:
Browser edit menu>find
http://www.ghazi.de/civwar.html
26. Step 4:
How Do I Know if the
Information is Credible?
27. CRITICAL EVALUATION
Why Evaluate What You Find on the Web?
Anyone can put up a Web page
about anything
Many pages not kept up-to-date
No quality control
less trustworthy than scholarly publications
no selection guidelines for search engines
28. Web Evaluation Techniques
Before you click to view the page...
Look at the URL - personal page or site?
~ , % , users, members, people, public, blog
Wordpress, blogspot, typepad, edublogs
Geocities, angelfire, lycos, yahoo, tripod, AOL
Domain name appropriate for the content?
edu, com, org, net, gov, ca.us, uk, etc.
Published by an entity that makes sense ?
News from its source?
www.nytimes.com
Advice from valid agency?
www.nih.gov
29. Web Evaluation Techniques
Scan the perimeter of the page
Can you tell who wrote it ?
name of page author
organization, institution, agency you recognize
e-mail contact by itself not enough
Credentials for the subject matter ?
Look for links to:
“About us” “Philosophy” “Background” “Biography”
Is it recent or current enough ?
Look for “last updated” date - usually at bottom
If no links or other clues...
truncate back the URL
Modern poetry site
30. Web Evaluation Techniques
Indicators of quality
Sources documented
links, footnotes, etc.
As detailed as you expect in print publications ?
do the links work ?
Information retyped or forged
why not a link to published version instead ?
Links to other resources
biased, slanted ?
31. Web Evaluation Techniques
Do Some Detective Work
Search the URL in alexa.com
Who links to the site? Who owns the domain?
Type or paste the URL into the basic search box
Traffic for top 100,000 sites
See what links are in Google’s Similar pages
Look up the page author in Google
http://whois.domaintools.com liberty05.com
What did the site look like in the past?
www.archive.org
32. Web Evaluation Techniques
STEP BACK & ASK: Does it all add up
?
Why was the page put on the Web ?
inform with facts and data?
explain, persuade?
sell, entice?
share, disclose?
as a parody or satire?
Is it appropriate for your purpose?
33. Cross Referencing
Triangulation—(3 angles)
3 DIFFERENT sources that agree on the same
fact or data
Why?
35. Cite it
Son of Citation Machine
Knightsite
Open a word processor
Copy and paste citation generated from
Citation Machine
.5” indent of second line of each citation for
MLA (and every line after within that source)
Warlick, David. "Stop The Madness." Landmark Project. June 15,
2007. Technology in Learning. 25 Sep 2007
<http://elearning.org/article/2007/expertart07.html>.
Notas del editor
Go through these procedures fairly quickly: there’s an exercise to learn this You want them to be able to understand the form and what it says. DOMAIN APPROPRIATE FOR THE CONTENT: Do you trust a NYT times article from a personal page as much as one from nytimes.com? A copy of Jackie Onassis’s will from a personal page as much as one from the California Bar Assn.? Example of a personal page would be: www.aol.com/~jbarker They are loosely paralleled by the sequence of the form in the next exercise.
You can trust the lii.org more than many referrals. If there are annotations by professionals, that helps. The burden is on you, always. Demonstrate link: search example in Google. Use http://www.hanksville.org/yucatan/mayacal.html