Locavores Synthesis Essay

Synthesis Essay: The Locavore Movement
I picked up a sweet, fresh, bright red apple at the farmer's market. The tangy smell of the apple
makes me hungry, knowing I'm getting the freshest and most nutritious apple. Though is it really
any different from the apple grown 300 miles away? The locavores are people who decided to eat
locally grown produce, this has become known as the locavore movement and is quickly becoming
widespread among more people. But, is a locavore movement really needed? The fact is, there is no
difference between local produce and produce that was grown hundreds of miles away. The locavore
movement may not make a huge difference.
A main argument for eating locally grown produce is that, it has more nutrients than store bought
food. Based on source A, the longer the produce has been stored the more the nutritional value goes
down, "... the nutritional value ... declines with time"(source A). Though, the longer the produce sits
does not affect the nutritional value, this issue is just a red herring. Nutrition isn't a factor that can
be considered when people talk about the locavore movement, " ... at New York University, she
waved away the nutrition issue as a red herring"(source B). The nutritional difference will be so
small that it won't make a difference no matter how someone looks at it, this...show more content...
Ordinarily, transport is said to be affecting the environment, but in reality the carbon footprint
doesn't make enough of an impact to make a difference, " ... transportation accounts for only 11%
of food's carbon footprint."(source C). Continually , the environment someone may live doesn't
provide lots of the produce they may need. If someone lives in Hawaii, they could get more fresh
fruit than someone who lives in Alaska, as seen in source G. With this implication to keep in mind,
at some point someone would need to go to the store to get some produce, it isn't all offered and
grown where they
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Locavores Research Paper
Locavores: Beneficial or harmful? Locavores are a group of people who prefer to consume
locally grown products and they get these products usually within a 100 mile radius from home.
The main idea of this local movement is to avoid consuming products that are moved a long
distance from the farm to the market. This a great movement for us the consumers because we
know what we're eating and how it was produced, in other words it has many beneficial health
factors. Subsequently, there is always two sides to every coin. The bad side of conventional
farming methods used by corporate farmers that result in the shipping of foods long distances to
major grocery stores. Big farm operations require energy at many points – petrochemicals and energy
are

Write An Essay On Locavore
The smell of fresh vegetables and fruit, the vibrant colors from every direction you look, and the
friendly smiles that come from the question, "Would you like to try one?" Yes, this is farmer's
market many people attend to buy the foods they eat at home. But why? The locavore movement, a
trend for people to eat locally grown products, can have many benefits when looking into the
environment around you and personal nutrition. In our busy lives, the environment is probably one of
the last problems on our mind. But, it is very important because the environment's health affects
everyone including future generations. In source A, it quotes "eating local is better for air quality
and pollution than eating organic." When looking into transportation,

Research Paper On Locavores
or kiosks, which may provide no shelter or seating, or fast food restaurants. Franchise operations that
are part of restaurant chains have standardized foodstuffs shipped to each restaurant from central
locations. According to the National Institutes of Health (NIH), fast foods are quick alternatives to
home–cooked meals. They are also high in saturated fat, sugar, salt and calories.
"Local food", "local food movement" or the "Locavores" are a movement which aim to connect
food producers and food consumers in the same geographic region; in order to develop more
self–reliant and resilient food networks, improve local economies, or for health, environmental,
community, or social impact in a particular place.[1] The term has also been extended

Locavorism
"Green living" is becoming the way of the future. Everyone will eat fresh, locally sourced foods,
packed with nutrients. GMO free. As more people grab ahold of this trend and spread it around,
shaming those who don't follow in their footsteps, they ignore the negative impacts that could
develop through locavorism.
Buying locally reduces transportation, therefore less carbon emission is released into the air. Does
this not mean that locavorism could save the planet? Well it actually may not according to James
McWilliams, a writer on Forbes.com. McWilliams says, "factors other than shipping far outweigh the
energy it takes to transport food...transportation accounts for only 11% of food's carbon footprint."
McWilliams regards things such as water usage, fertilizer types, processing methods and packaging
techniques to prove that buying fresher foods is not always the right idea. Farms and companies that
are said to be 'green' and 'better for the planet' could actually be harming the planet much more than
they thought.
McWilliams also references the issue of the economy, stating, "it also hurts farmers in other parts of
the world. The U.K. buys... green beans from Kenya... threatens the livelihood of 1.5 million
sub–Saharan farmers." Buying strictly locally grown foods will put large...show more content...
In an excerpt from a book about the 100 mile diet by Alisa Smith and J.B. McKinnon, the authors
speak to professor Marion Nestle, the former chair of nutrition, food studies, and public health at
New York university, about people's concerns about the foods they eat. Nestle says, "it is [not]
necessary to eat locally to be healthy... people are not nutrient–deprived." The largest fight for eating
locally is the health benefits, yet eating locally does not mean a person is less healthy and/or
nutrient–deprived than that of a locavore

Locavores are people who eat food grown "locally." They say they do it because it is more
nutritional, has positive effects on the community, and helps the environment. All of this information
is true. More nutritional? Oh yes. Positive effects on the community? Sure. Helps the environment?
To an extent, but yes. However, all of these examples are circumstantial, and even though they all
might be true, that doesn't mean it is necessary or beneficial for us to be locavores. Many people
that are locavores are partaking in the movement because those people believe they are eating
healthier due to the fact that there is more nutrition in the locally grown produce. While Professor
Marion Nestle, of NYU, admits that yes, there are more nutrients in locally grown farms due to the
extraordinary soil, however, that doesn't mean those nutrients are vital to our health or that because
people buy organic that we are "nutrient...show more content...
The nutrient intake will balance out with unhealthy eating habits and lack of physical activity.
The jobs given to farmers will cancel out with the people losing jobs with whom America trades
goods with. Another example of no real gain from being a locavore is the impact on the
environment. One reason people state is a sufficient reason to become a locavore is that "eating
locally is better for air quality and pollution than eating organic" (Source A). However, what they
don't realize is that while a transportation truck carrying hundreds of one product over hundreds of
miles is proportionate to a small truck carrying about 20 of the same product just 20 miles. Not to
mention that they would need to take more trips on a smaller load. It might even become an
inconvenience for the consumer to have to drive 50 miles to go to a local market, defined as
within a 100 mile radius, to get some fruit that will only last them a week. Which would lead to
even more emissions of toxic

Pros And Cons Of Locavorism
Locavorism is producing a multitude of produce locally. Currently, the United States uses
monocultures. For example, in Indiana corn and soybeans are primarily grown because it is easy
to grow them there. Locavorism has been received both positively and negatively. One of the
main reasons locavorism is being pushed is that it cuts down on transportation emissions and
uses fewer chemicals to grow food. While these are benefits of locavorism, others do not believe
locavorism is practical. Certain foods, like strawberries, grow more bountiful per acre in places
like California, than in say Michigan. Besides this, prices are likely to increases on fresh produce
if the united states were to switch to locavorism making it difficult for many people to buy fresh
produce, thus increasing concerns about obesity in the country. While there are benefits to
locavorism, it is impractical and would not benefit the country or the world if it were to be
implemented in a large–scale. Firstly, using locavorism would not reduce emissions or the carbon
foot print. Supporters of locavorism boast reducing transport emissions by decreasing distances
foods need to travel. While this may be true, "transportation account for 10% or less of the energy
used to bring food to market" (Myers, 1). By producing foods in areas that are not ideal, more
energy would be required to produce certain foods. For example, "it would take Michigan 14 acres to
grow the strawberries California grows in a single

Locavore Movement Essay
The Locavore Movement The locavore movement has become increasingly popular over the last
decade. Locavores are people who prefer to eat food that is locally grown and doesn't travel long
distances before getting to their plates. This thought process is slowly changing the way people eat
and the ideals people consider when choosing food to eat. Along with this fresh perspective on where
our food comes from, the movement provides a innovative ideal towards what is sustainable and
what is not sustainable. While the definition of local is dependent on the buyer the effect is the
same. The locavore movement has a positive impact on the local communities through improving the
income and number of local farms that fosters good communities, and increasing the nutritional
value of food eaten. With an increase of interest in local communities and their economies, any
businesses involved in the community will benefit. Since the locavore movement began there have
been tremendous improvements on the income local farms receive. In a study...show more content...
In reality this movement, while for the time being, is considered a 'trend' the movement is growing
into a way of life. As stated by Anthony Flaccavento "These are ordinary, middle–income folks who
have become really engaged in food and really care where their food comes from." (Source E)
This interest in where food comes from does not mean that they are attempting to be, as
Flaccavento so beautifully put it, a "fringe foodie culture". It is a group of ordinary people that are
invested in the origin and the nutritional value of their own food. While for some people just
knowing the story of their food makes them more comfortable with what they're putting into their
bodies rather than having to wonder what the food was grown in and what happened to it in the
long trip from crop fields to factories to super

The Locavore Movement
Many people are not sure whether the locavore movement is the right route to take, however,
Americans are not aware of the positive things it brings to its community. The taste and quality of
their produce will improve, along with nutritional factors. Making
Locavores are consumers of locally grown or produced products. Eating fresh foods from their local
farmer's market can improve income twice as much for its economy. This is important because
people give away their money to companies that could instead be giving it to benefit their
community. Gogoi Pallavi the author of The Rise of the Locavore states, "It's a movement that is
gradually reshaping the business of growing...local food movement has already accomplished
something almost no

The Movement in Locavores Although most of the scarce Locavores' intentions are focused on
nutrition and environment of their community, there are negative effects that many, including
locavores themselves, may not know of. Their basis on the focus of nutrition and environmentally
friendly decisions are deemed useless and the question of practicality in the U.S modern society is
prevalent. Locavores base their lifestyle decision on the thought that the closer the food is the better it
must be.But, according to Marion Nestle, a Professor and former chair of nutrition at New York
University, the quality of produce is not dependent on the proximity from which the food came, but
the independent factors like rich soil that determines the nutrients

Locavores Pros And Cons
In the world of today, a new form of agriculture is starting to take place called "locavores."
Locavores seek to change the way people eat by only growing and selling produce locally.
However, many problems must be brought up to light before choosing this method as a benefit to
the community. Granted, locavores promise to help the local community by benefiting local
farmers. In doing so, the local farmers get more of a financial advantage leaving in exertion the
destitute people who work for produce companies in foreign countries. As stated in source C, when
small time farmers challenge large companies and win, it takes the work and financial security of
thousands desperate workers. Also stated in source C, buying certain products from local

Rhetorical Analysis: The Locavore's Dilemma
Eating food produced within a hundred–mile radius has never been a prominent concern historically,
though there has been a recent increase in this trend. Those that are rigorously set on this new
ideology are being labeled "locavores". Christophe Pelletier, being a proficient individual on the
topic of food production had an educated opinion on the locavore's predicted way of life.
Pelletier's, "The Locavore's Dilemma", provides multiple examples to support his belief that
informing every resident of the carbon footprint their food contains would realistically carryout the
locavore's ideology to a more viable agriculture. His blog post on this ideology goes into depth about
the physical and economical destruction they would provoke. This would include: the possibility of
famine, lack of needed nutritional supplements,...show more content...
He uses small phrases that can be considered humorous throughout the more serious parts of his
writing to establish character. This establishment of character along with applying personal
experience creates a strong development of trustworthiness between him and his audience. When
Pelletier addresses the loss of coffee, tea, and beer–known treasures for the British Columbia
population–he is able to utilize the lighthearted remark "at least, there is no shortage of water"
(Pelletier p.703). As he takes a look beyond food itself, the hundred–mile radius would begin to
affect many other agricultural products. Cotton, wool, and even the manufacturing of cars would
soon fade away. For Pelletier's readers that are just beginning to think abroad the restrictions of only
local food sources; it is quite an eye opener. He uses another frivolous response, "the 100–mile rule
will solve traffic problems" to include a passively positive outlook on what local locavores should
expect to experience (Pelletier

Locavores Persuasive Essay
Locavores are people who have decided to eat locally grown or produced products. The more people
discuss locavores, the more support local farms get from surrounding communities. Placing the local
farms closer in proximity with one another will minimize the amount of pollution in the air due to
harmful chemicals secreted through transportation. Produce from local farms contain less
contamination from chemicals that try to kill pesticides. Local farms have organic certifications
refurbishments, which are requirements that have to be met in order to sell organic produce, such as
using the correct materials approved by the USDA and knowing what materials are not approved.
From these positive initiatives conducted to help improve one's health and

Essay On Locavores
Imagining a community in 2020 where the majority of the population were Locavores is quite
difficult due to the fact that modern society has expanded and is continuing to grow all the time.
Locavores are people who only eat food within a 100 mile radius.(source g) The idea of being a
locavore is new but slightly unnecessary due to the era of production our society lives on today.
Foods shipped from far places may be lacking the nutrients that any other fruit or vegetable grown in
a farm closer would have. (source B) But the nutritional differences are "marginal", it's not much of a
difference, not enough to affect a person's health anyways. Considering the fast–paced societies
growing today in America, relying on the "high demand" farmers would have to meet, can slow
down the community's economic growth speed. In 2020 the society will...show more content...
Buying locally "supports an area's farmers and, in turn, strengthens the community".(source C)
However, the localization of foods would have a negative effect on farmers who rely on
Americans by reducing demand. The decrease in business for these farmers will cause less crops
to be made because, if 90 percent of your products is no longer being bought, then you're losing
money if you make any more than 10 percent. Another thing food localization will cause is local
businesses outside of these communities, like farmers markets to foreclose, because farmers will
be forced to look for different work. If all the farmers in New Zealand are focusing on supplying the
US than no one is focused on what percent of foods stay locally in New Zealand. Therefore a
major movement towards being a locavore could have a big, negative effect on major food
production across the country. Many jobs will be lost, many families will be homeless, and many
families will split

"The local food movement has already accomplished something that almost no one would have
thought possible a few years back" (Gogoi). Eating locally means that a person is eating food that
is grown, produced, or raised locally and is usually within 100 miles radius of peoples homes.
When food is local, it does not have to travel a longer distance to get to its destination. A less
distance to traveled allows people know where their food came from and how it was made or
grown. This lets people trust their food more when buying produce in markets, knowing that it has
been grown locally. This movement supports farmers and gives them the opportunity to do what
they love. All in all, there are drawbacks and advantages of locavore movement like; how it
benefits farmers around the world, local farmers and the people, and a drawback like; carbon gas
emissions. Locavore Movement benefits a lot of smaller local farmers. Growing locally saves
money for the community's farmers. Farmers are not getting the money because it is spent on
produce that is shipped and traveled long distances. "Locavores argue that buying local food supports
an area's farmers and, in turn, strengthens the community" (McWilliams). Local grown food benefits
farmers in business, giving them the money instead. It supports them and allows them to grow in
business and in selling their products in markets making the people happy because they know where
it came from. "The number of small farms has increased 20% in the

Locavore Research Paper
Today's increasing popularity with becoming a locavore has sky rocketed with the new age of
health nuts. The main issue with becoming a locavore is whether the fresh produce is local.
However, as part of a group that enjoys the luxury of eating fresh food, becoming a locavore should
be the only way of living.
Fresh produce is such an amazing experience, yet many people haven't been blessed to try the crisp
bite of the food. Per (Marser), "food bought at your local farmer's market is often picked 24 hours
prior to your purchase." (Marser) also states that, "Because the produce is handled less, locally
grown fruit does not have to stand up to the rigors of shipping." Meaning the produce is given the
primal amount of time to grow before being

Locavore Synthesis Essay
Locavores consume only locally grown foods in an effort to reduce their carbon footprints and lose
weight, among other reasons. The popularity of locavorism has grown dramatically over the last
decade, and its merits are extolled by scientists and ordinary consumers alike. The locavore
movement seems to be indisputably beneficial to the environment, the economy, and to consumer
health, yet close examination of its common tenets reveals issues which should be taken into account
before beginning a locavore diet. Locavorism's environmental benefits are referenced frequently by
its supporters . "Food miles" – the distance your food has traveled before it reaches your plate – are
a commonly used term. Because of the substantial amount of fuel...show more content...
Locavores argue that food travelling long distances before being consumed declines in nutrition as
antioxidants and nutrients decay – meaning that food which travels less distance (and is therefore
eaten faster) is better for your health. However, Marion Nestle (as quoted by Alisa Smith and J.B.
McKinnon) thinks that the nutrition argument isn't based in science. According to her, "a person
making smart choices from the global megamart can easily meet all the body's needs", and "there
will be nutritional differences, but they'll be marginal" (Source B). It's clearly not unhealthy to eat
locally grown foods, and they may even be better for your health. However, the benefits of eating
freshly picked food may not be as great as locavores claim they are. Locavorism has both strong
supporters and vehement opposers, as most trends do. Overall, eating locally isn't a bad idea: it can
connect you with community farmers and help you to choose healthier meals. However – as with all
topics – it isn't all black and white. Many common locavorism arguments aren't grounded in science,
and people exalt it while blindly ignoring the aforementioned issues. People considering locavorism
should ensure that they consider the negatives before beginning a locavore

Essay On The Locavore Movement
The locavore movement is a powerful and extremely healthy movement; it cuts down on
transportation, supports a town's economy, and helps encourage society to consume healthier foods.
It is a powerful movement that would be great to the community in many ways. It would not just
benefit some people in the community but everybody individually. It is also an amazing way to
bring the people in the community together. The locavore movement encourages people in towns to
consume more locally grown food, by society consuming locally grown food transportation is cut
down which helps better the environment. Since locally grown food is produce that is cultivated in
the community transportation is down to a minimum which is a blessing for the environment. "
Eating local is better for air quality and pollution than eating organic. " ( Source A ) less
transportation use helps lessen the pollution in the air which in turn helps provide the community
with cleaner fresher air. " The move towards local food for all its trendiness highlights one of the
problematic pieces of the modern food economy : the increasing reliance on foods shipped halfway
round the world. " ( Source E ) The...show more content...
Local farmers markets give back to the community from the income that is made from selling
produce which helps boost the community's economy. " Eating local means more for the local
economy. " ( Source A ) Purchasing local foods from the community are a spectacular way to
provide for a community's economy. " According to a study by the New Economics Foundation in
London a dollar spent locally generates twice as much income for the local economy. " ( Source A )
Local food markets are better for the economy because the income would go to the community
unlike a big chain supermarket where the income made in that establishment would go to a corporate
office, none of the income would be put towards the

Research Paper On Locavore
A locavore is a character who desires to eat locally to empower a community, in addition, to
achieve healthy systems except locavores fail to remember one crucial group, the rest of Earth.
Locavores who believe they are improving Earth are actually harming it even greater than before.
Furthermore, not only is it harmful to mother Earth, but even the locavores themselves. Locavores
assume they decide to eat locally; however, in reality, locavores are forced to eat locally as no choice
is available. Understand locavores as well as their local food movements as it is seen superb to
every other eye; however, if carefully inspected, it is only an idea that will cause misconduct.
To begin this rant a locavore is one who limits themselves, a negative...show more content...
No matter, to restate, the entire world is affected if a locavore movement is to begin in a
community. See the problem is, when people try to include themselves in the community they start
to believe they are actually helping. For example, a locavore shops at a local farm to support him
and him only. What about other farmers who had the same dream, industry businesses that formed
to produce food for the people. All around the world people should realize how important everyone
is. Everyone wants to have a role in life no matter what it is, but if only worried about one's
community then this is seen as selfish act only to improve one's reputation. "Locavores argue that
buying local food supports an area's farmers and, in turn, strengthens the community (McWilliams,
Source C)." McWilliams continues to argue that it does in fact hurt other farmers around the world,
how can one be satisfied when another farmer could be struggling all because of a locavore
movement. One idea or movement that is community based should not be enough to take effect on
the rest of the

Poverty And The Locavores
Within the past few years, the locavore movement has been steadily growing as more people choose
to eat only locally grown and produced foods. Their reasons for doing so stem from a number of
causes. Some believe that locally grown food tastes better and fresher, leading to more nutrition.
Eating locally is also thought to better for the environment due to less transportation and pollution.
Still others believe that the movement benefits the local economy. Together, these three aspects lead
some communities to organize locavore movements. Despite the advantages, however, the locavore
movement's economic and environmental aspects prove that communities are better off without
shifting towards only eating locally. One key issue addressed by the locavore movement is how
the economy is affected locally. Many believe that the movement allows for a better local economy,
since the produce is being bought from nearby farms. In fact, one study done by the New Economics
Foundation discovered that locally spent money "generates 2 times as much income", an extremely
significant amount (Source A). It has already been found that money put into locally grown
products stays within the community, allowing the economy to further grow and support other local
businesses. With the movement's growth rate, small farms have seen a "revival." As more people
look for locally grown food, more farms are needed to keep them fed. The impact has been so great
that even American politicians have included

Locavores Synthesis Essay

Recomendados

Recomendados

Más contenido relacionado

Más de Best Online Paper Writing Service

Más de Best Online Paper Writing Service (20)

Último

Último (20)

Locavores Synthesis Essay