SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 36
Search & Rescue (SAR) Sample – Annex C Brainstorming Session Five Leonard F. Levine (Initial POC) [email_address] UPDM Group 24 February 2010
03 March 2010 Agenda
Why Upgrade? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Scope of Revisions in UPDM 2.0. ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
OV-1 for the Sample ,[object Object],[object Object]
Educate ,[object Object],[object Object]
Sample Clarifies Formal Normative Description ,[object Object]
User Requirements of SAR Sample ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Shall We continue to use SAR, another domain, and/or a  combination? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Testable ,[object Object],[object Object]
Real World Problems ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
More Detail ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Format:  Separate Part & Volume ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
SAR Team: Formation & Expertise Other? Teleconferencing & Whiteboarding Permanent Team Chair & co-chair (Matthew ?) Expert in using chosen modeling tool Functional Expertise: E.g., Service Oriented Expertise SME (SAR Expertise) End User Point of View Architect Call for Volunteers ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Expertise Name
Use of Individual  Upgrades to/since UPDM 1.0 SAR Sample ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Prioritization Write Tech Note to Governments on why one unified example is or is not possible 4 Draft Unified Example and then specializations. 3 Determine & clearly articulate objectives (see Modeling Guidance) 2 Form Team for SAR Example Upgrade. 1
Modeling Guidance (Methodology) ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Modeling Guidance (Methodology) ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Modeling Guidance (Methodology) ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Modeling Guidance (Methodology) ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
DoDAF v. MoDAF: Can we have a Unified Example? ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Next Steps and Action Items ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
References ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Preparation – “Run Up” to OMG Tech Meeting, Jacksonville,  ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Backup ,[object Object]
UPDM/DoDAF 2.0 Its Place and Role in Defense Acquisition Its Place and Role in Defense Acquisition Clarence Moreland Atego Inc.  All Rights Reserved
JCIDS Analysis Process 03/17/10 The FAA synthesizes existing guidance to  specify the military problems to be studied. The FSA takes this assessment as input, and generates recommendations for solutions to the needs. FNA then examines that problem, assesses how well the DOD can address the problem given its current program, and recommends needs the DOD should address.  Clarence Moreland Atego Inc.  All Rights Reserved Architectures are utilized Throughout
Methodology ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Clarence Moreland Atego Inc.  All Rights Reserved Assume that any (good) methodology minimally has these three components
Hierarchy of Frameworks and MS&A Test & Evaluation Operational Rqmts Dev Effectiveness Analysis Tactics Development Mission Planning & Rehearsal Architecture Framework Enterprise Processes,  CDRL & WBS Modeling Guidelines Language & Notation Many-on-Many Concept-to-Construct One-on-One Concept-to-Construct System/Subsystem/Component RESOLUTION Increasing Aggregation Comparative Results Actual Performance Increasing Resolution FUNCTIONS SUPPORTED FORCE OR SOS LEVEL UML/SysML/IDEF/BPMN Systems & Signals, OR, Automata Theory Methodologies, Practices, & Procedures C, C++, C# Java, ADA Lexicon Heuristics Data Dictionary Denotations (two levels) Connotations (three levels) DOTMLPF DLOD Clarence Moreland Atego Inc.  All Rights Reserved Design Manufacturing Cost Tech Rqmts Development Air Wings Battle Groups Corps Division Joint Combined Forces Combat Support Services Combat Support Combat Combat Maneuver System Tank Gunner’s Controls & Display Panel Fire Control Capabilities Materials ,[object Object],Morphemes Grammars ,[object Object],[object Object]
Systems are Amalgamated Architectures Systems of Systems are Emergent Architectures ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Recursive Structures Enables Commonality and Consistency At each level of hierarchy a consistent set of policies & Profiles are applied Verified Architectural Principles affirmed at one level are Captured, Codified & Reified at lower levels via the  Profiles, Patterns, Policies Institutionalized within the Repository’s Data Dictionary . Variability explicitly managed at different levels of refinement/abstraction  via recursive application of Standards, Policies, Principles, Patterns and Idioms. DARS Components MS&A Clarence Moreland Atego Inc.  All Rights Reserved AF - DoDAF Process - JCIDS Procedure – Mil Std 499 Language(s) – UML/SysML/BPMN SoS Acquisition Systems Policy Policy Policy Policy
Methodology Structure OV-1, OV-5, OV-6c OV-2, OV-4 OV-6 Class & State Diagrams System Performance OV-2, OV-3, SV-1, SV-2, SV-4, SV-6, SV-7, SV-10c Clarence Moreland Atego Inc.  All Rights Reserved DoDAF Task Lists Conditions Doctrine Standards Modeling Heuristics Work Organization CONOPS Development Operational Scenarios Definition Architecture Framework Definition CONOPS Development Operational Scenarios Definition Architecture Framework Definition CONOPS Development Operational Scenarios Definition Architecture Framework Definition Functional Area Analysis CONOPS Development Operational Scenarios Definition Architecture Framework  Definition Joint Integrating Concept Gap Analysis Gap Analysis Gap Analysis Gap Analysis Find Track Fix Target Access Engage “  As Is” Find Track Fix Find Track Fix Find Find Track Fix Target Access Engage Find Track Fix Target Access Engage “  As Is” Find Track Fix Find Track Fix Find Find Track Fix Target Access Engage Target Access Engage Target Target Access Engage “  As Is ” Constructive Iteration Constructive Iteration Constructive Iteration Functional Needs Analysis Integrated Experiments Performance Definition Measurement  Notation
Add input from Antoine ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Maritime SAR Configuration (Antoine Lonjon)
Blank
THANK YOU!

Más contenido relacionado

Similar a Updm Group Sar Example Brainstorm5(2010 02 24)

Discussion 1 post responses.Please respond to the following.docx
Discussion 1 post responses.Please respond to the following.docxDiscussion 1 post responses.Please respond to the following.docx
Discussion 1 post responses.Please respond to the following.docx
cuddietheresa
 
Mda start up
Mda start upMda start up
Mda start up
Lai Ha
 
Learning Software Performance Models for Dynamic and Uncertain Environments
Learning Software Performance Models for Dynamic and Uncertain EnvironmentsLearning Software Performance Models for Dynamic and Uncertain Environments
Learning Software Performance Models for Dynamic and Uncertain Environments
Pooyan Jamshidi
 
Gk1051 001 j2-ee_arch_tt425v1.1
Gk1051 001 j2-ee_arch_tt425v1.1Gk1051 001 j2-ee_arch_tt425v1.1
Gk1051 001 j2-ee_arch_tt425v1.1
vciampa
 

Similar a Updm Group Sar Example Brainstorm5(2010 02 24) (20)

Feature driven development
Feature driven developmentFeature driven development
Feature driven development
 
ALT
ALTALT
ALT
 
Discussion 1 post responses.Please respond to the following.docx
Discussion 1 post responses.Please respond to the following.docxDiscussion 1 post responses.Please respond to the following.docx
Discussion 1 post responses.Please respond to the following.docx
 
Educating in MDE
Educating in MDE Educating in MDE
Educating in MDE
 
Mda start up
Mda start upMda start up
Mda start up
 
Agile and Modeling / MDE : friends or foes? (Agile Tour Nantes 2010)
Agile and Modeling / MDE : friends or foes? (Agile Tour  Nantes 2010)Agile and Modeling / MDE : friends or foes? (Agile Tour  Nantes 2010)
Agile and Modeling / MDE : friends or foes? (Agile Tour Nantes 2010)
 
Systems Modeling Language (SysML®) v2 Request For Proposal (RFP)
Systems Modeling Language (SysML®) v2 Request For Proposal (RFP)Systems Modeling Language (SysML®) v2 Request For Proposal (RFP)
Systems Modeling Language (SysML®) v2 Request For Proposal (RFP)
 
Notes on software engineering
Notes on software engineeringNotes on software engineering
Notes on software engineering
 
Day1
Day1Day1
Day1
 
Requirement Types (Razvan Radulian, 2008)
Requirement Types (Razvan Radulian, 2008)Requirement Types (Razvan Radulian, 2008)
Requirement Types (Razvan Radulian, 2008)
 
Object Oriented Analysis and Design with UML2 part2
Object Oriented Analysis and Design with UML2 part2Object Oriented Analysis and Design with UML2 part2
Object Oriented Analysis and Design with UML2 part2
 
Ea citag presentation final
Ea citag presentation   finalEa citag presentation   final
Ea citag presentation final
 
Enterprise Architecture Overview
Enterprise Architecture OverviewEnterprise Architecture Overview
Enterprise Architecture Overview
 
Sioux Hot-or-Not: Model Driven Software Development (Markus Voelter)
Sioux Hot-or-Not: Model Driven Software Development (Markus Voelter)Sioux Hot-or-Not: Model Driven Software Development (Markus Voelter)
Sioux Hot-or-Not: Model Driven Software Development (Markus Voelter)
 
Domain Driven Design
Domain Driven DesignDomain Driven Design
Domain Driven Design
 
DDD
DDDDDD
DDD
 
Learning Software Performance Models for Dynamic and Uncertain Environments
Learning Software Performance Models for Dynamic and Uncertain EnvironmentsLearning Software Performance Models for Dynamic and Uncertain Environments
Learning Software Performance Models for Dynamic and Uncertain Environments
 
Gk1051 001 j2-ee_arch_tt425v1.1
Gk1051 001 j2-ee_arch_tt425v1.1Gk1051 001 j2-ee_arch_tt425v1.1
Gk1051 001 j2-ee_arch_tt425v1.1
 
A Lightweight MDD Process Applied in Small Projects
A Lightweight MDD Process Applied in Small ProjectsA Lightweight MDD Process Applied in Small Projects
A Lightweight MDD Process Applied in Small Projects
 
Non-functional requirements
Non-functional requirements Non-functional requirements
Non-functional requirements
 

Updm Group Sar Example Brainstorm5(2010 02 24)

  • 1. Search & Rescue (SAR) Sample – Annex C Brainstorming Session Five Leonard F. Levine (Initial POC) [email_address] UPDM Group 24 February 2010
  • 2. 03 March 2010 Agenda
  • 3.
  • 4.
  • 5.
  • 6.
  • 7.
  • 8.
  • 9.
  • 10.
  • 11.
  • 12.
  • 13.
  • 14.
  • 15.
  • 16. Prioritization Write Tech Note to Governments on why one unified example is or is not possible 4 Draft Unified Example and then specializations. 3 Determine & clearly articulate objectives (see Modeling Guidance) 2 Form Team for SAR Example Upgrade. 1
  • 17.
  • 18.
  • 19.
  • 20.
  • 21.
  • 22.
  • 23.
  • 24.
  • 25.
  • 26. UPDM/DoDAF 2.0 Its Place and Role in Defense Acquisition Its Place and Role in Defense Acquisition Clarence Moreland Atego Inc. All Rights Reserved
  • 27. JCIDS Analysis Process 03/17/10 The FAA synthesizes existing guidance to specify the military problems to be studied. The FSA takes this assessment as input, and generates recommendations for solutions to the needs. FNA then examines that problem, assesses how well the DOD can address the problem given its current program, and recommends needs the DOD should address. Clarence Moreland Atego Inc. All Rights Reserved Architectures are utilized Throughout
  • 28.
  • 29.
  • 30.
  • 31. Methodology Structure OV-1, OV-5, OV-6c OV-2, OV-4 OV-6 Class & State Diagrams System Performance OV-2, OV-3, SV-1, SV-2, SV-4, SV-6, SV-7, SV-10c Clarence Moreland Atego Inc. All Rights Reserved DoDAF Task Lists Conditions Doctrine Standards Modeling Heuristics Work Organization CONOPS Development Operational Scenarios Definition Architecture Framework Definition CONOPS Development Operational Scenarios Definition Architecture Framework Definition CONOPS Development Operational Scenarios Definition Architecture Framework Definition Functional Area Analysis CONOPS Development Operational Scenarios Definition Architecture Framework Definition Joint Integrating Concept Gap Analysis Gap Analysis Gap Analysis Gap Analysis Find Track Fix Target Access Engage “ As Is” Find Track Fix Find Track Fix Find Find Track Fix Target Access Engage Find Track Fix Target Access Engage “ As Is” Find Track Fix Find Track Fix Find Find Track Fix Target Access Engage Target Access Engage Target Target Access Engage “ As Is ” Constructive Iteration Constructive Iteration Constructive Iteration Functional Needs Analysis Integrated Experiments Performance Definition Measurement Notation
  • 32.
  • 33.
  • 34. Maritime SAR Configuration (Antoine Lonjon)
  • 35. Blank

Notas del editor

  1. Of course, these simplified inputs and outputs decompose into much more complicated sets of products, and the analyses themselves require much more examination. The point is, however, that a JCIDS CBA is not really different than any other analysis. It must specify the issues, estimate our current and projected abilities, and recommend actions. Note that your CBA may not include an FSA. The current trend in JCIDS for jointly-initiated assessments is to do an FAA and an FNA, and then produce a “Joint Capabilities Document” (JCD), which is sent to the JROC. If the JROC opts to act on the needs identified in the assessment, they will assign a sponsor (typically a Service), to do one or more FSAs. This also means that you may do a CBA which consists of nothing but an FSA. In these cases, you will have to rely on someone else’s FAA and FNA, to include repairing any defects and reacting to subsequent changes in guidance.
  2. There are five types of sememes: two denotational and three connotational, with connotational occurring only in phrase units (they do not reflect the denotation): Denotational 1: Primary denotation, for example "head" (body); Denotational 2: Secondary denotation by resemblance with other denotation: "head" (ship); Connotational 1: High position, as the role or function of "head" in the operation of the human body; Connotational 2: Emotive, e.g., meaning in "honey"; Connotational 3: Evaluative, e.g., meaning in "sneak" – move silently and secretly for a bad purpose Denotation is the specific, literal image, idea, concept, or object that a sign refers to. Connotation is the figurative cultural assumptions that the image implies or suggests. It involves emotional overtones, subjective interpretation, socio-cultural values, and ideological assumptions. Examples: Stop Sign Denotation—Stop (even without words, we recognize the meaning from the shape and color) Connotation—Risk (accident or ticket) Health club ad Denotation—fit person in foreground --> you could look like this Connotation—fit person in background --> you could pick up a date like this in our club
  3. The 6 C’s Completeness, Consistency, Correctness, Conservation, Compliance (to Rules/policy), Conformance (to contracts/I/F)
  4. Work organization occupies the highest level because it provides the structure within which the modeling language and its heuristics can be effectively applied, measured, and refined. While a given process may be able to accommodate many variations in heuristics and language, the these elements are the foundation of any methodology, as the directly impact the process and its artifacts.