SlideShare una empresa de Scribd logo
1 de 10
Brown vs. board of education  1954 US Supreme Court case Lucy Eccleston Norvall
Background: Plessy v. Ferguson After the end of the American Civil War in 1865, during the period known as Reconstruction, the government was able to provide some protection for the civil rights of the newly-freed slaves.  Reconstruction abruptly ended with the Compromise of 1877 and federal troops were withdrawn, southern state governments began passing Jim Crow Laws that prohibited blacks from using the same public accommodations as whites.
Plessy v. Ferguson (Continued) Plessy v. Ferguson, (1896), is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation  under the docterine of “separate but equal“ "Separate but equal" remained standard doctrine in U.S. law until Brown Vs. Board of Education.
Plessy vs. Ferguson In 1890, the State of Louisiana passed Act 111 that required separate accommodations for African Americans and Whites on railroads, including separate railway cars, though it specified that the accommodations must be kept "equal".  Concerned, several African Americans (including Louisiana's former governer PBS Pinchback) and Whites in New Orleans formed an association, the Citizens' Committee to Test the Separate Car Act, dedicated to the repeal of that law. They raised $1412.70 ($33711.21 in 2008 USD) which they offered to the then-famous author and Radical Republican jurist, Albion W. Tourgée, to serve as lead counsel for their test case.  Tourgée agreed to do it for free. Later, they enlisted Homer Plessy, who was one-eighth black, to take part in an act of planned civil disobedience. The plan was for Plessy to be thrown off the railway car and arrestedbut for violating the Separate Car Act, which could and did lead to a challenge with the high court. The Committee hired a detective to ensure that Plessy was arrested for violating the Separate Car Act, which the Citizen's Committee wanted to challenge with the goal of having it overturned. They chose Plessy because, with his light skin color, he could buy a first class train ticket and, at the same time, be arrested when he announced, while sitting on board the train, that he had an African-American ancestor. For the Committee, this was a deliberate attempt to exploit the lack of clear racial definition in either science or law so as to argue that segregation by race was an "unreasonable" use of state power. The intellectual roots of Plessy v. Ferguson were in part tied to the scientific racism of the era. However, the popular support for the decision was more likely a result of the racist beliefs held by most whites at the time.[3
Plessy V. Ferguson (Continued) Thirteenth Amendment Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction. Fourteenth Amendment Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the Plessy boarded a car of the East Louisiana Railroad that was designated for use by white patrons only.  He was able to purchase a ticket in first class because his light skin color, but was later asked to leave the car. Plessy refused to leave and was arrested. He sued the state of LA for infringing on his rights of the 13th and 14th Amendments.  privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Plessy vs. Ferguson (cont’d) However, the judge presiding over his case, John Ferguson, ruled that Louisiana had the right to regulate railroad companies as long as they operated within state boundaries.  The Committee of Citizens took Plessy's appeal to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, which ruled with the state AGAIN.  The committee appealed to the United States Supreme Court in 1896. The Supreme Court sided with LA and RACIAL SEGREGATION WAS WRITTEN INTO US LAW.
Brown vs. Board of Education 1951 For next 90 years,  “separate but equal “doctrine ruled the land.  In 1951, a class action suit was filed against the Board of Education of the City of Topeka, Kansas in the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas. The plaintiffs were thirteen Topeka parents on behalf of their twenty children.
Brown vs. Board of Education The suit called for the school district to reverse its policy of racial segregation. Separate elementary schools were operated by the Topeka Board of Education under an 1879 Kansas law, which permitted (but did not require) districts to maintain separate elementary school facilities for black and white students in twelve communities with populations over 15,000. The plaintiffs had been recruited by the leadership of the Topeka NAACP.  The named plaintiff, Oliver Brown, was a parent of Linda, a third grader, had to walk six blocks to her school bus stop to ride to Monroe Elementary, her segregated black school, which was  one mile (1.6 km) away, while Sumner Elementary, a white school, was seven blocks from her house.
Brown vs. Board of Education As directed by the NAACP leadership, the parents each attempted to enroll their children in the closest neighborhood school in the fall of 1951. They were each refused enrollment and directed to the segregated schools. Linda Brown Thompson later recalled the experience in a 2004 PBS documentary: The District Court ruled in favor of the Board of Education, citing the Plessy vs. Ferguson, (1896), which had upheld a state law requiring "separate but equal" segregated facilities for blacks and whites in railway cars The three-judge District Court panel found that segregation in public education has a detrimental effect upon negro children, but denied relief on the ground that the negro and white schools in Topeka were substantially equal with respect to buildings, transportation, curricular, and educational qualifications of teachers. The NAACP took the case to Supreme Court.
Brown vs. Board of Education Handed down on May 17, 1954, the Court's unanimous (9-0) decision stated that "separate educational facilities are inherently unequal." As a result, de jure racial segregation  was ruled a violation of the Equal Rights Amendment of the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution.

Más contenido relacionado

La actualidad más candente

Plessy vs ferguson
Plessy vs fergusonPlessy vs ferguson
Plessy vs ferguson
Keri Hays
 
Racial Segregation
Racial SegregationRacial Segregation
Racial Segregation
allie9
 
Cali u vs bakke powerpoint
Cali u vs bakke powerpointCali u vs bakke powerpoint
Cali u vs bakke powerpoint
wberntson
 
Little Rock Nine
Little Rock NineLittle Rock Nine
Little Rock Nine
nstechfun
 
Jim Crow Signs Powerpoint
Jim Crow Signs PowerpointJim Crow Signs Powerpoint
Jim Crow Signs Powerpoint
tranceking
 
Unit 9 PowerPoint Civil Rights Movement
Unit 9 PowerPoint Civil Rights MovementUnit 9 PowerPoint Civil Rights Movement
Unit 9 PowerPoint Civil Rights Movement
Crosswinds High School
 
Civil rights movement
Civil rights movement Civil rights movement
Civil rights movement
DFormyDuval
 
Reconstruction unit lesson 4 - jim crow laws - power point
Reconstruction unit   lesson 4 - jim crow laws - power pointReconstruction unit   lesson 4 - jim crow laws - power point
Reconstruction unit lesson 4 - jim crow laws - power point
GAMagnolia
 

La actualidad más candente (20)

Plessy vs ferguson
Plessy vs fergusonPlessy vs ferguson
Plessy vs ferguson
 
Brown vs. Board of Education
Brown vs. Board of EducationBrown vs. Board of Education
Brown vs. Board of Education
 
Jim crow laws
Jim crow laws Jim crow laws
Jim crow laws
 
Racial Segregation
Racial SegregationRacial Segregation
Racial Segregation
 
US civil rights Movement
US civil rights MovementUS civil rights Movement
US civil rights Movement
 
Cali u vs bakke powerpoint
Cali u vs bakke powerpointCali u vs bakke powerpoint
Cali u vs bakke powerpoint
 
Progressive era powerpoint
Progressive era powerpointProgressive era powerpoint
Progressive era powerpoint
 
Little Rock Nine
Little Rock NineLittle Rock Nine
Little Rock Nine
 
History of the Constitution
History of the ConstitutionHistory of the Constitution
History of the Constitution
 
Jim Crow
Jim CrowJim Crow
Jim Crow
 
HISTORY YEAR 10: IMMIGRATION IN AMERICA, AN ISSUE?
HISTORY YEAR 10: IMMIGRATION IN AMERICA, AN ISSUE?HISTORY YEAR 10: IMMIGRATION IN AMERICA, AN ISSUE?
HISTORY YEAR 10: IMMIGRATION IN AMERICA, AN ISSUE?
 
Jim Crow Signs Powerpoint
Jim Crow Signs PowerpointJim Crow Signs Powerpoint
Jim Crow Signs Powerpoint
 
Ppt 10 jim crow laws
Ppt 10 jim crow lawsPpt 10 jim crow laws
Ppt 10 jim crow laws
 
Racial conflict in the USA
Racial conflict in the USARacial conflict in the USA
Racial conflict in the USA
 
Civil Rights Movement
Civil Rights MovementCivil Rights Movement
Civil Rights Movement
 
Civil rights powerpoint
Civil rights powerpointCivil rights powerpoint
Civil rights powerpoint
 
Unit 9 PowerPoint Civil Rights Movement
Unit 9 PowerPoint Civil Rights MovementUnit 9 PowerPoint Civil Rights Movement
Unit 9 PowerPoint Civil Rights Movement
 
Electoral college
Electoral collegeElectoral college
Electoral college
 
Civil rights movement
Civil rights movement Civil rights movement
Civil rights movement
 
Reconstruction unit lesson 4 - jim crow laws - power point
Reconstruction unit   lesson 4 - jim crow laws - power pointReconstruction unit   lesson 4 - jim crow laws - power point
Reconstruction unit lesson 4 - jim crow laws - power point
 

Destacado (13)

Roe V Wade Finished Ppt
Roe V Wade Finished PptRoe V Wade Finished Ppt
Roe V Wade Finished Ppt
 
Brown vs board presentation 032812
Brown vs board presentation 032812Brown vs board presentation 032812
Brown vs board presentation 032812
 
Plessy v ferguson presentation
Plessy v ferguson presentationPlessy v ferguson presentation
Plessy v ferguson presentation
 
Mona Pexa In Re Gault
Mona Pexa In Re GaultMona Pexa In Re Gault
Mona Pexa In Re Gault
 
United states v. nixon
United states  v. nixonUnited states  v. nixon
United states v. nixon
 
Roe v. Wade
Roe v. WadeRoe v. Wade
Roe v. Wade
 
BoyarMiller – Public/Private Partnerships: Basic Concepts and Examples of P3s
BoyarMiller – Public/Private Partnerships: Basic Concepts and Examples of P3sBoyarMiller – Public/Private Partnerships: Basic Concepts and Examples of P3s
BoyarMiller – Public/Private Partnerships: Basic Concepts and Examples of P3s
 
Landmark supreme court cases
Landmark supreme court casesLandmark supreme court cases
Landmark supreme court cases
 
Supreme court Landmark Cases
Supreme court Landmark CasesSupreme court Landmark Cases
Supreme court Landmark Cases
 
Grutter v bollinger
Grutter v bollingerGrutter v bollinger
Grutter v bollinger
 
Segregation 20 powerpoint
Segregation 20 powerpointSegregation 20 powerpoint
Segregation 20 powerpoint
 
District of columbia v. Heller
District of columbia v. HellerDistrict of columbia v. Heller
District of columbia v. Heller
 
McDonald vs chicago
McDonald vs chicagoMcDonald vs chicago
McDonald vs chicago
 

Similar a Brown Vs Board Of Education (15)

Plessy V Ferguson Essay
Plessy V Ferguson EssayPlessy V Ferguson Essay
Plessy V Ferguson Essay
 
Ferguson Vs Plessy
Ferguson Vs PlessyFerguson Vs Plessy
Ferguson Vs Plessy
 
The Courts And The Pursuit Of School Integration
The Courts And The Pursuit Of School IntegrationThe Courts And The Pursuit Of School Integration
The Courts And The Pursuit Of School Integration
 
Group 3 power point
Group 3 power pointGroup 3 power point
Group 3 power point
 
Brown v. board of education
Brown v. board of educationBrown v. board of education
Brown v. board of education
 
Conflicts Of Segregation 2
Conflicts Of Segregation 2Conflicts Of Segregation 2
Conflicts Of Segregation 2
 
Dbq Plessy V. Ferguson
Dbq Plessy V. FergusonDbq Plessy V. Ferguson
Dbq Plessy V. Ferguson
 
Brown vs. boardmycom
Brown vs. boardmycomBrown vs. boardmycom
Brown vs. boardmycom
 
4th Amendment...
4th Amendment...4th Amendment...
4th Amendment...
 
4th Amendment
4th Amendment4th Amendment
4th Amendment
 
Plessy v. Ferguson Case by Shruti Misra
Plessy v. Ferguson Case by Shruti MisraPlessy v. Ferguson Case by Shruti Misra
Plessy v. Ferguson Case by Shruti Misra
 
African american education 19th cent
African american education   19th centAfrican american education   19th cent
African american education 19th cent
 
Important Supreme Court Cases
Important Supreme Court CasesImportant Supreme Court Cases
Important Supreme Court Cases
 
Civil rights 2
Civil rights 2Civil rights 2
Civil rights 2
 
Segregation
SegregationSegregation
Segregation
 

Último

1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
QucHHunhnh
 
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in DelhiRussian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
kauryashika82
 
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
ciinovamais
 
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptxSeal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
negromaestrong
 
An Overview of Mutual Funds Bcom Project.pdf
An Overview of Mutual Funds Bcom Project.pdfAn Overview of Mutual Funds Bcom Project.pdf
An Overview of Mutual Funds Bcom Project.pdf
SanaAli374401
 

Último (20)

1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi  6.pdf
1029-Danh muc Sach Giao Khoa khoi 6.pdf
 
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in DelhiRussian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
Russian Escort Service in Delhi 11k Hotel Foreigner Russian Call Girls in Delhi
 
Advance Mobile Application Development class 07
Advance Mobile Application Development class 07Advance Mobile Application Development class 07
Advance Mobile Application Development class 07
 
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introductionmicrowave assisted reaction. General introduction
microwave assisted reaction. General introduction
 
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activityParis 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
Paris 2024 Olympic Geographies - an activity
 
Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1
Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1
Código Creativo y Arte de Software | Unidad 1
 
fourth grading exam for kindergarten in writing
fourth grading exam for kindergarten in writingfourth grading exam for kindergarten in writing
fourth grading exam for kindergarten in writing
 
Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..
Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..
Sports & Fitness Value Added Course FY..
 
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdfActivity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
Activity 01 - Artificial Culture (1).pdf
 
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptxUnit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
Unit-V; Pricing (Pharma Marketing Management).pptx
 
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: The Basics of Prompt Design"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: The Basics of Prompt Design"Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: The Basics of Prompt Design"
Mattingly "AI & Prompt Design: The Basics of Prompt Design"
 
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptxSeal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
Seal of Good Local Governance (SGLG) 2024Final.pptx
 
SECOND SEMESTER TOPIC COVERAGE SY 2023-2024 Trends, Networks, and Critical Th...
SECOND SEMESTER TOPIC COVERAGE SY 2023-2024 Trends, Networks, and Critical Th...SECOND SEMESTER TOPIC COVERAGE SY 2023-2024 Trends, Networks, and Critical Th...
SECOND SEMESTER TOPIC COVERAGE SY 2023-2024 Trends, Networks, and Critical Th...
 
An Overview of Mutual Funds Bcom Project.pdf
An Overview of Mutual Funds Bcom Project.pdfAn Overview of Mutual Funds Bcom Project.pdf
An Overview of Mutual Funds Bcom Project.pdf
 
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The BasicsIntroduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
Introduction to Nonprofit Accounting: The Basics
 
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptxBasic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
Basic Civil Engineering first year Notes- Chapter 4 Building.pptx
 
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
Mehran University Newsletter Vol-X, Issue-I, 2024
 
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy ConsultingGrant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
Grant Readiness 101 TechSoup and Remy Consulting
 
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17 How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17  How to Extend Models Using Mixin ClassesMixin Classes in Odoo 17  How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
Mixin Classes in Odoo 17 How to Extend Models Using Mixin Classes
 
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot GraphZ Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
Z Score,T Score, Percential Rank and Box Plot Graph
 

Brown Vs Board Of Education

  • 1. Brown vs. board of education 1954 US Supreme Court case Lucy Eccleston Norvall
  • 2. Background: Plessy v. Ferguson After the end of the American Civil War in 1865, during the period known as Reconstruction, the government was able to provide some protection for the civil rights of the newly-freed slaves. Reconstruction abruptly ended with the Compromise of 1877 and federal troops were withdrawn, southern state governments began passing Jim Crow Laws that prohibited blacks from using the same public accommodations as whites.
  • 3. Plessy v. Ferguson (Continued) Plessy v. Ferguson, (1896), is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation under the docterine of “separate but equal“ "Separate but equal" remained standard doctrine in U.S. law until Brown Vs. Board of Education.
  • 4. Plessy vs. Ferguson In 1890, the State of Louisiana passed Act 111 that required separate accommodations for African Americans and Whites on railroads, including separate railway cars, though it specified that the accommodations must be kept "equal". Concerned, several African Americans (including Louisiana's former governer PBS Pinchback) and Whites in New Orleans formed an association, the Citizens' Committee to Test the Separate Car Act, dedicated to the repeal of that law. They raised $1412.70 ($33711.21 in 2008 USD) which they offered to the then-famous author and Radical Republican jurist, Albion W. Tourgée, to serve as lead counsel for their test case. Tourgée agreed to do it for free. Later, they enlisted Homer Plessy, who was one-eighth black, to take part in an act of planned civil disobedience. The plan was for Plessy to be thrown off the railway car and arrestedbut for violating the Separate Car Act, which could and did lead to a challenge with the high court. The Committee hired a detective to ensure that Plessy was arrested for violating the Separate Car Act, which the Citizen's Committee wanted to challenge with the goal of having it overturned. They chose Plessy because, with his light skin color, he could buy a first class train ticket and, at the same time, be arrested when he announced, while sitting on board the train, that he had an African-American ancestor. For the Committee, this was a deliberate attempt to exploit the lack of clear racial definition in either science or law so as to argue that segregation by race was an "unreasonable" use of state power. The intellectual roots of Plessy v. Ferguson were in part tied to the scientific racism of the era. However, the popular support for the decision was more likely a result of the racist beliefs held by most whites at the time.[3
  • 5. Plessy V. Ferguson (Continued) Thirteenth Amendment Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction. Fourteenth Amendment Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the Plessy boarded a car of the East Louisiana Railroad that was designated for use by white patrons only. He was able to purchase a ticket in first class because his light skin color, but was later asked to leave the car. Plessy refused to leave and was arrested. He sued the state of LA for infringing on his rights of the 13th and 14th Amendments. privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
  • 6. Plessy vs. Ferguson (cont’d) However, the judge presiding over his case, John Ferguson, ruled that Louisiana had the right to regulate railroad companies as long as they operated within state boundaries. The Committee of Citizens took Plessy's appeal to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, which ruled with the state AGAIN. The committee appealed to the United States Supreme Court in 1896. The Supreme Court sided with LA and RACIAL SEGREGATION WAS WRITTEN INTO US LAW.
  • 7. Brown vs. Board of Education 1951 For next 90 years, “separate but equal “doctrine ruled the land. In 1951, a class action suit was filed against the Board of Education of the City of Topeka, Kansas in the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas. The plaintiffs were thirteen Topeka parents on behalf of their twenty children.
  • 8. Brown vs. Board of Education The suit called for the school district to reverse its policy of racial segregation. Separate elementary schools were operated by the Topeka Board of Education under an 1879 Kansas law, which permitted (but did not require) districts to maintain separate elementary school facilities for black and white students in twelve communities with populations over 15,000. The plaintiffs had been recruited by the leadership of the Topeka NAACP. The named plaintiff, Oliver Brown, was a parent of Linda, a third grader, had to walk six blocks to her school bus stop to ride to Monroe Elementary, her segregated black school, which was one mile (1.6 km) away, while Sumner Elementary, a white school, was seven blocks from her house.
  • 9. Brown vs. Board of Education As directed by the NAACP leadership, the parents each attempted to enroll their children in the closest neighborhood school in the fall of 1951. They were each refused enrollment and directed to the segregated schools. Linda Brown Thompson later recalled the experience in a 2004 PBS documentary: The District Court ruled in favor of the Board of Education, citing the Plessy vs. Ferguson, (1896), which had upheld a state law requiring "separate but equal" segregated facilities for blacks and whites in railway cars The three-judge District Court panel found that segregation in public education has a detrimental effect upon negro children, but denied relief on the ground that the negro and white schools in Topeka were substantially equal with respect to buildings, transportation, curricular, and educational qualifications of teachers. The NAACP took the case to Supreme Court.
  • 10. Brown vs. Board of Education Handed down on May 17, 1954, the Court's unanimous (9-0) decision stated that "separate educational facilities are inherently unequal." As a result, de jure racial segregation was ruled a violation of the Equal Rights Amendment of the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution.