2. WHAT IS INSTABILITY?
During the use of normal shoulder,humeral head is
centered within the glenoid and coracoacromial arch
When the shoulder cannot maintain this centered
position it is said to be unstable
It is not the same as joint laxity allows the shoulder to
attain its full range of functional positions while an
unstable shoulder prevents normal function of that
upper extremity
5. STATIC FACTORS
Normal glenoid is about 7 degrees retroverted
If the retroversion is excessive, it leads to posterior
instability of shoulder
6. The labrum increases the superoinferior diameter of
the glenoid by 75% and the anteroposterior (AP)
diameter by 50%
7. The bony conformity of the glenoid and humeral head
articular surfaces provides some of the stability of the
shoulder.
Frequently, patients with recurrent dislocations have
bony deficits in one or both of these surfaces.
9. • Superior Glenohumeral ligament : Most important
check at zero degrees of abduction
• Middle Glenohumeral Ligament : Most important
check at middle ranges of abduction
•Inferior Glenohumeral ligament : Most important
check at more than 45 degrees of abduction
10. DYNAMIC FACTORS
1. The movement of rotator cuff muscles help to contribute to
the negative intra - articular pressure.
2. The rotator cuff muscles themselves make a protective cuff
all around the shoulder except inferiorly where shoulder
capsule is the weakest.
11. Other factors :
1.Muscles around the shoulder
- Levator scapulae
- Rhomboids
-Trapezius
2. Biceps Brachii
3. Proprioceptors
22. MATSEN’S CLASSIFICATION
T Traumatic
U Unilateral
B Bankart lesion
S Surgery is often necessary
A Atraumatic
M Multidirectional
B Bilateral
R Rehabilitation is the treatment
I If surgery is needed inferior capsular shift is performed
23. History
Define mechanism
Position of arm
Point of force
Amount of force
Electric Shock /Seizure
32. RADIOGRAPHIC EVALUATION
A routine AP shoulder radiograph shows overlap of the
anterior and the posterior glenoid rims. A true AP
radiograph demonstrates superimposition of the anterior
and the posterior glenoid rims, producing an excellent
view of the glenohumeral joint.
42. QUESTIONS TO BE ANSWERED WHILE
EVALUATING A PATIENT
Is the problem in the glenohumeral joint ?
Is the problem one of failure to maintain the humeral head in its
centered position ?
What mechanical factors are contributing to the instability ?
Are these factors amenable to surgical repair or reconstruction ?
48. NON-OPEREATIVE TREATMENT
A trial of non-operative treatment is recommended for the following
group of patients-a)
All patients who sustained a traumatic first time dislocation regardless
of age
b) Patients > 40 yrs with recurrent instability
c) All patients with atraumatic instability
49. NON-OPERATIVE TREATMENT PROTOCOL
All patients< 30 yrs shoulder immobilized for 3 wks
Patients 30-40yrs shoulder immobilized for 1-2 wks
Patients >40 yrs the shoulder immobilized for 1
wks
Atraumatic instability- immobilization not
required
Patients with anterior instability-limit ext. rotation
to 30 deg. and abd. to < 60 deg.
Patients with posterior instability- avoid flex.>60
deg. and int. rotation > 30 deg.
50. INDICATIONS FOR OPERATIVE TREATMENT IN
INSTABILITY
Failure of non operative therapy
Young adult with high functional demands
Irreducible dislocation
Open dislocation
51. TREATMENT OPTIONS TYPE OF INSTABILITY PREFERRED SURGERY
Traumatic anterior, with Bankart Lesion Open / arthroscopic Bankart repair
Traumatic anterior , with no labral
lesion, just capsular laxity
Open / arthroscopic capsular
imbrication
AMBRI lesions Lateral capsular shift( modified Neer
and Foster ) with closure of rotator
interval
Recurrent posterior dislocation in
association with a reverse Hill-Sachs
lesion
modified McLaughlin procedure
Head defect > 30 – 45 %
> 45 %
Acute disimpaction / Weber
osteotomy
Prosthetic replacement
Glenoid defect Bristow – Latarjet coracoid transfer
Structural bone graft
52. OPEN SOFT TISSUE PROCEDURES FOR
ANTERIOR INSTABILITY
Open Bankart procedure
Arthroscopic Bankart procedure
Arthroscopic Thermal capsulorraphy
Arthroscopic capsular imbrication
Putti-Platt procedure
Only 3 – 10 % failure
rate by various studies
10 – 15 % failure rate by
various studies
Long term follow up
shows high incidence of
OA, about 30 %
59. AMBRII Lesions-Idea of
management
Primary treatment nonoperative
Operative management recommended for
patients who have continued pain or
disability despite an adequate rehabilitation
The gold standard is open stabilization
61. POSTERIOR INSTABILITY-A
general overview
Rare
Often missed
Often has a component of muscle
imbalance
Indication for operative treatment is
generally continued problems despite
rehab.
62. Procedures
Procedure Description Results
Neer’s Capsulorrraphy Posterior capsular
tightening
Generally unsatisfactory,
upto 50 % recurrence
Staple capsulorraphy Tightening done with
staples
Small study group
Tieborne and bradley
procedure
Capsular Imbrication with
a horizontal T approach
Upto 20 % recurrence
Hawkins and Janda
procedure
Subscapularis
advancement and
shortening
0 – 5 % recurrence
Rockwood Glenloid
Plasty with Biceps
Tenodesis to the posterior
capsule
Combined bony and soft
tissue procedure
Not often done
63. ARTHROSCOPIC PROCEDURES FOR
POSTERIOR INSTABILITY
Posterior capsulolabral
reattachment with the help of
suture anchors
Arthroscopic posterior
capsulorrhaphy
64. OPEN ANTERIOR PROCEDURES FOR
POSTERIOR INSTABILITY
McLaughlin procedure
Neers modification of McLaughlin procedure
68. Putty Platt Operation
Surgical procedure for stabilizing the
glenohumeral joint after recurrent anterior
shoulder dislocations. The subscapularis tendon
is detached near its insertion on the humerus,
the joint opened, and the stump of the tendon on
the lesser tuberosity is sutured to the glenoid
labrum.
Sometimes the procedure is combined with
reattachment of the glenoid labrum.
Technically an easy procedure
Disadvantages:
The Putti-Platt procedure is not to be performed
on throwers because it can reduce the range of
movement in the shoulder.
30 – 35 % incidence of late OA
70. ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF
ARTHROSCOPIC STABILIZATION
ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
-Improved cosmesis -Technically demanding
-Shorter operative time -Difficult in revision case
-Short hospital stay -Difficult in altered anatomy
-Decreased morbidity -Cannot address bony
defect
-Decreased complication
-Lower cost
71. PHASES OF REHABILITATION
Phase I Rest and immobilization. Pain control with
nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and ice
applied to the shoulder
Phase II Isometric strengthening Isotonic
strengthening. Begin exercises with shoulder in
adducted, forward- flexed position, progressing to
abducted position
Phase III Endurance building along with
strengthening exercises. Goal: the patient reaches
90% strength in the injured shoulder compared
with the uninjured shoulder
Phase IV Increase activity to sport- or job-specific
activities